OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Michigan Lawmakers Push Law to Force Jill Stein to Pay 100% for Her ‘Frivolous’ Recount. Note from Orly: a law cannot be applied retroactively

Posted on | December 7, 2016 | 2 Comments

Michigan Lawmakers Push Law to Force Jill Stein to Pay 100% for Her ‘Frivolous’ Recount

Comments

2 Responses to “Michigan Lawmakers Push Law to Force Jill Stein to Pay 100% for Her ‘Frivolous’ Recount. Note from Orly: a law cannot be applied retroactively”

  1. David
    December 7th, 2016 @ 3:18 pm

    One exception to that may be that Bill Clinton passed a retroactive estate tax increase in 1993.
    https://articles.baltimoresun.com/1993-08-11/news/1993223042_1_retroactive-tax-rates-estate-taxes
    The supreme court case that made it possible.
    https://articles.latimes.com/1994-06-14/news/mn-3963_1_retroactive-tax
    “In a concurring opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia derided the government for “bait-and-switch taxation,” but he nonetheless voted to uphold the law.

    The Constitution itself bars ex post facto laws. Since 1798, the Supreme Court has said that limit applies only to criminal laws, not civil measures.”
    It looks like Michigan can do this.

  2. Earl
    December 8th, 2016 @ 10:49 am

    Very interesting writeup about the retroactive Clinton tax here:

    https://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/retroactive-tax-increases-and-the-constitution

    Scalia called it a “bait and switch” but still, the supreme court upheld it unanimously.

Leave a Reply