4 Responses to “Mark Levine sends a hint, he is willing to talk aobu Obama’s past, uses his Indonesian last name twice. Please, call Levine, ask im to report on several cases I filed in court showing Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN and bogus IDs”

1. bob68
   July 20th, 2014 @ 2:19 pm

   Levin cannot be trusted. He may be trying to cover his behind for when the truth about Barry is finally fully revealed, but he has spent years mocking and ridiculing those asking for the truth about Obama. He deserves no respect, just ignore him, and especially his books.

2. Stephanie Harmon-Gresham
   July 20th, 2014 @ 2:28 pm

   The United States deserves to know what he fought so hard to keep out of the public eye…if ut turns out to be nothing then so be it but idk anyone who hides his background bc its a good and positive one! If mark levine knows something its his responsibiliy as a US citizen to share it with the American people! #GodBless #ProudPatriot

3. Ken B.
   July 21st, 2014 @ 10:01 am

   I concur with you bob68. Don’t trust Levin, because he didn’t trust his callers about the ineligibility of the usurper in the White House.

   I just don’t trust him!!

4. Spaulding
   July 21st, 2014 @ 7:37 pm

   Levin cited the 1st Congress’ Nationality Act, the law used by Obama Con. Law Professor, and plagiarist, Larry Tribe, in a letter claiming John McCain was a natural born citizen (Senate Res 511 in April 2008) because of that Act. The 1790 Act was rescinded entirely in 1795 as Tribe and Levin must know. No mention was ever made by Congress of natural born citizenship, including never mentioned in the 14th Amendment.

   The 1790 Act was also the reason claimed by both by Levin, and by Glen Beck’s “Real News” team, for Ted Cruz’ eligibility, which is also nonsense, much as I like much of what Cruz has to say. Neither Cruz nor Obama have ever claimed to be natural born citizens. Levin is, however, no more guilty of ignoring the Constitution than every member of the Senate, all of whom signed the non-actionable resolution, Senate Res 511, the “Senator John McCain Natural Born Citizen Resolution”. McCain can only be rendered eligible by an amendment, and the law co-sponsored by Obama and his campaign co-chair Claire McCAskill in February 2008, the “Foreign-born children of military Citizens Natural Born Citizen Act” failed to pass out of the Senate Judiciary Committee. For all who don’t believe McCain, born to two citizen parents was ineligible, Obama, McCaskill, Leahy, Clinton, and many other senators clearly knew better. Senate 2678, February 2008 is a matter of record. Our Constitutional Law professor clearly understood otherwise, or would have been censured for submitting moot law.

   To his credit, Levin quotes the Madison letter to a constituent explaining why there are not definitions in the Constitution, and why terms must be interpreted using, as Chief Justice Morrison Waite explained in Minor v. Happersett, “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

   Madison explains that for the meaning of the Constitution to be eternal, as the document based upon “nature’s law” should be, because word meanings change over time, interpretations must depend upon the common law and language familiar to its framers. In particular, our nations’s first law book, so designated for our first law school, established by Jefferson at William and Mary in 1779, our most cited common law reference was was Vattel’s Law of Nations, Washington and Hamilton’s most trusted legal reference (from letters from Treasury Secretary Hamilton to Washington in 1793), which definition was explicitly cited by John Marshall in The Venus, 12 U.S. 253, 1814, and in a dozen or so cases until confirmed as precedent in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875.

Leave a Reply