OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Liberal NY Daily News reports: Obama’s approval is at all time low, only 41% or 4 out of 10 Americans approve of the job Obama does

Posted on | April 29, 2014 | 5 Comments

President Obama’s approval rating falls to new low: poll

New York Daily News
1 hour ago
Written by

Adam Edelman

Just 41% of respondents in a new Washington Post/ABC News poll said they approved of the job Obama is doing, his lowest-ever numbers for that poll.

Comments

5 Responses to “Liberal NY Daily News reports: Obama’s approval is at all time low, only 41% or 4 out of 10 Americans approve of the job Obama does”

  1. BO PE
    April 29th, 2014 @ 12:36 pm

    Barry Soetorahs Compadres – Follow the numbers.

    Notice Rice is labeled as a zero.. Nothing there..

    Fox’s chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge reported that the Sept. 14, 2012, email shows that White House Deputy National Security Adviser 1) Ben Rhodes
    advised 0) Rice to focus on a YouTube video as the cause of a spontaneous protest, though transcripts have since been revealed to show that senior defense officials had informed the administration on the night of the event that the assault was a terrorist attack.

    Rhodes outlined a number of talking points for Rice, with the advice “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

    “Now we know the Obama White House’s chief concern about the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama looked good,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

    “And these documents undermine the Obama administration’s narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video. Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department,” he added, referring to the organization having obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request.

    Among the top administration personnel who received the Rhodes memo were White House Press Secretary 2) Jay Carney; Deputy Press Secretary 3) Joshua Earnest; then-White House Communications Director 4) Dan Pfeiffer; then-White House Deputy Communications Director 5) Jennifer Palmieri; then-National Security Council Director of Communications 6) Erin Pelton; Special Assistant to the Press Secretary 7) Howli Ledbetter; and then-White House Senior Adviser and political strategist 8) David Plouffe.

    The Rhodes communications strategy email also instructs recipients to portray Obama as “steady and statesmanlike” throughout the crisis. Rhodes also says in the message that one of the goals is to “reinforce the president and administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”

  2. Harry3
    April 29th, 2014 @ 12:41 pm

    can we Americans trust even one word our controlled news-media reports-I THINK NOT-our judges & politicians & even our news reporters can be bought so easily- in short America has proven that DEMOCRACY doesn’t work-

  3. John Don Jackson Hewitt
    April 29th, 2014 @ 4:39 pm

    There is no way that man has an approval rating of above 30%. Even 25% is pushing it.

  4. Uncle Charles
    April 29th, 2014 @ 5:21 pm

    Yeah…it’s a liberal publication…so…it really has to be down…………to about 10%!!

  5. Kay
    April 29th, 2014 @ 6:26 pm

    Regarding BoPe’s comment above. You know if Jay Carney and David Plouffe received that e-mail that the strategy to cover up Benghazi has to lead to BHO himself. Special investigator – SOON PLEASE!

  6. daddy warbucks
    April 30th, 2014 @ 5:49 am

    Benghazi Emails Lead Directly to White House

    https://youtu.be/rX9sczz1WgA

    So why is NSA so quiet? Oh right, it’s classified, like 911, Sandy Hook massacre, flight 370, etc., etc., etc.

    Published on Apr 29, 2014

    Catherine Herridge reported some new developments in the investigation into the Sept. 2012 Benghazi attack, including the release of documents that lead directly to the White House. Among the documents, obtained by Judicial Watch through a FOIA request, is an email from senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials, including Press Secretary Jay Carney.

    Under the subject “prep call with Susan,” Rhodes wrote that the goal for Rice’s appearances on Sunday talk shows would be “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”

    The message was sent three days after the attacks, which left four Americans dead at a U.S. consulate and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya.

    Days later, Rice would go on numerous Sunday news programs, including on Fox News Sunday, to falsely assert that the Benghazi attack was spontaneous and occurred during a protest over an anti-Islam video. Since that time, the White House has come under fierce criticism from Republicans, who allege that the administration altered the CIA’s talking points about how the Benghazi attack unfolded.

Leave a Reply