Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

legal analysis by John charlton

Posted on | December 22, 2009 | 2 Comments

 Flag this message

Fw: Former-Marine Officer David O. Carter becomes an EX-Marine.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009 5:11 PM From: “Jeff Schwilk” View contact details To: Undisclosed-Recipient@yahoo.com Message contains attachments 1 File (38KB)

  —– Original Message —– From: Neil Turner To: Citizens for the CONSTITUTION Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:48 PM Subject: Former-Marine Officer David O. Carter becomes an EX-Marine.

If the image of Ex-Marine Officer Judge David O. Carter (below) appears ghostly and a shadow of his former self, it is because that’s what happens when a former Marine takes actions that relieve him of the ‘Former-Marine’ title and he becomes an ‘Ex-Marine’ (like Ex-Marine Congressman John Murtha).


Carter alters Oct. 29th ruling, ex post facto


Legal Analysis by John Charlton

No judge in America has so completely and quickly eviscerated his own reputation with one case, as has Judge David O. Carter, of the Federal Court in Santa Ana, California, in the case Barnett vs. Obama.

(Dec. 16, 2009) — On Sunday the nation saw one of the most noble gestures ever, when Dr. Orly Taitz filed a Motion for Clarification in the case of Barnett vs. Obama, seeking to know from Judge David O. Carter if his ruling of Oct. 29th, was to be considered an end of the case or merely a dismissal of the First Amended Complaint.

Considering that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure indicate that the statement, “dismissed with prejudice,” closes a case in such a way as to prevent the filing of a new action or the filing of an amended complaint to continue the case with a modified claim, Dr. Taitz’s filing gave the court the benefit of the doubt, and considered all the injustice and dishonesty already shown by Judge Carter as something that, in view of greater issues, could be overlooked for the present.

But no such honor was to be found sitting at Judge Carter’s desk of tyranny.

His in-chamber order, issued today was as brief as it was laughably mendacious:

OCTOBER 29, 2009

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification regarding whether the October 29, 2009 Order was a dismissal with or without prejudice.
The Court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint on October 29, 2009 was a dismissal without leave to amend and with prejudice.
The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action.

Mendacious, because no matter what Carter thinks his authority is, his authority and power are not capable of changing the past and adding words or significance, wherein no words or signification existed.

History herself recalls, that Judge Carter’s ruling of Oct. 29th clearly did not contain the words “dismissed with prejudice” nor any statement that the dismissal was “without leave to amend.”

Carter has, thus, closed the case and found himself guilty of the most grave breaches of judicial ethics:  lying to plaintiffs and their counsel in July in promising them a hearing on merits, as a trick to avoid having to render a default judgment against Obama for not responding to the service of court papers; hiring as a clerk a lawyer who is politically tied to the defendants; including false and unsubstantiated claims in his ruling of Oct. 29th with a purpose of defaming and libeling Dr. Orly Taitz; and finally, with great mendacity, claiming his order of Oct. 29th was something it never was in law.

Not the least of his crimes was his trashing of the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs in his Oct. 29th ruling.

The Post & Email need not proclaim Judge Carter a criminal or traitor to the Republic, he has done so with his own hand, blackening his soul thereby, with a far darker hue than the robes he wears.

Trying to go after Barack Obama as the illegal Usurper is one thing.
Letting American Grand Jury tackle the job is the way to go… come join us!  Start here at our Home Page!


American Grand Jury is actively trying to force the Judiciary to criminally prosecute Obama who is not a “natural born” citizen and therefore not eligible to hold the office of President & Commander in Chief. Visit our ProsecuteObama.org website to learn more!



2 Responses to “legal analysis by John charlton”

  1. Gomer Pyle
    December 23rd, 2009 @ 12:58 am



  2. Thomas
    December 23rd, 2009 @ 1:02 am

    That truly was a sad moment when Judge : David O Carter decided that He was not going to be concerned about protecting The United States of America any longer , The day he decided that even though the ball was in his court [ The Obama case was in his court room ] He Ran from the U.S. Constitution and allowed Obama to continue to destroy America !!!!!!