LA Times now quotes me in questioning the eligibility of Ted Cruz, yet they refuse to address Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425. Shame on dishonest LA Times and the rest of our corrupt puppet media
Posted on | February 25, 2015 | 3 Comments
LA Times now quotes me in questioning the eligibility of Ted Cruz, yet they refuse to address Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425. Shame on dishonest LA Times and the rest of our corrupt puppet media. See below the file showing Obama’s use of fabricated IDs. Please, write to LA Times, post comments in the article below and demand they report the truth on Obama’s lack of eligibility and his use of a stolen CT SSN and his use of fabricated IDs.
Table of evidence of forgery, fraud and fabrication in Obama’s IDs
| Los Angeles Times | – |
|
Column Question Ted Cruz should ask: Can a foreign-born American be president?
Commentary Canada Elections Ted Cruz Politics and Government Barack Obama
Question Ted Cruz should ask: Can a foreign-born American be president?
Doyle McManus
LOS ANGELES TIMES
doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com
@doylemcmanusRT @washingtonweek: Which 2 current reporters have been on #WashWeek the longest? 1 is @DoyleMcManus. Here’s a hint for the other: https://t…
Ted Cruz
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Susan Walsh / Associated Press)
Birther II: Ted Cruz really was born in a foreign country
Canadian Americans are perhaps our most underappreciated minority
Sen. Ted Cruz is getting close to announcing his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination. The Texan is spending almost as much time in Iowa and New Hampshire as he does on Fox News; he’s hired a staff and collected a long list of fiercely conservative supporters.
There’s at least one hitch: Ted Cruz was born in Calgary, in the Canadian province of Alberta. His mother was a U.S. citizen, born in Delaware; his father, a Cuban refugee working in Canada’s oil fields. Thanks to his mother, Cruz was a U.S. citizen at birth.
But that doesn’t clear up a legal muddle that’s as old as the Constitution: Is a U.S. citizen born abroad qualified to serve as president?
Is a U.S. citizen born abroad qualified to serve as president?
–
I don’t agree with Cruz on most issues. He wants to repeal Obamacare, abolish the Internal Revenue Service and pass a constitutional amendment allowing states to outlaw gay marriage, just to take the top of his list. But I still hope he runs — because it’s high time we established the right of Canadian-born Americans to serve as president.
Canadian Americans are perhaps our most underappreciated minority. Their contributions to U.S. culture range from hockey to comedy to, well, hockey. It’s an impressive list: Wayne Gretzky, William Shatner, Lorne Michaels, Jim Carrey, Pamela Anderson, Alex Trebek. And now Ted Cruz.
At this point I should confess a personal stake: My oldest daughter was born in Toronto. Like Ted Cruz, she inherited U.S. citizenship through one of her parents. But we assured her that she could grow up to be president of the United States. (Proud of her dual citizenship, she says she’d like to serve as prime minister of Canada too.)
lRelated The problem of dual citizenship
EDITORIAL
The problem of dual citizenship
SEE ALL RELATED
8
Canada is a wonderful country — wilderness on top, oil and gas underneath, plus universal healthcare and sensible gun control laws. All those good things, alas, are not an argument for a Cruz presidency. He has promised not to import any Canadian virtues to the U.S. homeland (except, perhaps, more Alberta oil) if he is elected to the White House.
“Canadians are so polite, mild-mannered, modest, unassuming, open-minded,” Cruz joked last year. “Thank God my family fled that oppressive influence before it could change me.”
Cruz hasn’t simply renounced Canadian moderation; last year, he formally renounced the Canadian half of his dual citizenship.
Why couldn’t Scott Walker agree that President Obama is a Christian?
Why couldn’t Scott Walker agree that President Obama is a Christian?
But even that doesn’t settle the constitutional issue — at least not to the satisfaction of some of the “birthers” who charged that President Obama was born outside the United States. “Clearly there is an issue of eligibility,” chief birther Orly Taitz told U.S. News a while ago. “It’s basically the same issue as Obama.”
Except that in Cruz’s case, he really was born in a foreign country.
Surprisingly, some legal scholars agree — not that Cruz is unqualified, but that the question isn’t a slam-dunk. The Constitution says only a “natural born citizen” can serve as president, but it isn’t clear whether the Founding Fathers intended that to include U.S. citizens born abroad.
“The consensus [among constitutional lawyers] is that it means citizens at birth,” said Gabriel Chin, a professor at UC Davis. “But people are not 1000% confident.”
cComments
@twhite007 While I don’t support ANY Muslim anything, you DO understand that there is nothing illegal, immoral, or UN-American about that don’t you? You also must know that Obama is clearly a CHRISTIAN! As a Muslim, we would see him PRAYING TO ALLAH 5 times per day, EVERY SINGLE…
BIKRMITCH
AT 7:10 AM FEBRUARY 25, 2015
ADD A COMMENTSEE ALL COMMENTS
69
“In my view, it does merit a test,” agreed Sarah Helene Duggin, a professor at the Catholic University of America. Indeed, she argued, if Cruz were to win the Republican nomination, it would be in the nation’s interest to get the question settled early.
“If we ever get to the point where we have a presidential candidate with this issue, we will need a clarification,” she said. “If the candidate were elected and then disqualified, that would be a serious constitutional crisis.”
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) faced a similar issue in 2008 but argued that his birthplace, the Panama Canal Zone, was U.S. territory at the time he was born; the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan resolution endorsing his eligibility.
Hillary Clinton’s identity crisis
Hillary Clinton’s identity crisis
It won’t be easy to get a once and for all decision. Somebody has to get the question into the courts through a lawsuit. But as the birthers discovered in 2008, most judges don’t think voters have legal standing to sue over a candidate’s qualifications. (To have standing, a plaintiff has to show that he or she is suffering concrete injury from a defendant’s conduct.)
One of Cruz’s competitors in the race could sue, but that might not play well as a campaign issue. That leaves the matter in Cruz’s hands. As an “originalist” who believes in the literal meaning of the Constitution, he ought to be the first to want that murky phrase in Article II cleared up.
“The Constitution matters — all of the Constitution,” Cruz said in 2013. “It’s not pick and choose. It’s not take what part you like and get rid of the parts you don’t like.”
If Cruz runs, he should ask a friendly state official to challenge his candidacy. Most legal scholars think he’d win, or at least not lose. (The courts might leave it to the voters to decide.) Win or lose, he would have the satisfaction of making constitutional history. Besides, my daughter wants to know if she can start thinking about 2024. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mcmanus-ted-cruz-20150225-column.html
Comments
3 Responses to “LA Times now quotes me in questioning the eligibility of Ted Cruz, yet they refuse to address Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425. Shame on dishonest LA Times and the rest of our corrupt puppet media”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
February 25th, 2015 @ 8:35 am
The definition of “Natural Born Citizen” was quite clear at the time our Constitution was being composed. Those involved in its construction considered the insertion of that definition a redundancy or they certainly would have been more descriptive. Being that the term itself is found almost exclusively in two places of distinguished influence, that being our Constitution, (now disdained by current political powers) and the treatise “The Law of Nations” by Emmerich Vattel, which was well known, highly regarded, and heavily resourced, even into the twentieth century, there should be no question as to the definition, and purpose for the phrase “Natural Born Citizen” within our Constitution.
It definitely should be clear to any one the dangers of allowing persons with known and obvious conflicting loyalties access to our highest offices. As it is obvious to me now that we are suffering from such infiltration at this very moment.
It Is only through passage of time, the dumbing down of the masses, and of course, the cooperation of the media guiding and controlling all debate and information, keeping truth from the people, that their is any question of obama’s ineligibility, or that cruz, jindal, and rubio, are also disqualified.
February 25th, 2015 @ 9:59 am
From the LA times article:
“”In my view, it does merit a test,” agreed Sarah Helene Duggin, a professor at the Catholic University of America. Indeed, she argued, if Cruz were to win the Republican nomination, it would be in the nation’s interest to get the question settled early.”
“”If we ever get to the point where we have a presidential candidate with this issue, we will need a clarification,” she said. “If the candidate were elected and then disqualified, that would be a serious constitutional crisis.”
We got to the point of a serious constitutional crisis the moment Obama was sworn in back in 2009, and from that day on Congress, both parties, have done everything possible to keep from dealing with the crisis they helped to create. This is why they will never impeach or investigate Obama. Congress knows he is ineligible and an identity fraud and will do anything to keep the truth from being fully exposed and acted on.
Why?….bacause Congress did nothing to stop Obama’s usurpation and they have participated in the 6 plus year cover-up. That is treason, for which the penalties are severe.
Congress protects Obama to protect themselves and the goal is to get him over the finish line in January, 2017 still officially considered a legitimate president. Nothing else really matters to Congress, at least to leadership.
February 25th, 2015 @ 12:22 pm
STILL PISSED SUSSMAN WITH KATIE GREEN, MICHAEL SAVAGE, MARK LEVIN CANT UTTER YOUR NAME ON AIR BUT YET RANT AND RAVE LIKE THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE AN ANEURYSM..
SURPRISED I SPELLED ANEURYSM RIGHT ON THE FIRST TRY. I WAS GOING TO PUT BLOOD CLOT.
WAKE UP…