OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Is anemic response to ISIS a sign of Obama’s weakness or a sign of Obama following marching orders of the International Globalist Oligarchy?

Posted on | May 24, 2015 | 6 Comments

Is anemic response to ISIS a sign of Obama’s weakness or a sign of Obama following marching orders of the International Globalist Oligarchy?

By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

US media writes about Obama’s weakness in responding to ISIS. However, I am not sure whether it is weakness or simply following the marching orders of the International Globalist ruling oligarchy.

Let’s remember that only a couple of years or so ago US tried to depose the long time hereditary ruler of Syria, Bashir Al Assad. While nominally Assad is considered the elected president, in practical terms he is a hereditary ruler. His father, Hafez al Assad, ruled Syria for decades and Junior stepped in after his father’s death. This scenario is reminiscent to the North Korean transfer of power. US wanted Assad dislodged for two reasons:

1. Alleged use of chemical weapons, though Assad claims that the opposition used those weapons and he gave up chemical weapons since then.

2. Second and more important reason is Assad’s alliance with Iran and Russia.

So, in the aftermath of alleged use of chemical weapons, Obama suggested striking Syria, however the public opinion in the US was sharply against yet another war. As such, the only way to dislodge Assad, was through local opposition. Though US preferred moderates, there were no moderates able to put a dent in Assads military might and grip on power. So, lo and behold, ISIS appears, led by Al Bagdadi, who used to be held in one of US camps in Iraq, and ISIS wrestles half of Syria from Assad. While I have no knowledge of US or other Western powers in any way aiding ISIS, the simple fact of ISIS removing Assad from power in half of Syria, is helping US and Western goals in the Middle East.

Now, let’s look at the other side of the equation: Iraq. US sought an agreement with Iraq allowing US to keep troops contingency in Iraq. However Shiite majority of Iraq did not want such and agreement.

So, as the US pulled the troops out, Shiites not only pushed Sunni out of positions of power, but also unleashed Iran backed Shiah militias on defenseless Sunnies. As Iraq became a Shiah Iran’s puppet, a dangerous alliance formed. When you add 77 million people in Iran and 33 million in Iraq, you have a de facto Shiah caliphate with 110 million people, strong armament and very close to manufacturing nuclear weapons. While formerly Iraq was ruled by Hussein, who was not a Shiah and who engaged in 2 wars with Iran, now Iraq and Iran are a de facto conglomerate, closely allied with Russia and China and hostile to the West. So, lo and behold, ISIS appears and wrestles 40% of Iraq from Shiah militias.

As we see, on both fronts ISIS’s advancements are parallel to goals of the West in moving against Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia and China alliance. I believe that the true power brokers in the West decided that as long as ISIS can be contained to attacking Assad in Syria and Shiiah in Iraq, there will not be a robust response to ISIS and Obama and other Western national leaders were placed under marching orders to create an appearance of doing something while doing next to nothing.

Furthermore, as long as ISIS is contained, I do not believe that a new inhabitant of the White House will do much more. When you look at 2016 Presidential candidates, you can group them in two categories:

1. members of the oligarchy

2. on the take by the oligarchy.

Clintons are reportedly worth between 150-500 million, and this does not even include their foundation, which reportedly is largely used as a slush fund. (Clintons’ foundation has raised nearly $2 billion www.washingtonpost.com)

Jeb Bush is probably close in personal wealth to Clintons. Clintons and Bushes were in lock step with the international oligarchy and are members of the group.

Then there are candidates, like Rubio and Christie, who are not that wealthy, at least not yet, however, they are largely dependent on the International billionaires club to materialize their aspirations of power and they are expected to do what the oligarchy tells them to do. So, with all the fiery speeches, as long as ISIS is contained and does not attack the West, we are likely to continue seeing an anemic response from the West to ISIS, regardless of who is the resident of the White House.

 

 

Category: Uncategorized
Tags: > > > > > > > > > >

Comments

6 Responses to “Is anemic response to ISIS a sign of Obama’s weakness or a sign of Obama following marching orders of the International Globalist Oligarchy?”

  1. Veritas
    May 24th, 2015 @ 5:12 am

    Or are we witnessing the fulfillment of Al Qaeda’s promise to “bring down America from the top.”

  2. Jerry G
    May 24th, 2015 @ 5:26 am

    An excellent analysis by Orly. It’s obvious that Obama does not want to stop Isis and our air attacks are simply a political show and a big joke.The other day we saw a large column of Isis vehicles which could have been wiped out with just one plane. But where was that plane?

  3. Mona Lola
    May 24th, 2015 @ 1:06 pm

    And what is going happen if another ineligible is our next president??? I am not going to vote for Hillary, but I can’t vote for Cruz, Jindal or Rubio.

  4. Gus
    May 24th, 2015 @ 3:34 pm

    You should be able to use this in your cases, Barry should be done now

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-23/secret-pentagon-report-reveals-us-created-isis-tool-overthrow-syrias-president-assad

  5. Linda
    May 25th, 2015 @ 2:40 am

    I believe that Obama’s own goals are much the same as the illuminati, i.e. bring down America so as to more easily morph into the NWO (which is probably the reason they installed him as President). However, he is a Muslim, so in the process of bringing America down, he’ll do all he can to help out his Muslim buddies. I will never vote for any President who is not an avowed Christian, because only someone who is a true believer in a loving God will be able to counter the will of the Luciferian criminal cartel that aspires to run the world. My #1 choice for President is Dr. Ben Carson. If you don’t know much about him, get the movie “Gifted Hands” (available on Netflix), the story of his life. It’s one of the most inspirational biographies I’ve seen.

  6. Danny Stewart
    May 25th, 2015 @ 8:19 am

    obummer is happily following orders to destroy the US.

Leave a Reply