OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

In received this letter below from an anonymous writer. It is in response to my column about Stanford judge, Aaron Persky

Posted on | June 19, 2016 | No Comments

 

I received this letter below anonymously. It states that Stanford professor, Michelle Landis Dauber, was the one who started this whole campaign against Stanford judge, Aaron Persky. Moreover, her campaign led to many young men  being labeled sexual predators and rapists for having a consensual sex with young women.

I believe that there is a campaign against men, particularly straight men and particularly white men. We are seeing this all over, on so many levels. For example, some moron Yale professor organized a revolt of Yale students, who said that they don’t want to study all those white male writers. This is a complete idiocy. Shakespeare, Maupassant, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and so many other great pillars of world literature happened to be white men. So it behooves those students to study their contribution to literature.

Similarly, we are seeing a reverse discrimination in employment, where white men are the last to be considered, even if they are veterans, who risked their lives for this country.

In my opinion this attack on men, particularly white men, is part and parcel of the globalist agenda where North America and Europe are in the process  of being subdued  and brought into the slavery of the Globalism. White men are losing jobs and livelihood to cheap labor that is being in-sourced by the Globalist elite or the jobs that are being outsourced to the Third World slave labor countries. 

So, white men are constantly being attacked, kept unsure in themselves, paralyzed and unable to fight back.

With Prof. Dauber, there might be additional reasons for her being so militant against men. Even though her bio states that she is married, she does not look particularly feminine to me. I am looking at her butch haircut, no makeup and a masculine suit and I wonder if she has some confusion about her femininity, some deep doubts about her own sexual orientation and for this reason she lashes out at men so much.

This is Professor Michelle Landis Dauber, who orchestrated this campaign against Judge Persky and Stanford student

Below is the letter I’ve received:

Someone brought to my attention your recent column re the Stanford case. I am sending this anonymously, which means unfortunately you cannot reply to it.

Your column is one of the few that gets the facts right. If you do some more research, you will see if you haven’t already that Stanford Law School Professor Dauber began a major campaign on these issues several years ago and became completely involved when this case arose.

It is widely believed Prof. Dauber wrote the long statement Ms. Doe read in court and that Prof. Dauber has been orchestrating an ongoing media campaign which resulted in CNN reading the letter on the air and members of the House of Representatives reading the letter into the House record last week. Prof. Dauber is the person who headed the campaign that led to over one million signatures to recall Judge Persky.

You say Ms. Doe indicated she didn’t want Mr. Turner to rot in jail.

The actual quote in the probation officer’s report is much more specific:

“I don’t want him to feel like his life is over and I don’t want him to rot in jail; he doesn’t need to be behind bars.”

You can find the probation department’s recommendation in the box in this Washington Post
article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/06/10/probation-officers-report-for-brock-turners-sentencing

Various news reports indicate the probation officer actually had recommended a range of four to six months and had explored whether any jail time at all was required, but one of the three statutes requires some amount of jail time.

Note that at the bottom of page ten of the statement MS. Doe read in court, again reportedly written or heavily edited by Prof. Dauber, Ms. Doe says she never said that to the probation officer.

Interesting question: does the probation officer have notes or even a recording of what Ms. Doe actually said before Prof. Dauber started rewriting things?

Prof. Dauber put seriously inflammatory language at the top of the statement Ms. Doe read in court: “You were in me.” Most people simply watching the media believe Mr. Turner found Ms. Dow lying unconscious behind the dumpster, pulled down her pants and underpants and inserted his penis when the two Swedish graduate students found him.

Totally wrong, and your column is one of the few that gets it right. The terrible question for all college men and women is: So if the man asks permission each step of the way as high school and college are taught these days (Mr. Turner says he actually asked Ms. Doe, may I finger you and she said yes) but the woman then passes out, at what point did consensual sex become a felony? That instant? Within 30 seconds? Or what?

This letter was written in response to the article below:

DOFF

OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

CNN defends Stanford judge, Aaron Persky, and on this one I am with CNN. The public should turn its’ anger to other judges, Obama-case judges, they need to sua sponte reverse their decisions or resign from the bench

Posted on | June 18, 2016 | 2 Comments

CNN defends Stanford judge, Aaron Persky, and on this one I am with CNN. The public should turn its’ anger to Obama judges, they need to sua sponte reverse their decisions or resign from the bench

By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

We are seeing a campaign of public outrage against a Stanford judge, Aaron Persky.

The facts of the case are as follows: a 20 year old young man, a Stanford university student and a star athlete with no criminal record, and a woman of around 26 years old attended a frat party where both of them got completely drunk, they went outside where they had sex. At some point the woman passed out from being completely drunk. The man got charged and convicted of rape for having sex with a woman who passed out. The judge gave the man 6 months in jail. Some liberal members of the public, particularly ones who are following a new fad, saying that all white men are bad and criminals, and ones who want to divert attention from other problems, such as radical Muslim terrorism, astronomical debt and lack of borders, are attacking the judge and demanding to throw the judge of the bench because he gave this 20 year old man with no criminal record only 6 months in prison.

Today, on CNN, Saturday anchor, Michael Smerconish, defended the judge. While I often disagree with CNN, I agree with them on this particular issue.

Smerconish stated that he read the full 90 page sentencing recommendation file which was compiled by the female probation officer on the case.

This female probation officer recommended 4-6 months in county jail.

The probation officer based her recommendation on the fact that the man was young, only 20, that it was his first offense and that he was intoxicated and his judgment was impaired. She also provided the statement given by the victim to the police where the victim stated that she does not want  the man to rot in jail. Later,  when the case got attention, the victim changed her mind and seemingly wanted longer sentence, however the probation officer went by her statement to the police.

Additionally, the probation officer argued that longer sentences are given to individuals who commit more serious crimes.

Indeed, one who rapes a minor, one who brakes into  a house and rapes a woman, one who kidnaps and rapes a woman, are perpetrators who deserve long prison sentences. Here is a different case, a case, where two young people got drunk at a party, had sex and a woman passed out during sex from being drunk.

So, Judge Aaron Persky simply followed the recommendations of the female probation officer and the desires of the victim, as she stated her desire to the police whereby she did not want the man to rot in jail. It is time to stop attacking Judge Persky. Time for the public to turn the attention to a more serious matter, to judges in Obama cases.

On the other hand, the judges as well as both AG Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch had and still have in front of them evidence of Obama using a stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425 and using toilet paper for IDs. So far they covered it up. (see the file of documents Evidence of forgery, fraud and fabrication in Obama’s IDs)

This cover up led to 8 years of usurpation of the US presidency with disastrous results. Obama incurred more debt than 43 presidents before him combined. He is committing an outright treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy, by bringing thousands  of Syrian migrants after ISIS announced that it embedded it’s terrorists among those migrants. Together with the Secretary of DHS, Jeh Johnson, Obama endangered us by deleting thousands of DHS files of radical Muslim terrorists. And the list goes on and on…

It is time for the public to turn to judges who covered up the issue of Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and demand that these judges sua sponte change their decisions.

It is time for the public to demand that AG Loretta Lynch appoint a special prosecutor to file criminal charges against Obama for his use of a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425 and fabricated IDs, for the usurpation of the US presidency via use of bogus IDs, for treason in bringing Syrian migrants with ISIS terrorists embedded in their midst and so much more.

It is time for the public to turn its’ attention to the most important legal issue of our time.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply