OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

If you are unable to post on my site, please try again with a different name and e-mail address. There may be tampering with my site by someone

Posted on | October 8, 2015 | No Comments

Obnoxious decision on cancellation of Oral Hearings on GRINOLS

Alexander Yakhnis to orly.taitz (yesterday)
Dear Orly,

I have attempted to post my comment on this decision under the name kRedPine

and email address 555@air.com

It was not posted, though the above data i never used before.

I think the expressions of public disappointment with the court decision is
important.

Here is my comment, please see if you would be able to publish it

possibly under different name.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: WL): The Court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.]

1) The court may be of the said unanimous opinion, but how would a Deputy Clerk find out that the Court has this opinion on the matter that the plaintiff is contesting in this court and it is of significant complexity?
2) How is it any easier for the Court to arrive at the said anonymous opinion, rather than to arrive at an actual Court’s decision in the course of oral hearings?
3) The Court has an obligation in front of American Public to make sound pronouncement and not to rely on Deputy Clerk to convey to the public and plaintiffs a complex decision such as cancellation of oral hearings on the matter of the utmost interest to the United States?
4) This matter of oral hearings for 13-16359 James Grinols et al… is no less important, than is current presidential election campaigns of the candidates and there is a relationship between their contents which is important to the public. The Court has no more reasons to cancel the said oral hearings than there are reasons to cancel presidential campaigns of the candidates.
5) Ladies and Gentlemen please get awake.

[Therefore, this matter is ordered submitted without oral argument on October 20, 2015, at San Francisco, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).]

1) Who is making this order to cancel the oral argument and on what basis?
2)The previous statement of The Deputy Clerk does not reveal to the American Public the reasons for cancelling the Oral Arguments for which we have been waiting for months. It is now cancelled 12 days before the target date for the oral hearings. Is there anything more abrupt, than the actions of this Court with regard to the American Public Expectations?

[Accordingly, Plaintiffs-Appellants’ motion for miscellaneous relief (motion for additional time during oral argument and motion for clarification) is DENIED. [9709768] (WL)]

1) The American Public is well justified to think that This Court has cancelled the oral hearings in order to deny the “motion for additional time during the oral argument” as no reasons for the cancellation of oral argument is given.
2) This Court avoids giving any rational for its procedural decisions and saves its labor costs to 0. It might as well go on a vacation forever.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply