If this yearbook note is a forgery, then the attorney for Judge Moore needs to hold a press conference, provide expert testimony and seek assistance of the FBI and police in investigating this and prosecuting the forger.
Posted on | November 14, 2017 | 2 Comments
Paula Hoehn | Dear Orly,
Elements of possible forgery in yearbook, RE Judge Moore (black ink at beginning, blue ink later, different ‘7’s, different capital M’s, “Moore” signature identified as D.A., but he obviously wasn’t DA in 1977, possibly assistant or deputy DA): MUST SEE=> Roy Moore ——- |
Comments
2 Responses to “If this yearbook note is a forgery, then the attorney for Judge Moore needs to hold a press conference, provide expert testimony and seek assistance of the FBI and police in investigating this and prosecuting the forger.”
Leave a Reply
November 15th, 2017 @ 10:08 am
Orly
Tradition forgery analysis is often disputed in court because there are some very good forgers out there. However with an old forgery, mass spectrographic analysis can easily determine the date and sometimes the manufacturer of the ink used. The IRS is rumored to use this technique but I don’t think they admit. It is used commonly in the private sector. I suspect the ink on that signature was made in 2017. Why isn’t Moore’s legal team asking for voluntary lie detector test?
November 15th, 2017 @ 11:28 am
I would ordinarily agree about going to the F.B.I., but, as we have seen, it has been politicized and is crooked.
I assume that Alabama’s state and local have the uncompromised expertise needed.