Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

If Justice Clarence Thomas does not grant a stay or referral to full court, Farrar v Obama will be reassigned to Chief Justice John Roberts

Posted on | July 10, 2012 | 10 Comments

Press release

Law Offices of Dr. Orly Taitz

Farrar v Obama in front of the Supreme Court

Farrar order denying motion to quash subpoenas

Farrar corrected proposed summary of law and fact


Farrar v Obama Application for Stay of  primary election votes for Barack Obama in the state of Georgia was filed and docketed in the Supreme Court of the United States and referred to Justice Clarence Thomas, a justice in charge of the 11th Circuit from which the case originated. If Justice Thomas does not grant the stay or referral to the full court, the case will be in front of the Chief Justice John Roberts.

This case was heard on January 26, 2012 in Atlanta Georgia. Attorney Orly Taitz brought 7 witnesses, among them Senior Deportation office of the Department of Homeland Security, all of whom testified that Obama’s Social Security card and Birth certificate are forged and fraudulently obtained documents. Taitz subpoenaed Obama to appear in court and produce valid identification papers. Obama filed a motion to quash the subpoenas filed by Taitz. Presiding judge Malihi ruled in favor of Taitz and ordered Obama to  appear in court and produce the identification papers. Obama and his attorney Michael Jablonski were in contempt of court ordered subpoena and boycotted the hearing, claiming that Obama is being harassed. GA law  requires the candidate to prove his eligibility, Obama did not provide any proof. Based on yet unknown consideration judge Malihi allowed Obama on the ballot.

DVD of the actual court argument in the case and witness sworn testimony  is available through this site by paying $20 (see Donate above and indicating that this is for the DVD of GA trial). Decision by Justice Thomas is expected within 2 weeks. If no state is granted by Thomas, decision by Roberts will be 2 weeks later.

Farrar v Obama is one of several cases prosecuted by attorney Taitz, challenging Obama Tax. Other cases are in front of the Federal District judge Wingate in Mississippi, Judge Reid in Indiana, Court of Appeals in Washington DC, Federal District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles.

Motion  Hearing in Taitz v Sebelius challenging Obama Tax as violating Establishment clause, Free Exercise of Religion Clause, Equal Protection Clause and Due Process clause of Christian and Jewish citizens due to exemptions given to religious sects and due to expected mass exemptions of Muslim citizens, will be on August 10, 9:30 am in the U.S. District court in Los Angeles.

End of Press release


10 Responses to “If Justice Clarence Thomas does not grant a stay or referral to full court, Farrar v Obama will be reassigned to Chief Justice John Roberts”

  1. Starla
    July 10th, 2012 @ 5:36 am


    [Well, thank God, It’s about time!!!]

    “Attorney General Eric Holder could lose his license to practice law in the District of Columbia, or face some other penalty from the D.C. Bar, now that he has been found in criminal and civil contempt of Congress.

    Last week, the bloggers who first exposed Operation Fast and Furious, Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea, filed a formal complaint with the Washington, D.C. Office of Bar Counsel alleging that Holder committed “professional misconduct” during the congressional investigation into the scandal.

    Because Holder was found in contempt of Congress for his “refusal to comply with a subpoena duly issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,” Vanderboegh and Codrea contend, “[i]t would appear that several, if not all of these rules [the D.C. Bar’s rules of professional conduct], have been violated.”


    Vanderboegh and Codrea each published the complaint they jointly registered on their individual blogs “[b]ecause of the serious political ramifications involved, and because some on the Board may be sympathetic to AG Holder’s positions and hostile to those of the House contempt charges, and in order to ensure that this complaint receives proper attention and is not ignored through deliberate indifference.”

    Read More Here: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/09/formal-complaint-seeks-disbarment-of-eric-holder-in-dc/#ixzz209L9fA4X

  2. Starla
    July 10th, 2012 @ 5:42 am



    Conscience Cause – Protecting The Civil Rights Of Conscience

    * Petition *

    “Our petition calls on Congress to take action against HHS’ employer mandate.”

    * Petition Text: *

    “Dear Speaker Boehner & Leader Reid,

    The First Amendment to our Constitution begins “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This explicit protection of rights of conscience is as fundamental to us as our unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    “A rule enacted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) forces individual and institutional employers to purchase health insurance for employees which provides free abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization procedures and contraceptive medications. Acknowledging that this mandate burdens the free exercise of religion of many Americans, the rule contains a limited accommodation for “houses of worship” but which is defined so narrowly as to exclude many employers with religious or moral objections, including religious hospitals, schools and charities.

    Because the rule compels such employers (whether they be individuals, institutions or corporations) to violate deeply-held tenets of faith and conscience, it is in direct violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. We fervently petition Congress to act immediately to repeal or amend this rule to protect the free exercise of religion and the rights of conscience of all Americans.

    As signers of this petition, we do not represent any particular religious faith or political party. We are people of many faiths, and some of no particular faith. We have no uniform view on contraception. We are, however, unified as Americans in our support of the primacy of rights of religion and conscience. We affix our names here because we believe the mandate represents an unprecedented and unnecessary intrusion into the civic and economic life of people of faith and conscience and sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans.

    We respectfully request the United States House of Representatives to take immediate action to preserve “rights of conscience against the enterprises of civil authority.” After such a protection passes the U.S. House, we respectfully request its approval by the United States Senate.”

    ~ Sign the Petition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ~


    “The First Amendment to our Constitution begins “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Reducing opposition to the so called contraception mandate to a discussion on the cost of birth control is akin to believing a block of ice floating in the ocean is of no consequence to passing ships.

    This rule represents not the tip of the iceberg but rather, a lethal mass hidden, in this case, under reams of legislative legalese and bureaucratic red tape.

    Requiring religious institutions to act against their faith or face punitive penalties is unconstitutional. Denying a centuries-old definition of what is a religious institution in service to the whims of a temporary administration is unconscionable.”



    What is the HHS mandate?

    “The mandate of the Department of Health and Human Services has received wide attention and has been met with vigorous and united opposition from people of all faiths. In an unprecedented way, the federal government will both force religious institutions to facilitate and fund a product contrary to their own moral teaching and purport to define which religious institutions are “religious enough” to merit protection of their religious liberty. These features of the “preventive services” mandate amount to an unjust law.”


    About Conscience Cause

    “Conscience Cause is a non-profit, non-partisan, public policy advocacy organization comprised of leaders from various faiths united to secure and preserve our constitutional rights of conscience. We will act by petitioning the federal legislature to bar any regulation that would compel religious institutions, as well as individuals and corporations, to violate the tenets of their faith or be subject to penalty of law.”

    “Conscience Cause leadership includes religious leaders and former government officials of different faiths and denominations, among them:”


    ~ ACT!!!!!!!!!!!! ~

    ~ TAKE ACTION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!! ~


    ***** “Fortnight for Freedom: Call your Member of Congress!!!!!!!!!!

    ***** Gather petition signatures from your fellow worshippers!!!!!!!!!!

    ***** Conscience Cause is a grassroots effort to encourage Congress to stand up for religious freedom!!!!!!!!!!”

    From: Many Judeo-Christian Churches, Many Synagogues, Many Civil Rights Groups & Foundations Such As:

    PreserveReligiousFreedom.org – Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, D.C.

  3. The Phoenix
    July 10th, 2012 @ 5:35 pm

    Let’s hope that the Muslims (have to) buy healthcare insurance, too? Then, we’ll see how fast this law gets repealed! Or…have that entire piece of work shredded, into confetti!

    This would be Thomas’ opportunity to strike a blow for America!

  4. leo derosia
    July 10th, 2012 @ 9:35 pm

    i admire orlys efforts but no judge wants to touch his eligibility, our only hope is that election isnt rigged.

  5. Mark
    July 11th, 2012 @ 1:54 am

    If I were a doctor and a Muslim came to me for medical treatment, given the new healthcare law, I’d make them pay cash for all services on the spot since they do not have any health insurance. The law doesn’t have any provision for free healthcare that I know of. Muslims don’t get free groceries if they go to the supermarket.
    Make them pay the full amount of their treatments including major operations. If they don’t pay, have them put in jail like we would be.

  6. Thomas
    July 11th, 2012 @ 5:04 am

    Mrs. Taitz, I have a question for you :
    Is Voter Fraud a Criminal Complaint OR A Civil Complaint? I’m doing my best to get this Template right so I can file it.

  7. Anonymous
    July 11th, 2012 @ 5:18 am

    I would like to see a complete list of all the resons or excuses that have been used for dismissal.

  8. Veritas
    July 11th, 2012 @ 7:06 am

    Wasserman-Schultz must be having a “senior moment.” She wants her comment to pertain to ROMNEY; she must be KIDDING or she is suffering DEMENTIA:

    Wasserman Schultz: ‘It Would Be Nice If We Had Candidate for President Who Was Committed To America’…

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 11th, 2012 @ 7:12 am

    you need to look in your statutes, can be codified as either

  10. winnybar
    July 11th, 2012 @ 7:04 pm

    Roberts has the same name as Owen Roberts a Supreme Court judge in the 1930’s. Not a coincident. Roberts speaks broken English so claims that he is from Indiana don’t make sense, more like Germany. That means he is an illegal alien and a Nazi spy. His assumed name is Roberts copied from the former judge.

    That visit to Malta is similar to Clinton and Gore leaving for Australia and Austria on a moments notice without their families a day or two before they learned 9/11 was coming down. Million dollar payoff time. Malta must be the headquarters of the Nazi Germans ruling America via Obama et al. Google ObamaAfricanRootsHoax1

    Google ClintonNo911Hero1 for the 9/11 story.

    Thomas is a pick of Bush I. Bush I also speaks broken English. He was in the white house on 9/11 keeping the planes down and he wasn’t the president then. His kid in Florida setting up a goat story.

Leave a Reply