IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION

Dr. Orly Taitz, et al.                                                                                                            PLAINTIFF(S) VS.                                                                                       CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12cv280 HTW-LRA Democrat Party of Mississippi, et al.                                                                            DEFENDANT(S)

RICO NOTICE

In this action, claims have been asserted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961.  Under the current  practice of the presiding  judge, all patties filing RICO claims must file a RICO statement conforming to this Notice.

The Plaintiff shall file, within twenty (20) days hereof, a RICO case statement.  This statement shall include the facts the Plaintiff is relying upon to initiate this RICO complaint as a result of the “reasonable inquiry” required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.  This statement shall be in a form which both uses the numbers and letters as set forth below, and states in detail and with specificity  the following information:

1.  State whether the alleged unlawful conduct is in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(a), (b), (c), and/or (d).

2.  List each Defendant and state the alleged misconduct  and basis of liability of each

Defendant.

3. List the alleged wrongdoers, other than the Defendant(s)  listed above, and state the alleged misconduct of each wrongdoer.

Subversive organizations and individuals created to aid and abet Obama’s use of forged IDs by inflicting collateral attack on civil right attorneys and Civil rights leaders

“Obama for America”

“Fogbow”-subversive organization, created with the purpose of aiding and abetting Obama in usurpation of U.S. Presidency with forged IDs and by defaming and slandering civil rights leaders, ike Plaintiffs herein, who are bringing civil challenges to Obama and destroy their ability to make a living.

Financial backers to “Obama for  America” and Fogbow, specifically the largest financial backer believed to be billionaire George Soros.  further discovery will be necessary to ascertain identity of backers and members of “Fogbow”). Financial backer of Fogbow organized and financed May 25, 2010 convention of fogbow in Phoenix, Arizona. One of the main topics of fogbow convention was derailment of the political run for the CA secretary of State by attorney Taitz. Taitz announced in her campaign, that if she wins, she as a secretary of state of CA will be seeking original IDs for Obama

Fogbow consists of a number of attorneys, who work for high ranked judges as clerks or staff attorneys, for IRS, state bars, military attorneys and other organizations. they used their positions to aid and abet Obama and slander, defame and impoverish ones who sought legal resolution and prosecution of forgeries by Obama

Fogbow attorneys used pseudonyms

One of the organizers of Fogbow is a California attorney and an attorney for the Democratic party –Scott J. Tepper, who uses a pseudonym  “Sterngard Friegen“. Tepper is a part time investigator for the CA bar. Tepper misused and abused his position as a part time investigator to launch collateral attacks on Taitz, in order to attack her CA license and prevent her from going after Obama and his forged IDs. While CA bar decided not to take any action against Taitz, she suffered over $10,000 financial damage in legal fees having to hire attorneys, specializing in bar representation to fend attacks by Tepper. Typically bar investigates complaints coming from clients or parties  to legal actions. Tepper was never a client of Taitz or a party to any legal action, where she was either a party or attorney. Tepper abused his position as a California bar investigator, went with a thin tooth comb through any legal action, where Taitz was a party and bombarded CA bar with complaints seeking to attack her license in  order to prevent her from representing other parties against Obama. at the same time Tepper co-founded subversive organization “Fogbow”, used  pseudonym Sterngard Friegen and attacked Taitz with defamatory remarks, sexually charged remarks, seeking   de-humanize her, assassinate her character. His remarks, as well as remarks of other members of Fogbow resulted in estimated damage of over $500,000 in lost income for Taitz in her dental practice. Additionally, members of Fogbow  wrote to multiple dental insurance companies seeking to affect Taitz contracts with those insurance companies. Members of Fogbow and others wrote defamatory statements to tenants, who subleased office space from Taitz. Those tenants were harassed and intimidated.  Lost rental income is estimated to be over $400,000. Members of Fogbow and others harassed and intimidated clients and witnesses of Taitz, seeking  their withdrawal from cases. this harassment and intimidation resulted in estimated loss of income of over $500,000 for Taitz, as an attorney, in her legal practice.

Bill Bryan, uses pseudonym “Foggy”, a former CA attorney, who rescinded from the CA bar in the midst of discipline investigation and after multiple suspensions.

Mitzi Craig Torri, AZ attorney, had another license (believed to be PA license). Torri uses a pseudonym “Butterfly Bilderberg”. Torri  is an attorney for the IRS. Further discovery is necessary. It is believed that Torri used her position as an IRS attorney to cause financial hardships to Plaintiffs and other civil rights attorneys and civil rights leaders   who were seeking adjudication on the merits of Obama’s forgeries.

Staff attorneys, law clerks, employees of several courts, who worked in a coordinated effort to  manipulate dockets, manipulate cases in order to derail any legal challenges to Obama. Some of these attorneys worked in concert with at least two convicted forgers, who directly or through their attorneys submitted perjured statements to courts in order to derail  cases challenging Obama. One of  attorneys engaged in derailment of anti Obama cases is believed to be an attorney for Perkins Coie, Siddharth Velamoor, who worked as an attorney for Judge David O. carter, who presided over the cases Keys, Barnett et al v Obama et al.

Convicted forgers: John Does worked in coordinated attacks with a number of attorneys and attorney law clerks for presiding judges to defame Taitz in collateral attacks on Taitz in order to prevent her proceeding against Obama

Computer Hackers-Currently identified as John Does, hacked and destroyed her e-mail accounts and web sites

“Oh for Goodness sakes”- subversive web site, created to defame and slander civil rights attorneys, and civil rights leaders who bring forward legal challenges against Obama and to destroy ability of such attorneys to make a living

“Orly’s World”- web site created to defame civil rights leaders and attorneys, who bring forward evidence of forgery in Obama’s documents and to affect ability of civil rights attorneys and leaders to make a living

“Orly”s World” was created by New Jersey and PA attorney Steven Feinstein. Feinstein’s license in NJ was not renewed. His license in PA was suspended for over a  year.

John Does, creators of Fake websites, fake Facebook accounts, fake twitter accounts  Such accounts created to  disinform the public about the work conducted by Taitz, assassinate her character and limit her ability to make income as a doctor and attorney. Damage estimated to be over $500,000.

A group of forgers used to aid and abet Obama: John Does, forgers who forged Obama’s birth certificate, Selective Service certificate and created a Social Security  card with a number which belonged to an individual born in 1890

Employees of the Social Security administration, currently listed as John Does, who aided and abetted Obama in creating a forged SSN. An individual, suspected to be one of those John Does is the former actuary of the Social Security Administration Harry C. Balantyne  According to investigation by former Scotland yard officer Neil Sankey and according to investigation of licensed investigator Susan Daniels one of the Social Security numbers used by Obama is the Social Security number of Balantyne’s deceased mother.

Jonn Doe, Believed to  be Obama’s step brother, Mark Ndsandjo (AKA Mark Obama, AKA Mark Nydsend), whose social Security number was used as one of the number used by Obama according to national databases.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA – with address 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500, who is sued as a candidate for the U.S. President in 2012 elections, who is using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 and running for the US President by virtue of fraud and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification .NANCY PELOSI, Chairwoman of the 2008 Democratic National Convention and Signor of the Certificate of Nomination for Candidate for President Obama with the address: Democratic Party Headquarters, 430 South Capitol St. SE, Washington DC, 20003; MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of SSA with the business address: Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235;WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD, former Director of the Selective Service, resident of TX ; ALVIN ONAKA, registrar of the Health Department of Hawaii -involved in the cover up of Obama’s forged birth certificate; BRIAN SCHATZ, Chairman of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama with the business address as: 1050 Ala Monana Blvd. #2660, Honolulu, HI 96814;LYNNE MATUSOW, Secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama with the business address as: 1050 Ala Moana Blvd. #2660, Honolulu, HI 96814.;  BALLOT LAW COMMISSION of State of New Hampshire with the address: 107 North Main Street, State House, Room 204, Concord, N.H. 03301;CLAY D. LAND, Federal Judge with the business address: Middle District of Georgia, PO Box 2017, Columbus, GA 31902;  JOHN AVLON, a reporter from Daily Beast, with the business address: The Daily Beast, 7 Hanover Sq. New York, NY, 10004.; CHRIS MATTHEWS, a host from MSNBC with the business address: MSNBC, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052.  MSNBC, a TV broadcast company with a business address as: MSNBC, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052; KFI AM 640, a radio station with a business address as: 3400 W Olive Ave Ste 550, Burbank CA 91505, JOHN & KEN SHOW, a show on KFI AM 640 engaged in defamation of Plaintiff Taitz. The business address is: 3400 W Olive Ave Ste 550, Burbank CA 91505, JOHN KOBELT, a host of JOHN & KEN SHOW on KFI AM 640 with the business address as: 3400 W Olive Ave Ste 550, Burbank CA 91505. FORBES MAGAZINE, located at : 60 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10011, KEVIN UNDRHILL, a reporter for Forbes Magazine with the business address as: 60 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10011.OBAMA FOR AMERICA, an organization created by Barack Hussein Obama with the business address as: P.O. Box 803638, Chicago, IL, 60680, PATRICK R. DONAHOE the Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of United States Postal Service with business address as: 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington DC 20260, CNN-is a corporation, a news organization that was and is actively complicit in fraud and cover up of Obama’s forged IDs. Current known address for CNN is P.O. Box 105366One CNN Center , Atlanta GA 30348; JOHN DOES and JANE DOES 1-100 Plaintiffs will provide the names of defendants John Doe and Jane Doe upon further discovery.

FRAUD Predicate Act

1. Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter Obama) never provided any valid documentary evidence of his natural born status, which is required for one to be a candidate for the U.S. Presidency according to the Article 2, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Obama placed his candidacy on the ballot claiming to be a natural-born citizen based on forged identification papers.

3. A natural born citizen would be expected to have valid U.S. identification papers, such as a valid long form birth certificate and a valid Social Security number, lawfully obtained by presenting a valid birth certificate to the Social Security Administration and which can be verified through official U.S. Social Security verification services, such as E-Verify and SSNVS.

4. The most glaring evidence of Obama’s lack of natural born status and legitimacy for the US Presidency, is Obama’s lack of most basic valid identification papers, such as a valid Social Security Number (“SSN”) and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number from the state of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, and which was never assigned to him according in part to SSN verification systems “E-Verify” and SSNVS. (Exhibit 7, 10  to Affidavit of elections challenge-affidavit of Linda Jordan and printout from E-Verify and SSNVS, showing that Connecticut Social Security used by Obama, was never assigned to him)

4.       Reports from licensed investigator Susan Daniels (“Daniels”) show that for most of his life Obama used a Connecticut Social Security Number  xxx-xx-4425  issued in 1977, even though he was never a resident of the State of Connecticut. In 1977 Social Security numbers were assigned according to the state where the Social Security applications were submitted. The first three digits of the Social Security number assigned prior to 2011 signified a state, where an individual applied for his SSN and where it was issued. Obama is using a SSN starting with 042, which signifies the state of CT.  In 1977 Obama was nowhere near Connecticut, but rather a young student at the Punahoa school in Hawaii, where he resided. (Exhibit 15, Sworn Affidavit of Susan Daniels, attesting to the fact that Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, which was never assigned to him)

5.       Additionally, according to the review performed by licensed investigators Sankey and Daniels, and as publicly available, national databases revealed another birth date associated with this number, a birth date of 1890. In or around 1976-77, due to changes in the Social Security Administration, many elderly individuals who never had Social Security numbers before, had to apply for their Social Security numbers for the first time in order to obtain Social Security Benefits. It appears that the number in question was assigned to an elderly individual in Connecticut around March of 1977. The death of this elderly individual was never reported, and from around 1980 this number was fraudulently assumed by Barack Obama. (See Exhibit 15  attached hereto, Affidavit of Susan Daniels.)

4.       Senior Deportation Officer from the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Mr. John Sampson (“Sampson”) provided an affidavit attesting to the fact that indeed, according to national databases, Obama is using a Connecticut SSN even though there is no reasonable justification or explanation for such use by one who resided in Hawaii in and around the time the Social Security number in question was issued. (See Declaration of elections challenge, Exhibit 9, Affidavit of senior Deportation officer John Sampson, attesting to fraud in Obama’s SSN)

5.       In 2010 Obama posted online on WhiteHouse.gov his 2009 tax returns. He originally did not “flatten” the PDF file thereof, so all the layers of modification of the file became visible to the public. One of the pages contained Obama’s full SSN xxx-xx-4425. Taitz received an affidavit from Adobe Illustrator program expert Mr. Felicito Papa (“Papa”) attesting to the fact that the tax returns initially posted by Obama contained the full Connecticut SSN xxx-xx-4425. While the file was later “flattened” and the SSN can no longer be seen, thousands of U.S. Citizens and individuals around the world were able to obtain the original file with the full SSN. (See Affidavit of Elections Challenge Exhibit 6 attached hereto, Affidavit of Felicito Papa.)

7.       Taitz received an affidavit from a witness Linda Jordan (Hereinafter “Jordan”), who ran an E-verify check for the aforementioned Social Security number, which was posted by Obama on line as his number. According to E-Verify, there is no match between Obama’s name and the SSN he used on his tax returns and Selective Service application. (See Affidavit of elections challenge, Exhibit 7 attached hereto, Affidavit from Linda Jordan). Obama’s close associate, William Ayers, in his book Fugitive Days, admitted to creating over a hundred fraudulent Social Security Numbers using names of deceased infants who did not get their Social Security numbers before their deaths. As he states in Fugitive Days, “After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card. Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.” William Ayers, Fugitive Days. Association and close friendship with Ayers is an additional indication and circumstantial evidence of Social Security fraud by Obama, and his lack of valid identification documents to prove not only natural born status, but any status for that matter. Additionally, two of Obama’s relatives, his aunt and uncle, who came from Kenya and are residing in the U.S. illegally, were able to obtains illegally Social Security numbers, which they are using to get housing and employment, therefore there is a pattern of Obama’s close associates and family member either manufacturing fraudulent Social Security cards and /or using fraudulent Social Security cards.

8.       For nearly three years after his inauguration Obama refused to provide to the public his long form birth certificate. On April 27, 2011, when Obama posted his alleged long form birth certificate online, just as with his tax returns, he originally did not flatten the file, which means that anyone with an Adobe Illustrator program on his computer could see layers of alterations in this alleged “birth certificate” which looked like a complete fraud and hoax.  Multiple long form birth certificates from 1961 are available. In those years green safety paper was not available and was not used. Other birth certificates, as one for Susan Nordyke, born the next day on August 5, 1961, in the same hospital, and signed by the registrar on August 11, 1961, show white paper with yellow aging stains, clear borders, raised seal and a lower serial number. (Exhibit 20) Obama’s alleged birth certificate is on a safety paper, which was not used in 1961, does not have a clear paper, no raised seal, and the serial number is higher than the numbers issued later by the same Registrar. See Exhibit 21. In July of 2012 Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona released results of his 6 months investigation. Arpaio released a sworn affidavit, attesting to the fact that Obama’s alleged birth certificate posted by Obama on line represents a computer generated forgery, additionally he found Obama’s Selective service certificate and Social security card to be forged. (See Affidavit of elections challenge Exhibit 1 Affidavit of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate, Selective service certificate and Social Security number )

12.     According to the affidavit from Adobe Illustrator expert Papa (Affidavit of elections challenge Exhibit 3 affidavit of Felicito Papa attesting to forgery in Obama’s birth certificate), the released image digital file showed layers of alteration of the alleged birth certificate. It showed a signature of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann D. Soetoro (her married name by her second husband), where it looks as though “Soetoro” was erased, whiten out and computer graphics used to add “unham Obama” and a signature “Stanley Ann Dunham Obama” was created by pasting and filling the blanks with computer graphics.

12. An affidavit from an elections clerk in Honolulu, Hawaii Tim Adams, who checked in both Honolulu hospitals and there are no birth records for Barack Obama in either of them. (Election challenge Exhibit 4 affidavit of Timothy Adams)

13.     Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. (“Vogt”) (See affidavit of Elections challenge Exhibit 2 hereto Affidavit of Douglas Vogt.) Vogt attests to further evidence of forgery, such as different colors of ink used. Some of the document shows as “gray scale” scanning, some as black and white scanning, and some as color scanning. It shows different types of letters and variations in kerning, meaning some letters are encroaching into the space of other letters which is possible only with computer graphics, not with a typewriter used in 1961. Numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 typewritten document, but a computer-generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics.

16.     Affidavit of Chris Strunk (Exhibit 14) shows that in Obama’s mothers passport records received by Strunk in response to his FOIA request submitted to the Department of State, Obama is listed under the name Barack Obama Soebarkah. There is no evidence of Obama ever legally changing his name.

17. Affidavit and an attached article of typesetting expert Paul Irey (Elections challenge exhibit 3 )  provide additional evidence of  forgery in Obama’s alleged birth certificate, as different parts of the document in question are typed using different fonts and sizes of letters and are cut and pasted from different documents.

18. Exhibit 16 Cover page and page 31 of the transcript of March 25th 2010 session    of the assembly of Kenya contain part of the speech of minister of Lands of Kenya, James Orengo. In his speech Orengo clearly states that Obama was born in Kenya and not a native U.S. citizen.

19. Exhibit 17 represents Obama’s biography, which he submitted to his literary agent Acton Dystel, which was published in 1991 and was posted on the agency website until 2007, states “Barack Obama, first African-American President of the Harvard Law review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” In 2007, when Obama started to run for the U.s. Presidency and decided that he needs to be born in the U.S. and needs to be a natural born U.S. citizen, the biography was scrubbed from the official web site of Acton Dystel, but was found in archives and on Wayback machine.

20.Additionally, in his school records in Indonesia Obama is listed under the name Soetoro and citizenship Indonesian (Affidavit of Elections challenge Exhibit 13 Obama’s registration in Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia, showing him using his stepfather’s last name Soetoro and citizenship Indonesian ).

21. All of the above evidence showed Obama to be using forged Identification papers and a social security number, which was never assigned to him. Aforementioned document show Obama’s citizenship to be Indonesian. There are no valid identification papers to show Obama to be a natural born U.S. citizen.

22. Obama is running for the U.S. Presidency in 2012 election committing fraud, claiming to be a natural born U.S. citizen, and using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a basis for his natural born U.S. citizen status.

23. Based on the above presented undeniable evidence candidate Obama lacks the constitutional requirements to become the U.S. President due to the fact that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of United States and was placed on the ballot by virtue of fraud, and his use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification documents.

24. Plaintiff Keith Judd was a Democratic Party candidate, who ran for the U.S. Presidentin the State of West Virginia and gained 40% of the vote. Judd lost his election in the state of West Virginia to Obama. Judd contents that if not for fraud committed by Obama and not for Obama using forged IDs as a basis for his legitimacy, Obama would not have won this election and Judd would be the winner of the West Virginia primary.

25. Keith Judd suffered damages of a lost election and associated financial damages.

26. Keith Judd’s damages were the actual and proximate result of fraud committed by Obama.

Other plaintiffs suffered damages of violation of their Constitutional and First Amendment right for free political speech and redress of grievances. Their constitutional rights were violated by Obama and other defendants (excluding defendants Emken and Feinstein) who acted in concert in depriving the plaintiffs of their rights to participate in lawful elections and their right for free political speech and redress of grievances which is reflected in lawful elections.

Plaintiff Taitz suffered additional damages, as an attorney bringing challenges against Obama, she was defamed, persecuted, harassed and sanctioned. All of these damages were an actual and foreseeable result of fraud committed by Obama.

27. Obama created “Obama for America” with a purpose of  defrauding American citizens and illegally usurping  the U.S. Presidency, while using forged identification papers.

28. Obama used a forged birth certificate as his identification paper and as a proof of his eligibility.

29. Obama used one or more Social Security numbers,  that were not assigned to him.

30. Obama used a forged Selective Service certificate.

31. Obama held April 27, 2011 press conference, presenting a forged birth certificate and attacking “birthers”.

32. Obama refused to comply with any subpoenas and notices to appear in court or elections commission or election board hearing in relation to his identification papers.

33. Obama acted through his agents, such as aids, press secretaries, attorneys, governmental officials, members of the media loyal to Obama and controlled opposition members of the media, campaign workers, his web site “Fight the Smears” and “Obama for America” in order to defraud the Plaintiffs and others and in order to attack, harass, defame, slander and persecute Plaintiffs and other patriots seeking to get expose Obama’s forged documents.

Defendant “Obama for America” is a RICO organization created by Obama and his accomplices with a goal of subsidizing elections fraud.

b) Fraud by defendant Alvin Onaka

34. Defendant Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the state of Hawaii, aided and abetted Obama and was complicit in the cover up of the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. Onaka refused to provide an original Birth certificate or original microfilm for examination

• c) Fraud by Defendant Astrue

35. Defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security, aided and abetted Obama by covering up the fact that Barack Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, xxx-xx-4425, which was issued in and around 1977 in the State of Connecticut to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and that this Social Security number does not pass E-verify, when checked under the name Barack Obama.

d) Fraud by Defendants Schatz and Matusow

36. Brian Schatz is being sued in his capacity as former Chairman of the Democratic party of Hawaii, and Lynn Matusow is being sued as the Secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii. Schatz and Matusow aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when they signed an altered/falsified Official Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama and removed the necessary wording “eligible according to the US Constitution”. Official Certification of Nomination for Al Gore -2000 and for John Kerry 2004 submitted by the Democratic party of Hawaii to the office of elections.  Those certifications show the necessary wording that the candidates for President and Vice President are “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of The U.S. Constitution”. In order to aid Obama and to attempt to avoid criminal liability in certifying a fraudulent Official Certification of Nomination, Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow falsified the Certificate of Nomination and removed the words “eligible to the U.S. Constitution” from the certification sent to Hawaii Office of Elections on behalf of Obama.   Obama’s Official Certification of Nomination (Exhibit 22 as well) states “This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held on February 19th 2008 in the state of Hawaii and by acclamation at the national Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado.”

e) Fraud by Defendants Nancy Pelosi and Alice Germond

37. Nancy Pelosi and Alice Germond aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when, as a former Chairwoman and Secretary of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, they signed an altered certificate of nomination to the State of Hawaii. Certification of Nomination for John Kerry, which was sent to all 50 states in 2004 and certification for Obama, which was sent to 49 states in 2008 (Exhibit 24) were identical. However, Obama could not get on the ballot in general election, as the state of Hawaii required the wording “eligible under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” and Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow, who resided in Hawaii   were not willing to sign the certification with such wording, as it was common knowledge among Hawaiian officials that  none of the Hospitals in Hawaii had any valid birth certificates for Obama, therefore, Obama was not a natural born citizen and did not qualify. Subsequently Pelosi, Germond, Schatz, Matusow and Obama acted in concert, as Schatz removed the necessary wording from the certification sent by the Democratic party of Hawaii and Pelosi added this wording to the DNC certification (Exhibit 25). Through this scheme, Schatz, Matusow, Pelosi and Germond acted in concert and aided and abetted ineligible Obama to get on the ballot in 2008 election. Through manipulation of certificates, Schatz and Pelosi were complicit in fraud and forgery of records.

f) Fraud by Defendant Holder

38. Eric Holder is being sued as the Attorney General of the United States, who received from Taitz a Quo Warranto complaint as well as multiple criminal complaints with evidence of Obama and others committing massive elections fraud and Obama usurping the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief by virtue of fraud, misrepresentation and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers.  Holder aided and abetted Obama by burying the matter and not responding to Quo Warranto and not prosecuting Obama. He aided and abetted Obama by being complicit and covering up the fact that a foreign national with all forged papers is usurping the U.S. Presidency. Holder put his cushy job ahead of his oath of office to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution.

39. g) Fraud by Defendant Napolitano

Defendant Napolitano is being sued in her capacity as the director of Homeland Security.

Defendant Napolitano received certified mail complaints from Taitz and multiple other individuals advising her that Obama is committing massive elections fraud and using forged identification papers and fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social security number.

Defendant Napolitano aided and abetted Obama by  being complicit and covering up the fact that a foreign national with all forged papers is usurping the U.S. Presidency. Napolitano put her cushy job ahead of her oath of office to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution.

 Fraud by Defendants Secretaries of States of Mississippi, California, Georgia, New Hampshire, West Virginia, as well as Ballot law commission of New Hampshire.

Defendants SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and Democratic Party of MISSISSIPPI were among the first to be put on notice of the fact that Obama is using forged IDs. Former Superior Court of Mississippi Judge James Bell together with attorneys from the state of TN, VA and HI filed a legal action challenging legitimacy of Obama for the U.S. Presidency. This legal action was brought on November 3rd, 2008 prior to 2008 election taking place. This legal action Thomas v Hosemann 08-241 Southern District of MS was brought on behalf of  28 electors from all over the country against Secretary of State of MS Delbert Hosemann.Complaint stated “…  That a growing number of questions have arisen in litigation in at least ten (10) states contesting whether Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama are natural born citizens and, therefore, constitutionally eligible to be entrusted with the office of President of the United States.  In the litigation against Senator Obama, allegations were made that his admitted dual citizenship in Kenya and Indonesia, and lack of evidence that he renounced the same, caused a loss of his U.S. Citizenship as a matter of law. Moreover, evidence released by the Obama campaign purporting to be a “Certification of Live Birth” on its face appears to manufactured and unauthentic.  See Exhibit A.  This evidence was released to FactCheck.org, an Annenburg related agency which seeks to determine the veracity of certain claims made in public forums.” From before November 2008 election defendant Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State of MS, and the Democratic Party of MS were on notice that Obama is using forged IDs. Secretary of State of MS is a chief elections officer, in whose hands legitimacy of elections is entrusted  In spite of evidence of forgery in Obama’s short form birth certificate Hosemann certified Obama as a legitimate candidate in 2008. Hosemann continued cover up through now. In January 2012 Taitz provided Democratic Party of MS and Secretary of State of MS with evidence of Obama using a forged long form birth certificate, forged selective service certificate, fraudulently obtained CT Social Security number, a last name not legally his and foreign citizenship. Defendants Democratic Party of MS and Secretary of State were complicit in cover up and racketeering scheme, where they failed to act, even though per MS elections laws, elections challenges have to be considered by the party the candidate belongs to and by the Secretary of State. Due to actions of the defendants the racketeering scheme continued and defendants suffered damages

40. Defendants Secretaries of States of California, Georgia, New Hampshire, West Virginia, as well as Ballot law commission of New Hampshire received from Taitz evidence in the form of sworn affidavits showing Obama being a foreign national, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency by virtue of fraud and use of forged identification papers and intending to do so for four more years. Defendant Secretary of State of West Virginia received formal complaints and election challenges from Plaintiff Judd, who was the Democratic party candidate for the U.S. Presidency in the Democratic primary election.

Secretary of state of New Hampshire and the Ballot Law Commission of New Hampshire received election fraud complaints/election challenge from State Representatives Lawrence Rappaport, Carol  Vita, Lucien Vita, Plaintiff  Orly Taitz, Plaintiffs -candidates Lax and Macleran. State of New Hampshire allows any citizen from any state to file an election challenge and election fraud complaint.

Defendants Secretaries of State and Ballot Law Commission of New Hampshire  were complicit with Obama and committed elections fraud by knowingly and maliciously allowing Obama on the ballot as a legitimate candidate for the U.S. President, while knowing that Obama committed fraud and placed his name on the ballot by virtue of fraud and misrepresentation, knowing that he is a citizen of Indonesia and that he is fraudulently representing himself as eligible on the ballot using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers and stolen Social Security number

g) Fraud by Defendant Land

g) Aiding and Abetting Fraud  by Defendant PATRICK R. DONAHOE-Postmaster General

70. Taitz submitted to Donahoe a complaint, which provided Donahue with evidence of Obama committing fraud and using a forged postal stamp on his alleged Selective Service certificate. Namely, U.S. postal stamp which was affixed to Obama’s Selective Service certificate contained only two digits”80″ , while other documents from 1980 showed a 4 digit postal stamp “1980”.

71. Additionally Taitz forwarded to Donohue a video-tape with presentation by Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of Maricopa  county Arizona, showing how Obama’s selective service certificate was forged and how 2008 postal stamp was cut in half, reversed and used as 1980 stamp with only two digits “80”  .

Donahue had in front of him evidence of the most serious crime being committed: most serious breach of the U.S. national Security and use by a foreign national a forged U.S. postal stamp in order to get into the position of the U.S. President.

Donahoe became criminally complicit when he took no action and covered up this crime.

h) Fraud by defendant CNN

72. In and around of April of 2011 CNN issued a report “Busting The Birther Conspiracy Theory. President’s long form birth certificate released more than a year ago”. Exhibit 35 -A. A video clip of the report can be seen on You-tube https://us.mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=71sdc0s28p5ea. Within the report CNN placed a microfilm of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii claiming it to be a birth certificate of Obama. Upon magnification of the image, it is clear that this is not a microfilm of Obama’s birth certificate, but an image of a certificate of a completely different person.(Exhibit 35-B). CNN, who claims to be a reputable news organization acted with a breathtaking malice, fraud and criminality. CNN, through its’ agents, its producers, directors, anchor men and other employees and agents placed a microfilm of a birth certificate of another person, claiming it to be a microfilm of Obama’s birth certificate.

73. Public believed the fraud committed by CNN, believed that indeed that was the microfilm of Obama’s birth Certificate.

74. As a result  multiple member of the public attacked Plaintiffs, as birthers, particularly attorney Orly Taitz, who led the legal actions, challenging Obama, and subjected them to abuse, harassment, intimidations, threats of bodily harm.

75. Damages suffered by the Plaintiffs are directly, actually and proximately related to fraud committed by CNN.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

RICO

Predicate crime-Fraud

76. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs as it relates to FRAUD as if fully pled herein.

“Obama for America” -Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization

Barack   Hussein   Obama   created   “Obama   For   America”   as   his   fundraising organization  for his Presidential  run. At all times Obama was not eligible for the US presidency and he used “Obama for America” as a vehicle to defraud American citizens  and  get  into  the  position  of  the  U.S.  President  while  using  forged documents.

DE-FACTO RICO ENTERPRISE, “ASSOCIATION-IN-FACT” RICO ENTERPRISE

77. Between   2007-2012   defendants   acted together or in groups   and created an

“association- in- fact” enterprise, which is sufficient for RICO, even if “Obama for America”  was  not  a  RICO  enterprise.  Defendants  acted  directly  or  indirectly, personally  or through agent or agents, employed the same or similar methods of commission with the purpose to defraud, utter forged documents, commit wire and mail fraud, unlawfully procure citizenship and nationalization unlawfully, obstruct justice    and  intimidate,  harass,  defame,  slander  and  otherwise  retaliate  against witnesses, victims, informants  and whistleblowers.  Plaintiffs were victims of the acts of the racketeering or the acts of racketeering  were otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and were not isolated events.

PATTERN OF ONGOING  RACKETEERING  ACTIVITY

78. Fraud  committed   by  defendants,   who  were  acting  directly  or  indirectly  and committed fraud, which   was on going from 2007 until now, for over four years. Actions by the defendants established a pattern of racketeering activity within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §1962(c), in that their common purpose was to defraud, the common result was to defraud. Plaintiffs  were victims of the acts of racketeering and   the    acts   of   racketeering    were   otherwise    related   by    distinguishing characteristics and were not isolated events.

“Obama for America” -Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization

Barack   Hussein   Obama   created   “Obama   For   America”   as   his   fundraising organization  for his Presidential  run. At all times Obama was not eligible for the US presidency and he used “Obama for America” as a vehicle to defraud American citizens  and  get  into  the  position  of  the  U.S.  President  while  using  forged documents.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

RICO-MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD

Plaintiff includes, by reference, all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein

79. Defendant Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on the Internet in and around April 27, 2012 a paper, which he claimed to be a true and correct copy of his long form birth certificate.

80. Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on the Internet on his site “Fight the smears” a paper, which he claimed to be his short form birth certificate.

81. Obama knew that he is committing fraud and intended to defraud in order to continue usurping the position of the U.S. President.

82. Obama committed fraud when he sent to 50 states in 2007-2008, as well as in 2011-2012 his declarations of candidacy. Obama used mail or other instrumentalities of the Interstate commerce to commit such fraud.

83. In and around November 19, 2011 Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he through his agent, Deputy Campaign Manager Juliana Smoot, personally attacked and defamed Taitz: “Release the Mugs

By Julianna Smoot, Deputy Campaign Manager on November 19, 2011.

Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther who wants President Obama officially removed from the state’s primary ballot.
So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we’re re-releasing the campaign’s limited-edition “Made in the USA” mugs.
There’s clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd—or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.
But when it starts to make your head hurt, I’ve found the best remedy is to have some tea in my “Made in the USA” mug.
Works like a charm. I recommend Earl Grey.”

84. Obama knew that Taitz is submitting to different courts and elections commissions, including Ballot Law commission in New Hampshire true and correct information showing Obama using all forged IDs and a stolen social Security number.

85. Obama acted with malice and using his employee, his assistant campaign manager he made a fraudulent statement, which he forwarded to millions of people via e-mails and other instrumentalities. This fraudulent statement was made to cover up fraud committed by him and in order to defame Taitz.

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION

RICO

PREDICATE CRIME-MISPRISION OF  FELONY-

United States Code Title 18 § 4 Misprision of Felony

(MISPRISION OF SOCIAL SECURITY FRAUD COMMITTED BY OBAMA)

         86. Title 18, §4 Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States is guilty of the federal crime of misprision of felony, shall be fined not more than $500 under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(all defendants aside from Defendants Feinstein, Emken, Logan)

a. Defendants were put on notice of felony of Social Security Fraud, namely Barack Obama using a stolen Connecticut Social security number xxx-xx-4425, which was never assigned to Obama according to E-Verify and SSNVS

b. Defendants committed Misprision of Felony by concealing this fact and not making it known to a judge or other person in civil or military authority

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION

RICO

PREDICATE CRIME-MISPRISION OF  FELONY

United States Code Title 18 § 4 Misprision of Felony

(MISPRISION OF ELECTIONS FRAUD  BY OBAMA)

87.Defendants received from Plaintiffs evidence of Obama committing elections fraud by claiming to be a legitimate candidate for the U.S. Presidency, while in fact not being eligible and being on the ballot by virtue of fraud and by false pretenses, while using forged identification papers: forged birth certificate, forged selective service certificate, and forged Social Security ID.

Defendants committed Misprision of Felony by concealing this fact and not making it known to a judge or other person in civil or military authority.

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION

RICO

PREDICATE CRIME-MISPRISION OF  FELONY

United States Code Title 18 § 4 Misprision of Felony

(MISPRISION OF  USE OF A FORGED POSTAL STAMP ON THE SELECTIVE SERVICE CERTIFICATE  BY OBAMA)

Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein

88. Defendants received from Plaintiffs evidence of Obama using a forged postal stamp on the Selective service certificate he is using. Defendants committed Misprision of Felony by concealing this fact and not making it known to a judge or other person in civil or military authority.

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION UNDER THE COLOR OF AUTHORITY

OF  1ST/14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT-FREEDOM OF FREE SPEECH OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

(AGAINST DEFENDANTS FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES)

89. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein.

90. First amendment of the U.S. Constitution and 14 th Amendment as available to the States prohibits violation of the Free Speech by the Federal and State governmental agencies.

91. Lawful voting represents the highest embodiment, the highest manifestation of the Free Speech. Any action by the Federal or state agency is seen under the “Highest Scrutiny ” test.

92.When representatives of Federal or State agencies under color of authority are aiding and abetting a criminal with forged IDs to run for the U.S. Presidency, they de- facto rob the citizens of their most secret right to a political free speech, as they enable the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a foreign citizen with all forged Identification Papers, they rob the citizens of their right to  free election, turning elections into a sham, a well choreographed Hollywood production without any substance behind it.

93. As an actual and proximate result of the actions by the Defendants , the First /Fourteenth Amendment right to free speech of the Plaintiffs was violated.

94. First amendment right for Political Free Speech of Plaintiff Taitz was also violated by Defendant Judge Clay D. Land.

Taitz, as an attorney, brought in front of Land two legal actions on behalf of members of the U.S. military, seeking verification legitimacy of Obama in light of his use of a forged Birth Certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and fraudulently obtained Social Security number.

Land desired to silence political opposition to Obama regime.

Land abused his judicial discretion and abused Taitz and her clients verbally, psychologically and financially.

Land’s actions were aimed to silence political speech against Obama’s usurpation of the U.S. Presidency.

Land frivolously and callously attacked Taitz, claiming that bringing a legitimate legal action against Obama is somehow frivolous, and used his opinion and sanctions against Taitz as means of intimidation of political dissidents, civil rights attorneys and members of the U.S. military who were seeking Obama’s removal from office due to his use of forged IDs.

95. Actions by the Defendants had a chilling effect on the free political speech of the Plaintiffs and every political dissident in the U.S.

96. Damages to  civil right of political free speech, as well as financial damage of $20,000, associated costs and fees, legal fees, damage as a result of defamatory statements in the opinion by Land,   psychological damages and emotional distress associated with actions by Land.

EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF  THE FIRST AMENDMENT / 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCIES UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY

(against defendants Federal and State Agencies and Defendant Land )

97. Plaintiffs brought their grievances relating to Obama’s use of forged and fraudulently obtained IDs to Defendant’s officials of the Federal and State governments.

98. Defendants violated Plaintiffs rights, did not provide a redress of Plaintiffs grievances and were complicit in Obama’s violations of Plaintiff’s rights.

99. Plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of violations by the Defendants.

Additionally Plaintiff  Taitz   suffered a violation of her right for redress of grievances by Defendant Land, who as a Presiding Judge arbitrarily refused to address  grievances by  Taitz’s clients claiming abstention and attacked Taitz and her clients with defamatory statements and sanctions in order   to intimidate other dissidents and civil rights attorneys and prevent them from seeking a redress of grievances against Obama’s usurpation of the U.S. presidency and against him placing his name on the ballot in 2012 election.

NINETH CAUSE OF ACTION

VIOLATION OF 5TH AMENDMENT OF DUE PROCESS AND 14TH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS OF THE PLAINTIFFS UNDER COLOR OF AUTHORITY.

100. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs.

Plaintiffs  were entitled to Due Process and Equal Protection.

Their rights were infringed upon by defendants Federal and State Agencies.

While State Agencies routinely removed from the ballots ineligible candidates, Defendants refused to do that with candidate Obama.

101. Additionally Plaintiff Taitz was denied her Due Process and Equal Protection rights by Judge Clay D. Land  when he denied her due process and sanctioned her without giving her due process hearing on the issue of sanctions.

TENTH Cause of Action

Defamation

Plaintiff includes, by reference, all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein

102. Obama directly and through his agents was committing fraud, while at the same time defaming and harassing Taitz and other plaintiffs, calling them “a side show” and “carnival barkers”. On April 27, 2012 he released a forgery claiming it to be a true and correct copy of his long form birth certificate and simultaneously  defamed plaintiffs calling them “carnival barkers” and “a side show”. Obama acted with malice and made a defamatory statement, which was understood by others as relating to plaintiffs, which lowered Plaintiff’s standing in the community and caused damages.

103. Plaintiffs suffered defamation and humiliations, being attacked as “birthers”, were called crazy, while they were telling the truth about the fact that defendant Obama is committing elections fraud and is using and uttering forged documents as proof of his eligibility for the U.S. Presidency.

104. Plaintiff Taitz received multiple death threats from Obama supporters who do not believe that their “messiah” is capable of committing elections fraud and use forged documents

105. From 2008 campaign until now Taitz and other Plaintiffs and patriots of this country suffered a total of nearly four years of humiliation, defamation, slander, persecutions, harassment, sanctions, tampering with vehicles, attacks on their families by some of the defendants.

106. John Avalon, a reporter for Daily Beast, a writer, contributor to CNN and Newsweek engaged in systemic defamation of Taitz.

Avlon started by yelling and screaming at her and her client former U.N. Ambassador  Alan Keyes, while appearing together on CNN.

Later Avlon contacted Taitz and told her that he apologizes for his behavior and would like to fly from New York to California and do an in depth interview.

Taitz agreed to give an interview to Avlon.

Avlon flew to California and interviewed Taitz for about two hours, at which time Taitz provided him with the information relating to fraud and forgery in Obama’s IDs, which is described in paragraphs 1-23 herein.

Additionally Avlon asked her for a number of  books and video tapes Taitz had on the subject, which Taitz gave him.

Avlon never published any information that Taitz gave him regarding Obama and continued defrauding the public by claiming that Obama is legitimate for the position of the President.

Additionally Avlon published a book called “Wingnuts”, where he included Taitz among other politicians, that he called “Wingnuts”.

107. When Taitz ran for the U.S. Senate in 2012and according to 4 consecutive polls by Public Policy Polling, only one day before the election, Avlon published in Daily Beast a hit job defamatory article about Taitz, which was republished by multiple other magazines and newspapers.

Avlon  knew that no judge have ruled on the merits of the case.

Avlon knew that  Sheriff Arpaio held multiple press conferences, where he presented evidence showing Obama using forged birth certificate and Selective service certificate

Avlon had evidence that Obama is using  a Connecticut Social Security number, which was not assigned to him.

Avlon knew that no judge has ever seen an original birth certificate for Obama, an original application for Selective Service and an original application for Connecticut Social Security number that Obama is using, while copies were found to be forgeries by Sheriff Arpaio and other experts. Avlon acted with malice, aided and abetted and attacked and defamed Taitz with a clear goal of derailing her campaign.

Avlon was criminally complicit with Obama and viciously misrepresented the truth defamed Taitz in order to aid and abet Obama in cover up of Obama’s elections fraud and Obama’s forged IDs. On June 5th 2012, the elections day for the U.S. Senate he wrote an article in “Daily Beast” (Exhibit 26) He wrote:

“I’ve met Taitz, debating her on-air once and spending an hour at her law office/dental practice in the hills of Rancho Santa Margarita while I was researching Wingnuts. She is not unintelligent and is almost charmingly insane, proudly showing off prominent alleged Facebook friends and then comparing Obama to Stalin, all while passing over hundreds of pages of Xeroxed documents she has sent to governors of all 50 states and the entire U.S. Senate. The packet details accusations including impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation of character, harassment, breaking into the computer system of the Supreme Court, voter fraud, and forgery, concluding: “Verify the above facts brought forward by me and demand Obama/Soetoro’s immediate resignation or removal from office due to fraud and constitutional inability. National security and national survival depends on your expedient actions …”

In other words, nut-balls. Orly Taitz as a candidate for U.S. Senate would make Christine O’Donnell look like Henry Clay. She would make Sharron Angle look like Daniel Webster. Donald Trump seems a model of restraint by comparison.”

Avlon referred to Taitz as a “national embarassment”, “wingnut”, “nutball”, “radioactive destruction”, “crazy”, “freak beat”, “fringe”, “insane”, “clownishly unelectable candidate”.

108. As most readers of “Daily Beast” and “Forbes magazine” do not follow this litigation, they believe that those magazines are reputable publications. They believe that reporters are legitimate reporters who do not commit journalistic malpractice and who do not defame individuals. The public believed that Avlon and other reporters, such as Kevin Underhill from Forbes, who republished Avlon’s hit piece, are writing the truth.

109. Taitz standing in the community was affected, as a result of defamation by Avlon and other members of the media listed herein.

110. Public clearly understood that statements were made about Taitz, understood those statements to be true and Taitz standing in the community was affected and reduced as a result of actions by Avlon. Damages suffered by Taitz are actually and proximately related to actions by Avlon.

DEFAMATION BY “DAILY BEAST”

111. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs  as if fully pled herein.

Defamatory statements by Avlon were made on the pages of “Daily Beast” by Avlon as a writer for Daily Beast.

“Daily Beast” is vicariously liable for defamation of Taitz which was perpetrated by the writer of “The daily Beast” on the pages of “The Daily Beast”.

DEFAMATION BY KEVIN UNDERHILL, WRITER FOR “FORBES”

112. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs, as if fully pled herein.

Kevin Underhill, writer for “Forbes” wrote a defamatory article about Taitz .

Underhill wrote “Finally, and this is why I started this thing in the first place, famed Birther-activist and naturalized-Moldovan-lawyer-dentist Orly Taitz is running for the Senate. She hopes to run against Dianne Feinstein, and according to some polls she may actually get the chance. California has a “top-two” primary, meaning all candidates run on the same ballot and the top two then face off in November. Feinstein will be number one, and 23 others are vying for number two. Since no one else has any name recognition at all, there is some concern — including in the GOP — that Taitz might eke out enough votes to stay around until November. She does have a long record of losing, but also a long record of being undeterred by it.

An official Taitz run would be amusing but also disturbing, as John Avlon, who has interviewed and debated Taitz, writes at the Daily Beast. That piece is worth reading partly for its comical descriptions of Taitz as “almost charmingly insane,” “demonstrably unhinged,” “clownishly unelectable,” and one who “would make Sharron Angle look like Daniel Webster.”

Underhill acted with malice. He did not contact Taitz prior to writing his article. he did not get her side of the story and wrote a one side defamatory article with a clear goal of derailing her campaign and aiding and abetting Obama in completing elections fraud.

Underhill was defaming Taitz and defrauding the public by creating an impression that Obama is legitimate for the U.S. Presidency and had valid IDs, while he never had any IDs and used forged and fraudulently obtained IDs. Underhill was criminally complicit in aiding and abetting elections fraud, forgery, Social Security fraud as Obama was using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.

Public believed that Underhill is writing a truthful account. Taitz standing in the community was reduced due to actions by Underhill.

Taitz suffered damages due to defamation. Her damages were actually and proximately related to actions by Underhill.

DEFAMATION BY “FORBES” MAGAZINE

113. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all prior paragraphs, as if fully pled herein.

Kevin Underhill wrote a defamatory article about Taitz in “Forbes” .

Underhill was a writer of Forbes.

Forbes was vicariously liable for actions of Underhill.

Public at large believed “Forbes” to be a reputable magazine.

Public believed that defamatory statements written in “Forbes” about Taitz were true.

Taitz standing in the community was affected  and diminished by the article published in “Forbes”.

Damages suffered by Taitz were actually and proximately related to the article published in “Forbes”

Defamation by  John Kobelt, ” John and Ken” Show, KFI AM 640 radio and Clear Channel communications.

114.John Kobelt is a talk show host in a duo of two hosts  “John and Ken” in the radio program “John and Ken show” on KFI AM 640Radio

KFI is owned by Clear Channel communications.

On April  27 2011 Obama released what he claimed to be his long form birth certificate. The same day Taitz was contacted by a number of radio and TV programs and was asked to comment on that alleged birth certificate. Among the programs that invited Taitz, was “John and Ken show”.

115. When  Taitz got on the show, she was verbally attacked and defamed by Kobelt, who stated that she is “insane” and that she “has obsessive impulsive brain disorder” further shouting that Taitz’s “chemicals in her head are screwed up”.

John Kobelt then suggested that LA Times should publish a news article named “Orly Taitz is Insane”.

Further in the show, John Kobelt called her “crazy”, “the biggest liar in the history”, and “the looniest person in the history”.

Such statements were done in order to affect Plaintiff’s reputation, and to humiliate and discredit Taitz in the eyes of general public. The public at large understood that the statements were related to Taitz, such statements reduced her standing in the community and was an actual an proximate cause of her damages.

116. Before the Primary Election in California on June 5^th, 2012, KFI radio representative Brian Barry contacted Taitz, inquiring whether she would be willing to advertise on KFI. Taitz responded that she had a bad experience with the John and Ken show and wanted assurances that this would not happen again. Such assurance was given. Supporters of  Taitz paid $7,500 to run campaign ads on KFI. Consequently Kobelt continued the same pattern of behavior: a pattern of defamation and ridicule.

117. As the result of defamatory statements by John Kobelt made while the show John and Ken was on the air, Plaintiff suffered loss of reputation, and was discredited among general public the day before the Primary Election, in which, prior to the day of the show, Plaintiff was leading according to the national polls.

118. John Kobelt acted with malice and intent to defame and harass Taitz. His statements created a false image of the Plaintiff, discredited Taitz, and hosts’ defamatory tactic served the purpose of intimidation, humiliation and threats to Plaintiffs reputation.

As John Kobelt is a Host of “John and Ken Show, which is owned by the Clear Channel comunications, those entities are vicariously liable for actions by Kobelt.

119. Mathews is a host of “hardball” program on MSNBC

Mathews is a strong Obama supporter, who was so excited about Obama election that he reported famous “tingling up his leg” during inauguration.

Mathews due to his support for Obama s attacked Taitz repeatedly on his program.

Mathews did not limit himself to defaming Taitz, but he also was a de-fact cheerleader of attacks and threats made against Taitz.

In 2010, when Taitz ran for the position of the Secretary of State, on the election day, Mathews appeared on hi program “Hardball” in Prime time an stated: “Orly Taitz is a malignancy. You should tie her up to the stake like a witch. She should be tied to the stake like a witch” .

after this call to arms by Mathews, hundreds of crazy Obama supporters were sending Taitz e-mails, comments on her web site and leaving messages on her phone. Some of those threatening messages Taitz preserved. In those messages Obama supporters and Mathews followers were stating that Taitz needs to be burned at the stake and her burned body needs to be dragged down the streets.

Taitz and her supporters contacted Mathews and repeatedly asked to give Taitz an opportunity to appear on his show and provide truthful information.

Mathews refused to provide truthful information and continued defaming Taitz.

Due to actions by Mathews Taitz was defamed.

Members of the community understood that defamatory actions were related to Taitz.

Defamatory statements by Mathews had an effect of lowering Taitz standing in the community.

120. MSNBC is a TV network that employs Chris Mathews and other reporters, who engaged in defamation of Taitz

MSNBC is vicariously responsible for actions by Mathews.

Taitz travelled to MSNBC studious in New York and recorded a two hour interview with an MSNBC host Kate Hampson, which was directed by MSNBC producer/director Payal Bawa. In the interview Taitz provided full information in regards to Obama using a forged Selective Service Card, forged Birth Certificate and a stolen  Social security number, which was issued to a resident of Connecticut, born in 1890.Taitz was assured that truthful information will be provided to the public. Instead MSNBC included a very small segment of her interview, about a minute or less in a documentary about militias. In such documentary they completely misrepresented Taitz, showing her as an extremist, to par with a militia and did not provide the public any truthful information about Obama.

Additionally several other talk show hosts on MSNBC made defamatory statements about Taitz. Among them Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz.  Rachel Maddow created a whole commercial, where she misrepresented Taitz as a racist.

MSNBC acted with malice and with an intent to defame Taitz.

It was done with a clear intent to lower her standing in the community.

The Public understood that the defamatory statements were made about Taitz and the effect of these statements was indeed such that Taitz standing in the community was effected and was lowered.

Defamatory statements made by the employees of MSNBC  were an actual and proximate cause of damages suffered by Taitz.

g) Fraud by Defendant Land

Defendant Clay D. Land (Hereinafter “Land”) aided and abetted Obama in elections fraud, use of forged Identifications papers for purpose of elections fraud.

Taitz presented to US District Judge of the Central District of Georgia, Clay D. Land, two cases brought by officers of the US military against Barack Hussein Obama.

Over 200 members of the U. S. military signed consent forms wishing to be clients of attorney Orly Taitz challenging Barack Obama as ineligible for the position of the US. President and Commander in Chief. Taitz brought legal actions on their behalf in different courts around the nation. Two of these actions were brought in Columbus GA in front of Federal Judge Clay D. Land.

The first action was brought by Taitz originally on behalf of Major Cook and later joined by Major General Childers and Lieutenant Colonel Earl Graef.

Taitz provided Land with evidence showing that Obama does not have a valid birth certificate and does not have a valid Social Security number.

Taitz provided Land with a sworn affidavit of licensed investigator Neil Sankey. Sankey is also a former Scotland Yard officer who served in an elite unit dealing with organized crime and communist proliferation. Sankey provided a 44 page affidavit, which showed that according to most reliable national databases used by the licensed investigators and attorneys such as Lexis Nexis and Choice Point there are multiple Social Security numbers used by Barack Obama, none of which was issued in the state of Hawaii, where Obama grew up and started working and was supposed to obtain a SSN.  Major Cook, who was a highly decorated US officer and who was supposed to be deployed to Afghanistan within days, was asking a stay/ injunction of his deployment until Obama’s legitimacy to the US Presidency and validity of his Identification papers is ascertained by the court.  Knowing that Obama does not possess any valid papers and in order to avoid the embarrassment, the military rescinded the deployment orders for Cook. This was done within hours before the scheduled hearing.

Taitz brought a motion seeking to join Major General Childers and Lieutenant Colonel Earl Graef, arguing that even if Cook’s deployment orders were rescinded, the issue is not moot, that this case is akin to Roe v Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973),, in that this is an issue which presents itself repeatedly before the court but eludes resolution on the merits.  Land dismissed the case by all plaintiffs against all defendants, denied all plaintiffs their First Amendment rights of redress of grievances and wrote a demeaning and defamatory opinion about both Plaintiffs and Taitz. As a result, as the case was never heard on the merits and Plaintiffs were denied their right to present their case, Major Cook was fired from his position as an analyst with a company providing defense contracts.  Retired Major General Childers lost several consulting contracts and believed that it was in retaliation for his involvement in this action.  Shortly thereafter another officer, Flight Surgeon Sergeant Connie Rhodes was supposed to be deployed. She asked Taitz to represent her in a similar action. By that time Obama administration was concerned that further revocation of orders might seriously affect deployment.

Land decided to use this case and Taitz in particular as an example, showing that the establishment will persecute anyone who dares to represent active members of the military against usurper Obama.  Land could not deny standing as Rhodes was supposed to deploy within days. Land dismissed the case based on the doctrine of abstention, stating that this is a matter for the military to decide. He claimed that this is a matter for the military to decide, even though Taitz provided Land with a letter by Commander Crawford, counsel for Admiral Mullin, Chairman of Joint Chief of Staff, where Crawford stated that the military is concerned with the situation, but cannot do anything as Obama is a civilian and not a member of the military. Land did not limit himself with wrongfully denying Rhodes her First Amendment civil right of Redress of Grievances under the color of authority, but he also wrote a defamatory and demeaning ruling. Land also assessed $20,000 of sanctions against Taitz claiming that it was frivolous to bring legal actions against Obama on behalf of active members of the U.S. military. There was no justification for sanctions. The only reason Land did it, was to try to silence Taitz, as a federal whistleblower, and to aid and abet in the cover up of Obama’s forged IDs. Land knew that he has in front of him evidence of the biggest security breach in the history of this nation. He had evidence of Obama using fraudulent Social Security numbers, including two numbers in his own back yard in Columbus, GA. Land knowingly and with malice aided and abetted Social Security fraud and elections fraud by refusing to hear the cases on the merits, even though the plaintiffs had standing and by abusing his authority and position of a federal judge, to verbally and financially abuse Taitz and harass her with sanctions in order to stop litigation against Obama. Land further abused plaintiffs’ civil right for redress of grievances by refusing to hear the case on the merits, even though the plaintiffs had standing by his own admission. Land abused Taitz rights under the color of authority by assessing her $20000 of sanctions without allowing her a hearing on the issue of sanctions. Taitz and her plaintiffs were the whistleblowers against Obama. Through his actions Land engaged in intimidation of a whistleblower in order to cover up crimes committed by Obama. Members of the media used demeaning and defamatory comments by Land in order to assassinate her character. In a number of cases attorneys were not willing to work with her because of demeaning comments and sanctions assessed by Land. Taitz suffered a damage of $20, 000. All of the Plaintiffs suffered damage, as Lands ruling was used by other courts, and other plaintiffs were denied their right for redress of grievances against Obama’s usurpation of the U.S. Presidency, when U.S. attorneys and AG attorneys used Land’s decision to attack Taitz and others in different courts. All of the defendants acted with an intent to defraud. Plaintiffs were intended victims and foreseeable victims. Plaintiffs suffered financial damages, defamation, humiliation, harassment and emotional distress as a result of fraud committed by the Defendants. Further Taitz is seeking discovery on possible connection between Land and 3 Social Security numbers used by Obama in Georgia according to databases. Taitz is seeking further discovery of connection between Land and one Beny Edwards.  

4.  List the alleged victims and state how each victim was allegedly injured.

Taitz, as listed previously, lost over $500,000 in income in her dental practice due to a campaign of character assassination conducted by the defendants, harassment and intimidation of dental clients and dental insurance companies, over $500,000 loss in her law practice due to harassment and intimidation of clients, witnesses and judges in her cases, over $400,000 in lost rental income due to intimidation and harassment of tenants, $10,000 in legal fees due to actions of Scott J. Tepper (see above), $20,000 due to actions of Clay D. Land (see above).

Estimated Over $500,000 in lost income and in repair fees due to constant vandalism and destruction of web sites, e-mail accounts, tampering with cars, constant vandalism of computers, electric circuits in the office.

5.  Describe in detail the pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debts alleged for each RICO claim.   A description of the pattern of racketeering shall include the following information:

a.  List the alleged predicate acts and the specific statutes  which were allegedly violated;

b.  Provide the dates of the predicate acts, the participants in the predicate acts, and a description of the facts surrounding the predicate acts;

c.  If the RICO claim is based on the predicate offenses of wire fraud, mail fraud, or fraud in the sale of securities, the “circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity.”  Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b).  Identify the time, place and contents of the alleged misrepresentations, and the identity of persons to whom and by whom the alleged misrepre­ sentations were made;

d.  State whether there has been a criminal conviction for violation of the predicate acts;

e.  State whether civil litigation has resulted in a judgment in regard to the pred icate acts;

f.  Desc1ibe how the predicate acts fonn a “pattern of racketeering activity”; and

g.  State whether the alleged predicate acts relate to each other as part of a common plan.  If so, describe  in detail.

6.  Describe in detail the alleged enterprise for each RICO claim.  A description of each

enterp1ise shall include the following infonnation:

2

Case 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA   Document 2    Filed 04/25/12   Page 3 of 5

a.  State the names of the individuals, partnerships, corporations, associations, or other legal entities, which allegedly  constitute the enterprise;

b.  Describe the structure, purpose, function  and course of conduct  of the enterprise;

c.  State whether  any Defendants are employees, officers  or directors of the alleged enterprise;

d.  State whether  any Defendants  are associated  with the alleged  enterprise;

e.  State whether  you are alleging that the Defendants are individuals or entities separate from the alleged  enterprise, or that the Defendants are the enterptise itself, or are members of the enterprise; and

f.  If any Defendants are alleged to be either the enterptise itself  or members of the enterprise, explain  whether  such Defendants are perpetrators, passive instruments, or victims of the alleged racketeering acti vity.

7.  State whether  you are alleging  that the pattem of racketeering activity and the enterprise are separate or have merged  into one entity.  In either event, describe in detail.

8.  Desctibe the alleged  relationship between  the activities of the enterprise and the pattem of racketeering activity.   Di scuss  how the racketeering activity differs from the usual and daily activities of the enterpri se, if at all.

9.  Describe what benefits, if any, the alleged enterprise  receives from the alleged  pattem of racketeering.

10.  Describe the effect of the act ivities of the enterprise on interstate or foreign  commerce.

11.  If the complaint  alleges  a violati on of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), provide  the following infonnation:

3

Case 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA   Document 2    Filed 04/25/12    Page 4 of 5

a. State who received the income derived either from the pattem of racketeering activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt; and

b. DesCiibe the use, investment or locus of such income.

12.  If the Complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b), describe in detail the acquisition or maintenance of any interest in or control of the alleged enterprise.

13.  If the complaint alleges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), provide the following information:

a.  State who is employed by or associated with the enterprise; and

b.  State whether the same entity is both the liable “person” and the “enterprise” und er § 1962(c).

14.  If the complaint alleges  a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), describe in detail the alleged conspiracy.

15.  Desc1ibe the direct causal relationship between the alleged injury and the violation of the RICO statute.

16.  List the actual damages for which Defendant is allegedly liable.

17.  List all other federal causes of action, if any, and provide citations to the relevant statute(s).

18.  List all pendent state claims, if any.

19.  Provide any additional information  that you feel would be helpful  to the Court in considering your RICO claim.

This the   25th  day of _—-‘A-‘p'”‘””‘ri:..:._l__, 201l_.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

15 Responses to “I just started working on the RICO statement, which is due on Monday, October 15th. Please, let me know if I am forgetting any damages and any facts”

1. Tess D'Ubervilles
   October 11th, 2012 @ 6:09 am

   Looks good! Put it in the envelope and send it off. Good luck!

2. Shelley Goldstein
   October 11th, 2012 @ 6:16 am

   The questionnaire asks you to:

   “State who received the income derived either from the pattem of racketeering activity or through the collection of an unlawful debt; and

   b. DesCiibe the use, investment or locus of such income.”

   Who has made money off of the state of Hawaii’s forged birth certificate.

3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 11th, 2012 @ 7:51 am

   dream on obot

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 11th, 2012 @ 7:52 am

   it is not complete yet

5. Thomas
   October 11th, 2012 @ 8:41 am

   Mrs. Taitz… You could add me to your RICO case. I have been Decieved,Lied to and can NO LONGER Trust the Government. The same ones who WORK for the People… The Public Trust.
   The Damages are permanent, the Trust is gone.
   Can you put a monetary figure on The Constitution? How about doing The Will OF THE PEOPLE?

6. Richard Kramer
   October 11th, 2012 @ 8:56 am

   How much did it cost to fix your car when it was tampered with? How much did you borrow to run for Senate? How much has the value of your house gone down in value since 2008?

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 11th, 2012 @ 9:12 am

   I believe I have to show only monetary damages for RICO. however, you might have had damages in your cases
   I know you challenged the Sec of State of SD

8. Richard Kramer
   October 11th, 2012 @ 10:16 am

   Oh, I get it. Like unjust enrichment from the sale of mugs with a fake birth certificate. I heard that Obama raised $8 million from the sale of mugs through the ad which made fun of you. Is that considered monetary damages if the $8 million was raised at your expense?

9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   October 11th, 2012 @ 10:32 am

   why bother with the small change of 8 million, he raised 2 billion in two campaigns under false pretenses

10. Ed.O
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:10 pm

    Orly, include the judge who sanctioned you $20,000.00. Did he not claim you filed a frivolous suit?

11. Dr. Conspiracy
    October 12th, 2012 @ 6:38 am

    I bought a birth certificate mug, the t-shirt, the bumper sticker and the campaign button. Collect the entire set. They’ll be worth a fortune one day.

12. Dr. Conspiracy
    October 12th, 2012 @ 8:01 am

    You seem deeply confused in this document. You’re writing up the plaintiffs in Judd, not the ones in Mississippi. Go back and look at your RICO Plaintiffs in the Mississippi and limit your comments to them.

13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 12th, 2012 @ 8:10 am

    I know, I just started
    also, there are questions in regards to additional victims of RICO conspiracy though

14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 12th, 2012 @ 8:13 am

    they will be worth as much as the copies of Nixon tapes

15. Fred Farmer
    October 12th, 2012 @ 10:18 am

    You forgot to add in Fogbow pseudoname lawyer Wild Bill who frauded everyone with a fake Virginia lawsuit.

Leave a Reply