I have never seen such unrest…
Posted on | October 29, 2009 | 9 Comments
| Judith Bailey |
Submitted on 2009/10/29 at 11:14am
Dr. Orly, I am longing, (for a better word) for the day that this man who calls himself the president, is put out of office. And while we are at it we need to get rid of some of the other communist surrounding him. This is a sad time for this country. I never thought that the Democrat Party would stoop so low as to elect a man that was ineligible for office. I an a Independent voter of West Virginia and I can assure you that if this is the way of the Democrat Party I will never cast my vote for any Democrat again. As for the unrest in this country, I have never witnessed such unrest as we have seen in the time BO has took office. We cannot place all of the blame on him when he has the support of all of his liberal cronies and most of the Democrats. I hope to see a big change in the next election but I hope we can put BO out of office before then. |
Comments
9 Responses to “I have never seen such unrest…”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 29th, 2009 @ 11:53 am
That is to bad…better a democrat than a bigot
October 29th, 2009 @ 11:54 am
Judge Clay Land Oct.28.2009
120 12th Street,
PO Box 124,
Columbus, GA 31902
Sir: In regard to Orly Taitz and her client Captain Rhodes M.D.
“Old Fool”,”Feeble Minded Birfoon”Are these ur words or that of ur Lackey’s?
https://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=3837
It appears, U and ur Lackey’s have a serious disrespect for Seniors and the U.S.Citizens whom u serve.
I believe Ur Lackey’s showed the same Cavalier disrespect at Waco and Ruby Ridge. Will ur next step be to murder me also?
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
BORN IN THE USA? ELIGIBLE? NEW APPEAL
Alan Note:another case to obtain facts about Obama’s eligibility rests with Federal District Judge David O. Carter in Santa Ana, California but appears to be in a state of limbo. He has taken the request to dismiss the case, filed by Orly Taitz, by Obama’s attorneys under submission but has not stayed with his original indication that he would make a ruling a few days later in early October.
He has, however, set a pre-trial date of January 11th, 2010 and a jury trial date of January 26th, 2010
By WorldNetDaily
A case alleging Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president has been sent on appeal to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
WND previously reported when a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by Charles F. Kerchner Jr. and others against Congress.
Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the action in January on behalf of Kerchner, Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The case focuses on the alleged failure of Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, “provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College Electors.”
The case asserts “when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same.”
The Constitution provides, the lawsuit says, “If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified.”
“There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified,” the case explained.
The attorney now has posted online a notice of his appeal to the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia.
“Through his dismissal, Judge Simandle avoided having to reach the merits of the question of whether Obama is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ and eligible for the office of president and commander in chief,” Apuzzo said.
“We allege that Obama has not conclusively proven that he was born in Hawaii. More importantly, we also allege that he is not an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ because when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same.”
The lawyer said it is important that the court did not rule Obama was born in Hawaii, nor did it rule that the claim was frivolous.
It simply said the case was dismissed because of a jurisdiction issue.
“By the court finding that plaintiffs do not have standing and that their claims present a political question, the court was able to avoid having to address the underlying merits of the Kerchner case. With such a decision, the American people unfortunately still do not know where Obama was born and whether he is an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ and therefore constitutionally eligible to be president and commander in chief,” the attorney said.
“A court cannot refuse to hear a case on the merits merely because it prefers not to due to grave social or political ramifications,” he continued. “The court’s opinion dismissing the Kerchner complaint/petition did not address the real Kerchner case but rather looked for a way to dismiss the case without having to reach the merits of the question of whether Obama is an Article II ‘natural born citizen.’
“The American people deserve to know whether Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. More importantly, even if he is born in Hawaii, given that he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship, the American people deserve to know whether he is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ which would make him eligible to be president,” the attorney said.
WND had reported only days earlier when Kerchner publicly argued that the courts have an obligation to make a decision on Obama’s eligibility.
He wrote, “The federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama.”
He said his basis for such a statement is the opinion of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, who wrote in an 1821 case, Cohens vs. Virginia:
“It is most true that this court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us.
We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.
We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”
Kerchner added, “The … judges in the … cases should simply read the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall from the past and take jurisdiction of the constitutional question of the Article II eligibility clause in the Constitution and proceed to a fact finding hearing and trial on the merits.
Thank u
Leonard C. McCauley
111 North Vine
Cleveland, Oklahoma 74020
October 29th, 2009 @ 1:01 pm
The real test will come when the military leaders make their move and start taking orders from someone other than the president. This is how it will go down I think.
October 29th, 2009 @ 2:03 pm
Moving beyond, that is, assuming at some point soon — certainly well before the 2012 election — Obama will be ousted as ineligible (either by political pressure once Alan Keyes recovers in tort fraud against BHO or some other direct judicial directive to leave), there seems to be two opinions on determining a successor POTUS. (Biden would certainly be a no-go as connected to the ineligibile Obama fraud.)
Orly Taitz seems to think there’d be a special election. I’m not so sure. Wouldn’t Congress select a successor under the Constitution? Any discussion on this would seem to be of interest.
October 29th, 2009 @ 2:23 pm
Amen, Judith. And the unrest will–and should–continue until Obuma is gone.
October 29th, 2009 @ 2:33 pm
Dr. Orly, you have just been raked over the coals by Thugocracy!
https://www.scribd.com/doc/21808122/Judge-Carter-Ruling-on-MTD
From The Obama File..
“What Carter said:
• It’s OK to ignore Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution.
• Votes trump the U. S. Constitution.
• The U. S. Constitution does not allow the judicial branch to interfere in a coup d’etat.”
October 29th, 2009 @ 4:08 pm
so much for judge carter being a former marine, eh? our government has failed us. what will it do to us next?
October 29th, 2009 @ 4:34 pm
Since Judge Carter has thrown out your case, wouldn’t now be a good time to sue Obama for multi-hundred million dollar fraud in posting a fake COLB on the net?
He posted it before usurping the office of President, so impeachment isn’t necessary for a judgement in our favor, just the trial verdict at this point.
Certainly there are those now disaffected with Obama who contributed on the basis of the web-posted document, and who have legal standing.
October 29th, 2009 @ 5:39 pm
I have read the transcrpt of the Hearing October,26,09 in Judge Carters Court where Orly Taitz answer questions regarding
STANDING from Judge Carter. No answer con-
vinced the Judge that we definitly had
STANDING and stated that if he had to make
a desision now he would dismiss the case.I
believe that there is only one group in
America who has the responsibility and the
authority and STANDING in this Constitutional
matter because they have been defrauded and
injured by Obama Campaign,Democratic Party,Electorial Commission,Polosi,Cheney,Congress and all
Secretaries of the 50+- states who neglected
to determine if Obama was a NBC.This one group is the American People who obtained their authority form GOD and Created the Constitution
and are the Defenders of the Costitution.This case must be filed in the name of the people and can filed in any US Federal District Court
where the order for discovery is given and all required documents are delivered and inspected
by the Court and experts in determing the authenticity.