Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Huge! Order by a Superior Court Judge in IN to conduct an expedited trial on October 22 to enjoin Obama from being on the ballot

Posted on | October 11, 2012 | 62 Comments

Press Release

Law Offices of Orly Taitz

Expedited Trial for Declaratory Relief and Permanent Injunction from allowing Candidate Obama on IN Ballot or alternatively for any votes to be counted for Obama is ordered to be held by Honorable judge Sherry K. Reid in the Superior Court, Indianapolis Indiana on October 22, 10 am. see order attached

IN Order by Judge Reid setting trial

After 4 years of struggle this is the first trial on the merits in the Superior Court of any state. Previously there was only one trial in the administrative court, which had limited jurisdiction and only advisory capacity. This is the first trial in the Superior Court of a State with full jurisdiction to enjoin candidate Obama from being on the ballot or alternatively to enjoin  his votes  being counted. The basis for the trial is evidence provided by the Plaintiffs, showing citizen of Indonesia and possibly still citizen of Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama committing elections fraud  by placing his name on the ballot, while using a last name not legally his and using as a basis for his identity a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to Obama according to E-Verify and SSNVS

Supporters are urged   to travel to Indiana and be at trial. Donors are asked to help with expenses of the trial and with the cost of travel and accommodation of out of state witnesses. Attorney Taitz is conducting this case and a number of other civil rights cases pro bono. None of the plaintiffs were charged. More information on the case is on the web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com A link to the pleadings is at the top of the home page.

End of Press Release


62 Responses to “Huge! Order by a Superior Court Judge in IN to conduct an expedited trial on October 22 to enjoin Obama from being on the ballot”

  1. Sam the Man
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:28 am

    Is this — finally — the court case where Arpaio and Zullo will show up?

    They better show up. Or they’re all just hot air and no balloon.

  2. Homeboy
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:40 am

    God speed in IN. Dr. Taitz!

  3. Freedom First
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:45 am

    Have you finally found an honorable judge? One who will stand by their oath of office and enforce the rule of law? I’m praying that you have Dr. Taitz.

    May God bless and protect you.

  4. Richard Kramer
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:51 am

    Will this be a jury trial?

  5. The Trouble Maker
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:01 am

    So Does Obama have to show up or will he be too busy raising money?

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:11 am

    no a bench trial, we did not ask for a jury trial, no time to arrange for voir dire

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:11 am

    I am praying to God too
    we’ll see soon enough

  8. Richard Kramer
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:19 am

    Why can’t your witnesses testify by phone and why were you only given 2 hours for this important trial? I thought you had lots of witnesses.

  9. bruce
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:26 am

    Contemplate that which may cause this case to fail and prepare to defend against those perceived complications before any judge can continue with insulting us citizens and the judicial system. Good Luck!

  10. God
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:40 am

    Yes, yes Orly, I heard your prayers. But you have a lot of nerve praying to Me after trying to bring down the rightly elected President of the nation I have so blessed. If I were you, I wouldn’t walk around in thunder storms any time soon. Not that I can’t get you when you’re inside.

    Look out — BEHIND YOU!

  11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:46 am

    now an obot is pretending to be God, cool

  12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 9:47 am

    we’ll see how many actually come to the hearing. if need be, we will ask for more time

  13. Richard Kramer
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:11 am

    But if you ask for more time, won’t a continuance put us beyond election day. I think you should file some sort of motion telling the judge that your due process rights are being violated by any time limits. The trial should be scheduled for at least the entire day!!! I believe the Judge only gave you two hours so that you would be forced to ask for a continuance and then she could later say that the issue is moot. Don’t let the judge play games with you. Tell her you need at least one day and that 2 hours is a violation of court rules or at least an impossibility.

  14. kit Carson
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:20 am

    God, my foot! He’s more like satan! Such an obnoxious snot!

  15. Sven Teigen
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:29 am

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

    Why just look! Even God Himself keeps track of your remarkable accomplishments. HA!

    Well, we are in the final stages of our voting process and I am certain you will prevail. I just wanted to “touch base” as you Americans say, to prepare you for the global recognition and praise that will surely follow!

    Be strong, Dr. Taitz, be patient, and most of all, be ready for greatness!

    Sven Teigen
    Nobl Prize Nomination Committee

  16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:33 am

    nobody is asking for continuance, stopping being an obot

  17. Winner
    October 11th, 2012 @ 10:35 am

    This is such good news. Now we know for sure that Obama can’t win the election by getting Indiana’s electoral votes.

    Will the judge allow you to subpoena Hawaii? Will the judge allow you to have witnesses?
    Are Sheriff Joe and Zullo going to appear?
    How about all of your other witlesses?

    You are truly a clever attorney to have made it this far. No doubt that the defense is shaking in their shoes.

  18. Jim Black
    October 11th, 2012 @ 11:02 am

    Dear Orly,

    Worst case scenario – Obama wins at least 270 electoral votes.

    But it’s not over.

    The votes then go to the President of the Senatre where they are tabulated.

    After that, the VP calls for any “objections” (3 USC @15). If at least one Rep. and one Senator object the matter must go to both houses for resolution.

    So, should Obama win, we need Republicans across America to call their Reps and Senators and remind them of this provision for objection and to include themselves in the process.

    Hope all goes well in Indy.

    God bless,
    Jim Black

  19. turnright
    October 11th, 2012 @ 11:03 am

    It’s amazing. Thanks to Dr taitz we have to now plan for an expanded post oBIMA era, one beyond his merely losing the election.

    How does the United States handle the impeachment of both of oBie’s Supreme Court judges? Or, is impeachment necessary since the appointer is illegit?

    How do we cancel all of the laws and executive orders he signed?

    How do we handle the impeachment and jailing of those national politicians knowledgely culpable in his obtaining the office?

    Itsa gonna be a new day. REJOICE!

  20. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 11:35 am

    most of these reps and senators are totally impotent, they have not done one thing on eligibility for 4 years

  21. The Right Thing To Do
    October 11th, 2012 @ 12:23 pm

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    I certainly hope things go well for you in court in Indiana on October 22nd.

    Isn’t this case of “SUPER MAJOR IMPORTANCE” to the History of the United states?

    Why did Judge Reid cross-out “ALL-DAY” and only give you “TWO HOURS”? Does she think this case only deserves two hours of her time?

    Instead of all the crossing-out of so much of her Orders, why didn’t Judge Reid just have one of her court clerks type-out a new Order? That one have taken just a very few minutes to do.

    This could be one of the most important court cases in the History of the United States, but it looks like this Judge is trying to shrink it down to nothing, and have it disappear.

  22. kit Carson
    October 11th, 2012 @ 12:44 pm

    Orly: Does Jim Black have that right? Can the election results go to the House and Senate, if (1) person from the senate and (1) from the House speaks up? If so, that’s our Fail-Safe measure to blocking Obama! And that’s fantastic!

  23. Alec
    October 11th, 2012 @ 12:49 pm

    Why is half the order crossed out? Is not this unusual?

  24. LarryO
    October 11th, 2012 @ 2:21 pm

    That’s funny! An Obot that thinks he is God.
    Kind of describes the idiot that is strolling around the Whitehouse planning his next golf outing or pickup basketball game.
    Just know Dr. Taitz that God is with you and is using you to restore our great nation.
    Our prayers are with you.

  25. John Wanye
    October 11th, 2012 @ 2:21 pm

    In support of Alec
    Why is half of the order crossed out? Judges normally do not do this, but have their clerk retype the whold order. LOOKS MESSY !!!

  26. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 2:30 pm

    very often state judges do this
    judge Reid also crossed out proposed order by the Attorney General , which was submitted previously

  27. God
    October 11th, 2012 @ 2:45 pm

    Don’t FUCK with me, LarryO. I’m God. I will FUCK YOU UP.

  28. Redd
    October 11th, 2012 @ 2:52 pm

    Also, October 22 is the final romney vs commie usurper debate.

  29. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2012 @ 3:37 pm

    I did not know that

  30. Creg Maroney
    October 11th, 2012 @ 3:39 pm


    To be a 14TH Amendment ” citizen ” one must not only have been born on U.S. soil but also of been a ” SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF ” at the time of birth as written within the 14Th Amendment of The United States Constitution

    14TH Amendment U.S. Constitution Section 1:

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

    ” Subject to the Jurisdiction thereof ” means NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANYBODY ELSE.

    This fact is within the Congressional Record and cannot be disputed.
    United States Senate in 1866 Sen. Lyman Trumbull (IL):”The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.”

    United States Senate 1866 Sen Jacob M. Howard (MI):

    ” This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.

    This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are FOREIGNERS, ALIENS, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States.”

    Under Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes: “All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States.”

    Thomas Jefferson said “Aliens are the subjects of a foreign power.”

    Most people have not even heard of HR 140. The U.S. Congress has stooped so low since the Founding Fathers of this great striving nation that they have to write a Bill to uphold the 14Th Amendment of the United States Constitution. This Law Already EXISTS! http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h140/show

    The meaning of Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof is outlined in this Fox News Report quite well here: “States Fight To End Birthright Citizenship:” http://video.foxnews.com/v/4487782/states-fight-to-end-birthright-citizenship/

    The U.S. Supreme Court has never granted U.S. citizenship to illegal aliens children born on U.S. soil. Domicile foreigners on U.S. soil are NOT THE SAME as illegal aliens.

    As for “natural born Citizen” Father of the 14TH Amendment Rep. John Bingham of Ohio confirms in the House on March 9, 1866 that:

    ” I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being BORN WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF PARENTS (PLURAL) NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY FOREIGN SOVEREIGNTY IS, IN THE LANGUAGE OF YOUR CONSTITUTION ITSELF, A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.”

    U.S. SUPREME COURT Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875). This is the only Supreme Court PRECEDENT UNILATERALLY defining who a natural born Citizen is even though the case was about women’s voting rights AND IT HAS NEVER BEEN CHALLENGED OR OVERRULED.

    In the Minor case the court had to determine if Virginia Minor was a U.S. citizen and in doing so they stated because she was a ” NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN ” BORN OF TWO(2) CITIZEN PARENTS(PLURAL) THERE WAS NO NEED TO DETERMINE IF SHE WAS A SIMPLE ” CITIZEN ” BECAUSE THERE HAVE BEEN DOUBTS ABOUT THAT DEFINITION AND THEY DID NOT HAVE TO GO THERE.

    Minor v. Happersett Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875):

    “…IT WAS NEVER DOUBTED THAT ALL CHILDREN BORN IN A COUNTRY OF PARENTS WHO WERE IT’S CITIZENS BECAME THEMSELVES, UPON THEIR BIRTH, CITIZENS ALSO. THESE WERE NATIVES OR NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts…..”

    The U.S. Supreme Court stated pertaining to this case that it is ” not necessary” to solve the doubts of who a ” citizen ” is because it was “never doubted” that Minor was a “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” born of two (2) U.S. citizen parents(PLURAL) within the United States.

    Weakness in the Constitution will cripple the people.

  31. Creg Maroney
    October 11th, 2012 @ 3:46 pm

    This was Published at the Post & Email /News.

    On June 29, 2011, Adobe expert Mara Zebest stated at a WorldNetDaily press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC that Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is “unequivocally a forgery.”

    An Article II natural born Citizen, which is one of the Constitutional requirements for POTUS in the United States (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5), was never doubted to be a child born of two (2) U.S citizen Parent[s].

    The US Supreme Court ruling in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) [[ DEFINING ]] a natural born [C]itizen is Precedent NOT *Dicta*, as Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) was.

    Minor v. Happersett:

    …it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. AS TO THIS CLASS THERE HAVE BEEN DOUBTS, [[ BUT NEVER AS TO THE FIRST. ]].

    What has [[NEVER]] been doubted? Answer: The ”FIRST.” The ”FIRST” is: “…all children born in a country of PARENT[S] who were its CITIZEN[S] became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or NATURAL BORN CITIZENS,…”

    Todd Leventhal of the U.S. State Department confirms Barack Hussein Obama was born a DUAL citizen of the U.K. and the U.S. from 1961 to 1963 and was then a DUAL citizen of KENYA and The U.S from 1963 to 1982.

    Obama’s own FactCheck confirms he was born a DUAL citizen: “Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.

    The British Nationality Act of 1948 confirms Barack Hussein Obama Sr passed UK citizenship TO HIS CHILDREN (Barack Hussein Obama Jr.) no matter where the child’s birth took place. The British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5) states: ” Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.”

    Barack Hussein Obama himself confirms he was born a DUAL citizen on his “official” website, Fight The Smears: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr…was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”

    There it is in black and white.

    A DUAL citizen at birth does NOT have sole allegiance to the United States and is NOT an Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 natural born Citizen eligible for the Presidency of these 50 States of the Union within the meaning and context of the United States Constitution as required.

    Lower Courts CANNOT overrule the Supreme Court.


  32. Ehud Feenberg
    October 11th, 2012 @ 4:54 pm

    I heard a rumor that Judge Reid is under orders to cancel the hearing or at least postpone it until after the election. Someone supposedly got to her and she immediately set up a conference for tomorrow to inform the parties of this.

    Apparently, no one wants any distractions from the presidential debate on that same day.

    I hope that this is not true and that Judge Reid won’t become part of the RICO conspiracy too!!! I’m sure you will have the cojones to stand up for justice and not let Judge Reid bully you. Otherwise, I am afraid you will lose my respect.

  33. ron
    October 11th, 2012 @ 6:23 pm

    just think real soon here we will be running these commies out of this country. America is about to become a very unwelcome place for all of you scum. (socialist, communist utopian, marxists) SCUM! get to packin!

  34. Eve Adams
    October 11th, 2012 @ 7:13 pm

    In the beginning there was Truth in All Our Courts, is it still there?

  35. Rod Riddle
    October 11th, 2012 @ 7:32 pm

    This may be a milestone as to the venue the case is being heard but I’m still skeptical. Don’t forget the burden of proof is on Hussein to prove his eligibility to be placed on the ballot. Dr. Taitz doesn’t have to prove a thing despite the fact that she has overwhelming proof of Felony Fraud & Forgery. It isn’t rocket science. If this Judge is not part of the cover up then all she has to do is this. “Ok Mr. Hussein, the game is up. I want you to release your paper long form original BC out in Hi for inspection and let’s see the microfiche with you on it while we’re at it. Also, I need your SS info from Ct. I want to see your Selective Service app too. And while we are finally on a trasparent basis now with the court release all your college apps and transcripts.” Until I hear that kind of order I aint buying this 2 hour dog & pony show business!

  36. Philip Stone
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:40 pm

    Remember the 2008 primaries – Obama claimed to be a “native born citizen” – claimed dual citizenship since he acquired british citizenship by descent from his british colonial father and american citizenship from his mother and these claims make him ineligible to qualify for the presidency since he is not a “natural born citizen”. Judge Reid should be reminded that Obama by his own claims is testifying that he can not legaly be president.

  37. Eve Adams
    October 11th, 2012 @ 8:50 pm

    Two Court Appearances scheduled thousands of miles apart, and on top of that, the second Presidential Debate. Hmmm.

  38. leo derosia
    October 12th, 2012 @ 1:56 am

    A ” citizen of united states” isnt eligible now under article 2 to be president which means a 14th amendment “citizen of united states” isnt eligible. A NBC and citizen of united states are separate categorys in article 2. Isnt barry a deity? I just hope he ends up in prison or at very least not reelected

  39. Real Lawyer
    October 12th, 2012 @ 3:50 am

    Creg and leo know shit about the law. Creg, Minor isn’t a citizenship case – it’s a suffrage case. Wong Kim Ark is the controlling precedent, but you don’t know what that means. Leo, current law says that NBC=jus soli (look it up). That’s why birthers always lose.
    Wanna be a lawyer? Go to law school. Otherwise, keep your meaningless legal opinions to yourself.

  40. EqualjusticeI
    October 12th, 2012 @ 4:41 am

    Should we write a letter to judge Reed. How many citizens wants this cause to be heard? 100 000 ? 1 000 000 000.
    What can we do to help you Dr Taitz?

  41. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 12th, 2012 @ 4:46 am

    I am not allowed any ex parte communications with the judge. I have to communicate only in the form of motions with service to the defense

  42. Creg Maroney
    October 12th, 2012 @ 5:45 am

    ” Real Lawyer. ” Coward.

  43. turnright
    October 12th, 2012 @ 6:37 am

    Hey yo, unreal Real…

    “If you need a professional liar, hire a lawyer”. That’s a maxim holding true in many cases (and here certainly excluding Orly), made evident since at any given time half of all trial lawyers are on the wrong side of the law.

    America is soon to be fed up with your ilk’s activities, those of contorting the law to fit your guiding principles. And what are those principles? Greed must be listed. And dangerously narcissistic ego, as exemplified by the current Resident of the United States, and now, as all have seen, by the public debate carryings-on of Joe The Smirk.

    Were I to capture your errant profession’s essence in a snapshot of time, I must see Mussolini, arms folded about his chest on the balcony in Rome, lips thrust outward, head bobbing in cadence to the rhythm of the heavenly chant of his greatness that only he could hear.

  44. Anthony
    October 12th, 2012 @ 7:46 am

    How about Emmerich de Vattel – Law of Nations >Book 1, Chapter XIX
    § 212. Citizens and natives.

    The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country., “jus solis” is only part of the equation one must consider also “jus sanguis” Hence being born of a Kenyan father of a British commonwealth may put into play the question of allegiances – the may is the part that must be considered by the courts based on evidences provided which must yet be heard on its merits. Godpseed “Mrs, Esq., and DDS.” Taitz.

  45. Brad Peterssen
    October 12th, 2012 @ 10:38 am

    “Let me see your identification papers” is a phrase we don’t use in this country — sounds fascistic.

  46. Anthony
    October 12th, 2012 @ 2:07 pm

    Interesting Mr. Peterssen. By your last name are you stating it is not used in the USA, if you are a resident here, or in a Scandinavian country where you may be a resident. You are not clear on this point which can be mis-leading. It is used all the time. Birth certificates, passports, social security card. opening a bank account, carrying a concealed weapon (AKA ccw) et al. The problem here is that it was not demanded in vetting the POTUS, and now they are all CYA’ing and has led all of these time and financial burdens.

    Respectfully submitted.

  47. turnright
    October 12th, 2012 @ 3:13 pm


    I’d like to hear “Let me see your birth certificate” a little more than we do now. Don’t you agree?

  48. turnright
    October 12th, 2012 @ 3:13 pm


    I’d like to hear “Let me see your birth certificate” a little more than we do now. Don’t you agree?

  49. Anonymous
    October 12th, 2012 @ 4:11 pm
  50. Real Lawyer
    October 12th, 2012 @ 8:04 pm

    Creg, I’ll kick your lily ass any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
    Turned-out, you can blow me.
    Anthony, de Vattel has no influence on the wording of the Constitution. English common law, however, was hugely influential – you may recall that all of our Founding Fathers were English. Jus soli is a bedrock principle of English common law.

  51. Homeboy
    October 13th, 2012 @ 4:32 am

    Unreal Shyster, please read uS Constitution Article 1 section 8 clause 11. I quote. “to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and against THE LAW OF NATIONS;” (emphasis mine.” Now why would our founders use those words? Maybe because they used the Law of Nations as a partial blueprint when drafting our Constitution.

  52. Authenticator
    October 13th, 2012 @ 5:23 am

    Real Lawyer, You may be a hotshot but you took a thread of truth and turned it into the centerpiece of a lie. You used it as a tool to exploit an innocent governmental system to the point you raped its treasury, overthrew its military, stealthily threaten its citizens, bribe the rest, destroy hope, combine all religions into yours, and shackle the chicken little, (all) religious and secular news outlets from even being able to begin to expose your tricks. You may be smart but you are the dirtiest, most infiltrating force this nation has ever known.

  53. Anthony
    October 13th, 2012 @ 9:04 am

    Homeboy, I am glad you ran with the set up to show Real Lawyer; is not, or as so many other lawyers not even aware of the principles of very influential Vatel, Locke et al. It is stated in the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Real Lawyer, the U.S. constitution was written, and as the current document is the most incredible expression of human self-governance proposed and many other constitutions from other newly formed countries use it as an example for themselves. Our founding fathers were taking the opportunity of time and distance to take a system that follows the whims of the Parliament which could change laws at any time with a simple majority vote, and make it more solid. So much for a “living document” because short of a convention it is unchangeable unless tampered with by activist judges. Mr. Real Lawyer: when you had your U.S. Constitution course, Law 101, did not your inquiring newly attorney to be mind not wonder . . . what the hell does the Law of Nations refer to in this Article 1 Section 8 mean? Surely it was not a spurious insertion. Why did you not catch it and have it explained to the class or did your attorney professor dodge it as he did not know that either. Like begets like so to speak. If this sounds challenging and a bit confrontational, good! It stimulates a good debate which as an attorney you can no doubt do but not with only half facts as you demonstrated cited above in your post. Posted threats of assault to an individual can very well be considered confrontational too. I stand behind Homeboy and Authenticator as they, in the spirit of the founders of our nation, research and base their thesis on facts not on unacceptable “hearsay”. Vatel did have an influence by his works and it was important enough to have its title included in our constitution. Also Mr Real Lawyer please research and tell us which of our Great founders received 3 copies from Charles Dumas 1775, then sent one to Thomas Jefferson whose highly annotated copy is in the Library of Congress today. Now go research before you make such careless statements.

  54. turnright
    October 13th, 2012 @ 9:40 am

    Excellent use of language Authenticator.

    Have we all noticed that those who appear at surface to be knowledgeable opposition to Orly have become of lesser number over time – demonstrating that the smarties on the other side realize their cause is lost.

    It can’t be that they needed to get back to real work and couldn’t spend the time here. This WAS their real work.

  55. Creg Maroney
    October 13th, 2012 @ 10:17 am

    Hawaiian Statute 338-41 PART II. CERTIFICATES OF HAWAIIAN BIRTH Issuance; procedure:

    “(b) Any certificate of Hawaiian birth issued heretofore under or by virtue of any law of the Territory of Hawaii or the State, shall be PRIMA FACIE evidence of the facts therein stated.”

    DEFINITION OF PRIMA FACIE: On first appearance. A fact presumed to be true UNLESS IT IS DISPROVED.In common parlance the term prima facie is used to describe the apparent nature of something upon initial observation. Evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question UNLESS REBUTTED.

    Evidence submitted by Law Enforcement disproving/rebutting Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate as authentic here:
    http://youtu.be/8muZ1Pe9OAo and here: http://youtu.be/alVzyfptF80

  56. Factual Truth
    October 13th, 2012 @ 10:37 am

    Sven Teigen,

    You are starting to look like a “MONKEY’S BACKSIDE”.

  57. blue
    October 14th, 2012 @ 11:09 am
  58. Simonson
    October 16th, 2012 @ 4:51 am

    Two hours! This just means that the judge has already made her decision. If she did that in order to favor Obama, she must be indicted, having accepted to act in accordance with the US and human laws, based on un deniable proof of the guy´s crimes. Hope she accepts the motion against the Kenyan citizen, which would free America of a horrible destiny.

  59. Duane Davis
    October 22nd, 2012 @ 5:11 am

    Orly, your cause is not only just but essential to the future of this nation. May the power of TRUTH sustain your effort in Indiana. I fear a system, though, in which the truth of the false-flag events of 9/11 has YET to be tested in a Court of Law! Free and fearless inquiry, free and fearless testing of truth, free and fearless access to justice was not an option under the Third Reich either. In that system it was: =submit to the way things are, or else”! One can hope that you will be addressing a freer system than that. Yes, you will be free to present truth–squeezed into two hours, though a full day is needed, but will the recipient of your message be truly free from the “or else” of ancient evil to hear and rule justly? That is the question. We shall see.

  60. Kathy
    October 22nd, 2012 @ 12:43 pm

    Any update on how it went this morning? I haven’t heard anything.

  61. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 22nd, 2012 @ 1:01 pm

    went great, she allowed all our testimony of forgery in Obama’s BC, decision will be shortly

  62. John
    October 22nd, 2012 @ 10:45 pm

    Dr. Taitz
    Please be extremely careful as you travel. We would not want to see anything bad happen to you. You know how so many witnesses to 9/11 and other high profile issues have mysteriously died. You mustvseriously think about body guards for a very long time. I have read about an extreme number of people who had lethal consequences when they took on the government of the US.
    May God be with you and keep you safe. I hope that some brave men will come forward to help you stay safe. Perhaps some men who have faithfully served this nation . I will,pray that you are surrounded and protected by navy seals, day and night, for many years. God bless.

Leave a Reply