OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Here is the certified SS-5 for Thomas Wood, SSN 042-68-4424, one number before Obama’s 042-68-4425. Bounel, born in 1890 and Obama share the same SSN, most reasonable explanation that Bounel’s death was not reported

Posted on | January 23, 2013 | 30 Comments

Thomas Wood Certified SS-5

Comments

30 Responses to “Here is the certified SS-5 for Thomas Wood, SSN 042-68-4424, one number before Obama’s 042-68-4425. Bounel, born in 1890 and Obama share the same SSN, most reasonable explanation that Bounel’s death was not reported”

  1. Andrew Morris
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 1:36 pm

    Most likely explanation is that Bounel’s SSN was recycled, which happens all the time so they don’t run out of numbers

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 1:44 pm

    YOU MUST BE AN OBOT SEEKING TO DISINFORM THE PUBLIC, social security numbers are never recycled

  3. Bobby Joe
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 1:49 pm

    Couple questions
    1. If that number really was issued in 1890, why is the next consecutive number issued in 1977, which is the year that Obama claims he got his SS number?
    2. Doesn’t this increase the chances that whatever site said it was issued in 1890 is mistaken?
    3. Doesn’t this support Obama’s position that he was issued the SS# in 1977?

  4. Fran
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 2:29 pm

    Has anyone found out what Soc Sec No he was using when he worked at Baskin Robins?

  5. Davey Crockett
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 2:37 pm

    Yeah, Orly’s right. They are NOT supposed to recycle any S.S. #! So I’m wondering who # is being used, (if) his mother is using (2)?

  6. Marty
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:00 pm

    How does a guy born in 1890 get a SSN number assigned to him that is one number up from a guy that is born in 1962?

    Did he apply for his SSN at the same time as the guy that was born in 1962 applied for his? Were you able to get his SS-5?

    This looks like check mate!

  7. R Howerton
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:17 pm

    Andrew, what? You just make up want sounds good to you and fits your story? They NEVER recycle SSN’s

  8. Kevin
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:24 pm

    A better probability is that Obscama stole used that SSN and identity to illegally immigrate into USA feloniously conspiring with Michele Robinson Bounel’s great grand daughter.

  9. Laurie Styslinger
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:26 pm

    Why would this Thomas fellow SS number be one number away from someone’s that was born in 1890? Don’t the numbers fall in chronological order? I know my twins did.

  10. Laurie Styslinger
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:26 pm

    Why would this Thomas fellow SS number be one number away from someone’s that was born in 1890? Don’t the numbers fall in chronological order? I know my twins did.

  11. Laurie Styslinger
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:29 pm

    Did this man apply for his SS card when he was 87? He would have had to in order for it to fall in order with Thomas’s.

  12. Dionisio Lopez
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:42 pm

    “Dr. Conspiracy” wiped my comments on his blog.

    I explained why the Long Form is a fraud, included links to the Adobe PDF specification, and included their own words in previous posts and comments where even the Obots acknowledged that the Long Form was manually manipulated – including the words of “Dr Conspiracy” himself.

    He also removed comments from other Obots where they ACKNOWLEDGED the Long Form is a Fake.

    It took about 30 mins for all the comments to be removed.

    How long can we go on when the evidence is right in front of our faces?

    What’s truly ridiculous about this “birther” ordeal is the willing suspension of disbelief required to ignore the physical evidence posted for the world to see.

    What’s truly frightening is that our Congress, despite having enough evidence IN THE PUBIC DOMAIN to convict ANY other American of identity theft, is BENDING OVER BACKWARDS to allow these crimes to go unanswered.

    Truly, we are no longer a Nation of Laws, but of men.

  13. blackyb
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 3:43 pm

    Obama supposed to have changed the present SS#ing to random. The way they were showed what area and district they were in, etc. Obama is trying to obliterate States’ rights and make citizens part of a global network. That should not be changed. It was a cover. He did this, no doubt to cover up the fact he has a false SS#. These numbers, the way I heard since 2011 are randomized. Before 2011 they definitely were not. Obama should not be allowed to change this. He is changing things to cover his trail of deceit and institute a system that would not allow states to share information on citizens via their social security #s.

  14. Ro
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 4:36 pm

    Andrew, You are an obot. SS# ARE NOT recycled. and just so you know, I live in CT and got info first hand at our own SS office about how ss applications are given out and by whom and under what circumstances. In 1977-1979 it was very easy to get a ss#. I know more but won’t tell. Go give it up h ere.

  15. A
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 4:53 pm

    Numbers 000-00-0000 through 999-99-9999 equates to 10 million unique numbers. They must be recycled, and, further, for 300 million + people in the US, there are people out there with MY SSN, right now (up to 30 of them). Proper identification is name AND SSN.

  16. Veritas
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 4:57 pm

    Says he worked in a FRUIT STORE

  17. John Perram
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 5:28 pm

    “The SSA is adamant that numbers are never recycled and likely won’t be for the foreseeable future. Given the nine-digit format, there are a hair under 1 billion possible permutations, taking into account that numbers like 000-00-0000 and other oddities aren’t distributed. (An elaborate mathematical guesstimate here quotes the precise figure as 988,911,099.) So far, the SSA has doled out roughly 400 million numbers. Population researchers calculate that roughly 300 million people will require new Social Security numbers by the year 2050—about 230 million native births plus 68 million immigrants, give or take 50 million all told. Barring unforeseen circumstances, such as a meteor strike or cloning boom, the current enumeration system should last nearly another century.”
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2003/04/what_happens_to_your_social_security_number_when_you_die.html

  18. Required
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 5:46 pm

    I found re ords for Harry bunghoul does that help.

  19. TinaLou
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 5:55 pm

    No they do not recycle SSN’s Andrew. Do your research.

    (Below Info from ssa.gov)
    Within each group, the serial numbers (last four (4) digits) run consecutively from 0001 through 9999. This tells me that if 042-68-4424 was issued in 1890, 042-68-4425 would have been the very next birth in that state. Is this correct Dr Taitz? I am SO rooting for justice! Thank you for fighting!

  20. blackyb
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 6:45 pm

    Wood’s Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama

    would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state

    from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

  21. blackyb
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 6:47 pm

    Newton? A concidence, perhaps. Strange.

  22. truly
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 6:56 pm

    #1 “Andrew Morris” -
    Question: Where did you get that information? Please show a valid reference. (“Run out of numbers”?)
    We are talking about the U.S.A. and the numbers issued in THIS country.
    Please provide VALID reference for your statement.

  23. Darkhorse Patriot
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 7:02 pm

    CASE CLOSED!!!

    Go to: http://stevemorse.org/ssn/ssn.html

    Five-Digit Decoder

    SSN starting with - – XXXX

    was issued in 042-68: Connecticut, 1976-1977

    Where and when card was issued, not where and when person was born

  24. Tommy Thompson
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 7:47 pm

    that’s true…social security numbers ARE NOT recycled. The problem with stealing a SS# is that the original owner will always be in the system somewhere. Obama can’t shake that.

  25. e. scott
    January 23rd, 2013 @ 7:48 pm

    It probably wasn’t reported. He retired in HI and died there. Obama’s grandma, I believe, had access to the info, from the bank she worked in….

    You are correct. SS numbers are NEVER recycled. (but, apparently, they are stolen!)

  26. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 24th, 2013 @ 3:42 am

    no, it was issued in 1977. there were a lot of elderly individuals who never paid any taxes or paid taxes since the SSA was estblished in 1936, but did not apply for SSN. In 1976, 1977 there were new laws passed requiring SSN in order to get medicare benefits,so people, who never hada Social had to apply in their old age

  27. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 24th, 2013 @ 7:48 am

    not 10 million, but 1 billion minus 1

  28. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 24th, 2013 @ 7:52 am

    because the old man applied in 1977 only when he needed his meidare benefits. also, it is possible that his applicaton was filed out by the hospital administrator

  29. Rod Riddle
    January 24th, 2013 @ 1:58 pm

    Fran, after a long & arduous search we found the owner of the store out in Hi. He told us that someone had broken into a storage room where he had those records stored. After going thru the employment records with him, guess who’s records were missing? More scrubbing of vital records.

  30. Larry Overby
    January 24th, 2013 @ 3:00 pm

    Dr. Taitz,
    Thank you for straightening this out. As well as all the wonderful things you have and are doing for this country. We are forever indebted.
    Many people think that SS laws are like they are today. SS # issued at birth, but in previous years, the option was yours or your parents, but in most cases, this did not happen until you went to work. In Mr. Bouner’s case, it was when a # was needed for medicaid, etc.
    And this is to all the readers of this blog: please, say one small prayer for this country and those like Dr. Taitz that is standing up in our stead.

Leave a Reply