OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Hearing held on 12.15.15 in Texas v US. Attorney Taitz argued before Judge Andrew Hanen. Sheriff Arpaio didn’t show up.

Posted on | December 15, 2015 | 13 Comments

 

U.S. District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 12/15/2015 at 3:55 PM CST and filed on 12/15/2015

Case Name: State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
Case Number: 1:14-cv-00254
Filer:
Document Number: No document attached

Docket Text:
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Andrew S. Hanen. MOTION HEARING held on 12/15/2015. Appearances: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Angela V. Colmenero; Adam Nicholas Bitter; Attorneys for Defendants: John R. Tyler; Jennifer D. Ricketts; Daniel Hu; Adam D. Kirschner; Attorney Nina Perales for Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3; Attorney Orly Taitz for Orly Taitz; (Court Reporter: Sheila Heinz)(01:34-02:26) Discussion held as to [311]. [311] Joint MOTION to Stay Merits Proceedings Pending Resolution of Supreme Court Review -GRANTED as outlined in todays hearing. Discussion held as to [91] MOTION to Intervene by Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3. Discussion held as to [137] MOTION to Intervene as an Additional Plaintiff by Orly Taitz and Court will take under advisement. Parties may file any pleadings by 01/08/16., filed.(csustaeta, 1)

orly taitz »

Judge to hold hearing on Arpaio, Taitz roles in immigration suit

Politico (blog)  – ‎Dec 14, 2015‎
The main front in the legal war over President Barack Obama’s immigration policies may have moved to the Supreme Court, but a federal judge in Texas isn’t letting that stop him from taking up a curious side issue in the case: whether birther Orly Taitz…
Attorney Orly Taitz is working pro bono and all donations are greatly appreciated

Judge to hold hearing on Arpaio, Taitz roles in immigration suit

The main front in the legal war over President Barack Obama’s immigration policies may have moved to the Supreme Court, but a federal judge in Texas isn’t letting that stop him from taking up a curious side issue in the case: whether birther Orly Taitz and controversial Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio are entitled to join the fight.

Both sides in the lawsuit that halted Obama’s latest round of immigration moves nearly a year ago have told U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen they want the case put on ice until the Supreme Court announces whether it will take up the major executive power dispute — a decision expected as soon as next month.

In a little-noticed order earlier this month, Hanen set a hearing for Tuesday afternoon on the proposal to stay the case. However, he went on to say he wanted the parties to address whether to allow several other individuals to intervene in the litigation, among them Taitz and Arpaio.

“The Court … wants the parties and those who have expressed an interest in becoming parties to be ready to address the extent to which the intervenors are going to participate in this matter,” Hanen wrote.

The judge’s call to dive into the issue and for the proposed intervenors or their attorneys to show up in person has left some immigrants’ rights advocates suspicious.

“You’ve got a joint motion to stay the merits. … It’s difficult to understand why this has to be taken up right now as the Supreme Court is considering it,” said David Leopold, an Ohio-based immigration attorney and past president of the American Immigration Lawyers’ Association. “It has the potential of unnecessarily adding more politics to a case that’s already politically charged.”

Last month, a split three-judge appeals court panel sided with Hanen and refused to overturn his injunction against Obama’s new Deferred Action for Parents of Americans initiative and his expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. However, the same panel voted unanimously to uphold the rights of three unnamed illegal immigrants to intervene in the case to protect their interests.

Fifth Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod gave various reasons for the ruling and noted that one reason the women cited was that the federal government may have alienated Hanen by issuing about 100,000 permits despite the injunction. The feds have blamed the issuances on bureaucratic foul-ups and have insisted the government did not intend to mislead the court.

Hanen said in his order (posted here) that he is “particularly concerned about the possible applicability of [the appeals court ruling] to parties beyond the three Jane Does discussed therein.” He went on to list Taitz, Arpaio and several other people who sought to join in the high-profile court battle.

Taitz and Arpaio have previously struck out with similar efforts.

In July, Hanen threw out a lawsuit Taitz brought Obama, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and others over various aspects of federal immigration policy. The following month, a federal appeals court in Washington upheld the dismissal of a similar case in which Arpaio challenged the legality of Obama’s moves to make millions more immigrants who entered the country illegally, or overstayed visas, eligible for quasi-legal status and work permits.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/12/judge-to-hold-hearing-on-arpaio-taitz-roles-in-immigration-suit-216757#ixzz3uaNZtAP8

Category: Uncategorized
Tags: > > > >

Comments

13 Responses to “Hearing held on 12.15.15 in Texas v US. Attorney Taitz argued before Judge Andrew Hanen. Sheriff Arpaio didn’t show up.”

  1. X-Files
    December 16th, 2015 @ 1:15 pm

    I pray that this going before Judge Hanen, Orly will prove helpful in your mission!

  2. Fanboi
    December 16th, 2015 @ 5:49 pm

    Loved your competitive standing argument in your motion. No one else thought of that. Bravo Orly!

  3. will
    December 17th, 2015 @ 12:31 am

    what happened to arpiao? is he so afraid of the illegal in washingon that he didnt show up? or maybe a payoff came in time? i have absolutely no confidence in this guy sine he ripped of a lot of money got evidence then refused to use it…
    will

  4. EyeballNews
    December 17th, 2015 @ 5:57 am

    Arpaio was hard at work preparing “universe shattering information”…

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 17th, 2015 @ 7:29 am

    ha ha! a good one!

  6. EyeballNews
    December 17th, 2015 @ 9:16 am

    Lol, I couldn’t resist! Glad you enjoyed it.

    So, what was the outcome of this hearing?

  7. Rich
    December 17th, 2015 @ 9:46 am

    This is what you get when God is no longer welcome in our mainstream. He has been made unconstitutional in favor of the deficit spending entitlement crowds of the liberal establishment. It is the law of the land. Most of us had no choice. The evil are ingenious in their wickedness. Rom 1:21-32.

  8. Onegin
    December 17th, 2015 @ 10:01 am

    When can we expect a ruling?

  9. Extirpates
    December 17th, 2015 @ 10:39 am

    If you felt any hot air at all in the courtroom, the spirit of Arpaio was in place!

  10. Larry
    December 17th, 2015 @ 11:12 am

    Could Arpaio be controlled opposition ????
    Making like he has all this info (and then not releasing it) so no body else will investigate Obama thinking Arpaio already has the info and is on the verge of releasing it….mmmm…and Obamy keeps smiling and defrauding the American people secretly sending money and thank you notes to “Old Joe”

  11. tim
    December 17th, 2015 @ 11:16 am

    Joe Arpaio is a fraud. He claims to have explosive evidence against Obama — but refuses to lay charges.

    Arpaio claims to have “uncovered the truth” — but refuses to do anything about it.

    Arpaio says that he will “stop at nothing” to get the facts out — and then he stopped — at nothing. Having done nothing. Achieved nothing.

    HOWEVER: Arpaio has raised a lot of money by appealing to Orly’s supporters. He will keep doing so until someone calls him out on his colossal failure to do anything at all.

    Only Orly has ever actually achieved anything in court. Why does anyone believe Arpaio? Sheesh. He’s been suppressing the truth for years, and taking credit for Orly’s work in the meantime.

  12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 17th, 2015 @ 11:18 am

    I hope you support me and donate. I cost me over $2,000 to take time from work and fly to TX to the hearing

  13. RamatGun
    December 17th, 2015 @ 3:19 pm

    The reporter Josh Gerstein writes:

    [In a little-noticed order earlier this month, Hanen set a hearing for Tuesday afternoon on the proposal to stay the case.]

    Why stay the case?

    [However, he went on to say he wanted the parties to address whether to allow several other individuals to intervene in the litigation, among them Taitz and Arpaio.]

    Yes, we want Dr. Taitz and Arpaio to participate in this litigation as both of them have been deeply involved in the (illegal) immigration issues. Why does Judge need be so polite as to ask the parties for their opinion on participation for Taitz and Arpaio? Aah…. I understand now. This may bring Taitz and Arpaio into the lawsuit better, than the Judge trying to force them into the lawsuit. Judge Hanen appears to be wise man.

    [“The Court … wants the parties and those who have expressed an interest in becoming parties to be ready to address the extent to which the intervenors are going to participate in this matter,” Hanen wrote.]

    OK. Judge wants to bring more firepower into the lawsuit and wants to open the box and show how much extra power will be brought in. What about giving a substantial explorative capabilities to the Court and the new participants in the lawsuit? That is why reveal all the possibilities upfront?

    [The judge’s call to dive into the issue and for the proposed intervenors or their attorneys to show up in person has left some immigrants’ rights advocates suspicious.]

    These immigrants and their advocates may have their own motives that are opposed to the American public interests. The Judge should be very suspicious about the Immigrants lawyers concerns.

    Most importantly, Orly, what has happened during the hearings past Tuesday, I think it was?

Leave a Reply