OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Grinols et al v electoral college et al part 1, 2, exhibits, motion to strike

Posted on | December 29, 2012 | 4 Comments

Grinols et al v electoral college et al

 

https://www.scribd.com/doc/118339060/Grinols-et-al-v-electoral-college-et-al

Grinols reply to opposition to TRO 1,2, motion to strike

Category: Dossiers, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, LINKS, Obama Fraud Gate, Orly Taitz doctor and attorney, Orly Taitz Hawaii, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate, Orly Taitz Obama social Security number, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Orly Taitz subpoena, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Supporting Documentation

Comments

4 Responses to “Grinols et al v electoral college et al part 1, 2, exhibits, motion to strike”

  1. Sally Sassington
    December 29th, 2012 @ 11:59 am

    Perfect!!! CHECKMATE!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Rock the Boat
    December 29th, 2012 @ 12:35 pm

    This is brilliant! Under federal statutes, the US Attorney’s Office can be the designated agent for service of process on a President but cannot represent the President if he’s being sued as an individual. The USC provides that, once service is effected on the US Attorney, they have a duty to forward all documents to Obama but cannot defend him. I am sure that you have thoroughly researched this and will be prepared to supplement your written arguments with a few surprises of your own, including sanctions for wasting taxpayers’ money. You are a taxpayer so you have standing to ask for sanctions on our behalf!!!

  3. Joan
    December 30th, 2012 @ 5:08 pm

    I sure hope this trial succeeds in bringing down the Usurper in Office. I am so tired of seeing our rights go down the tubes ever since he has been in office. I can’t wait to see Obummer in an orange jumpsuit.

  4. tffolkes
    January 3rd, 2013 @ 3:51 pm

    As a thought, it just dawned on me that in a strange way this is could even be QUI TAM in approach. Just a thought and if the percentage of moneys involved holds you would get a percentage of that. Particularly when it comes to any corporations such as GE that have gotten a contract from a person who knew he was not qualified to make such a decision.

    just a thought

Leave a Reply