9 Responses to “Globe published part of the interview I gave them, as well as an interview with their expert, showing Obama to be a criminal, using a forged birth certificate”

1. turnright
   May 14th, 2011 @ 8:27 pm

   Orly…

   Posted on WND.com for Friday the 13th is an article near the top of the main page about how two students checked for birth certificates of others born in Hawaii around the time of Obie’s purported birth date. They found a gap in the train of issued birth certificates. They have discovered a death certificate of a baby born one day and having died the next, without a birth certificate to be found.

   Is the Resident claiming a birth certificate number in this way… taking one of a child who died? He got a number from someplace, why not from a source who can’t respond to the theft?.

   A paragraph from the article on WND follows:

   A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
   Students find evidence of Obama fraud?
   Satirical piece taking jab at ‘birthers’ circulates on Internet
   Posted: May 13, 2011

   © 2011 WorldNetDaily

   “The two students, the article says, found a death certificate for a baby born on the day of Obama’s birth who died one day later. They discovered that there was no corresponding birth certificate and began raising other questions about the authenticity of the White House document, but, “By then, we were too depressed to dig any deeper.” “

2. Florence Stone
   May 14th, 2011 @ 8:52 pm

   Good! The more places the truth is put forth, the more informed the American people should become, if their heads aren’t buried too awfully deep in ObamaLand.

3. MinutemanCDC_SC
   May 15th, 2011 @ 3:49 am

   The Globe should have published some of the more blatant evidences of forgery:

   1. the purported Certificate from 1961 doesn’t appear to be 50 years old… in fact, it show no signs of aging whatsoever.

   2. the purported Certificate has no embossed seal to certify it.

   Plus, it doesn’t look old.

   3. seven of the fields on the left side do not align with the left margin, as other Certificates do.

   The typewriter ink shows no sign of aging.

   4. this counterfeit Certificate appears to be identical to the Aloha Reporter counterfeit published over a year ago, except it crops out the last line:
   Birthplace: Kenya;Registered HRS 338-17.8 per grandmother
   which referenced a law which was not enacted until 21 years later.

   But neither of the counterfeits show any aging.

   5. there is no mention of the layers in the PDF file, which break out the counterfeit into logical (rather than physical) components, from which this counterfeit was assembled.

   Oh, and did I mention, IT DOESN’T LOOK OLD?

4. Chum Lee
   May 15th, 2011 @ 8:40 am

   Of course it is not old. It is a copy! That has been made clear multiple times.

5. Dansmith1954
   May 15th, 2011 @ 8:48 am

   I bought the Globe Magazine as a keepsake.
   However, they left out a few things about the
   alledged forged “COLB”. The stamped signature
   has the word THE spelled TXE, and the age of
   the father is listed as 25. Obama Sr. has signed documents stating he was born on June 18, 1934 which would have made him age 27 in 1961.
   https://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File

6. Stephen
   May 15th, 2011 @ 11:31 am

   There is barely visible in the lower left third of the document evidence of a seal. Push the contrast to the maximum and you will be able to see it better. Not sure if it was intended to be concealed or not because of how faint the seal is.

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   May 15th, 2011 @ 12:53 pm

   it is a forgery. I lost any respect for you or any other attorney, who continues to defend this third rate forgery. This is an embarassment to intelligence of any normal person. Either Obama got completely brain dead from using all those drugs at Oxi or he is so full of himself, that he feels that every American is a complete idiot and will buy even this forgery

8. Stephen
   May 15th, 2011 @ 7:18 pm

   I was not defending the clear forgery. I was simply notifying you that indeed there is an indication of a seal. I suspect that this may lead to more evidence of a forgery because it does not distort the image which was superimposed over it. One would expect that a seal would be applied after the paper had been printed and would thereby distort the copy printed on it. I don’t know, but I think it makes for a stronger case for forgery.

9. Clark Kent
   May 15th, 2011 @ 11:04 pm

   Poor chum:…he has to lash out, due to the fact that he doesn’t like TRUTH thrown at him all the time! Well, duh!!!

   It’s an “up-to-date” copy, due to the fraudulent C.O.L.B. being “up-to-date”! If we copy an old, original, it will come out “old” and proper!

   So, is it that you are upset over having to read about how “fraudulent” the “makeshift” doc is? Well, what did you expect? Do you not realize, yet, that this “V” in the WH is “NOT” a real prez?

   How much more “empirical” evidence does it take to convince some people that we’ve been had?

   This whole lethal, illegal, immoral, quasi-covert attempt at the take-over of America is a full-fledged “gambit” that will ultimately fail…!

   And it IS a very poorly played “chess” game, that will “backfire” on the NWO!

   We The People will spread the news far and wide and America will be (NOW) wide awake for the next election! Very little will get by us!

   Keep Praying, everyone!

Leave a Reply