OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


from reader Tom Arnold

Posted on | November 29, 2010 | 21 Comments

> From: Tom Arnold
> Subject: THE SUPREME COURT DOES NOT GIVE A S__T ABOUT OUR CONSTITUTION AND I CAN PROVE IT!
> To: puzo1@blogspot.com
> Cc: AsktheLeader@mail.house.gov
> Date: Monday, November 29, 2010, 2:25 PM
> Today, it was announced that attorney
> Mario Apuzzo’s case KERCHNER V OBAMA (one of literally
> dozens, if not hundreds, of current lawsuits questioning
> Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s eligibility according to OUR
> CONSTITUTION to hold the office of president and
> commander-in-chief) was denied on its “Writ of
> Certiorari.”  As usual, the Supreme court DID NOT GIVE A
> REASON for its decision!  What a joke!  These are the
> same people (the Supreme Court justices) who found it
> necessary and ruled that there was “standing” and sufficient
> constitutional importance to hear such cases as JANET
> JACKSON’S WARDROBE MISHAP DURING A RECENT SUPER BOWL and
> ANNA NICOLE SMITH’S INHERITANCE FROM HER ELDERLY HUSBAND
> BUSINESS TYCOON J HOWARD MARSHALL!  Do you get the
> picture?  THIS, FOLKS, IS A F__KING JOKE!  IT IS A
> DISGRACE!  THIS ISSUE (qualifications according to our
> CONSTITUTION to be eligible for president), I guarantee you,
> is without a doubt THE MOST IMPORTANT SINGLE ISSUE,
>  AND MOST RELEVANT ISSUE, EVER TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE OUR
> SO-CALLED SUPREME COURT!  YET, THEY, THE “SUPREME
> COURT,” DODGE THE ISSUE AND DENY IT A HEARING!  I say
> that history will find these Supreme Court justices,
> individually and as a sorry whole, CORRUPT AND EVEN
> TREASONOUS.  Can you, the recipients of this email,
> prove me wrong, and if you cannot, what are you and WE THE
> PEOPLE prepared to do about it!  Who really is supposed
> to be in control in our country?  I thought it was THE
> PEOPLE!  IMPEACH THE B__TARDS!

Comments

21 Responses to “from reader Tom Arnold”

  1. Leonard McCauley
    November 29th, 2010 @ 5:33 pm

    After what the Supreme Court did today with it’s refusal to Hear or even comment on the latest eligabilty challenge…We r no longer a Nation of Law…We r now a Nation of the Biggest Gun Rules…The whole world is ready to go to War, due to a very weak United States…White Gentile America has been Carpet Bagged and Polititioned…Just exactly like the Civil War all over again…

  2. BruceWho
    November 29th, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

    Another sad day for We The People as we loose a battle and must fight on to win the war against those who want to completely trash the Constitution along with rule of law. Are there any Congressional Investigations scheduled for this issue after January 3, 2011?

  3. Ed
    November 30th, 2010 @ 4:33 am

    Tom, You are SPOT ON!!! I have been thinking and looking at what is happening here in America these last few days with the SC not even reviewing any cases as concerns Obama; and it reminds me so much of what came out during the Nuremberg Trails in Germany after e WWII ended, how the rule of law in GERMANY HAD BECOME SO perverted by the fear of hitler and other and his goon squads ( now unions here)….I fear that we’re headed there as a Nation but it will be Consevatives/Tea Party/Independents/People of religion, any religion etc that wil be paying the price for not swearing to uphold this
    OBAMA-NATION”…God help us all….WAKE UP AMERICA!!! WAKE UP!!!!

  4. RO
    November 30th, 2010 @ 5:54 am

    You are right Tom and We the People need to take some major action over this.

  5. RJ
    November 30th, 2010 @ 8:36 am

    As appalling as this Supreme Court denial decision is, I don’t believe the decision rests solely on the inappropriate refusal of Kagan and Sotomayor to recuse themselves as they clearly should have done.

    It took four Justices to agree to hear the case and there weren’t four Justices willing to do so. That means that even among the presumed conservative Justices there was no agreement to hear the case. Among Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia, there was at least one defector. As I recall, Thomas was actually once quoted with words to the effect that the Court was ‘punting’ on this entire issue of eligibility.

    This decision certainly sets the stage for the two remaining pending petitions for Writ to be summarily denied as well and validates the expedient and money saving obama decision to waive its right to respond to these Writs.

    How very sad that the Supreme Court has been so co-opted in this country as to have consigned itself to such anti-Constitutionalism.

  6. Axel Janeway
    November 30th, 2010 @ 8:41 am

    > THE “SUPREME
    > COURT,” DODGE THE ISSUE AND DENY IT A HEARING

    Yes, just like they’d “dodge” a hearing on whether the moon is made from cheese.

    They already have ruled enough on the NBC issue and need not revisit again.

  7. Coastal Eddie
    November 30th, 2010 @ 11:34 am

    The High Court formerly known as supreme court is not “the law of the land”. “We the people” are the law of the land.

    If this refusal is bot an act of treason, we owe Benedict an apology.

  8. Leonard McCauley
    November 30th, 2010 @ 12:46 pm

    It appears now, we the Great Unwashed Masses r at odds with the Ruling Class Elite. Neutralize the Judges First, then the Lawyers. Those r the 1st steps in a Revolution, which Body Hussein Odor has done to the Supreme Court…Lock & Load and tell us who to shoot.

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 30th, 2010 @ 5:15 pm

    you cannot advocate violence. Innocent people will get hurt. There has to be a peaceful way

  10. Chum Lee
    November 30th, 2010 @ 6:00 pm

    Leonard,

    Apart from sitting at your computer, what are you doing as part of the revolution?

    Would you have killed the lawyers back in 1776?

  11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    November 30th, 2010 @ 8:31 pm

    nobody should talk about any violence. You will not achieve anything with violence, you will only end up in prison

  12. Henry Tisdale
    November 30th, 2010 @ 8:49 pm

    But Orly, no one is researching what can be done with the hundreds of sheriffs in all the states. Somewhere, I have read that the sheriff, a leader of the county’s constabulary elected by the people, can, I believe, under serious felonious behavior or treason of any elected federal official, can be arrested and tried.

    Anybody, am I wrong?

  13. Henry Tisdale
    November 30th, 2010 @ 9:10 pm

    Axel Juneway, if you made it through the third grade, and you knew all the facts of this case, which you obviously don’t, SCOTUS has not “ruled” on anything relative to this issue. The correct claims pertaining to the case have have been filed in accordance with all laws and procedures. “Refusing to hear a case” which has legally come to the SCOTUS, must be based on a reason, which they never bother to write. They are using their opinion, not vote results, to refuse hearing a properly submitted claim.

    One more point which you obviously don’t know is this. Treason was committed by the Chief Justice for meeting in private with President Elect Obama and Vice President Elect Biden in November 2009. Regardless of how many people ask Chief Justice Roberts if he abided by the constitution, and all laws and procedures based thereon, he is as quiet as a constitpated canary.

    Axel, your best bet is to begin your own research before you compare this highly critical case with the moon being made of cheese.

  14. James K
    November 30th, 2010 @ 10:33 pm

    These Justices did not ‘defend’ the Constitution. They violated their sworn oath. Any reasonable citizen can understand that ‘defend’ can be an active action as compared to passive. The judges by not acting to hear arguments as to a possible breach of our Constitution violated their oath ‘to defend’. they should be removed from the Court. How is the question .

  15. Phil
    December 1st, 2010 @ 4:05 am

    Chum:…I can tell you what I do, to help further the cause of Saving America:…
    1)I send out emails/letters to (3) emails lists.
    2) I send out emails to alumni, on several major topics.
    3) I write emails to members of Congress from my home state.
    4) I contacted all (mainland) S.O.S.’s to alert them to the “treasonous” use of the Sequoia & Diebold voting Machines.
    5) I post on Orlys’ Site to further ideas and suggestions to be there for Orly, not to mention that I also write emails, text, call and get involved to help her and America.
    6) I use a couple of ways to make contact with emails, at home and at a library, to research some things I can’t find any other way.
    7) I investigate reasons for “why” certain things aren’t done to “follow through” by organizations, that should be doing their jobs.
    8) I call and leave messages for members of Congress, when I can, to check on this and that.
    9) I take several online news media sources with great insight to help us.
    10) I offer info and suggestions to Orly and to other people, including home state politicians and other Patriots.
    11) I continually think of ways to help Orly and America, to advance our efforts. We all need to think “creatively”!
    12) And since it’s about 6am now, I will finish with this: “I also donate once a month to help Orly & America! And could probably come up with other points to list, if I wasn’t getting bushed!

    So, my question to you, chum, is: do you donate? Do you do anything to be of help to Orly? to America? so that we can “reverse” this freakin’ “nightmare on Elm Street”?

    When you post, it’s almost like an act of smugness! Like you enjoy just watching most of the posters here spend our time…cause either you are a socialist? or you just don’t comprehend just how serious this entire matter is, which resembles a gruesome scene from some “Poe Novel”!

    Davey Crockett…

  16. hippybiker
    December 1st, 2010 @ 6:17 am

    “I would rather die standing on my feet, than live my life on my knees.” Zapatta

  17. Chum Lee
    December 1st, 2010 @ 6:52 am

    Hippy,

    Nice quote from a leftist rebel!

  18. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 1st, 2010 @ 6:54 am

    I posted before the e-mail addresses of all the sheriffs in the country. You can form a group, contacting them

  19. Henry Tisdale
    December 1st, 2010 @ 7:59 am

    Thanks, dear hard working lady. You seem to always have the answer.

    Now for all the patriots within Orly’s regiment (LOL), please contact me and let me know if you would like to form such a group which Orly refers to on comment 18. We have two initial jobs to get started on: 1) find that email list of sheriffs to which Orly refers, and 2) all of us together compose a single, cogent but effective letter to see how many sheriffs want to save America as we do.

    Orly again, any ideas where I night find that list? Do not spend your valuable time searching, lady, if we must, we will do it all over again. Hopefully, we will have a group red blooded American patriots who will help look up the counties in certain states. As the Big Cheese, I will take those states with the fewest counties hehehehehe.

    One final question. Orly on these law suits such as Quo Warranto and ‘Writ of Certiorari’, is there any stipulation within either the Federal Courts or SCOTUS, which requires a formal response from either?

    Now genuine Americans, who love Orly and her dedication to evicting the usurping WH tenant, I hope to see a bunch of emails in my golden basket. Ya’ll heah whud ahm sayin?

  20. Chum Lee
    December 1st, 2010 @ 11:30 am

    Henry:

    The Supreme Court has no duty or requirement to explain why Cert was granted or denied. The Supreme Court receives thousands upon thousands of Petitions and grants perhaps 100 each year.

  21. hippybiker
    December 1st, 2010 @ 2:39 pm

    Hey Chum Lee…He borrowed it from one of our founding fathers…I believe it was John Adams.

Leave a Reply