OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

From reader Jim

Posted on | May 25, 2010 | No Comments

Jim

Let’s hope that Judge Lamberth uses some common sense when deciding on this.

Since this number was issued in 1976-1977, there is only one way that a number could be issued from Conn. without actually living there. That is to have a mailing address in Conn.

Now for the common sense.

Say you are a 16 year old looking to get his first job. Do you

(a) Go to the nearest Social Security office and fill out the form in order to get the card as fast as possible so you can get that summer job as fast as possible; or

(b) (1) Have someone on the mainland fill out the card for you

(2) Once filled out, they have to mail it back to you for your signature

(3) You then send it back to them with your birth certificate (that is needed in applying for a social security number )

(4) He then files the form, but instead of putting your address on it as the mailing address so that the card is sent directly to you, a Conn. mailing address is put on the application

(5) The card is sent to the mailing address in Conn and is then sent on to you in Hawaii.

I ask you, if this number were obtained through legitimate means, which is the more likely scenario a 16 year old boy would use – (a) or (b) ? Obviously it would have been (a). This would have resulted in a number issued from Hawaii – not Conn. Thus seeing as the number was issued from Conn, procedure (b) would have to have been used. Therefore by plain common sense that a 16 year old boy would have used procedure (a) and not (b), it shows this number was not obtained legitimately.
Category: Letters from Readers and Patriots

Comments

Leave a Reply