From Give US Liberty
Posted on | October 29, 2009 | 11 Comments
Give Us Liberty
Show The Troops Your Support Wear Red Friday !
What doesn’t break us, makes us strongerPosted on | October 29, 2009 |
As many of you know, Judge Carter has issued an order to grant the motion to dismiss.
Clearly it is not the end of the road. We will continue. I need some time to study this order and provide full answer point by point. I will not give a full analysis of judge Carter’s orders at the moment. Today I was inundated with phone calls from different media outlets. Interviews were given to different affiliats of FOX radio, CBS, WND, LA Times, LA Daily Journal, City report, I don’t remember all of them. One interview I remebered. It was with Jessica Rosenthal from FOX radio. She asked me, when will I give up? I asked her in turn: “Jessica, when do you give up on the Constitution of this country? When do you give up on your constitutional rights for redress of grievances, for your right not to be defrauded by the government, not be treated as a slave?”
While I will not address the legal aspects of the order today, I will address a couple of issues relating to me personally, as I can see a concerted effort to assassinate my character similar to what was done to Sarah Palin, when she joined McCain, when within a day McCain-Palin ticket was 12 points ahead of Obama. What did Chicago combine do? They assassinated her character. So I have to address some of those issues, because it appears that the media has named me a leader of this movement. I am the only attorney, who brought legal actions from plaintiffs with real standing. I brought actions from active duty military and state representatives. My opposition see me as a threat. What was done? Some puppets were used to defame me, slander me, write garbage letters to judge Carter.
First of all I need to point that I never did anything unethical and never told anyone to do anything unethical. I was horrified to see that Judge Carter has mentioned in his order some complete garbage that was in some letters that he received. Those letters were a complete defamation of character, I had no opportunity to address those allegations, those were not part of the record, and it is extremely prejudicial for a judge to include this complete garbage in his order. If anything, this is definitely something that can and should be addressed on appeal. I hoped that this judge had more integrity of character, I guess I was wrong.
Another point – Judge Carter state in court and in his order that I told people to call him This is not true. Who told it to judge Carter? His new clerk, fresh out of Perkins Coie, law firm, that represented Obama, in some 100 cases?
There is another issue. There is a vicious circle that you see in a regime. There is no unbiased media. So far no one in our media had integrity of character to report on multiple social security numbers of Obama, even though it is a criminal offense, and with 39 social security numbers a person should be criminally prosecuted and should be serving a lengthy prson term. When media reports nothing, the public and the judges are misinformed. The judges are afraid to make decisions, that they think, will upset the public, and in turn, their timid and lopside decisions influence the media.
Citizens seem to have no voice, they have no standing to bring any legal actions in face of any fraud. They only have standing to pay taxes and pay for the judges, clerks, congress and senate who never address any issues. They should have no concerns about an inhabitant of the White house sporting 39 social security numbers, some are the social security numbers of the deceased. How long will it take for those citizens to revolt? Washington Post has written that 8 out of 10 Americans know about this issue. According to AOL-it’s 85%. This number is growing. How long will those people be silent? 4,5 million marched on Washington DC on September the 12th. How many will march next time around, when so many loose their jobs (half a million jobs every month officially) and probably double that number unofficially. When they loose their homes at a rate higher then the rate during great depression. When they become numb from hatred against this fraudulent usurper in the White House, corrupt politicians and corrupt judges. Who will stop them? A few snooty remarks on MSM and on the faithful to regime lap dog blogs like Politijab, Salon or Politico? When people loose their voice, when they are livid from the arrogance shown by the ruling elite, they simply revolt
To be contined…
THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS OBAMA IS A USURPER AND NOT QUALIFIED TO BE POTUS…PERHAPS IT’S TIME FOR 10 MILLION MAN MARCH ON THE WHITE HOUSE!
“This [opinion] looks like it was written by the defense,” she told WND.
She described the fight against Obama as “very tough.”
“He has more power than anybody, unlimited financial resources, and a lot to hide,” she said.
TAITZ vows to appeal…
BREAKING!!!!!! CARTER FOLDS….IS THEIR NO JUSTICE?…WHY THE BIG WAIT?…WHAT CAUSED THE CHANGE OF MIND…YOUR HONOR?…
Judge David O. Carter betrays the Nation!
The Post & Email published
RULES THAT MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD GIVES NO ONE STANDING!
by John Charlton
(Oct. 29, 2009) — In a ruling that has stunned none but those who love this Nation, Judge David O. Carter has granted the Motion to Dismiss presented by the Department of Justice, in the case Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al..
The case involved the massive election fraud which occurred in 2008 General Election, when Barack Hussein Obama, though not an eligible candidate, was admitted to the ballot in California, and thus harmed and disadvantaged candidates running on third-party tickets, such as Wiley S. Drake, Alan Keyes, Gail Lightfoot, and Markham Robinson.
The ridiculous ruling was characterized by Dr. Orly Taitz, lead counsel for the Plaintiffs as something “written by the Defense,” according to the World Net Daily report.
The Post & Email will highlight the most vicious and erroneous statements in the ruling.
CARTER SHOWS HIMSELF TO BE A VICIOUS BAITER OF PATRIOTS
What Judge Carter did was not only deny justice, he viciously insulted and baited patriotic Military personnel everywhere, by his outrageous statement regarding the military plaintiff, Jason Freese in the case:
This Court will not interfere in internal military affairs nor be used as a tool by military officers to avoid deployment. The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve.
Just prior to this outrageous insult, the Carter shows himself to be a true supporter of dictatorship over law, when he claims that U.S. Military must serve even if their chief commander has no lawful authority to command them:
Furthermore, Lieutenant Freese’s claims are based upon the notion that his duty to serve is based upon who is in office. The duty to defend is not dependent upon a political or personal view regarding the individual who serves as President and Commander-in-Chief. It is an unequivocal duty to defend our country.
He then ridiculously claims that those who participate in the reception of funds taken unlawfully from the national treasury are not capable of being found guilty of crime, so long as they claim a reasonable doubt as to the legitimacy of the theft. For a Judge famed for his opposition to Mexican Mafia, he seems to have entire support for the Chicago Mob. Isn’t that a racist attitude, from the liberal point of view?
Carter’s laughable ruling also claims that you have a duty to pay taxes to the IRS, but you have no rights to ask whether the President who signs the spending bills for those taxes is legitimate: or in other words, you are a feudal serf, and must pay no matter how illegitimate or corrupt the Federal Government becomes, because, in the Judge’s words, the Supreme Court says so!
Then, while Carter begrudgingly admits that third-party candidate suffered injury by being opposed by a potential ineligible candidate, he finds that his court cannot remedy the crime, and therefore he will not take action on the complaint! His argument ignores completely the question of eligibility of office, and presumes the fact that Obama is eligible, contrary to the fact of the case! He even implies that Congress can change the definition of what a Natural Born Citizen is, by its choice of a presidential candidate in Joint Session!
On quo warrento, Carter makes the bold face lie of claiming the D.C. code gives exclusive jurisdiction over quo warrento proceedings regarding the President to the D.C. courts!
Carter closes by personally attacking Dr. Orly Taitz
Finally, if there is anyone who thought that Judge Carter was impartial, his closing remarks, in which he devotes a very long paragraph insulting Dr. Orly Taitz should be read in full:
The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs’ arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning.
Imagine that! Taitz’s supporters are “followers” and “prejudiced”! My my, what bigots we patriots are!
Judge Carter continues his diatribe thus:
While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs’ enthusiastic presentation, Taitz’s argument often hampered the efforts of her cocounsel (sic) Gary Kreep (“Kreep”), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court
Any objective listener will remember, however, that it was Attorney Kreep who often criticized Taitz’s arguments in court, and not the other way around.
The Court has attempted to give Plaintiffs a voice and a chance to be heard by respecting their choice of counsel and by making every effort to discern the legal arguments of Plaintiffs’ counsel amongst the rhetoric. This Court exercised extreme patience when Taitz endangered this case being heard at all by failing to properly file and serve the complaint upon Defendants and held multiple hearings to ensure that the case would not be dismissed on the technicality of failure to effect service.
While the original complaint in this matter was filed on January 20, 2009, Defendants were not properly served until August 25, 2009. Taitz successfully served Defendants only after the Court intervened on several occasions and requested that defense counsel make significant accommodations for her to effect service.
Imagine that! When Obama and his lawyers pretended not to receive service, it is Taitz who is at fault!
Carter descends further into the house of the mad, when he writes:
Taitz also continually refused to comply with court rules and procedure. Taitz even asked this Court to recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato on the basis that he required her to comply with the Local Rules. See Order Denying Pls.’ Mot. For Modification of Mag. J. Nakazato’s Aug. 6, 2009, Order; Denying Pls.’ Mot. to Recuse Mag. J. Nakazato; and Granting Ex Parte App. for Order Vacating Voluntary Dismissal (Sep. 8, 2009).
Taitz also attempted to dismiss two of her clients against their wishes because she did not want to work with their new counsel. See id.
Then Judge Carter gives a tantrum, because citizens wrote him letters encouraging him to be a patriot — clearly an offense that this usurper supporter will not pardon!
Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court’s decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court’s decision.
Then Judge Carter defames Attorney Taitz:
Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.
While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court.
If Carter — he obviously does not deserve the title of “Judge” — showed his ethics by hiring Siddhart Velarmoor as law clerk, it is clear tha he has shown himself a traitor to the Nation, by his ruling in Barnett vs. Obama.
Finally, Carter closes with the most exquisite piece of pharisaical self-defense in the history of the American judiciary:
Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.
Comments
11 Responses to “From Give US Liberty”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:30 pm
“Give Us Liberty”
Your gesture of supporting the troops by wearing “red” is thoughtful but not helpful. At this point in time “we” don’t need gestures “we” need immediate action to be taken that is going to set this country back on the correct path to righteousness and acknowledgment of our God. By doing so, this will restore “right and wrong” in our society. Nevertheless, one should ask where are our soldiers voices and the parents of the loved ones being slaughtered by the inaction and treason of the Usurper and the military officers? These people truly have standing and their grievances cannot be summarily dismissed by these cowardly and gutless wonders on the the bench!
Dr. Taitz, you keep the faith but please STOP laying out your arguments on this site, please STOP telegraphing your game plan, and please STOP feeling that you must explain everything about your cases to everyone because I have realized a long time ago that there are “trolls” on this site and possibly helping you that means you and your cases no good! Dr. Taitz, ask yourself why would the judge include information written to him in his order without you having a chance to even read the letters of accusations? Its a set up Orly! Please be less transparent in the future so you can get to the bottom of this corruption and systematic dismantling of our country before its too late!
Aloha,
Taylor
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:32 pm
This is on a site called Post & Email
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Serby charges Land with potential Federal Crime!
October 28, 2009 by John Charlton
AMICUS CURIAE FILING EXPOUNDS UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SENDING $20,000 SANCTION TO NON-PROFIT
by John Charlton
(Oct. 28, 2009) — In a filing which is anything but what its name means (Amicus curiae = “friend of the court”), Victor M. Serby of Woodmere, NY, has sent Judge Clay D. Land a scathing legal rebuke for the latter’s attempt to award the $20,000 Sanction against attorney Orly Taitz, esq., to a non-governmental entity.
In this 13 page filing, Serby cites a potential violation of 31 USC § 1341, for Land’s stated consideration to pay the award to the National Infantry Foundation, at Fort Benning, Georgia, after receiving it from Taitz on behalf of the U.S. Treasury. Such a violation, according to 31 USC § 1350, carries the penalty of a $5,000 fine and a maximum imprisonment of 2 years.
In support of his argument, he cites Office of Personnel Management vs. Richmond 496 U.S. 414, 424-430 (1990), which ruled that a District Court cannot assign monies received to the U.S. Treasury as penalties for transgressions before its bench; since it pertains to Congress alone, and not to the Article III Judiciary to spend public monies of the Federal Government.
Posted in Law Cases | Tagged 31 USC § 1341, 31 USC § 1350, Judge Clay D. Land, Office of Personnel Management vs. Richmond, Victor M. Serby | 1 Comment
One Response
1.
on October 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM Judge Land rebuked in amicus brief regarding Orly’s $20,000 sanction « Politicaldoc’s Dx
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
As long as there are defenders
of the Patriots, such as Post &
Email
the people have a good chance of
winning and impeaching the
Communist in the Oval Office.
There are other defenders
who have the knowledge and
the backbone and
are joining in the support
of Dr. Taitz, who has been
treated as if SHE is the
criminal.. a common reaction
from guilty and corrupt
officials.
This is a super breakdown
from Post & Email concerning
the so-called ‘Dismissal’
arguments by Mr. Carter.
The document, itself, was
difficult to comprehend,
but this makes it clear
for us lay people.
And the added comments
regarding Carter’s remarks are
extremely helpful and
enlightening.
When the rest of America
learns about this travesty
in the court system, there
will be no lack of a grass-
roots movement to take back
what has been seized by
this Marxist/criminal.
There will always be those
who are ignorant and so
uneducated that they don’t
really ‘get it’“ that which is
happening to this country
and why Obama is a threat
to everyone alive in this
whole world.
Their voices are also being
heard as being derogatory
toward fixing what is wrong
and making it right. They
are, I think, in the moronic
minority.
Marching by the millions
will make a statement that
can’t be ignored. Calling
for Impeachment is necessary
and soon.
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:46 pm
If the military can’t be interfered with (just glanced at the article) surely there must be some way a regular citizen has standing. Keep up the fight. We appreciate it
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:53 pm
When we clean house in Washington, we must take out the garbage in our corrupt courts. A new day is coming. Submit to them nomore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 29th, 2009 @ 11:10 pm
Keyes Transcript 10-5-09
8:50 – 9 Mr. West:
Yes. I believe that the Courts could have some jurisdiction over the question of whether a candidate is qualified to be on the ballot.
8:50 – 13 Mr. DeJUTE:
I do agree, Your Honor.
October 29th, 2009 @ 11:15 pm
8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
David O. Carter, presiding
Arthur Nakazato, referral
Date filed: 01/20/2009
Date terminated: 10/29/2009
Date of last filing: 10/29/2009
October 29th, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
what is your comment?
October 30th, 2009 @ 2:10 am
Hearing about Carter’s decision is incredibly disheartening. However, with hope and faith, anything is possible; justice will still prevail. As long as we don’t give up, we will win.
I am reminded of the song “When You Believe”, from the Prince of Egypt. I think it appropriately portrays how everyone must feel now. Our prayers so far seem to be in vein; nothing has been able to overcome the extreme magnitude of Obama’s power and influence. However, we will not give in. This is not the end. There can be miracles- if we believe.
“Many nights we’ve prayed
With no proof anyone could hear
In our hearts a hopeful song
We barely understood
Now we are not afraid
Although we know there’s much to fear
We were moving mountains long
Before we knew we could
There can be miracles
When you believe
Though hope is frail
It’s hard to kill
Who knows what miracles
You can achieve
When you believe
Somehow you will
You will when you believe
In this time of fear
When prayer so often proved in vain
Hope seemed like the summer birds
Too swiftly flown away
And now I am standing here
Now I’m standing here
With heart so full I can’t explain
Seeking faith and speaking words
I never thought I’d say
There can be miracles
When you believe
Though hope is frail
It’s hard to kill
Who knows what miracles
You can achieve
When you believe
Somehow you will
You will when you believe”
October 30th, 2009 @ 3:11 am
From the ruling :
“Plaintiffs argue that despite the fact that President Obama has produced a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, there is evidence to show that the president was actually born in Kenya, thus making him ineligible to be president,” Carter wrote.
Judge Carter , you are a disgrace to your robes and should hang them up. There was NEVER ANY evidence presented to the court of a birth CERTIFICATE being produced from the State of Hawaii. All that was mentioned to the court was the IMAGE of a CERTIFICATION ( which is a suspect forgery ) that was posted on the internet. No claim was ever made that Hawaii vouched for that image.
October 30th, 2009 @ 8:08 am
Hi Orly,
So desperately sorry to hear this news.
You must be reeling after this shocker, as we all are.
You are made of strong stuff tho Orly, don’t let this dampen your spirits too much.
Corruption and fraud is rampant in the USA – you are up against a huge and powerful machine – so although this outcome has shocked me, it really should not have. It is a tangled web this man weaves – but then that is a family trait.
Carter has proved to be spineless, and no better than the person you are trying to prove is unworthy of being POTUS.
Judge Carter is a disgrace. In time, he too will go down in history, not as a Patriot, but a spineless, corrupt and unpatriotic Judge. A Judge that doesn’t deserve any status or to reside over any Court, in any land, in any country.
Carter should be ashamed of himself but thats far too much to expect from someone so sly and conniving as he is.
Here in the UK, those working within the realms of Law watch on with shock and awe at this mans blatant corrupt and cowardly behaviour.
The day will come when Obama’s eligibility is proved to be fraudulent – Carter will be seen as a one of his cohorts. What a shameful legacy Carter has handed down to his family! I look forward to that day.
Chin up Orly, keep going gal.