from “Before It’s news web magazine”
Posted on | November 1, 2011 | 15 Comments
An open letter to Orly Taitz and OPINION on the new findings
Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:04
To: Dr. Orly Taitz, J.D., D.D.S. Top Attorney, Practicing Doctor of Dental Surgery, Applied Constitutional Integrity
From: Al Thompson, R.E.A. C.E.I. – Small Business Owner, Innovative Entrepreneur, Promoter of Constitutional Compliance
An Open letter to Dr. Orly Taitz and Opinion on Taitz’s document delivery and Sheriff Arpaio’s the Cold Case Posse’s preliminary findings (NOTE: Some information referenced in WND)
Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio May be Armed and Dangerous?
Attorney Orly Taitz meets with Sheriff Arpaio and hands-off SSN,other documents to add to the Birth Certificate investigation and it appears Sheriff Arpaio may getting close be armed with sufficient documentation to warrant further investigation by the USSC.
________________________________________________________________________________________
by Curator: Al Thompson
Re: Sheriff Joe Arpaio is virtually armed with his Cold Case Posse’s preliminary BC Discoveries and
after his verification, your CT SSN and other relevant documents.
Orly — Congratulations!!! Your presentation last week of the alleged bogus CT social security number Obama was using along with the other documents you gave Sheriff Joe Arpaio seems to have paid-off.
It appears Sheriff Arpaio has added his own discoveries regarding the authenticity of the last (most recent) birth document President Obama certified as his true and correct original birth certificate and investigated (verified) your documents regarding Obama’s alleged phony Social Security Number issued in CT, a state in which Obama has never lived, along with the many other suspicious activities that seem to have surrounded Mr. Obama’s life since day one.
I realize this is still preliminary results from his “official” investigation, but it appears Sheriff Arpaio may reach similar conclusions on the BC and CT SSN cases on which you, myself and many others have already concluded. Those two items should be enough evidence to obligate to Supreme Court top open an official investigation into the legitimacy of Barack Obama as a president and a presidential candidate and Obama as a citizen
Obama’s has reportedly spent over $2Million in lawyers fees in an attempt to keep his birth, his past, his education and personal life a secret. In some cases, the records on Obama have mysteriously been “lost” or just vanished. It seems Obama’s past is now just a self-sculpted skeleton of what a president of the USA’s documented life should be.
When and to whom Arpaio ultimately delivers his Report of Findings and recommendations remains top be seen. Assuming the USSC ends up with this hot potato of case, the USSC is in my opinion, hoping this day would never come, (when it officially comes) .. they should feel obligated to perform due diligence for a change and stand up for the Constitution of the United States.
I have to take my hat of to you Orly, as well as Sheriff Arpio for graciously accepting your assistance – it was the right thing to do. I am impressed with your tenacity on this case that has lasted years … you “bird dogged” this all the way to the mat in getting the documents in Sheriff Arpaio’s hands in front of a surprised audience that showed their approval with as standing ovation after your presentation to Arpaio. The audience appeared to be applauding you for aggressively pursuing that moment and for your stance on this most important issue – an issue with our national security at stake. Again, congratulations Orly… I know (first hand) just how hard it was just to get to Sheriff Arpaio.
Now we will see how far Sheriff Arpaio will take these findings and how far his recommendations will go and to whom he will “deliver the goods”. This could be the well deserved break you and all of us have been working and waiting for. Good luck.
Source of some of the information from a recent WND report.
Al Thompson
Comments
15 Responses to “from “Before It’s news web magazine””
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
November 1st, 2011 @ 12:47 pm
You do understand that the Supreme Court doesn’t have the Constitutional power to open “an official investigation” of a sitting President?
November 1st, 2011 @ 3:12 pm
Mr. Thompson mistakenly believes that the Supreme Court conducts or can order investigations. Of course, you know that the Constitution limits the Supreme Court to deciding cases. I’m sure you have explained this to your supporters, but it bears repeating.
November 1st, 2011 @ 3:38 pm
Orly, according to WND the sheriff wants to see the original as well as other records. Does the sheriff have standing in the courts to get this information?
November 1st, 2011 @ 8:14 pm
Standing doesn’t matter, the integrity of the constitution matters!
November 2nd, 2011 @ 4:42 am
Does “constitutional integrity ” include giving effect to all parts of the constitution including the “case or controversy” clause, Ana? I’d appreciate your views on this since yoiu are a constitutional scholar.
November 2nd, 2011 @ 5:28 pm
I never claimed to be an expert. Just tired of hearing the phrase ‘lacks standing’.
November 3rd, 2011 @ 4:13 am
Ana, thanks for the excellent response. So, when you’re tired of hearing a phrase that means that constitutional integrity matters. Thanks for the explanation. If you are not a constitutional scholar you should be.
November 3rd, 2011 @ 5:26 pm
I, too, am tired of hearing the courts use the “standing” issue for not looking at the merits of the case. But, since this is what the courts are doing, my question still stands: does the Sheriff have standing to get to the merits of his wanting the records?
November 3rd, 2011 @ 10:00 pm
The snow ball is growing by the minute, and the strong arms of Sheriff Arpaio started pushing it down the hill, it can not be stopped now. Bravo Orly ! What you started with a handful of snow is finally becoming the unstoppable avalanche to win our country back. True patriots rejoice.
November 4th, 2011 @ 1:49 am
of course. Obama is using a forged BC and a stolen SSN as a basis to get on the ballot and run for office in Maricopa county, AZ
November 5th, 2011 @ 2:34 pm
Rejoice!
November 11th, 2011 @ 10:36 am
When is it going to stop? The CT SSN does not claim that Obama lived in Ct — you could apply for a SSN anywhere in the country at that time. See Snopes, Factcheck.org, and any of the fact checking sights. This was disproved ages ago. You haters do not seem to be interested in facts.
November 11th, 2011 @ 11:08 am
“of course [arpaio has standing]. Obama is using a forged BC and a stolen SSN as a basis to get on the ballot and run for office in Maricopa county, AZ”
Doesn’t the “full faith and credit” clause mean that each state has to take the word of another state when it comes to their records? So his standing presumably doesn’t go any further than taking the copy he’s handed and asking Hawaii if it’s a legitimate copy.
November 11th, 2011 @ 11:59 am
no, a forged alleged copy does not constitute a record (unless you mean a record for criminal prosecution of Obama)
November 11th, 2011 @ 12:01 pm
are you stupid? Snopes and Factcheck are run by liberal Democrats and Obama lackeys, never use that garbage to check anything. One had to apply from the state of CT, to get a CT SSN. Obama is busted and sooner or later will be in prison