Wisconsin Recount Update: Trump Loses 2 Votes; Stein Gains Most
The first day of the Wisconsin recount is over, and, perhaps ironically (or not, depending on your perspective), it was Green Party candidate Jill Stein who gained the most votes in the updated returns.
Stein’s vote tally increased by 17 votes (she went from 7 votes to 24 in the only reporting county), according to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s day 1 spreadsheet.
If some were hoping the recount would help Hillary Clinton and hurt Donald Trump, it didn’t on day 1 anyway. Hillary Clinton lost a grand total of one vote, and Donald Trump lost two. That means Trump lost a grand total of a net 1 vote on day 1 of the recount.
That’s not going to go very far toward flipping the state. Wisconsin has 71 more counties to go (including populous ones, like Milwaukee), and Trump leads by more than 22,000 votes. The recount is historic; it’s the first presidential recount requested by a candidate since 2000, says WTMJ-TV. Stein is also trying to force recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan; in Michigan, Trump has the ability to object to a recount, and he did so on December 1, calling it a “farce.”
Designated observes watch as tabulators work on recounting presidential ballots in Dane County (Wis.) on December 1, 2016 in Madison, Wisconsin. (Getty)
To be clear, the day 1 vote totals from Wisconsin don’t mean anything when it comes to predicting the recount’s outcome because of the recount’s snail’s pace; only one tiny Wisconsin county – Menominee – had completed its returns by the end of the day on December 1, the first day of the first 2016 presidential recount in the country. That was a county that went for Clinton. However, a smattering of other villages and towns had also completed their results, and no one was reporting much had changed. Examples:
Four towns now done in @browncountywi. Only change: @HillaryClinton gaining a vote in Holland #WIRecount@fox11newsFollow
#WIRecount “They matched exactly” says official from River Hills. 1st municipality to finish in MKE county. @fox6now
AT 5: A live #WIrecount update from @browncountywi. Towns of Eaton and Glenmore recounts had no changes @fox11news
Here’s the final results for the town of Middleton. Total # of ballots cast matched exactly, additions are from ballots marked “creatively”
It’s perhaps just ironic that it was Stein who pulled in the most new votes, gaining a grand total of 17 votes from Menominee County, which is the home of the Menominee Nation Indian reservation. Stein shelled out $3.5 million in donor money for the Wisconsin recount. However, it didn’t cost her very much in Menominee County. The Menominee only charged $200 for their hand recount, according to the Election Commission. In contrast, Milwaukee County is costing Stein more than half a million dollars all by itself.
This is what the Wisconsin Election Commission wrote about the day 1 returns:
“Menominee County has concluded its Recount for President, and its numbers are included in the spreadsheet. The minutes of each county board of canvassers will include an explanation of any change of 10 or more votes in a reporting unit. This is the explanation provided by the Menominee County Clerk for the differences in numbers between the canvass and the recount:
Johnson/Weld — different by 12 due to human error. Didn’t get added to our tally sheet.
Stein/Baraka — different by 17 due to human error. Wards 1,3,4,5 didn’t get added to tally sheet.”
The Excel spreadsheet itself compares the original vote totals to the recount totals. Here is what the spreadsheet said Menominee County reported. The rest of the spreadsheet was blank at the end of day 1 because, even though some other municipalities are done, no other counties as a whole are.
Original Vote Totals – Menominee County
Wards 1, 3-5
Trump :259
Clinton: 821
Stein: 0
Johnson: 0
Ward 2
Trump: 10
Clinton: 182
Stein: 7
Recount totals
Wards 1, 3-5
Trump 257
Clinton 820
Castle 3
Johnson 11
Stein 17
Ward 2
Trump 10
Clinton 182
Johnson 1
Stein 1
Read more about the Wisconsin recounts here:
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
December 2nd, 2016 @ 5:52 am
They have made Trump’s point once again! They can call it whatever they want to call it, I call it VOTER FRAUD!
December 2nd, 2016 @ 9:47 am
Taxpayers should not be required to put salve on Jill’s injured ego.
December 2nd, 2016 @ 10:32 am
Whatever they are doing, it will hurt Trump, sooner or later!
This whole thing should not have been allowed to happen from the beginning!
Mr Trump please pay attention to what is happening in these re-counts.
This is going to hurt you, someway?!
Have the attorney general of Wisconsin do what the attorney general of Michigan is doing, file a suit and put an end to this NOW!
And have the people in Pa. do this, too? As with one of the categories already posted here today, this will not allow the votes to be counted????
December 2nd, 2016 @ 10:37 am
Now, what if they find that Trump loses popular votes here?
What happens if the count goes so long that it will go beyond the 19th of Dec.?
What happens if Trump loses all of the electoral votes in Wis.? But keeps Michigan? Keeps Pa.?
Or…Loses Wis.? loses either of the other two states?
Will he still have enough votes to keep the election, to take the Oath on Jan. 20th?
December 2nd, 2016 @ 10:45 am
Also…are the vote re-counters checking to see if any of the votes cast are from any of the following groups:
1. Dead roll(s)?
2. Illegal roll(s)?
3. Anyone voting more than once?
4. Other group(s)?
This also needs to be challenged for authenticity of the votes!