OrlyTaitzESQ.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Enlarged PDF of the SS-5 for Ann Dunham, that shows that her application was forged as well

Posted on | July 6, 2011 | 18 Comments

I am cautiously optimistic, as the latest letter from the SSA shows, that the government is starting to cooperate. After nearly 3 years of my unrelenting e-mails, phone calls, letters and law suits different governmental agencies are starting to comply, cooperate and provide information. The fact, that in the latest case I was given standing and was able to serve court generated subpoenas is encouraging. The latest letter from the SSA provided me with ammunition to prove without a doubt, that Ann Dunham’s application for SSN is forged. It, also, helped me show a pattern of similar forgery in Dunham’s application and Obama’s long form birth certificate. Please, forward all the information from Taitz v Astrue 11-cv 402 RCL USDC District of Columbia to each and every state and federal official and demand that they follow their oath of office and prosecute and/or demand prosecution in ObamaFraudGate or they will be held accountable.    

Taitz v Astrue letter from SSA 06.27.2011 

enlarged pdf ss-5 for Ann Dunham

SSA sent to me additional information regarding Ann Dunham. The new form shows revision date 7-55. As you can see, based on letter, sent by the SSA, there was no revision date in 55.

Enlarged copies of the form under  x200 and x300 magnification show that the last digit in the number is clearly a “5″. There was no revision of the form in 1955. Additionally, a clear sign of forgery, is difference in typesetting of two fives. We saw the same signs of forgery in Obama’s long form BC, where different letters from different typesetting was used. Lastly, we pulled SS-5 forms used in 1959. Those forms have a sign in bold

 “Form-SS-5

Treasury Department

 Internal Revenue service

( Revised 7-56)

in the upper left corner of the form. Dunham’s form does not have it.

Considering affiliation of  Dunham-Obama family to William Ayers-Bernadine Dohrn, 60s hippies/flower children-turn domestic terrorists, the forger was either:

a. stoned

b. drunk

c legally blind from all the smoking and/or drinking

d. all of the above   

My guess is D-all of the above. Regardless of the reasoning and details, we have now clear and irrefutable evidence, that both Obama and his mother used forged and fraudulently obtained documents. We have the biggest breach of the US national security since the creation of this nation. We have treason of the highest degree.In comparison to that, Watergate looks like a playground brawl.  If the courts don’t start acting now, sooner or later  a lot of people will end up with convictions for treason. This will not be swept under the rug.

Reminder, penalty for treason is a life sentence or death penalty.

Comments

18 Responses to “Enlarged PDF of the SS-5 for Ann Dunham, that shows that her application was forged as well”

  1. Veritas
    July 6th, 2011 @ 7:28 am

    Her tawdry habits rubbed off on her son. Anti-patriots of the highest calibre!

  2. Tina
    July 6th, 2011 @ 11:58 am

    Here’s an idea. Since the SS-5 was an IRS form during the 1950′s why not do a FOIA request of the IRS? Go directly to the source for information about the revisions.

  3. jcm52
    July 6th, 2011 @ 12:56 pm

    So just to be clear, the choices are:

    1) You’re wrong

    or

    2) She used a non-existent form to get a social security number to which she was legally entitled and which she would have just as easily gotten by using the existing form. Then somehow whoever processed it failed to notice that the form she used was non-existent.

    Occam’s razor says…

    Just to carry this to the conclusion you want: you think we should decide to put Obama to death because you think when he was 4 years old his mother forged a document to get an SSN to which she was legally entitled?

  4. Pv
    July 6th, 2011 @ 1:16 pm

    jcm52: why would mother forge a document to get an SSN to which she was legally entitled?

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 6th, 2011 @ 2:27 pm

    I guess she was not entitled to it.

  6. Thayne Doak
    July 6th, 2011 @ 2:45 pm

    jcm52,
    Are you suggesting that Dr. Taitz is actively advocating the assassination of the President? Are you actively advocating and/or calling for the assassination of the President? The last time I checked, Dr. Taitz is simply trying to determine if Soetoro aka Obama is legally, and Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of the presidency. You are the ONLY poster to put the President and a death wish in the same sentence. You ought to be careful, sir or maddam. You may have just earned yourself a visit from the Secret Service…I hope that you have.
    Thayne Doak
    Greeley, CO.

  7. will
    July 6th, 2011 @ 3:05 pm

    jcm52 said : why would mother forge a document to get an SSN to which she was legally entitled?

    whos i do not believe the mother forged a document.. WHAT I BELIEVE is that obama in all his lies had one forged to try to show his mother did have a ss number.. oh what a tangled web he wieves… but he is going to get his due… life in prision would actually be a light sentence for what he has done to destroy the constitution… i dont want him impeached.. i want him tried for treason (and high treason at that) because its already been proven he is a fake..

    WHY THE *ELL DOESNT CONGRESS LISTEN?

  8. Martin Dumi
    July 6th, 2011 @ 3:35 pm

    jcm52,

    What is this garbage? Can you not imagine other possible choices? Or do you write here with such a fixed bias that you can’t help but to present the issues in a oversimplified misconception? Sheesh!

    Dr Orly,

    Did the SSA give any indication that they thought this forgery was worthy of investigation?

  9. turnright
    July 6th, 2011 @ 4:18 pm

    Aren’t we now left with the question: “Who really WAS Stanley Ann Dunham? And, was she cloned?

    Was she a member of the Girls From Brazil?

    Are People’s Revolutionary Courts in our future to clean this mess up?

  10. Terri
    July 6th, 2011 @ 4:38 pm

    Now you are being very dumb Orly…geeezeeee

  11. Pv
    July 6th, 2011 @ 5:09 pm

    She is not in Kansas anymore….

  12. Zethi
    July 6th, 2011 @ 5:24 pm

    I think they know something is wrong with the SS deal and the ship is about to sink so the smartest of the rats are reaching for the life savers. Happens all the time. The dumb socialist rats stick with the captain.

    It is time to come clean!!

  13. jcm52
    July 6th, 2011 @ 5:33 pm

    Pv:

    that’s a great question. We know who her parents were. There is no question she was a US citizen. So she was undeniably entitled to an SSN. Heck, you don’t even have to be a US citizen, or even a US resident to get an SSN.

    So why, oh why would she need to forge anything?

    That’s a question for orly.

  14. Leilani
    July 6th, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

    The caseworkers and eligibility workers of American (and retired workers) anxiously await decisions on Obama’s eligibility and strict punishment for fraud, if it is found.

  15. Samantha Kearney
    July 6th, 2011 @ 5:44 pm

    You know the benefits statetment social security administration sends out which accounts for all your contributions from the first time you were ever employed to present? It may be a stupid question, but could it subpeonaed? It would provide a history of recorded employment and corresponding ssn…like when he supposedly was an employee at baskin & robbins…

  16. Veritas
    July 6th, 2011 @ 6:05 pm

    Jcm: Occams razor or Lex Parsimonae would be they both used radical connections to rook the system to live high on the hog of the nation they really revile in a perfect Taqiyyah Extravaganza. Pretend to be one of the many to bring down the society they want to change by force. They ain’t foolin nobody. We smell a rat and it is Marxist through and through

  17. Florence Stone
    July 7th, 2011 @ 2:16 am

    Correct me if I am wrong, but when Stanley Ann married Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia, didn’t she give up her U.S. citizenship? And, if so, is there any record that she ever got her U.S. citizenship back? Indonesia did not allow duel citizenship. Perhaps, as an illegal alien, like Obama, she had to forge documents to give herself an identity as an American. Perhaps that is why she was not entitled to a SS number and had to forge one. It seems being crooked was well imbedded in the Dunham/Obama family; it came as natural as breathing. And Obama CANNOT be impeached. That can only be done to a sitting POTUS, which Obama is not. Obama is a felon, unable to be POTUS, and can/should only be arrested, tried, and, when found guilty, a certainty with all the evidence gathered by Orly and Jerome Corsi, sent to prison for the rest of his days.

  18. DixT
    July 13th, 2011 @ 6:44 am

    I don’t think Obama’s Mother was the one who forged that SS-5 Application. Did you also notice that the top portion appears to be handwritten in a FELT-TIP PEN??? They DID NOT have felt-tip pens in use in 1959! And they DID NOT have “pens” that wrote that “widely”! And WHY does the top portion of this form look “new”, while the bottom of the form (signature area) look “old”?

Leave a Reply