OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Drudge writes about Arpaio/Klayman case, which was dismissed, but does not write about my case in the 9th circuit, where I was granted a hearing and it was already found that my client, former Pres. Candidate, Keith Judd, was granted standing. Was Drudge, like WND and Birther report, paid by Arpaio to promote him and quash any news about my cases?

Posted on | August 14, 2015 | 2 Comments

Press release

Law Offices of Orly Taitz

9th Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument in case Grinols, Judd et al v Electoral college, Obama, Biden, Governor of CA, Secretary of State of CA.

This case was filed by CA attorney Orly Taitz.  In this case the District Court judge, Morrison C England,  has already found that  presidential candidate, Keith Judd, who received 40% running against Obama in 2012 WV Democratic party primary, had standing to proceed with the law suit against Barack Obama based on evidence that Obama  is using a stolen CT Social Security number and all fabricated IDs. However, the judge ruled that this is not a justiciable issue, meaning that the court cannot rule on eligibility of the candidate. The argument was laughable and an insult to intelligence of every American citizen, as time and again the courts ruled on eligibility of a candidate. What is even more appalling and disturbing, is that in the same federal court in Sacramento, around the same time another presidential candidate, Peta Lindsey, was found to be ineligible due to the fact that she was not 35 years old and as such not eligible. Lindsey was thrown of the ballot. When her attorney claimed in the 9th circuit that the issue is not justiciable, the 9th Circuit found it to be justiciable. So Attorney Taitz and her clients have a perfect precedent and the law on their side. If the judges will not be corrupt, they will have no other choice but to rule in favor of the plaintiffs.

So far no conservative or “dissident” media reported on this hearing, yet they reported on other cases, which are being dismissed. The question is “Why?”. Attorney Orly Taitz is urging all patriots to be at the hearing on October 20th and spread the word by forwarding this announcement to media outlets around the country.
This issue is more important today than ever, we need a declaratory relief on Obama’s lack of citizenship, his lack of valid Social Security number and valid IDs, we need a relief on his lack of eligibility and his lack of allegiance to this county. Obama’s actions of completely bankrupting this nation with 10 trillion of additional debt, cuts the military and recent deal with Iran are a bigger threat to this nation that Clinton’s e-mails. Success in this case will lead to eventual adjudication that Obama’s deals, bills and executive orders are null and void, as he was signing those based on fraud, asserting his identity and eligibility for presidency based on bogus IDs.

Taitz will be asking the court to give her additional time for this important case. Additionally, Taitz works pro bono and any and all donations are greatly appreciated and can be given at wwwOrlyTaitzESQ.com or by mail to 29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Calendar for James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco

Oral Argument Notice

Note: Calendar entries may change up until the hearing date. Please remember to check the docket report for updates. Case synopses are prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
2015-10-20  9:00 am  Courtroom 2, 3rd Floor Rm 330, James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco
Case No. Title Nature Origin Time / Side
12-70442 Amandeep Kaur v. Loretta E. Lynch – A citizen of India petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture, and adjustment of status. Immigration BIA 10 min
13-16564 Dennis Barnett v. Brian Duffey – A California state prisoner appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for second degree robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. [5:08-cv-01604-RMW] Habeas N. CA 10 min
14-10080 USA v. Randly Begay – Randly Irvin Begay appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. [3:13-cr-08073-NVW-1] Criminal AZ 10 min
13-16251 A. Copeland v. Raymond Lane – An appeal from the dismissal of an action under the Securities Exchange Act against Hewlett-Packard Company officers and directors. [5:11-cv-01058-EJD] Civil N. CA 15 min
13-16304 David Roberts v. PayPal – David Roberts appeals the district court’s summary judgment in his action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act regarding a text message sent to his cell phone by PayPal, Inc. [4:12-cv-00622-PJH] Civil N. CA 15 min
13-16359 James Grinols v. Electoral College – Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action challenging President Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for the Office of the President of the United States in 2012 and alleging violations of California Elections Code § 2150. [2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD] Civil E. CA 15 min

Location Address

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco CA 94103

Appeals court rules against Sheriff Joe in immigration dispute…

Category: Uncategorized
Tags: > > > > > >

Comments

2 Responses to “Drudge writes about Arpaio/Klayman case, which was dismissed, but does not write about my case in the 9th circuit, where I was granted a hearing and it was already found that my client, former Pres. Candidate, Keith Judd, was granted standing. Was Drudge, like WND and Birther report, paid by Arpaio to promote him and quash any news about my cases?”

  1. Davey Crockett
    August 15th, 2015 @ 11:06 am

    Yeah, boy…

    The old Sheriff, Joe…

    Is just “The Mouth that roared!!!”

  2. Veritas
    August 15th, 2015 @ 11:21 am

    There is something shockingly wrong in America.

    Below is a new story about HAMZA BIN LADEN, Osama’s son, calling for “Lone Wolf Attacks” inside the USA:

    https://nws.mx/1IRLu3z

    But, ISN’T this the SAME Hamza Bin Laden whom MICHELLE visited in a Boston Hospital at the time of the Boston Marathon Terror attack?:

    https://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.com/2014/02/photo-of-michele-obamas-boston-marathon.html

    Shouldn’t America, AND THE WORLD, be asking why the Obamas would be visiting someone asking for “lone wolf attacks” inside the USA?

Leave a Reply