DRAMA: 1/3 of Huma Abedin emails 100% redacted… Information on Clinton server too sensitive even for Congress…I wonder, who was bribed and how much to give Huma clearance and place her as an aide to Clinton? Call FBI and Congress demand investigation in light of Huma Abedin’s connection to Muslim Brotherhood
Posted on | August 25, 2016 | 12 Comments
DRAMA: 1/3 of Huma Abedin emails 100% redacted... Information on Clinton server too sensitive even for Congress... |
Comments
12 Responses to “DRAMA: 1/3 of Huma Abedin emails 100% redacted… Information on Clinton server too sensitive even for Congress…I wonder, who was bribed and how much to give Huma clearance and place her as an aide to Clinton? Call FBI and Congress demand investigation in light of Huma Abedin’s connection to Muslim Brotherhood”
Leave a Reply
August 26th, 2016 @ 7:43 am
For years people have wondered even assumed HUMA was a Muslim Brotherhood plant financed by Saudi Arabia.
Huma, married to a Jew and “this close” at all times to a major political figure in the USA and possible POTUS, is the perfect embodiment of TAQIYYA to promote “the Cause” of Western Islamization.
Sound Far Fetched?
Does it really?
August 26th, 2016 @ 8:00 am
I b elieve you are right and her marriage to Weiner is a farce, a facade only
August 26th, 2016 @ 9:40 am
Besides, Weiner is not much of a Jew.
But there is another twist to it:
EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton bombed Saddam to distract from the Monica Lewinsky scandal – what Huma Abedin’s Muslim journal claimed about her boss’s husband
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3758922/Bill-Clinton-bombed-Iraq-distract-Monica-scandal-Huma-Abedin-s-Muslim-journal-claimed-boss-s-husband.html
August 26th, 2016 @ 9:44 am
Huma’s real name may mean Umma – nation, community
August 26th, 2016 @ 1:09 pm
Because of the many questions about Huma and her security clearance, or lack thereof, I am posting this again:
Security Clearance Process: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Congressional Research Service. (CRS)
Link to CRS document:
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R43216.pdf
Question from document, page 7 of 15.
Are Constitutional Officers (e.g., the President, Members of Congress) Required to Hold a Security Clearance to Access Classified Information?
Answer:
Security clearances are not mandated for the President, Vice President, Members of Congress, Supreme Court Justices, or other constitutional officers.
The criteria for election or appointment to these positions are specified in the U.S. Constitution, and except by constitutional amendment, no additional criteria (e.g., holding a security clearance) may be required.
As Commander-in-Chief, the President has the authority to establish the standards for access to classified national security information. This authority is typically exercised through the issuance of executive orders. Executive Order 13467, which covers suitability checks and security
clearances for federal employees, applicants, and contractors, includes a determination of which executive branch individuals are covered and which are exempted.
‘Covered individual’ means a person who performs work for or on behalf of the executive branch, or who seeks to perform work for or on behalf of the executive branch, but does not include:
(i) the President or (except to the extent otherwise directed by the President) EMPLOYEES of the President under section 105 or 107 of title 3, United States Code; or
(ii) the Vice President or (except to the extent
otherwise directed by the Vice President)
EMPLOYEES of the Vice President under section 106 of title 3 or
annual legislative branch appropriations acts.
End of CRS info.
My summary of the above: Once the presidency is usurped by an ineligible, identity fraud con-artist that person can then appoint anyone they want to see any information they want them to see. That is exactly what happened with Barry Soetoro. This explains how Huma, Valerie Jarrett, members of the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama’s Czars, including admitted Communist Van Jones and many others in the Obama regime who could never pass a security background check, including Obama himself, are nonetheless given access to anything they want to see by the current putative president.
August 26th, 2016 @ 1:21 pm
Expert (missed name) on FOX this afternoon reporting that the key word BENGHAZI came back positive on a number of erased emails to be released. Only Smoke? Like a California Wild Fire more like it.
August 26th, 2016 @ 6:05 pm
Bob69
If what you say is true about security clearance procedure exemption for constitutiona officers why does this not come up in the arguments concerning the qualification of Obama’s eligibility as well as Cruz’s? Members of Congress do not have be natural born citizen s as well. This seems to be a contradiction.
August 26th, 2016 @ 6:15 pm
As for Huma, must assume that the Saudis and
MB paid Weiner to marry her, private bribe and
dowry. Would help the stealth and espionage.
As for Huma, her mother is a pro-Muslim anti-US
terrorist. Like Mother, like daughter. Huh?
Check it out, Danno!!!
August 26th, 2016 @ 8:45 pm
Ever wondered what Van Jones has been doing nowadays? Well, he is working in education…
In 2010 Van Jones received appointments at Princeton University, as a distinguished visiting fellow in both the Center for African American Studies and in the Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs – Wikipedia.
August 27th, 2016 @ 11:20 am
Hi Rich,
I am not sure what you are saying about Obama’s eligibility, but yes, what I am saying about requirements for a security background check is true and easy to back up with various documents. This is a link to E.O. 13467. signed in June of 2008 bu GWB and mandated by Congress to be in effect by January, 2009, Just in time for Barry.
Link to E.O. 13467
https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-13467.htm
Section 1.3, (g) from the executive order:
Quote:
(g) “Covered individual” means a person who performs work for or on behalf of the executive branch, or who seeks to perform work for or on behalf of the executive branch, but does not include:
(i) the President or (except to the extent otherwise directed by the President) employees of the President under section 105 or 107 of title 3, United States Code; or
(ii) the Vice President or (except to the extent otherwise directed by the Vice President) employees of the Vice President under section 106 of title 3 or annual legislative branch appropriations acts.
This is from Snopes in response to a question about how could Obama pass a security background check with the relationship he had with Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers. The answer is, he doesn’t have to take one.
https://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/security.asp
From Snopes in October of 2008.
Quote:
“No such background checks are required for Barack Obama’s current position as a U.S. Senator, or for his possible future position as President of the United States. Senator Obama already has access to a good deal of secret intelligence information as a member of Congress, and as President he would not only have access to more of it but would also have the power to determine who else within the government might see it.”
More information here about members of Congress not having to take a security background check. I especially like this quote:
https://news.clearancejobs.com/2012/05/16/do-members-of-congress-have-security-clearances/
Quote:
“Opponents of requiring security clearances argue the process could compromise the independence of legislators. More likely, it would add increased scrutiny on members that may prove politically, if not personally, harmful. Given the number of sex scandals and other congressional debauchery, one could argue a fair number of members of congress may have blackmail problems, and a lot to lose in the event of an unfavorable clearance decision.”
This information is all over the place but rarely talked about. The perfect set-up for the take-over from the inside out was waiting for Obama and his puppet-masters. This needs to be covered more because a lot of people just don’t want to believe it. What most people think is happening to protect America’s secrets….isn’t, and has not been for a long time.
August 27th, 2016 @ 12:41 pm
This is something that should not be allowed: that someone who is like O and Cruz…they should not be allowed to sit in Congress, as well.
They are still NOT eligible to sit in the WH, so why would we allow them to sit in Congress in order to help some foreign power????
IMO, this needs to be changed, to read ONLY those who are natural born citizens, and legally immigrated foreigners, who take the Oath to defend America, would be allowed to sit in the Hallowed Halls of Congress!
August 27th, 2016 @ 5:25 pm
Perhaps the redacted emails were nothing more than the menu planning for El-Fitr Feast?