Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Discrepancy in assertion in the WND article by Corsi showing that Ah’Nee-Randolph bc was issued in 1995 and recently received information that Ah’nee could not get her LFBC as late as 2009

Posted on | December 12, 2013 | 7 Comments

Press Release from Attorney Orly Taitz


In and around the time of Obama’s release of his alleged Long Form BC there was a release of another BC by a volunteer. Jerome Corsi and WND published this BC in a redacted form. Later a number of volunteers found the name of the volunteer in the Hi Advertiser based on her birth date August 23 and part of her mother’s name, which was not fully redacted. So from 2011 this bc was not a secret, it belonged to Johanna Ah’Nee .

At issue is a discrepancy: Article by Jerome Corsi states that this BC was issued in 1995, it contains the back of the BC with the alleged 1995 stamp, however it conflicts with what she told her employer, namely that she did not have a long form bc as late as 2009.

Johanna was referred to Attorney Orly Taitz in 2011 by Miki Booth, who knows Johanna’s employer, Al, owner of the printing shop, Sure Shot Graphics and Printing Supplies in Honolulu, HI.

Her e-mail stated that Miki Booth asked Al to find a long form BC, as health department refused to give Miki her  long form BC. After Miki Booth could not obtain her long form BC, she asked Al if he could go to the Health department with someone else and get it for another person.
According to the e-mail received by Taitz  recently Al and Johanna Ah’Nee-Randlph went to Health  Department after 2009, after Miki could not get her LFBC and the Health Department refused to give Johanna Ah’nee her LFBC.

This contradicts with the article in WND by Jerome Corsi, whereby Corsi   posted the back of the alleged origina BC that Johanna sent to him and it contained 1995 stamp.

Now we have a real discrepancy: according to the stamp on the back, this LFBC copy was given to Johanna in 1995, however it contradicts the fact that she did not have it as late as 2009 and went to the Health Department to ask for it and could not get it. Taitz  got from Ah’Nee only a copy and did not have the copy of the back of the LFBC with 1995 stamp.

Johanna met Taitz in HI at the airport when Taitz flew there with 2 experts around August 7, 2011. Taitz had late dinner with Johanna and her niece and a local attorney. Ah’Nee was supposed to go with Taitz to the Health Department the next morning, but she e-mailed Taitz at around 5 am saying that she changed her mind and will not go with her to the Health Department.

What is also interesting, is the fact that Johanna demanded that Jerome Corsi return to her the original. Why did she want it returned? Why would she give Corsi an original instead of a copy?

A couple of days ago Taitz wrote to Miki Booth and Johanna Ah’Nee Randolph and asked how did Johanna finally got her BC after the Health Department refused to give it to her. Taitz did not get any response from either Miki Booth or Johanna. Taitz suspects that the alleged LFBC for Ah’Nee was a dry run for Obama. Investigation continues. This press release is being forwarded to Jerome Corsi wih the request to safe keep the alleged original sent by Ah’Nee to him.

Further in regards to Taitz v Donahoe case, the 12.02.2013 Motion by Taitz to recuse J

End of press release.



7 Responses to “Discrepancy in assertion in the WND article by Corsi showing that Ah’Nee-Randolph bc was issued in 1995 and recently received information that Ah’nee could not get her LFBC as late as 2009”

  1. Hugh G. Rection
    December 12th, 2013 @ 5:11 am

    Orly, did you hear Loretta Fuddy died in a plane crash yesterday?

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 12th, 2013 @ 5:55 am

    yes, read the article and press release

  3. Charles Midroni
    December 12th, 2013 @ 8:47 am

    If it is an original, he has no choice. Has to return it on request. He can of course have a certified copy made, and keep that.

  4. Scott
    December 12th, 2013 @ 1:25 pm

    Charles, Corsica is under no obligation to return the original BC. She gave it to him. I would make her sue for its return and delay delay delay.

    If she knows anything about a forgery, she better speak up before she also is murdered by Obama operatives.

    Fuddy murder was no crash, sounds like a controlled water landing and she was drowned.

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    December 12th, 2013 @ 1:30 pm

    why is Corsi not responding and not showing the original?

    December 12th, 2013 @ 2:12 pm

    Poster #1: be nice and use a civilized screen name! That one is obnoxious!

    Orly: is it possible that you have come across a situation that I’ve been through with “infiltrators” stopping, re-directing and maybe keeping emails, from getting to where they’re supposed to go?

    Since I am now working with a new machine, this hasn’t happened, YET!!

  7. Brian Reilly
    December 12th, 2013 @ 3:11 pm

    It is looking more and more clear the identities of Doug Vogt’s Jane Doe# 1 and Jane Doe # 2. The question remains, who is the alleged perpetrator or perpetrators of this spectacle that is beginning to be exposed. The truth will soon be exposed.

Leave a Reply