OrlyTaitzESQ.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



DC circuit did not post the notice of default yet. Please, contact the clerks’ office, ask to docket the notice ASAP

Posted on | February 19, 2013 | 10 Comments

 Case SearchCalendarOpinionsOrders/JudgmentsBriefsXMLTXT

LogoutHelp

 

Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-5304Docketed: 10/31/2011
Termed: 05/25/2012
Nature of Suit: 2895 Freedom of Information Act of 1974
Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue
Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fee Status: Fee Paid

Case Type Information:
1) Civil US
2) United States
3)
 

Originating Court Information:
District: 0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCLLead: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District JudgeDate Filed: 02/16/2011Date Order/Judgment:Date NOA Filed:08/30/201110/25/2011

 

03/16/2012Open Restricted DocumentRESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
04/27/2012Open DocumentMOTION filed [1371429] by Orly Taitz for default judgment. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 05/07/2012) [Service Date: 04/24/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
05/25/2012Open DocumentPER CURIAM ORDER filed [1375820] denying motion for default judgment [1371429-2]; denying motion for summary reversal [1364625-2]; granting motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2], withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Rogers, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
06/04/2012Open DocumentPETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/20/2012Open Restricted DocumentSUPPLEMENT [1380221] to petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] filed by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 06/18/2012] [11-5304]
07/30/2012Open DocumentMOTION filed [1387271] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/09/2012) [Service Date: 07/26/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]
08/02/2012Open DocumentCLERK’S ORDER filed [1387293] Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that the motion be dismissed as moot. No mandate has issued in this case. A petition for rehearing en banc remains pending before the court. The mandate issued July 24, 2012, in No. 11-5306, Taitz v. Ruemmler, where no petition for rehearing was received by the court. [1387271-2] [11-5304]
08/09/2012Open DocumentPER CURIAM ORDER, En Banc, filed [1388336] denying petition for rehearing en banc [1377943-2] Before Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Garland, Brown, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [11-5304]
08/29/2012 MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [11-5304]
01/29/2013Open DocumentMOTION filed [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DUE TO NEW EVIDENCE AND NEW DECISIONS"] [1417882] by Orly Taitz to recall mandate (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/11/2013) [Service Date: 01/28/2013 by US Mail] Pages: 11-15 with attachments. [11-5304]

Comments

10 Responses to “DC circuit did not post the notice of default yet. Please, contact the clerks’ office, ask to docket the notice ASAP”

  1. Roger
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:01 pm

    Is there a number to call?

  2. Gary Dugas
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:24 pm

    Red Flag is saying it was den

  3. Gary Dugas
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:25 pm
  4. Kramer
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:37 pm

    My friend Bob Sacamano said there’s no need to call. Ignoring your lawsuit is not against the law.

  5. Sherri
    February 19th, 2013 @ 12:46 pm

    What’s the phone number?

  6. Virginia W.
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:02 pm

    “The Washington Post reports on the seriousness of this abuse of office, “is more than an unconstitutional attempt to circumvent the Senate’s advise-and-consent role. It is a breathtaking violation of the separation of powers and the duty of comity that the executive owes to Congress.” Crucially, no other president in history has ever tried to force through such alleged “ recess appointments” while Congress is still in session.” (Excerpt from below)

    http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/02/breaking-news-u-s-federal-court-hits-president-barack-hussein-obama-with-three-charges-of-abuse-of-office-2455332.html

  7. James Smith
    February 19th, 2013 @ 2:48 pm

    This is a travesty. Some if not all the Supreme Court justices should be tried for high crimes against the United States of America. I would have never dreamed I would see the day this could happen in the once great United States of America. And I say; that’s the exact same thing people said in the Russian gulags and nazi Germany right before they were lead to a mass grave pit and shot to death. s.

  8. bella
    February 19th, 2013 @ 4:03 pm

    “moderation” for a decision?

  9. Thomas
    February 20th, 2013 @ 7:05 am

    Mrs. Taitz, I just needed to put this down to be read…
    These Bastards in Washington DC are under the impression that “THEY make the Laws, but THEY do not have to Abide by them”…
    People, THIS IS THIER MINDSET!!! And thier is only One way I can think of Changing THIER outlook on Justice (but I cannot mention it).

  10. Davey Crockett
    February 20th, 2013 @ 10:37 pm

    Virginia: what has come of this court that filed those charges against O?
    ……….
    And Orly, will this court really do anything to O?

Leave a Reply