Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Corrupt judge was arrested by citizens for treason against the constitution, covering up fraudulent documents and contempt of court. A huge group of people chanted to the judge “shame, do your job”. People everywhere are rising against the globalist unlawful mafia destroying the lives of people. In the U.S. corrupt and treasonous judges are covering up Obama’s forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service certificate and stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which he is using and which was never assigned to Obama according to E-verify and SSNVS. Treasonous bought and paid for media will not report this, you have to spread the word! Send far and wide.

Posted on | December 19, 2012 | 12 Comments

Ms. Taitz,

You must see this. I immediately thought of you and the problems you are having with our corrupt USA judicial system. I can’t say when this occurred, but I think it was just posted on-line a day or so ago.

Thank you for your efforts and stay strong and vigilant,

Edward Keim

 

Judge Arrested In Court For Treason By UK Citizens

 

Power to the People!
Not seen it on LL so sharing it here. This was ignored by the mainstream media in the UK. They don’t want us realising the difference between common law of the land and maritime law.
“Arrest that judge!”
British Constitution Group chairman Roger Hayes arrests the judge for refusing to produce his oath of office over illegal council tax fraud committed by the local council with the help of citizens from the UK.

 

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f32_1355777163

Share

Comments

12 Responses to “Corrupt judge was arrested by citizens for treason against the constitution, covering up fraudulent documents and contempt of court. A huge group of people chanted to the judge “shame, do your job”. People everywhere are rising against the globalist unlawful mafia destroying the lives of people. In the U.S. corrupt and treasonous judges are covering up Obama’s forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service certificate and stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which he is using and which was never assigned to Obama according to E-verify and SSNVS. Treasonous bought and paid for media will not report this, you have to spread the word! Send far and wide.”

  1. Veritas
    December 19th, 2012 @ 4:00 am

    Awareness growing daily:

    ————-
    Arizona Electors Question Barack Obama Birth Certificate

    By John Celock @ The Huffington Post

  2. Flatpointhigh
    December 19th, 2012 @ 7:29 am

    —–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
    Hash: SHA1

    Hmm. That’s an English Police van, and England has no Constitution.
    —–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
    Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
    Comment: GPGTools – http://gpgtools.org

    iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0d1ZAAoJEMrutuqXGb9MFykIAImohzRTH+DE0KgPL8htLQoE
    0/BVUZVw40Tn6LZcjzcr/p38LFosYyRf/dUhJnhgkulBQ/Gm1WnCOjhgluWosKWR
    /ig9ODDcTXTgbC4bClr/pogncGyJp/sWoXXagD0D5PJg1zjzHfkPsf2A0Pcr7Zrk
    POeXsOo6UytFmGSFotS2kYQt5/BCM88a86dEdtJf9WKGdtoD4BN1uO+fTD9nOlSU
    KzcF8PlaEDzxOcedPMeUjLSxGbh3x2ttug9NZhCtXdYBe1quLEjODhuCo27/tlq2
    sjP2m6IcDCndl0igIpjK9IUHrTfRFOWzYEdjq5q9rZGQUy1xziq3xNxxxPCCNLY=
    =coaS
    —–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

  3. Edward C. Noonan
    December 19th, 2012 @ 10:57 am

    What is so distressing, is that this March 7, 2011 has come to nothing. There was no “arrest”
    according to
    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/British_Constitution_Group

    Since the British Constitution is “unwritten” and mostly found in several different documents, our British cousins are up the creek without a paddle. But they claim the Magna Carta and COMMON LAW to be their authority to arrest the corrupt judge. It sounds good to me!

  4. Elizabeth
    December 19th, 2012 @ 12:24 pm

    Yesterday I found this information about why the GOP never defies the Democratic Party.

    It is on a site called Fellowshipofminds.wordpress
    and briefly, an arrangement (decree)
    was made 30 years ago, between the two parties, that there would not be any
    conflict of interests.

    A Dr. Eowyn is the host of this web site.

    Most of this information is unknown
    by Americans, and explains much of
    why the GOP is passive in the face of
    voter fraud.

    Here is an excerpt from the web site:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    This all goes back to a lawsuit 31 years ago, in 1981. The following is compiled from an account on The Judicial View, a legal website specializing in court decision research and alerts, and from “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615.

    In 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the RNC, the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

    The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).

    The lawsuit alleged that:

    The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.

    The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.

    The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

    To settle the lawsuit, in 1982, the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The following is what the RNC and RSC, in the Consent Decree, agreed they would do:

    [I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:

    (a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;

    (b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;

    (c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;

    (d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

    (e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

    (f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

    The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”

    As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

    Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.

    In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). (I paid The Judicial Review $10 for the PDF of Case No. 09-4615 and uploaded the 59-page document to FOTM’s media library. To read Case No. 09-4615, click here!)

    This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:

    In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

    Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

    Guy Benson of Townhall.com points out that in last Tuesday’s election, Obama only won by 406,348 votes in 4 states:

    Florida: 73,858
    Ohio: 103,481
    Virginia: 115,910
    Colorado: 113,099

    Those four states, with a collective margin of 406,348 votes for Obama, add up to 69 electoral votes. Had Romney won 407,000 or so additional votes in the right proportion in those states, he would have 275 electoral votes.

    All four states showed Romney ahead in the days leading up to the election. But on November 6, Romney lost all four states by a substantial margin, all of which have precincts that inexplicably went 99% for Obama, had voter registrations that exceeded their population, and had experienced problems with voting machines.

    This election was stolen by the Democrats via vote fraud. Despite all the evidence of fraud, the Republican Party has been strangely silent about it.

    Now you know why.
    I’ll leave you with one last, even more disturbing thought:

    The RNC and DNC made their Consent Decree 30 years ago, in 1982. The agreement in effect gives a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.

    The Democrat Party knew this 30 years ago, more than enough time to put a plan in place to identify and groom their “perfect candidate” — in the words of Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) in 2008, a “light-skinned” black Democrat who has “no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one.”

    Being a black Democrat, this perfect candidate would get the support of almost all black Americans (96% in 2008!) and other racial minorities (two-thirds of Hispanics in 2008).

    Being a “light-skinned” black with “no Negro dialect”, this perfect candidate would get the support of white Americans perpetually guilt-ridden about America’s original sin of slavery.

    It doesn’t matter if this “perfect candidate” has dubious Constitutional eligibility to be president. They would see to it that his original birth certificate (if there is one) would never see the light of day. The same with his other documents — his passports, school and college records, draft registration, and medical records (so we’ll never know why Obama has that very long scar running from one side of his head, over the crown, to the other side).

    Now, we understand the significance of the account Tom Fife wrote during the 2008 presidential campaign. Fife, a U.S. government contractor, claims that in 1992 while he was visiting Moscow, a woman with undying allegiance to Soviet Communism (the Soviet Union had recently collapsed, on December 31, 1991) told him that a black man named Barack, born of a white American woman and an African male, was being groomed by communists to be, and would be elected, President of the United States.

    Now, we finally understand the cryptic remark made in May 2010, by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: “Obama was selected before he was elected.”

    In 2008, this “perfect candidate” won the presidential election. And despite his many failures in his first term, he would be reelected in 2012 for a second term via massive vote fraud. But nothing would be done about the vote fraud, because of that Consent Decree signed by the RNC 30 years ago.

    The Republican Party is dead — and with it, the U.S. two-party system as well — and the sooner we voters recognize that the better.

    The question that remains is whether the American Republic is also dead.
    UPDATE (Nov. 16, 2012):

    Since I published this post yesterday, we’ve been asking each other: “What can I/we do about this?” Here are my suggestions:

    1. If you are a registered Republican, QUIT! Switch your voter registration ID to non-partisan Independent.

    2. Stop donating money, not even one penny, to the GOP. Tell them why.

    3. Spread the word. Please send the URL of this post (http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/) to:

    EVERYONE on your email list.
    Media people for whom you have email addresses.
    Tea Party groups you know.
    Post the link on your Facebook page.
    Post the link as your comment on websites and blogs you visit.

    4. Write your state’s attorney general and ask him/her to investigate vote fraud in your state. Click here!
    UPDATE (Nov. 21, 2012):

    5 days after I’d published this and 7 days after PolitiJim of GulagBound published his acount, someone in the conservative establishment media is writing about this — WND’s Bob Unruh. Click here for his article, “GOP Legally Barred From Fighting Vote Fraud”. But it’s still the sound of crickets from conservative talk radio, even though I’ve sent my post to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, and a reader had also sent it to Mark Levin.

  5. cq
    December 19th, 2012 @ 2:06 pm

    Ben Swann Reality Check: Are calls for stricter gun laws really about guns?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf0MO55kMsI&feature=youtu.be

  6. AMJ
    December 19th, 2012 @ 6:45 pm

    Elizabeth I read that at another site too. That’s why I hope somebody like Lakin/keys runs on a 3rd Party ticket in 2016 “if there is a 2016″ if they ran on Reagan principles and had a requirement that You must be a NBC I think most everyone would vote for that. The Rino Party is finished.

  7. Stars and Stripes FOREVER
    December 19th, 2012 @ 7:04 pm

    Hmmm…well then, why doesn’t the RNC make an effort to reverse the situation and file a similar case against the (DNC) for seeing to it that the military votes seem NOT TO MATTER?
    …….
    Couldn’t this counter the dumba__ idea 30 years ago, to make it null and void for the (D)’s to pull any more of this nonsense? The (R)’s seem to be a group of “go alongs, to get alongs!” This is just moronic and treasonous!

  8. Authenticator
    December 19th, 2012 @ 8:55 pm

    Elizabeth, sounds like orlytaitzesq.com’s deep waters once again are trawled by WND to make a big catch that they can put their name to and make big money on?

    “..5 days after I’d published this and 7 days after PolitiJim of GulagBound published his acount, someone in the conservative establishment media is writing about this — WND’s Bob Unruh.” -Elizabeth

  9. Elizabeth
    December 20th, 2012 @ 6:35 am

    Go to their web site and read more
    about what can be done. If people
    had voted Independent this time
    around, they would have had two
    great contenders…. Dr. Laurie Roth
    and Thomas McClearan (spelled wrong,
    sorry).

  10. Lisa in Nevada
    December 20th, 2012 @ 9:54 am

    This is really crazy — We must secede to stop this nonsense..no civil war is needed as this information is enough to convince even the stupidest of borderline dumbocrats..secession would render these past two elections null and void wherein citizens could move to the country of their choice..California is toast so Texas is about the only option to establish a new Republic. The media is solely responsible for this insanity and they must be eliminated!

  11. Elizabeth
    December 20th, 2012 @ 11:36 am

    The correct spelling:

    Thomas Gregory MacLearan
    who is also a plaintiff in
    one of Dr. Orly’s cases.

    I first heard of him and read his
    posts on Sharon Rondeau’s
    Post&Email.

  12. Elizabeth
    December 20th, 2012 @ 11:41 am

    Ooops.. it is MacLeran

    and he is a plaintiff in the
    Grinols vs. Electoral College case.

    He and Dr. Roth both had excellent
    posts concerning how they would
    rectify the wrongs in this country.
    They are just normal people; I believe
    he is a veteran and she is a radio
    hostess. We need normal people.

Leave a Reply





*