OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



Correspondence with Senator crapo. if you find out that the US attorneys defrauded Judge England an did not notify the senators, congressmen and electors about the case, pleas write to Judge england, advice him that fraud was committed that Dep of justice defrauded the judge and did not notify senators of the case and the TRO motion

Posted on | January 19, 2013 | 4 Comments

Fwd: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator Crapo

 
         
 
Inbox
  x  
         
 
 
 
George Ashford
——– Original Message ——– Subject: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator …
3:41 PM (18 hours ago)

 
——– Original Message ——– Subject: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator …
 
 
George Ashford <drgla@cableone.net>
3:41 PM (18 hours ago)

 
 
 
 
to dr_taitz, me
 
 
Images are not displayed. Display images below – Always display images from drgla@cableone.net
 
 
 
 
 
 

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator Crapo
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:14:02 -0700
From: George Ashford <drgla@cableone.net>
To: @yahoo. com., @gmail. com
Orly Taitz
orly.taitz@gmail.com
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Orly,I thought you would be interested in this ridiculous response I received from Senator Crapo to the Obama fraud.

George Ashford

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: Correspondence from Senator Crapo
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:35:08 -0500
From: <correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov>
Reply-To: <correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov>
To: <drgla@cableone.net>
January 18, 2013
 
 
George Ashford
1385 W Villa Norte Street
Boise, ID 83702-6637
 
Dear George:
 
Thank you for contacting me regarding citizenship and other eligibility requirements for public office. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.
 
In recent years, questions have arisen about the eligibility of President Barack Obama for the office of President of the United States. You are justified to be concerned about a possible violation of the Constitution, and I understand how important your concerns are. Having confidence in the electoral process and our officials is critical to maintaining public confidence in our country. As such, the people must be confident in the integrity of the electoral process and our electoral institutions.
 
A number of provisions of Constitutional, federal and state law govern the resolution of this issue. First, and perhaps foremost, in our system of law, the states have jurisdiction to determine and establish documentation of live births. The Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
 
This Constitutional reservation of powers to the states gives them a significant role in determining the eligibility of those running for federal office. In this case, the State of Hawaii has clearly declared that the birth certificate showing that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, is valid. Both the Director of Hawaii’s Department of Health and the state’s Registrar of Vital Statistics confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency.
 
In response to remaining questions about documentation, the White House publicly released President Obama’s birth certificate in April 2011. The Certificate of Live Birth released by the White House bears the certification of the Hawaii State Registrar. Experts reviewing the documents generally concur it contains all the elements of a valid Certificate of Live Birth, including all the relevant data and signatures. Claims that the document was forged have not been substantiated.
 
The Constitution and federal law require that, among other things, only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) are eligible to be President of the United States. Under our system of law, it is the states that make the determination of and provide the validation of birth to determine qualification to serve as president. In this matter, the State of Hawaii has done so. If contrary documentation is produced and verified, this matter will necessarily be resolved by the judicial branch of our government under the Constitution.
 
In that context, these and other related allegations have been raised, but consistently dismissed in several courts, including the United States Supreme Court. Specifically, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed Berg v. Obama. That case has been taken to the U.S. Supreme Court on multiple occasions, but the Court has refused to hear it each time. The Hawaii Supreme Court denied the petitioner’s request in Martin v. Lingle. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Donofrio v. Wells, which challenged the citizenship of both Obama and Senator John McCain (R-Arizona), who was born in the U.S. territory of the Panama Canal Zone. The Connecticut Supreme Court dismissed Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz, which the U.S. Supreme Court later declined to hear. Finally, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently dismissed Hollister v. Soetoro.
 
Under our Constitution, it is the state that determines live birth status and the courts that oversee proper determination of the facts and application of the law. In this circumstance, those requirements have been followed. If additional information is brought to light then further review will be undertaken, as it properly should, in our judicial system.
 
I appreciate hearing from you and appreciate your vigilance in supporting our Constitution. I look forward to working with you on other matters of importance.
 
Again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me in the future on this or other matters of interest to you. For more information about the issues before the U.S. Senate as well as news releases, photos, and other items of interest, please visit my Senate website, http://crapo.senate.gov.
 
Sincerely,
 
Mike Crapo
United States Senator
 
MDC:rj
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
   
 
 
Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
10:18 AM (0 minutes ago)

 
   
to correspondence., George, dr_taitz
 
 
 
 
 

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkw, ste 100

rancho santa M,argarita, CA 92688

949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

01.19.2013

ATTN SENATOR CRAPO

202 Falls Ave, ste 2

Twin Falls, ID 83301

 
correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov  
 

Reply to response sent to constituent Mr. George Ashford

Dear Mr. Crapo

My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney, who brought forward a number of legal challenges with undeniable evidence, showing Barack Obama using forged IDs and a CT SSN 042-68-4425. Based on your letter you were not advised by the assistant U.S. attorney Edward Olsen that you and your fellow members of Congress are DEFENDANTS IN THIS LAW SUIT and that Mr. Olsenhas submitted on your behalg an opposition to TRO, which saught to stay certificationog Obama’s electoral votes until the forgery in his IDs is adjudicated on the merits ,

Mr. Crapo, please, read attached pleadings. I will be advising the presiding judge, Chief U.S. district Judge for the eastern District of California, Judge Morrison C. England, that you are clueless about the case and that the US Attorneys, who claimed in court that they submitted pleadings on your behalf, simply defrauded the court and did not put you on notice.

Mr. Crapo, you are absolutely wrong regarding the state of HI certifying Obama’s records.

Please, take the time to read the pleadings in the legal action filed against you instead of forwarding to your constituents the boiler plate garbage forwarded to you by the counsel of Congress Mr. Maskel. The state of HI absolutely refused to produce the original birth certificate of Obama. They refused to comply with federal and state subpoenas and provide Obama’s original birth certificate allegedly created in 1961. As no original document was ever provided it is believed not to exist. A copy published by Obama on line, on white House.gov is found by multiple experts to be a computer generated forgery.

If an actual 1961 birth certificate were to exist, it would have been produced by now and a cheap computer generated forgery would not have been released to the public.

No judge and no court ever decided this case on the merits. No courts has ever issued an order to compel production of Obama’s original IDs and the nation has not seen them yet. All of the cases were dismissed on lack of standing and jurisdiction. There is no Res Judicata in ObamaForgeryGate.

Obama’s school registration from Indonesia show him a citizen of Indonesia.

For four and a half years Judges and Congressmen have engaged in a despicable game of “kick the can”, pointing at each other, judges stating that they do not have jurisdiction, it is up to the Congress to impeach Obama, Senators and Representatives pointed to judges, stating that it is up to the courts to decide, whether Obama’s IDs are valid and whether he is legitimate. As a result 315 million U.s. citizens fell through the cracks and were deprived of their civil right to honest lawful elections and ended up being ruled by a foreign usurper, a foreign squatter with all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number. Collectively judges, both federal and state and US Congressmen and Senators committed treason against the United States of America and the people of the United States of America by allowing a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia Barack Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah with all forged IDs, stolen Social Security number, forged Selective Service Certificate, forged birth certificate and a last name not legally his to usurp the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief. This is the most shameful and most criminal episode in the US history. You, sir, should be deeply ashamed of yourself for being a pet of it.

You and fellow Congressmen and judges have to step to the plate. This is the matter of national security, which needs to be heard immediately in both Congress and courts. Obama and every one complicit in his scheme have to be prosecuted immediately.

American people will not be silent to this act of treason and criminal complicity forever. People will revolt and will hold you accountable.

Please, advice immediately, when will you bring this matter to the floor of the Senate and Senatorial committees dealing with national security, elections fraud and governmental oversight.

Sincerely

(at this point I can’t even write respectfully, as so far behavior of many in Congress does not warrant any respect)

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

 
 

 

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:41 PM, George Ashford <drgla@cableone.net> wrote:

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator Crapo
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:14:02 -0700
From: George Ashford <drgla@cableone.net>
To: @yahoo. com., @gmail. com
Orly Taitz
orly.taitz@gmail.com
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Orly,I thought you would be interested in this ridiculous response I received from Senator Crapo to the Obama fraud.

George Ashford

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: Correspondence from Senator Crapo
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:35:08 -0500
From: <correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov>
Reply-To: <correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov>
To: <drgla@cableone.net>
January 18, 2013
 
 
George Ashford
1385 W Villa Norte Street
Boise, ID 83702-6637
 
Dear George:
 
Thank you for contacting me regarding citizenship and other eligibility requirements for public office. I appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.
 
In recent years, questions have arisen about the eligibility of President Barack Obama for the office of President of the United States. You are justified to be concerned about a possible violation of the Constitution, and I understand how important your concerns are. Having confidence in the electoral process and our officials is critical to maintaining public confidence in our country. As such, the people must be confident in the integrity of the electoral process and our electoral institutions.
 
A number of provisions of Constitutional, federal and state law govern the resolution of this issue. First, and perhaps foremost, in our system of law, the states have jurisdiction to determine and establish documentation of live births. The Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
 
This Constitutional reservation of powers to the states gives them a significant role in determining the eligibility of those running for federal office. In this case, the State of Hawaii has clearly declared that the birth certificate showing that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, is valid. Both the Director of Hawaii’s Department of Health and the state’s Registrar of Vital Statistics confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency.
 
In response to remaining questions about documentation, the White House publicly released President Obama’s birth certificate in April 2011. The Certificate of Live Birth released by the White House bears the certification of the Hawaii State Registrar. Experts reviewing the documents generally concur it contains all the elements of a valid Certificate of Live Birth, including all the relevant data and signatures. Claims that the document was forged have not been substantiated.
 
The Constitution and federal law require that, among other things, only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) are eligible to be President of the United States. Under our system of law, it is the states that make the determination of and provide the validation of birth to determine qualification to serve as president. In this matter, the State of Hawaii has done so. If contrary documentation is produced and verified, this matter will necessarily be resolved by the judicial branch of our government under the Constitution.
 
In that context, these and other related allegations have been raised, but consistently dismissed in several courts, including the United States Supreme Court. Specifically, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed Berg v. Obama. That case has been taken to the U.S. Supreme Court on multiple occasions, but the Court has refused to hear it each time. The Hawaii Supreme Court denied the petitioner’s request in Martin v. Lingle. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Donofrio v. Wells, which challenged the citizenship of both Obama and Senator John McCain (R-Arizona), who was born in the U.S. territory of the Panama Canal Zone. The Connecticut Supreme Court dismissed Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz, which the U.S. Supreme Court later declined to hear. Finally, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently dismissed Hollister v. Soetoro.
 
Under our Constitution, it is the state that determines live birth status and the courts that oversee proper determination of the facts and application of the law. In this circumstance, those requirements have been followed. If additional information is brought to light then further review will be undertaken, as it properly should, in our judicial system.
 
I appreciate hearing from you and appreciate your vigilance in supporting our Constitution. I look forward to working with you on other matters of importance.
 
Again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me in the future on this or other matters of interest to you. For more information about the issues before the U.S. Senate as well as news releases, photos, and other items of interest, please visit my Senate website, http://crapo.senate.gov.
 
Sincerely,
 
Mike Crapo
United States Senator
 
MDC:rj

 


Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
 
 
2 attachmentsDownload all attachments
  Letter to Senator Crapo.docx
16K View Download
  Grinols order, summons, TRO, complaint.pdf
24287K View Download
 
 
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
   
 
 
Mail Delivery Subsystem
10:18 AM (0 minutes ago)

 
   
to me
 
 
 
 
 
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 <correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov>… User unknown (state 13).

—– Original message —–

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=C9h4DnlGsTDoifb3X0NfCw53eEQDdDGSdGjdbqXNHlY=;
b=cT+jg6SQq46Y7cD0aOR+3acouxY8rq//Fih2rcesUoB5yyhegpU4rbdhYNBKvI7RMW
1BBclw5wh26h7WBxNjL5V+3jajDckh1PDHEgx1zy4ytuHZSod7y3h6powP9AEL6ArUZo
xO90lS7/C3K9nTL6R5Tq83brvbiUEihYhEJRUljOTDX/FUxa91SZbk/AoQDdQSSgLEtQ
am9ctM7klO76F+QA2KKFCsoy5nQBFahJDFfRqbg6piLJvMLqgjPOIxxLMU2jyJlzCKLk
kOVJAr7/9QTpL2XSlB4fqTIBZfdhBBTs07dApdjmOh+gB+/JL2rVOz0FDkmDBQlx12uN
IZSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.174.109 with SMTP id br13mr12183633vdc.23.1358619536462;
Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:18:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.38.161 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:18:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50F9DDAB.4030404@cableone.net>
References: <50F9D73A.1090708@cableone.net>
<50F9DDAB.4030404@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:18:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CABoA0veaBFMHBr8PWD0XU2DDBRNk9Rkbr1LDK_Nju38hh5u-Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Correspondence from Senator Crapo
From: Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
To: George Ashford <drgla@cableone.net>, correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.gov
Cc: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=bcaec51b15e5db59a404d3a842f9

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ29839 Santa Margarita Pkw, ste 100

rancho santa M,argarita, CA 92688

949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

*01.19.2013*

*ATTN SENATOR CRAPO*

*202 Falls Ave, ste 2*

*Twin Falls, ID 83301*

correspondence_reply@crapo.senate.govReply to response sent to constituent Mr. George Ashford

Dear Mr. Crapo

My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney, who brought forward a number of
legal challenges with undeniable evidence, showing Barack Obama using
forged IDs and a CT SSN 042-68-4425. Based on your letter you were not
advised by the assistant U.S. attorney Edward Olsen that you and your

fellow members of Congress are *DEFENDANTS IN THIS LAW SUIT and that Mr.

Olsenhas submitted on your behalg an opposition to TRO, which saught to
stay certificationog Obama’s electoral votes until the forgery in his IDs

is adjudicated on the merits *,

 

 

Comments

4 Responses to “Correspondence with Senator crapo. if you find out that the US attorneys defrauded Judge England an did not notify the senators, congressmen and electors about the case, pleas write to Judge england, advice him that fraud was committed that Dep of justice defrauded the judge and did not notify senators of the case and the TRO motion”

  1. Supporter of Lady Liberty
    January 19th, 2013 @ 9:03 pm

    Don’t plaintiffs have to notify defendants of a lawsuit?

  2. Harry Butler
    January 20th, 2013 @ 6:25 am

    Is Senator Crapo’s first name Full Of?

  3. Andrew
    January 20th, 2013 @ 12:23 pm

    Dr. Taitz Esq.
    I also approached CRAPo and my two representatives of Idaho concerning this very same issue approximately one month ago. I received exactly the same response as this from all three of them. It was as if they agreed on the same format. My reaction was exactly as yours. I am so insulted and angry I cannot respond in any respectful manner. It proves to me they are not representing the interest of the citizens or this country, only their own. Orly, keep up the good fight and I’m sure one day this will be the ultimate event in our history.

  4. Authenticator
    January 20th, 2013 @ 3:35 pm

    Dear Dr. Taitz ESQ,

    Thank you for breathing new life into old U.S. Senatorial graveyards.

    It occurs to me that the private sector, by-and-large by age, gets obsolesced out of the work force and that – nowadays – often means without sufficient future income or savings and at relatively young ages.

    These government officials on the other hand, once they have fought through the ranks of public office are brandished into a sort of mandated job security and income stream where performance and intellect are replaced by misprision, lying, indifference, influence, and latency of intellect into a new realm of relatively unaccountable, self justified and sometimes dictatorial conduct.

    Those among our Officials in this new era of moral cancer who try to do the right thing are set aside in favor of shooting holes through the bottom of our metaphorical ship.

    The strangest thing is that a lot of these are really nice guys in an every day way but they almost seem to have a spell set upon them that refuses to see core truth for what it is and respond in gracious fashion; to work to restore rather than to destroy the entire operating system.

    ‘It is what it is’ for many observers who until now were unable to counter what looks more and more like an official U.S. mafia with real, albeit already occurring, global potential.

    You, Doctor of Truth, have demonstrated to those who have consciousness of right and wrong – the eternal – how to properly think. Now, with or without you, people can know how to properly think and process the garbage from dignitaries who think they are so smartly fooling us with their rubbish. We can finally and with confidence assign these forced dignitaries to the category of “Nobody” in terms of time and history.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Leave a Reply