OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

cases are different, I am the only attorney bringing forward the most explosive evidence of forgery and Social Security fraud

Posted on | December 30, 2011 | 3 Comments

letter from Mark Hattfield

Please, read a letter from attorney Mark Hattfield above.

This letter is very similar to one, sent by attorney Van Irion.

What is the difference between their cases and mine?  Here is my understanding. If I am incorrect on any aspects of Van Irion’s or Hatfield’s cases, let me know.

In GA election challenge was filed originally by a voter David Farrar. Later 3 other voters filed complaints of their own.

One of those subsequent voters is now represented by Van Irion, 2 are represented by Hattfield. Their cases are only on behalf of voters, only against Obama and have only one argument: a case called Minor v Hatterfield. They are not doing any discovery and are not issuing any subpoenas, as they rely only on a dicta, something that was mentioned by the Supreme court in one case in 1875 in a case Minor v Happersett, which dealt with voting rights of a woman Virginia Minor, but made a statement in regards to her citizenship. My case mentions Minor, but providers more argument, facts  and parties.

My case includes 1 voter, 4 presidential candidates (2 of whom are Democrats), I included the Secretary of State and Democrat party of GA as additional defendants and aside from the precedent of Minor v Happersett, I am providing additional arguments of Obama using a SSN, which was not assigned to him and using a birth certificate, which is a forgery according to experts.

I got multiple phone calls and messages asking me, why is my case different.

1. Adding Presidential candidates, particularly Democrats during the primary provides standing

2. Secretary of state and Dem party of GA are additional defendants in my case, as the order by the judge will have to be directed to them. For example an order to Sec of State not to put Obama on the ballot

3. If the court rules that this case, Minorv Happersett  does not resolve the controversy, if the court finds this case irrelevant or not controlling,  than the cases filed by Van Irion and by Hattfield will be dismissed immediately, on the other hand my case will go on, as there are additional arguments.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “cases are different, I am the only attorney bringing forward the most explosive evidence of forgery and Social Security fraud”

  1. margie
    December 30th, 2011 @ 1:44 pm

    Dear Orly Taitz –
    Could you please enlighten me on this question:
    When there are several different cases from different people on pretty much the same subject,
    is it very beneficial to have them presented separately?
    or is it a stronger, heavier case if all with similar subjects get together to “hit” as ONE?
    (Obviously I don’t understand legal process, but am rooting for success in this cause!)

  2. orly taitz
    December 30th, 2011 @ 2:16 pm

    it will really make no difference. Judge will hear each one and will rule on the merits of each one. As long as the judge has integrity, we are fine

  3. Patty
    December 30th, 2011 @ 10:32 pm

    Oh good! The judge granted your motion to add plaintiffs and defendants. When Obama’s attorney brought that up as an issue I was worried, but now that the judge has ruled I feel more confident about your case.

Leave a Reply