Can you force a religious Christian to work on Sunday or a religious Jew to work on Saturday? Attacks on Indiana are just a diversion from Obstruction of Justice that is possibly being committed by Clinton or treason possibly committed by Obama
Posted on | March 30, 2015 | 7 Comments
Now we have a huge bruhaha about the state of Indiana, which passed the same religious protection bill, which was passed by Bill Clinton in 1993, which was signed by Barack Obama, when he served in the Illinois state senate, and which is in the constitution and state codes of nearly half of the states in the nation. All the law states is that the government cannot persecute a person because of his religious believes.
Tim Cook of Apple and other prominent gays are attacking Indiana as anti gay because there were several cases when small business owners were destroyed financially when they refused to perform services for gay and lesbian weddings . However, let me bring a couple of examples. Let’s imagine, a Jewish couple asks a deeply religious Christian baker to bake a wedding cake on Sunday. The baker response that he is a Christian, he goes to church on Sunday and he will not bake the cake. He did so due to his religious believes. Similarly, let’s imagine a Christian couple asking a religious Jewish person to bake a wedding cake on Saturday: he responds that he will not do it as he observes Shabat, he does not work on Saturday.
To make sure that people are not forced to violate their religious views or be forced into voluntarily servitude, de facto slavery in having to work in violation of their views, there are such laws protecting religious freedoms. People should not be forced to violate their religious views or be destroyed financially if they follow their religious views. This is a no -brainer.
So, why there is such a bruhaha against the state of Indiana, which passed a law that is similar to laws passed in nearly a half of the nation, 20 other states and which was signed by Obama as a state senator in Illionis and which was signed by Clinton in 1993 as a federal law?
In my opinion, the answer is simple, the ruling establishment and their lap dog media use this issue as a diversion from what might be finally prosecuted as obstruction of justice committed by Hillary Clinton and treason committed by Obama.
Now we know that Hillary Clinton wiped clean her server after she was served with a subpoena to produce all of the information on that server. For actions like these Clinton, who is a Yale educated lawyer and should know better, can be sent to prison.
Similarly, Obama is now pushing a nuclear weapons agreement with Iran, de facto representing the Interests of Iran, the nation, where leaders and the public are chanting “Death to America” and calling the US: “The Great Satan”. This is on top of the fact that Obama is still using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number and bogus IDs, which he used as a basis for his identity and eligibility for presidency. For acts like these Obama can get life in prison of death penalty. So, in order to divert attention from Obama and Clinton, the media is attacking the state of Indiana.
By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ