OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt

Posted on | July 5, 2012 | 39 Comments

 

Press Release

Sent to 30,000 U.S. and International Media outlets

For Immediate Release

Breaking news!

New 113 page complaint with exhibits  class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens  to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt. Additionally, Plaintiff Attorney Orly Taitz, who is seeking a class action certification, is bringing forward a second challenge to Obama Tax, asserting that it is illegal, as it was signed  into law  by Barack Obama   under false pretenses and by virtue of fraud, usurping the position of the U.S. President while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social security number. Additional cause of action is RICO, asserting that Obama doe America is a de facto RICO organization created to procure fraud committed by Obama. Additional defendants are Attorney General Holder, Registrar of the Department of health of HI Alvin Onaka, former director of Selective Service William A. Chatfield, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, former Chair Woman of Democratic National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz and a number of other defendants.

While the case was filed in the Southern Division of the Central District of California, it was moved by the clerk of the court to the western Division in Los Angeles. When asked, why was the case moved, the clerk stated that it is a violation of civil rights case, which affects the whole district.

Both DOCX and PDF versions of the complaint are attached

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

Pro se plaintiff

 

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PLAINTIFF                      )     CASE #

V                                                                             )  ASSIGNED TO

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS                                          ) TRIAL SCHEDULED ON

IN HER CAPACITY  OF  SECRETARY OF            ) VIOLATION OF 14TH AMENDMENT

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,                     ) EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS,

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,                               )  ESTABLISHMENT   CLAUSE                                   

 IN HIS CAPACITY OF THE SIGNOR OF THE     ) ARTICLE 2, SEC 1 OF COSTITUTION         HR3590 PPACA,                                                    ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, STAY  

NANCY PELOSI,  IN HER CAPACITY                   )DECLARATORY RELIEF

 OF THE CHAIRWOMAN OF THE 2008             ) RICO, PREDECATE CRIMES:

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION        ) FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING

AND SIGNOR OF THE CERTIFICATE              ) FORGERY AND UTTERING OF FORGED

 OF NOMINATION  FOR CANDIDATE          ) DOCUMENTS  TO COMMIT ELECTIONS

FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA,                               ) FRAUD

BRIAN SCHATZ, LYNN MATUSOW               ) 7TH AMENDMENT JURY DEMANDED

 IN THEIR CAPACITY AS 2008)

 CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY

OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

OF  HAWAII AND SIGNORS OF THE,

 CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDATE  FOR

PRESIDENT FOR BARACK OBAMA;

ALVIN ONAKA, IN HIS CAPACITY

  AS THE REGISTRAR OF THE
HEALTH EPARTMENT OF HAWAII,

MICHAEL ASTRUE, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE

COMMISSIONER OF SSA, ERIC HOLDER IN HIS

 CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA,  

WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE

 IMMEDIATE PAST DIRECTOR OF THE SELECTIVE

 SERVICE, ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND IN HER CAPACITY

AS A SECRETARY OF THE 2008 DEMOCRATIC

NOMINATING  CONVENTION

OBAMA FOR AMERICA

JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES 1-100,              

DEFENDANTS                                                     

COMPLAINT

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE.

Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a citizen of the State of California, tax payer and a registered voter with a business address of 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688.   Taitz was subjected to persecution, harassment and defamation due to her legal actions, and bringing forward evidence showing Barack Hussein Obama, currently occupying the position of the President of the US and a presumptive nominee for the 2012 Presidential general election, to be usurping the US presidency by fraud and false pretences and use of forged identification papers.

Defendant Katlleen Sebelius, is being sued in her capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human services.

Michael Astrue is being sued in his capacity as the commissioner of Social Security, who is complicit in the cover up of Obama using a Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 which was not assigned to Barack Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter “Obama”) is being sued in his capacity as the signor of the  H. R. 3590  “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA).

Defendant Alvin T. Onaka (hereinafter “Onaka”) is being sued in his capacity as the registrar of the Department of Health, who certified a computer forgery, claiming it to be a true and correct copy of Obama’s 1961 typewritten birth certificate.

Defendant William A. Chatfield is sued in his capacity as a former director of Selective Service who buried all evidence of forgery in Obama’s Selective Service certificate, after Taitz hand delivered all evidence to him.

Defendants Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow are residents of the State of Hawaii and are being sued in their capacity as former Chairman and Secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, who signed an altered/falsified Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama and removed the necessary wording “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” in order to allow Obama in the White House, while using forged identification papers.

Defendants Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond are being sued as former Chairwoman and Secretary of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, who signed an altered Certificate of Nomination to the state of Hawaii and added the wording that the Chairman and Secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Schatz and Matusow were not willing to include and swear to.

Defendant Eric Holder is being sued as the Attorney General of the United States, who received from Taitz a Quo Warranto complaint as well as multiple criminal complaints with evidence of Obama and others committing massive elections fraud and Obama usurping the position of the US Presidency by virtue of fraud, misrepresentation and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and who aided and abetted Obama in the cover up.

Defendant Obama for America, is a fundraising organization for defendant Obama, an alleged RICO created to aid and abet Obama in unlawfully usurping U.S. Presidency through use of forged and fraudulently obtained documents

Defendants Jane Does and John Does 1-100 are  believed to be a part  of the RICO and of the concerted effort of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Obama and violation and deprivation of constitutional, civil, human and economic rights of U.S. citizens and racketeering, intimidation, harassment of whistle blowers, civil rights leaders and attorneys like Taitz, who are fighting to end such usurpation and restore above mentioned rights. Jane Does and John Does information will be provided upon further discovery.

JURISDICTION and VENUE

 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 (federal question), 28 U.S.C. §1343 (civil rights), 18 U.S.C. §1964(c) (RICO),  and 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988 (civil rights action seeking declaratory or injunctive relief).  Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §2201-2202 as well as 1988(a).
2.    Venue is proper under FOIA and 42 U.S.C. §1988(a) because several plaintiffs live in Orange County within the Southern Division of the Central District of California.

ALLEGATIONS

  1. 1.     On 06.28.2012 Supreme Court of the United States issued a rulling in National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.; Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Florida, et al.; Florida, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. 567 U.S. 2012 (docket 11-393, 11-398. 11-400).  In a narrow 5- 4 decision  against some 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, Supreme Court ruled that even though the healthcare bill and individual mandates within it, violate the Commerce clause, it is valid under taxing powers of Congress.
  2. 2.     As of yet this bill was not examined to ascertain whether it violates the rights of the US citizens under the 14th Amendment equal protection clause and Establishment clause. Taitz filed an intevener brief in the original case filed by the states before judge Roger Vinson in the US. District court in Florida, however judge Vinson decided not to allow individual citizens interveners, as the legal action was voluminous and complex, considering the number of individual states involved. As such individual U.S. citizens did not have an opportunity to have their day in court and redress their grievances vis-à-vis the new Healthcare bill, which is now (compliments to Justice Roberts) is deemed as a Healthcare Tax, or ObamaTax. (Hereinafter “ObamaTax”).  Most importantly Taitz alleges that the provision of the  Obamatax, which gives exemptions to certain religious sects and divisions, violates the Establishment clause as well as her 1, 5th, 14th amendment rights by violation of her Free Exercise of Religion right, her Due Process right, her equal Protection Under the Law rights.
  3. 3.     There was no determination whether  US citizens rights were violated due to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, II (Hereinafter “Obama”) the individual who signed the Healthcare bill into law did so under false pretenses, being a foreign national, citizen of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain, who got into the position of the US President and signed the bill into law, used a name that is not legally his and was never legitimate for the office, due to his use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: a forged Birth Certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, which was never assigned to him.

VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDEMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE 5TH AMENDEMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE

  1. 4.     Under the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution and the 5th Amendment due Process Clause all citizens similarly situated should be treated equally.
  2. 5.     H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) Section 1411 (5)(A) Exemptions from individual requirements state:

“Sec 5000A. Requirements to maintain minimum essential coverage“

Section 1411 5(A)

(5) EXEMPTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

In the case of an individual who is seeking an exemption certificate under section 1311(d)(4)(H) from any requirement or penalty imposed by section 5000A, the following information:

(A)In the case of an individual seeking exemption based on the individual’s status as a member of an exempt religious sect of division…”

  1. 6.     A religious sect or division being exempted is a Muslim sect or religion, which claims that any insurance is against their belief, as they see insurance as a form of usury. Consequently any Muslim is exempt from paying a hefty H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) ObamaTax (Hereinafter “Obamatax”), while Christians and Jews will have to pay an estimated $400,000 each over the life time. While Obamatax is scheduled to start with 1% first year, then go up to 2% next year, the sky is the limit. Similarly first Federal income tax passed by the Democrats in Congress in 1894, started with modest 2% Wilson-Gorman Tariff. In 1895 Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429 SCOTUS, which at a time retained some independence and was not prone to bullying from other branches yet, found unapportioned Federal tax to be unconstitutional. In response the federal government pushed for the 16th Amendment, which paved the way to a massive rise in taxation by the federal government. So, as Federal income tax went up from modest 2% on a small group of citizens  in Wilson-Gorman act to 35%, so can Obamatax  skyrocket, considering inflation, rising cost of healthcare, and particularly violation of 5th Amendment due process and 14th Amendment equal protection clause, which are  buried in 2,700 pages of the act.
  2. 7.      U.S. hospitals do not turn away patients, particularly patients in need of urgent care. So, as Muslims are exempt of paying Obamatax, as an exempt religious sect, Taitz and other similarly situated Christians and Jews will be forced to carry on their shoulders not only the Obamatax assigned to them, but also reapportioned cost of healthcare and Obamatax for the care of Muslims who are exempt.
  3. 8.     Current situation of social services in Europe going broke shows that aforementioned burden can be enormous. Muslim religion allows a man to have multiple wives, which leads to one man having a large number of children. As an example, Osama Bin Laden was one of 51 children legally fathered by one Muslim man according to Sharia law. Now, according to new Obamatax, Taitz and other similarly situated Christians and Jews will have the burden of not only paying Obamatax for themselves, but also carrying the burden of paying an enormous amount of Obamatax to cover the care of all of these Muslim men, their multiple wives and children.
  4. 9.     Aforementioned represents a clear violation of the 5th Amendment due process and 14th Amendment equal protection under the law.

VIOLATION OF ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT

  1. 10.                      Plaintiff includes, by reference, all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein.
  2. 11.                      Providing in Obamatax exemptions to some religious sects, while heavily taxing others, at the tune of possibly as much as $400,000 over a life time of every Christian and Jew being taxed by ObamaTax, Federal government is not only engaged in violation of 5th and 14th Amendment due process and equal amendment rights, but is also flagrantly violating the 1st Amendment Free Exercise clause and Establishment clause.
  3. 12.                      First Amendment forbids Federal or state government to interfere with free exercise of religion and from establishing a state religion or intertwining state and religion.
  4. 13.                      By heavily taxing Christians and Jews in Obamatax, while exempting Muslims, Federal government is interfering with a free exercise of religion by Christians and Jews and is forcing them to move towards Muslim religion and ultimately convert in order to avoid heavy new income taxation by the government.
  5. 14.                      This behavior by the Federal government is akin to Jisya (tribute) that is charged by Muslims according to Sharia law from non-Muslims, typically Christians and Jews.
  6. 15.                      Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama, aka Barry Obama Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro resided in Indonesia. His school records from Assissi school in Jakarta, Indonesia show him to be a citizen of Indonesia, and of Muslim religion.(Exhibit 16 School Registration #203 from Assissi school in Jakarta, Indonesia for Barack (Barry) Obama, showing him as a citizen of Indonesia, using the last name of his stepfather Lolo Soetoro as his legal last name and religion Islam).  Consequently, new Obama Judeo-Christian federal income tax was brought about by a foreign national, a Muslim citizen of Indonesia Barack(Barry) Soetoro(Obama). It heavily taxes American citizens of Christian and Jewish religion, while exempting Muslims and making Christians and Jews pay a Jizya for the cost of Healthcare provided to Muslims. Obamatax is unconstitutional towards Christians and Jews, as it violates  the 1st, 5th, 14th Amendments
  7. 16.                      Additionally it is unconstitutional, as it violates the Article 2, Section 1 of the   US Constitution.

REQUEST FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF TAITZ AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF A CLASS

Taitz is seeking a class certification and a certification of a class representative herein. She is alleging that she is a member of a class of U. S. citizens, who are either Jewish or Christian, who are being flagrantly discriminated as they are obligated to pay a hefty Obamatax, while Muslims are exempt.  They are being further discriminated, as they will have to pay not only Obamatax for themselves, but also to cover the Healthcare of Muslims, who are exempt from paying Obamatax.

This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP Rule 23, which states as follow :

(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if:

(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;

(2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class;

(3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and

(4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

(b) Types of Class Actions. A class action may be maintained if Rule 23(a) is satisfied and if:

(1) prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of:

(A) inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class; or

(B) adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;

(2) the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole; or

(3) the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. The matters pertinent to these findings include:

(A) the class members’ interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions;

(B) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members;

(C) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in the particular forum; and

(D) the likely difficulties in managing a class action.

The members of the class are so numerous that it is impossible and impracticable  to bring all of them to this court as named plaintiffs.

Damage to Taitz is similar to damage of other class members

Not certifying this legal action as a class action can lead to conflicting rulings and judgments;

there are questions of law or fact common to the class, specifically unconstitutionality of ObamaTax, as applied o Christians or Jews;

the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and

Taitz will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OBAMATAX VIOLATES ARTICLE 2, SECTION 1 OF THE US CONSTITUTION AS IT WAS SIGNED BY BARACK OBAMA BY VIRTUE OF FRAUD AND UNDER FALSE PRETENSES AND USING FORGED AND FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED IDENTIFICATION PAPERS

  1. 17.                      In order to be legal, a bill needs to be signed into law by a lawful US President.
  2. 18.                      Obamatax, is unconstitutional, as it was signed into law by Barack Obama, a citizen of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain, who usurped the position of the U.S. President by fraud and by virtue of use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers.
  3. 19.                      Exhibit 1 is a sworn affidavit of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona, attesting to the fact that as a result of his six month investigation he found Obama to be using a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a forged Social Security number.
  4. 20.                      Exhibit 2, affidavit of Douglas Vogt, expert in scanning and copying machines, attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.
  5. 21.                      Exhibit 3, affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.
  6. 22.                      Exhibit 4, affidavit of Timothy Adams, former Assistant Elections Clerk from Honolulu Hawaii, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii and it was a common knowledge among employees of the office of the Registrar and Elections in Honolulu, Hawaii, that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Hawaii.
  7. 23.                      Exhibit 5, affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that when Barack Obama originally posted his tax returns, he did not “flatten” the PDF file and full Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 that he is using, became visible to the public.
  8. 24.                      Exhibit 6, sworn affidavit of Senior Deportation officer John Sampson, who attested to the fact that there is no legitimate reason for Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii in and around 1977 to obtain a Connecticut Social Security number,  which was assigned to a resident of Connecticut, who resided in 1977 in the State of Connecticut.
  9. 25.                      Exhibit 7, affidavit from Linda Jordan attests to the fact that the Social security number, 042-68-4425, which Obama is using was not assigned to him and does not pass E-verify according to attached E-verify record.
  10. 26.                      Exhibit 8, shows SSNVS (Social Security Verification Number) printout which shows that Connecticut Security number, 042-68-4425, which is being used by Obama, was never assigned to him.
  11. 27.                      Exhibit 9, affidavit of typesetting expert  Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form birth certificate is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes.
  12. 28.                      Exhibit 17 Affidavit of Chris Strunk, attesting to the fact that in the passport records for Barack Obama, recently received under the FOIA request, Obama’s legal name, as listed in his mother’s records, is Barack Obama Soebarkah, therefore even if Obama were to have valid identification records, his signing of the ObamaTax was not valid, as he signed it under a name, which was not legally his.
  13. 29.          Based on all of the above, Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, was a foreign national who got into the position of the US President and Commander in Chief based on forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers and in violation of Article 2,
    Section1 of the US Constitution. As such Obama was never legitimate for the US presidency and unlawfully signed the H. R. 3590  “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) into law.

RICO

Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968

Predicate acts

section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents),

section 1341 (relating to mail fraud),

section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers

section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant),

section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section

section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents)

 

FRAUD

  1. 30.          Fraud committed by Obama

Obama defrauded the Plaintiff and others similarly situated by getting on the ballot and in the white house and signing Obamatax under false pretenses and by fraud, using a name that is not legally his and using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers. He created “Obama for America” with a purpose of defrauding American citizens and illegally usurping the U.S. Presidency, while using forged identification papers.

  1. 31.                      Fraud committed by defendant “Obama for America”

“Obama for America” is a RICO organization established and maintained with an illegal purpose of defrauding the U.S. Citizens and usurping the U.S. Presidency.

  1. 32.                      FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANT ALVIN ONAKA

Defendant Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the state of Hawaii, aided and abetted Obama and was complicit in the cover up of the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate from the state of Hawaii.

  1. 33.                     FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANT ASTRUE

Defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security, aided and abetted Obama by covering up the fact that Barack Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, 042-68-4425, which was issued in and around 1977 in the State of Connecticut to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and that this Social Security number does not pass E-verify and SSNVS, when checked under the name Barack Obama.

  1. 34.                      FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANTS BRIAN SCHATZ AND LYNN MATUSOW

Brian Schatz AND Lynn Matusow are being sued in their capacity as former chairman and secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii, who aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when they signed an altered/falsified Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama and removed the necessary wording “eligible according to the US Constitution”. Exhibits 10 and 11 show required certification of a candidate for US Presidency, submitted by the Democratic party of Hawaii to the office of elections for Al Gore in 2000 and for John Kerry in 2004.  Those certifications show the necessary wording that the candidates for President and Vice President are “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of The U.S. Constitution”. In order to aid Obama and to attempt to avoid criminal liability in certifying a fraudulent certificate of Nomination, Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow falsified the Certificate of Nomination and removed the words “eligible to the U.S. Constitution” from the certification sent to Hawaii office elections on behalf of Obama.

  1. 35.                     FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANTS NANCY PELOSI AND ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND

Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when, as a former Chairwoman and Secretary of the 2008 Democratic National Convention they signed an altered certificate of nomination to the State of Hawaii. Certification of Nomination for John Kerry, which was sent to all 50 states in 2004 (Exhibit 13) and certification for Obama, which was sent to 49 states in 2008 (Exhibit 14) were identical. However, Obama could not get on the ballot in the general election, as the State of Hawaii required the wording “eligible under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” and Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow were not willing to sign the certification with such wording, as they knew that Obama was not a natural born citizen and did not qualify. Subsequently Pelosi, Germond, Schatz, Matusow and Obama acted in concert, as Schatz removed the necessary wording from the certification sent by the Democratic party of Hawaii and Pelosi added this wording to the DNC certification (Exhibit 15). Through this scheme Schatz, Matusow, Pelosi and Germond acted in concert and aided and abetted ineligible Obama to get on the ballot in 2008 election. Through manipulation of certificates, Schatz, Matusow, Germond and Pelosi were complicit in fraud and forgery of records.

  1. 36.                      Eric Holder is being sued as the Attorney General of the United States, who received from Taitz a Quo Warranto complaint as well as multiple criminal complaints with evidence of Obama and others committing massive elections fraud and Obama usurping the position of the US by virtue of fraud, misrepresentation and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and who aided and abetted Obama in the cover up.
  2. 37.                      Defendants acted with an intent to defraud. Plaintiffs were intended victims and foreseeable victims. Plaintiffs suffered financial damages, defamation, humiliation, harassment and emotional distress as a result of fraud committed by the Defendants.

MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD

  1. 38.                      DEFENDANT OBAMA

Defendant Obama committed mail and wire fraud when he posted on the Internet in and around April 27, 2012, a paper, which he claimed to be a true and correct copy of his long form birth certificate, which was in reality a computer generated forgery. He additionally committed mail and wire fraud by sending to multiple courts his forged birth certificate, claiming it to be a genuine birth certificate. Not only did he post a forgery, but he also used this opportunity to unleash a campaign of persecution, harassment and intimidation of Taitz and other civil rights leaders and political dissidents by calling them a “side show’ and “carnival barkers”.

  1. 39.                      Obama committed mail and wire fraud when he posted on the Internet on his site “Fight the smears” a paper, which he claimed to be his short form birth certificate, which was in fact a computer generated forgery. He continued committing such fraud by sending this forged birth certificate to multiple courts and organizations.
  2. 40.                     Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on line on White house.gov Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425, claiming it to be a valid number, when in fact it is a fraudulently obtained number, which was never assigned to Barack Obama
  3. 41.                     Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on line his alleged Selective Service Certificate,  claiming it to be his valid Selective Service certificate, making him eligible to work in the Federal Government, while in reality he posted a forged birth certificate, created in 2008 with a cut out in half and reversed 2008 postal stamp.
  4. 42.                      Obama knew that he was committing fraud and intended to defraud in order to continue usurping the position of the U.S. President.
  5. 43.                      Obama committed fraud when he sent to 50 states in 2007-2008, as well as in 2011-2012, his declarations of nomination. Obama used mail or other instrumentalities of the Interstate commerce to commit such fraud.
  6. 44.                      Obama committed fraud when, in and around January 25th, 2012, through his attorney Michael Jablonski, sent a defamatory letter to the Secretary of State of Georgia, where he attacked Plaintiff Taitz, who was an attorney in Farrar v Obama, claiming that he has produced a birth certificate and that he suffers from Taitz.
  7. 45.                      In and around November 19, 2011, Obama committed mail and wire fraud when, he, through his agent, Deputy Campaign Manager Juliana Smoot, personally attacked and defamed Taitz: “Release the Mugs By Julianna Smoot, Deputy Campaign Manager on November 19, 2011. Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther, who wants President Obama officially removed from the state’s primary ballot. So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we’re re-releasing the campaign’s limited-edition “Made in the USA” mugs.
    There’s clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd—or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.
    But when it starts to make your head hurt, I’ve found the best remedy is to have some tea in my “Made in the USA” mug.
    Works like a charm. I recommend Earl Grey.

PATTERN OF ONGOING RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

  1. 46.                      Fraud committed by Defendants who were acting directly or indirectly and committed fraud, which  was on going from 2007 until now, for over four years. Actions by the defendants established a pattern of racketeering activity within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §1962(c), in that their common purpose was to defraud, and the common result was to defraud. Plaintiffs were victims of the acts of racketeering and the acts of racketeering were otherwise related by distinguishing characteristics and were not isolated events.
  2. 47.                      Forged document that were uttered by Obama

a. Long form birth certificate- affidavits of Adobe illustrator expert Felichito Papa, scanning  and printing machines expert Doug Vogt, senior deportation officer John Sampson and announcement by sheriff Arpaio (exhibits 1-3) show Obama’s long form birth certificate to be forged

b. Short form birth certificate-certification of live birth. Research by Dr. Ron Pollard show short form birth certificate to be forged

c. Selective service certificate-investigative report by federal agent Steven Coffman, journalist Linda Bentley and announcement by Sheriff of Maricopa county, Arizona and lead investigator Mike Zullo, show Obama’s selective service certificate to be forged.

d. Social Security certificate-affidavits of  Senior Deportation officer Sampson, licensed investigator Daniels, researcher Linda Jordan, adobe illustrator expert Felicito Papa show Obama using as his own a social security number 042-68-4425, which was assigned to another individual, resident of Connecticut, who was born in 1890.

e. Possibly all other identification documents are fraudulently acquired, as those rest on forged primary identification papers.

  1. 48.                      Barack Obama knew that he is using forged identification papers and is not eligible for the U.S. Presidency.
  2. 49.                      Obama created “Obama for America” with a purpose to defraud American citizens and illegally usurp the U.S. Presidency, while using forged identification papers.
  3. 50.                      Defendant Loretta Fuddy, director of Health of the State of Hawaii,  aided and abetted Obama in committing elections fraud by covering up the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate
  4. 51.                      Defendant Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the State of Hawaii aided and abetted Obama and was complicit in the cover up of the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate.
  5. 52.                      Defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security aided and abetted Obama by covering up the fact that Barack Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, 042-68-4425, which was issued in and around 1977 in the State of Connecticut to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and that this Social Security number does not pass E-verify, when checked under the name Barack Obama
  6. 53.                      Defendant William A. Chatfield, former director of Selective Service acted in concert with other defendants in burying all evidence after Taitz provided it to Chatfield in and around March 25, 2009. Chatfield did not take any action in regards to Obama’s forged Selective Service certificate and simply left the Selective service shortly thereafter
  7. 54.                      Plaintiff suffered defamation and humiliation, endured multiple death threats and sanctions, while she was telling the truth about the fact that defendant Obama is committing elections fraud and is using and uttering forged documents as a proof of his eligibility for the U.S. Presidency. Plaintiff Taitz received multiple death threats from Obama supporters who do not believe that their “messiah” is capable of committing elections fraud and using forged documents. Unless the injunction is issued and the public is apprised of the evidence of the elections fraud and forgery by Obama, such death threats will continue until one of Obama’s supporters will succeed in making his threat a reality.
  8. 55.                      Plaintiff suffered damages of emotional distress, financial damages, defamation, slander, harassment as a direct result of the actions by the Defendants.
  9. 56.                      Defendants acted intentionally, outrageously, oppressively, despicably  and  maliciously. Exemplary and punitive damages are warranted in order to punish and deter such conduct in an amount to be determined at trial.

RELIEF SOUGHT

  1. Declaratory relief deeming individual mandate H. R. 3590  “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA)  to be discriminating and violating of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment, Due Process clause of the 5th Amendment and Free Exercise of Religion and Establishment clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution  and therefore unconstitutional.
  2. Declaratory relief deeming the Healthacare tax to be violative of the Establishment clause and unconstitutional.
  3. Certification of Taitz as a representative of a class of 306 million US citizens, who are Christians or Jews, whose constitutional rights of equal protection under the law and free exercise of religion under the First Amendment and separation of State and Church under the Establishment Clause have been egregiously violated by the heavy taxation imposed by the H.R. 3590 PPACA (Obamacare), while 7 million Muslims, US citizens  were exempted from such taxation
  4. Stay of taxation of citizens under H.R. 3590 PPACA, whose religion does not give them an exemption based on individual’s status as a member of an exempt religious sect or division.
  5. Stay of any and all collection of taxes and penalties by the IRS in relation to failure by Taitz or any other individual who is a Christian or a Jew or member of any other religion, who does not fall under the exemption of religious sect or division under Section 1411 5(A)(5)(A) which grants Muslims an exemption from paying the Healthcare tax.
  6. PERMANENT INJUNCTION preventing  taxation of Taitz, as well as other US citizens, who are Christians or Jews, who were made to pay heavy Healthcare tax under H. R. 3590″ Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) , in order to subsidize healthcare of Muslims, who were exempted under 1411 (5)(A)   and an exempt religious sect or division.
  7. Declaratory relief deeming taxation of Taitz and others similarly situated U.S. citizens under the new H.R.3590 tax to be unconstitutional, as H.R. 3590 was signed into law by a foreign national Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah, who usurped the position of the US President by fraud and while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and while never being eligible for the position of the U.S. President.
  8. Declaratory relief deeming that defendants (aside from defendant Sebelius)

acted in a racketeering fashion and acted in concert in committing elections fraud and allowing usurpation of the US Presidency by a foreign national Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, using forged and fraudulently obtained identification records, and allowing him to unlawfully sign bills and executive orders, including ObamaTax, aka H.R. 3590.

  1. Treble damages in RICO to cover financial damages, as well as damages suffered as a result of defamation, slander, harassment and persecutions of Taitz, who blew the whistle on Obama and other Defendants.
    1. Court costs, attorneys’ fees and any and all relief that the court will find to be just and proper.

 

 

Respectfully submitted

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

07.02.2012

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

 

Exhibits

  1. Affidavit of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, stating that Barack Obama’s alleged Birth certificate, Selective service Certificate and Social Security number represent forgeries.
  2. Affidavit of expert Douglas Vogt attesting to the fact that Obama’s birth certificate represent a forgery.
  3. Affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.
  4. Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.
  5. Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Barack Obama posted his full Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 on white House.gov with his 2009 tax returns and posted on April 15, 2010.
  6. Affidavit of John Sampson, Senior Deportation officer of the department of homeland security, attesting to the fact that there was no legitimate reason for assigning a Connecticut Social security number to Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii.
  7. Affidavit of Linda Jordan and attached e-verify attesting to the fact that Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 issued to Obama was not assigned to Obama.
  8. SSNVS (Social security verification systems) printout attesting to the fact that   Connecticut social security number 042-68-4425 used by Obama was never issued to Obama
  9. Affidavit of typesetting expert  Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes
  10.  Certification of Nomination of Al Gore issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2000.
  11.  Certification of Nomination of John Kerry issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2004.
  12.  Certificate of Nomination of Barack Obama issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2008.
  13.  Certificate of Nomination of John Kerry by Democratic National Committee sent to the State of Hawaii in 2004.
  14.  Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee in 2008 sent to 49 states.
  15.  Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee sent to the Office of Elections of the State of Hawaii in 2008 (with edited wording).
  16.  School registration #203 for Barack Obama from Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia and showing Obama using his step father’s last name Soetoro as his legal name, as well as listing his citizenship as Indonesian and his religion Islam
  17.  Affidavit of Chris Strunk, authenticating passport records of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann  Dunham, received by him under the FOIA request from the Department of State and showing Obama’s legal name in his mother’s passport records to be Barack Obama Soebarkah.
  18. Taitz v Sebelius pages 1-30

    Taitz v Sebelius pages 31-60

    Taitz v Sebelius pages p61-90

    Taitz v Sebelius pages p91-113

     

Comments

39 Responses to “Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt”

  1. Jeff Bales / Pima GOP Executive Committee
    July 5th, 2012 @ 11:38 am

    Go, Orly, GO!

  2. Veritas
    July 5th, 2012 @ 11:39 am

    It is SHARIAH COMPLIANT.

    Jews and Christians are, under OBAMATAX, de facto “dhimmmis.”

    Remember Al Qaeda saying, after 9/11, that the “next time” they would take the USA down from “the top” in way that we would “not understand until its too late.”

    Food for thought….

  3. Veritas
    July 5th, 2012 @ 11:58 am

    Read it on Drudge! Is Obama truly, under all his taqiyyah artifice, telling the USA and the WORLD that it is ISLAMIC TRIUMPHALISM which is “here to stay” ? :
    —————————-

    ‘THE LAW I PASSED IS HERE TO STAY’

  4. dianna burton
    July 5th, 2012 @ 2:31 pm

    Just wanted to say THANK YOU ORLY.You are the only one that is doing something about this.Our Congress and Senate are blow hards.I know one thing,they are going to be voted out for them doing nothing.We send them to do our bidding and they are doing what Obama wants them to do.Its got to stop.Enough is enough.I am fed up with their do nothing antics.God Bless you Orly and may you have success in this and everything else.A supporter.

  5. Elizabeth
    July 5th, 2012 @ 4:59 pm

    I am absolutely speechless. I am a
    school teacher and not an attorney,
    but in reading this, I have to say,
    in awe, that you are beyond wonderful.

    Anyone of the ‘obots’ who has the
    stupidity to comment in one of its
    moronic posts that you were a
    ‘mail order attorney’ (whether it were
    true or false), should be aware that
    it is immaterial how one gains one’s
    license, when the result is so spectacular.

    *not that any of us ever thought an obot
    had any intellect, anyhow.
    AND…
    (I just wanted to point out the pathetic
    stretch in obots’ attempts to
    demean anyone who is above their stature.
    They are a pitiful lot.)

    If this case is dismissed, for any
    unlawful reason at all, then we the people
    of the United States will know that the
    time has come for other options.

    From the blogs that I read, I know that
    99% of this country will not take any more
    of this merde from Obama and his henchmen/henchwomen.

    We are sick in our souls, about what has
    happened to this country, how insurgents
    have taken over while the population
    slept in a coma; it is now apparent
    that the citizens are waking up;
    it involves their wallets/pocketbooks, so
    there is no way in heck that Americans will ever let a dismissal of this case be the final answer.

    Obama’s obots can count on that and we WILL win.

    Our ancestors won.. so shall we,
    one way.. or another.

    As for you, Dr. Taitz, I am so in awe of you,
    you are, in our hearts, placed on a pedestal for the world to know that you are our
    Joan d’Arc.

    Ignore the Lepanes and the Raichas,
    and the other fools. All of them
    exist in a much lower dimension of this universe. Their judgment day will come.

  6. Screw Orly
    July 5th, 2012 @ 5:15 pm

    Yous is just a stupid white nigga bitch and ya need to be fucked good by some nigga cock!

  7. Brian
    July 5th, 2012 @ 5:27 pm

    As a United States Natural Born Citizen, a citizen in the State of California, and a born again Christian vehemently opposed to this illegal mandate penalty

    — which never got 5 votes on any one point of law regarding III-B, the mandate clause (cf. the June 28, 2012’s decision’s Syllabus) …Ginsburg was the 5th vote against it as a tax, Roberts was the 5th vote against it under the Commerce clause (see opening of Opinions of Roberts and Ginsburg at http://www.brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2012/06/questions-remain-on-healthcare-ruling.html ) —

    where do I sign up to be part of this class action?
    Thanks.

  8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 5th, 2012 @ 5:55 pm

    e-mail me at orly.taitz@gmail.com
    Are you sure that Ginsburg was against the taxing clause?

  9. Leslie Johnson
    July 5th, 2012 @ 6:10 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    I just turned 78, I am telling you this to let you know from what time frame I am coming from. One of my grandfather was a traveling Southern Baptist preacher in the panhandle of Texas, and he would have really admired all your spunk and courage that you exhibit, while fighting for such a just cause. If you win in what you are doing all of America wins, and if you lose America loses big time. America please wake-up!

  10. LHowerton
    July 5th, 2012 @ 6:27 pm

    I’m in another state. Can I join this or do I need to start another action for that state? Thank You!!

  11. The Phoenix
    July 5th, 2012 @ 7:24 pm

    Hey, screw-(ball): I got a better suggestion…go “boink” yourself, little darlin’!!! Who knows, you might enjoy it?! LOL! 🙂

    And Orly, Wow! Your terrific case is going to “blow their minds!” These “shyster attorneys” are going to have a tough time to cope with all that truth!!! 🙂 OMG!~

  12. The Truth
    July 5th, 2012 @ 8:52 pm

    Now that is what I’m talking about!!!!!!
    WOW!
    That’s how you will beat them Orly. They keep underestimating you.

  13. Lady Patriot
    July 6th, 2012 @ 1:28 am

    Elizabeth put it so well,all I can say is..BRAVO !!!!!

  14. The Doctor
    July 6th, 2012 @ 5:56 am

    I’ve got a feeling that you finally got em’. Stay the course!

  15. Leslie Johnson
    July 6th, 2012 @ 11:17 am

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    Congraduations, you really have them on the run now. Sooner or later they are going to run out of gas, then it’s curtains for them, and the “Big House” for whatever his name really is.

  16. GREAT OUT
    July 6th, 2012 @ 1:34 pm

    HOORAY… or is it HOORAY… BECOME A MUSLIM AND BE EXEMPT FROM “OBAMA HEALTH INSANITY”.

    The WHITE HOUSE MUSLIM is RECRUITING CONVERTS TO BECOME HIS allies by IMMUNIZING MUSLIMS from the HEALTH CARE ACT.

    Just think… more Muslims to push SHARIA on America for the DEFEAT of Israel.

    BECOME PRO-ACTIVE AND MAKE SIGNS FOR YOUR CARS, HOUSE LAWNS, AND MORE ELSE BECOME A MUSLIM OR PAY THE TAX TO STAY ALIVE IF YOU DON’T CONVERT TO THE CULT OF “ISLAM”.

  17. Leslie Johnson
    July 6th, 2012 @ 2:45 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    I will be at, and if at all possible to get in, in the Federal Courtroom in Santa Ana, California on August 10, 2012 at 9:30am to show my support for you, and I would like to urge any and every American Citizen anywhere near Santa Ana to show up there and show their support for you. I am certain there are thousands of American Citizens near that area that support what you have been doing to save and protect the U.S. Constitution. This is a great chance for them to show you their appreciation for you sacrificing your life to save our U.S. Constitution and our American way of life. Come on all you American Citizens, this is our chance to do it bigtime. I hope to see you all there!!!

  18. Leslie Johnson
    July 6th, 2012 @ 3:01 pm

    Attention all American Citizen, I got my court venue mixed-up above, don’t appear in Santa Ana, appear in Los Angeles. Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., has some many great things going right now, it’s just hard to keep them all straight. Isn’t she really a super person? Remember Los Angeles on August 10th, not Santa Ana. See you all you American Citizens in LOS ANGELES. This is your chance to do something to help the American way of life, so let’s all do it.

  19. Sean
    July 6th, 2012 @ 9:28 pm

    Can residents(my wife and I)in California still be added to the list for this law suit.If so we would like add our names immediatly!
    Thank you

  20. The Phoenix
    July 6th, 2012 @ 9:40 pm

    The last statement Obama explains: “…this law is here to stay…!” I say: no! Not if a (R) gets elected!!

    We should call him: President “Caligula!!” What a demented excuse for a man!!!

  21. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 7th, 2012 @ 5:35 am
  22. Dan
    July 7th, 2012 @ 3:48 pm

    Wonder what would happen if SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts was added to the list?
    After all, he is the one who swore Obama into
    Office behind closed doors. The first swearing in had some minor flaws.

  23. Mr. Smith
    July 8th, 2012 @ 5:12 pm
  24. Yoel
    July 8th, 2012 @ 10:54 pm

    “If you shut up the truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”

    – French author Emile Zola.

  25. Mark
    July 9th, 2012 @ 2:53 am

    The US constitution doesn’t exist anymore. Our elected leaders got rid of it as Bush once said it was an antiquated old document. There have been many attempts to rewrite the constitution. Our elected leaders only pretend to follow the constitution for a Dog and Pony Show to the public. It’s all fake. Obama has violated this and congress allows it to go on and on.
    If congress actually upheld the constitution then we would see impeachment charges filed against Obama. He would be in federal prison long ago when he was a State Senator. The people you marked on your ballot will never follow their oath of office and not one part of our government will do anything to correct it. No part of government will listen to the evidence of Obama breaking all those laws regardless. No one will ever act against him. If any legislator or justice dare to do it then they will be killed.

  26. Yephora
    July 9th, 2012 @ 3:40 pm

    #25 – which Bush said that, and when. Link?

  27. Starla
    July 10th, 2012 @ 5:38 am

    “FORMAL COMPLAINT SEEKS DISBARMENT OF ERIC HOLDER IN DC”

    [Well, thank God, It’s about time!!!]

    “Attorney General Eric Holder could lose his license to practice law in the District of Columbia, or face some other penalty from the D.C. Bar, now that he has been found in criminal and civil contempt of Congress.

    Last week, the bloggers who first exposed Operation Fast and Furious, Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea, filed a formal complaint with the Washington, D.C. Office of Bar Counsel alleging that Holder committed “professional misconduct” during the congressional investigation into the scandal.

    Because Holder was found in contempt of Congress for his “refusal to comply with a subpoena duly issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,” Vanderboegh and Codrea contend, “[i]t would appear that several, if not all of these rules [the D.C. Bar’s rules of professional conduct], have been violated.”

    snip….

    Vanderboegh and Codrea each published the complaint they jointly registered on their individual blogs “[b]ecause of the serious political ramifications involved, and because some on the Board may be sympathetic to AG Holder’s positions and hostile to those of the House contempt charges, and in order to ensure that this complaint receives proper attention and is not ignored through deliberate indifference.”

    Read More Here: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/09/formal-complaint-seeks-disbarment-of-eric-holder-in-dc/#ixzz209L9fA4X

  28. Starla
    July 10th, 2012 @ 5:44 am

    CONSCIENCE CLAUSE

    PROTECTING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE

    Conscience Cause – Protecting The Civil Rights Of Conscience

    * Petition *

    “Our petition calls on Congress to take action against HHS’ employer mandate.”

    * Petition Text: *

    “Dear Speaker Boehner & Leader Reid,

    The First Amendment to our Constitution begins “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This explicit protection of rights of conscience is as fundamental to us as our unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    “A rule enacted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) forces individual and institutional employers to purchase health insurance for employees which provides free abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization procedures and contraceptive medications. Acknowledging that this mandate burdens the free exercise of religion of many Americans, the rule contains a limited accommodation for “houses of worship” but which is defined so narrowly as to exclude many employers with religious or moral objections, including religious hospitals, schools and charities.

    Because the rule compels such employers (whether they be individuals, institutions or corporations) to violate deeply-held tenets of faith and conscience, it is in direct violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. We fervently petition Congress to act immediately to repeal or amend this rule to protect the free exercise of religion and the rights of conscience of all Americans.

    As signers of this petition, we do not represent any particular religious faith or political party. We are people of many faiths, and some of no particular faith. We have no uniform view on contraception. We are, however, unified as Americans in our support of the primacy of rights of religion and conscience. We affix our names here because we believe the mandate represents an unprecedented and unnecessary intrusion into the civic and economic life of people of faith and conscience and sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans.

    We respectfully request the United States House of Representatives to take immediate action to preserve “rights of conscience against the enterprises of civil authority.” After such a protection passes the U.S. House, we respectfully request its approval by the United States Senate.”

    ~ Sign the Petition!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ~

    http://consciencecause.com

    “The First Amendment to our Constitution begins “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Reducing opposition to the so called contraception mandate to a discussion on the cost of birth control is akin to believing a block of ice floating in the ocean is of no consequence to passing ships.

    This rule represents not the tip of the iceberg but rather, a lethal mass hidden, in this case, under reams of legislative legalese and bureaucratic red tape.

    Requiring religious institutions to act against their faith or face punitive penalties is unconstitutional. Denying a centuries-old definition of what is a religious institution in service to the whims of a temporary administration is unconscionable.”

    http://consciencecause.com/learn

    ==========================

    What is the HHS mandate?

    “The mandate of the Department of Health and Human Services has received wide attention and has been met with vigorous and united opposition from people of all faiths. In an unprecedented way, the federal government will both force religious institutions to facilitate and fund a product contrary to their own moral teaching and purport to define which religious institutions are “religious enough” to merit protection of their religious liberty. These features of the “preventive services” mandate amount to an unjust law.”

    ==========================

    About Conscience Cause

    “Conscience Cause is a non-profit, non-partisan, public policy advocacy organization comprised of leaders from various faiths united to secure and preserve our constitutional rights of conscience. We will act by petitioning the federal legislature to bar any regulation that would compel religious institutions, as well as individuals and corporations, to violate the tenets of their faith or be subject to penalty of law.”

    “Conscience Cause leadership includes religious leaders and former government officials of different faiths and denominations, among them:”

    http://consciencecause.com/about

    ~ ACT!!!!!!!!!!!! ~

    ~ TAKE ACTION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!! ~

    * OUR CIVIL RIGHTS & FREEDOMS & LIBERTIES ARE BEING DESTROYED BY THE OUT-OF-CONTROL, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND LAWLESS USA FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE’S ~

    ***** “Fortnight for Freedom: Call your Member of Congress!!!!!!!!!!

    ***** Gather petition signatures from your fellow worshippers!!!!!!!!!!

    ***** Conscience Cause is a grassroots effort to encourage Congress to stand up for religious freedom!!!!!!!!!!”

    From: Many Judeo-Christian Churches, Many Synagogues, Many Civil Rights Groups & Foundations Such As:

    PreserveReligiousFreedom.org – Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, D.C.

  29. Starla
    July 10th, 2012 @ 6:44 am

    THE LAW OF THE LAND

    “JOHN ROBERTS: BRIBERY OR BLACKMAIL?”

    “EXCLUSIVE: LARRY KLAYMAN WANTS AN INVESTIGATION OF CHIEF JUSTICE’S APPARENT FLIP-FLOP”

    By Larry Klayman
    July 6, 2012

    “In this context, let’s talk about the highest of the high on the echelon of federal judges: Supreme Court justices. One in particular comes to mind in the last week or so. His name is Chief Justice John Roberts, the high-court jurist who wrote perhaps the most dishonest majority decision in the history of the nation, upholding Obamacare as a constitutional tax. But then again, it was revealed on the streets of the capital just a few days ago that Roberts not only wrote the majority decision, but before he miraculously switched sides and voted with the leftist wing of the Supreme Court – socialist Justices Kagan, Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor – he had also written what ultimately became the minority opinion signed by conservative justices Scalia, Alito, Thomas and Kennedy.

    What explains Chief Justice Roberts’ conversion from one who had decided to strike down Obamacare to a justice who dishonestly twisted and perverted the law to uphold it as constitutional? […]”

    […]

    “I am currently in Ocala, Fla., organizing and implementing a Citizens Grand Jury to do the job our public institutions and government law enforcement authorities should be doing.
    That’s because it’s time that we citizens do what must be done, peacefully and legally.

    If we do not take responsibility for saving the nation, then all will soon be lost.

    As John Adams, our great second American president, Founding Father and Framer declared just days before signing the Declaration of Independence, without ethics, morality and religion we will have no lasting liberty.

    Now, just as Adams and his compatriots embarked upon in 1776 and the formative years that followed the successfully fought American Revolution, we must pledge our sacred honor, and risk our fortunes and lives, to save and rebuild a great country, thereby preserving its freedoms for all mankind, by the grace of God.”

    See The Entire Article Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/john-roberts-bribery-or-blackmail/

  30. Leonard McCauley
    July 10th, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

    Christian or Jewish Relgion =YES
    Judeo-Christian = Absolutely, no such term.

  31. Mark
    July 10th, 2012 @ 1:10 pm

    Any law is null and void if no one obeys it and that includes the Obamatax. No one has to vote in the next election. If we have criminals in our government and vote knowing this, then we are not that bright after all. IF you want to fix this problem, keep away from the ballot box and let the terms of these criminals expire. We would be far better off with no government at all. A government can only exist if we want it to. Personally I do not want our government to exist based on what we have in it now which are criminals.

  32. Mark
    July 10th, 2012 @ 1:37 pm

    In reply to #26.

    There have been 8 attempts to change the constitution and remove the requirement for the President to be a Natural born US citizen.
    Today it continues quietly.

    George W. Bush was in an argument over renewal of the Patriot Act in 2005. It violates our Constitution. His comments about it were these >

    “I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

    “Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

    “Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” G.W. Bush screamed back. “It’s just a god-damned piece of paper!”

    I’ve talked to three people present for the meeting that day and they all confirm that the President of the United States called the Constitution “a god-damned piece of paper.”

    And, to the Bush Administration, the Constitution of the United States is little more than toilet paper stained from all the shit that this group of power-mad despots have dumped on the freedoms that “god-damned piece of paper” used to guarantee.

    Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, while still White House counsel, wrote that the “Constitution is an outdated document.”

    The link is at
    http://whitehouser.com/politics/bush-constitution-just-a-piece-of-paper/

  33. Yeah
    July 10th, 2012 @ 3:40 pm

    The usual bulls**t

  34. Yephora
    July 11th, 2012 @ 12:29 am

    #32 – Thanks. Just as I suspected, the alleged quote attributed to G.W.Bush is unreliable and unverified and was even eventually retracted:

    “. . . [it was] based on sources that we thought, at the time, were reliable. We have since discovered reasons to doubt their veracity. For that reason, this article has been removed from our database.”

  35. Spiritual Guardian Angel Of God
    July 12th, 2012 @ 12:08 am

    Re: Leonard McCauley
    July 10th, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

    Judeo-Christian = Absolutely, no such term.

    ================================

    Think again. Read this to straighten your error and misconception out.

    ================================

    “WHAT DOES ‘JUDEO-CHRISTIAN’ MEAN?”

    By Dennis Prager

    Jewish World Review March 30, 2004

    “THE UNIQUENESS OF AMERICA”

    http://www.jewishworldreview.com

    “The United States of America is the only country in history to have defined itself as Judeo-Christian. While the Western world has consisted of many Christian countries and consists today of many secular countries, only America has called itself Judeo-Christian.
    America is also unique in that it has always combined secular government with a society based on religious values.

    But what does “Judeo-Christian” mean? We need to know. Along with the belief in liberty — as opposed to, for example, the European belief in equality, the Muslim belief in theocracy, and the Eastern belief in social conformity —

    Judeo-Christian values are what distinguish America from all other countries. That is why American coins feature these two messages: “In G-d we trust” and “Liberty.”

    Yet, for all its importance and its repeated mention, the term is not widely understood. It urgently needs to be because it is under ferocious assault, and if we do not understand it, we will be unable to defend it.

    And if we cannot defend it, America will become as amoral as France, Germany, Russia, et al.

    First, Judeo-Christian America has differed from Christian countries in Europe in at least two important ways. One is that the Christians who founded America saw themselves as heirs to the Hebrew Bible, as much as to theirs. And even more importantly, they strongly identified with the Jews.

    For example, Thomas Jefferson wanted the design of the seal of the United States to depict the Jews leaving Egypt. Just as the Hebrews left Egypt and its values, Americans left Europe and its values (if only those who admire Jefferson would continue to take his advice).

    Founders and other early Americans probably studied Hebrew, the language of the Jewish Bible at least as much as Greek, the language of the New. Yale, founded in 1701, adopted a Hebrew insignia, and Hebrew was compulsory at Harvard until 1787.

    The words on the Liberty Bell, “Proclaim Liberty throughout all the land . . . ,” are from the Torah. Vast numbers of Americans took Hebrew names — like Benjamin Franklin and Cotton Mather (kattan in Hebrew means “little one” or “younger”).

    The consequences included a strong Hebrew Bible view of the world — meaning, in part, a strong sense of fighting for earthly justice, an emphasis on laws, a belief in a judging, as well as a loving and forgiving, G-d, and a belief in the chosenness of the Jews which America identified with.

    The significance of this belief in American chosenness cannot be overstated. It accounts for the mission that Americans have uniquely felt called to — to spread liberty in the world.

    This sense of mission is why more Americans have died for the liberty of others than any other nation’s soldiers.

    It is why those who today most identify with the Judeo-Christian essence of America are more likely to believe in the moral worthiness of dying to liberate countries — not only Europe, but Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. That is why America stands alone in protecting two little countries threatened with extinction, Israel and Taiwan.

    That is why conservative Americans are more likely to believe in American exceptionalism — in not seeking, as President Bush put it, a “permission slip” from the United Nations, let alone from Europe.

    The second meaning of Judeo-Christian is a belief in the biblical G-d of Israel, in His Ten Commandments and His biblical moral laws.

    It is a belief in universal, not relative, morality.
    It is a belief that America must answer morally to this G-d, not to the mortal, usually venal, governments of the world.

    That is why those who most affirm Judeo-Christian values lead the fight against redefining marriage. We believe
    that a pillar of Judeo-Christian values is to encourage the man-woman sexual and marital ideal, and to provide children with the opportunity to benefit from the unique gifts that a man and a woman give a child, gifts that are never replicable by two men alone or two women.

    That is why those who most affirm Judeo-Christian values are unmoved by the idea that the war in Iraq is moral if Germany, France, China and Russia say so, but immoral if they oppose it.

    We ask first what G-d and the Bible would say about liberating Iraq, not what Syria and other members of the U.N. Security Council say.

    That is why those who most affirm Judeo-Christian values believe that war, while always tragic, is on more than a few occasions a moral duty. Nothing “Judeo” ever sanctioned pacifism. Of course, the Hebrew Prophet Isaiah yearned for the day that nations will beat their swords into plowshares. But another Hebrew Prophet, Joel, who is never cited by those who wish to read the secular value of pacifism into the Bible, said precisely the opposite: “Beat your plowshares into swords and your pruning hooks into spears. Let the weakling say, ‘I am strong!'”

    And that is why those who want Judeo-Christian values to disappear from American public life affirm multiculturalism, seek to remove mention of G-d from all public life, and make Christmas a private, not a national, holiday.

    The battle over whether America remains Judeo-Christian or becomes secular like Europe is what this, the Second American Civil War, is about.”

    http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0304/prager_2004_03_30_04.php3

  36. Spiritual Guardian Angel Of God
    July 12th, 2012 @ 12:18 am

    Re: Leonard McCauley
    July 10th, 2012 @ 1:08 pm

    Judeo-Christian = Absolutely, no such term.

    ================================

    Think again. Read this to straighten your error and misconception out.

    ================================

    “WHAT DOES ‘JUDEO-CHRISTIAN’ MEAN?”

    By Dennis Prager
    Jewish World Review – March 30, 2004

    “THE UNIQUENESS OF AMERICA”

    http://www.jewishworldreview.com

    “The United States of America is the only country in history to have defined itself as Judeo-Christian. While the Western world has consisted of many Christian countries and consists today of many secular countries,
    only America has called itself Judeo-Christian.
    America is also unique in that it has always combined secular government with a society based on religious values.

    But what does “Judeo-Christian” mean? We need to know. Along with the belief in liberty — as opposed to, for example, the European belief in equality, the Muslim belief in theocracy, and the Eastern belief in social conformity —
    Judeo-Christian values are what distinguish America from all other countries. That is why American coins feature these two messages: “In G-d we trust” and “Liberty.”

    Yet, for all its importance and its repeated mention, the term is not widely understood. It urgently needs to be because it is under ferocious assault, and if we do not understand it, we will be unable to defend it.

    And if we cannot defend it, America will become as amoral as France, Germany, Russia, et al.

    First, Judeo-Christian America has differed from Christian countries in Europe in at least two important ways. One is that the Christians who founded America saw themselves as heirs to the Hebrew Bible, as much as to theirs. And even more importantly, they strongly identified with the Jews.

    For example, Thomas Jefferson wanted the design of the seal of the United States to depict the Jews leaving Egypt. Just as the Hebrews left Egypt and its values, Americans left Europe and its values (if only those who admire Jefferson would continue to take his advice).

    Founders and other early Americans probably studied Hebrew, the language of the Jewish Bible at least as much as Greek, the language of the New. Yale, founded in 1701, adopted a Hebrew insignia, and Hebrew was compulsory at Harvard until 1787.

    The words on the Liberty Bell, “Proclaim Liberty throughout all the land . . . ,” are from the Torah. Vast numbers of Americans took Hebrew names — like Benjamin Franklin and Cotton Mather (kattan in Hebrew means “little one” or “younger”).

    The consequences included a strong Hebrew Bible view of the world — meaning, in part, a strong sense of fighting for earthly justice, an emphasis on laws, a belief in a judging, as well as a loving and forgiving, G-d, and a belief in the chosenness of the Jews which America identified with.

    The significance of this belief in American chosenness cannot be overstated. It accounts for the mission that Americans have uniquely felt called to — to spread liberty in the world.

    This sense of mission is why more Americans have died for the liberty of others than any other nation’s soldiers.

    It is why those who today most identify with the Judeo-Christian essence of America are more likely to believe in the moral worthiness of dying to liberate countries — not only Europe, but Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. That is why America stands alone in protecting two little countries threatened with extinction, Israel and Taiwan.

    That is why conservative Americans are more likely to believe in American exceptionalism — in not seeking, as President Bush put it, a “permission slip” from the United Nations, let alone from Europe.

    The second meaning of Judeo-Christian is a belief in the biblical G-d of Israel, in His Ten Commandments and His biblical moral laws.

    It is a belief in universal, not relative, morality. It is a belief that America must answer morally to this G-d, not to the mortal, usually venal, governments of the world.

    That is why those who most affirm Judeo-Christian values lead the fight against redefining marriage. We believe
    that a pillar of Judeo-Christian values is to encourage the man-woman sexual and marital ideal, and to provide children with the opportunity to benefit from the unique gifts that a man and a woman give a child, gifts that are never replicable by two men alone or two women.

    That is why those who most affirm Judeo-Christian values are unmoved by the idea that the war in Iraq is moral if Germany, France, China and Russia say so, but immoral if they oppose it.

    We ask first what G-d and the Bible would say about liberating Iraq, not what Syria and other members of the U.N. Security Council say.

    […]

    And that is why those who want Judeo-Christian values to disappear from American public life affirm multiculturalism, seek to remove mention of G-d from all public life, and make Christmas a private, not a national, holiday.

    The battle over whether America remains Judeo-Christian or becomes secular like Europe is what this, the Second American Civil War, is about.”

    http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0304/prager_2004_03_30_04.php3

  37. Angela
    July 12th, 2012 @ 5:40 am

    Orly, Thank You
    All Americans are EQUAL under the law
    No Church and State HA HA HA they lose
    I was wondering when someone was going to challenge this injustice.
    We Catholics and Jews ETC should all make new rules to our religions wonder how they would like that? Yes , “I think we do have the power to do just that.”
    Much Love Angela , Keep up the Great Work
    You are my Joan of Ark

  38. Benjamin C. Freeman
    August 10th, 2012 @ 5:38 pm

    Dear America,

    There is only one true God. God sent His

    only Son, Jesus, to die on a cross so that,

    men, made in His image might be saved from

    original sin. Jesus succeeded in His mission!

    Anno Domini means, “in the year of

    our Lord”. From the moment Jesus was born,

    even time has paid homage to His greatness.

    Everything that happened before His birth is

    labeled B.C. or before Christ.

    I invite all peoples made in the image of

    God, to convert to Christianity and worship

    the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

    Jesus loves you! God Bless the U.S.A.

    P.S. Jesus says, “Love your Enemies”.

  39. android
    September 24th, 2012 @ 7:15 am

Leave a Reply





*