Is anyone familiar with Guardian? Are they really that bad?
Posted on | September 1, 2009 | 18 Comments
Don’t do this interview !!!
As I’m sure you know, the Guardian is a far-left rag with almost zero
credibility.
I think they will take whatever you say, misquote parts of it, invent
other parts of it, and generally try to make you look like an ass.
You know, the way the US MSM does.
Except the Brits are better at it.
W. Smith
PS Thanks for pursuing the good fight on behalf of all Americans. Try
to keep cool under pressure — it’s the only thing Obama does well.
Comments
18 Responses to “Is anyone familiar with Guardian? Are they really that bad?”
September 1st, 2009 @ 10:53 am
A sample of a work in progress presentation.
https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dg7bd2qt_9596srpshm
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:04 am
I tend to agree with W. Smith in his general assessment of the Guardian although she might give the interviewer a dossier with her basic argument and try to keep the interview on a few key facts like Obama not being a natural born citizen. If the interviewer does a smear job then maybe certain facts will get through; what is more, the Guardian is a big name and might look good in Orly’s resume: “I try to talk to anyone with an interest in the subject hoping they will each stick to the truth as much as possible,” that sort of thing.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:09 am
All that i can say about interviews is that they can destroy a person’s cause.
When the interviewers begin to take offensive actions against their guest, to destroy the guest’s public image, then the guest needs to be prepared to defend and take the conversation back to their own cause.
The interviewers by asking questions to deliberately put the guest on the defensive, in the interviewers eyes, is good public relations and improves their ratings for their media status.
When an interviewer asks what time it is…then the guest being interviewed shouldn’t begin telling the interviewer how to build a clock or watch. The guest being interviewed needs to have a strategy to bring the interview into the guest’s court and on the guest’s topic.
One question that is never asked of the interviewer is the following; “can you “interviewer’s name” positively assure the world that the stink in the white house is qualified to be there? Tell me ‘interviewer” how do you firmly and positively know that the ‘stink’ in the white house is properly qualified when there’s more evidence available saying he is not qualified.
The interviewer invariably refers to the newspaper birth publication…and the response to that interviewers comment is that almost EVERY newspaper has a ‘social/society’ reporter whose job is to get birth, death, and community news for publication in the social columns of their newspaper.
Just my summarized thoughts on what I’ve experienced when listening to interviews.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:26 am
They’re not that bad — they’re worse. When stories appear online and result in a firestorm of readers taking issue with their story, they delete virtually all the comments and even have been known to disable the comment feature. Think MSNBC.
September 1st, 2009 @ 11:30 am
The Guardian ia a notorious liberal/socialist newspaper for up-market intelectuals.
September 1st, 2009 @ 12:35 pm
God Bless YOU! DR. Orly! 🙂 YOU are a wonderful patriot! 🙂 Prayers for strength for YOU! 🙂
September 1st, 2009 @ 12:58 pm
ORLY,
I think you should do the interview and present your point of view as well you can.
Reaching a new audience is very important the lieberals will not change their minds but who cares about them…but moderates will go and learn more and taht is the IDEA. We need to ever more keep intorducing the issue to people that are SHIELDED by the Obama Brownshirts and Bedmate Media. Going on Colbert Report brought the issue to lots mor epeople that had never heard of it. Even if only one person learns about the issue and agree with us it is ONE MORE that we didn’t have before.
Like I have said many times these issues will be decided on the Real People’s Court, the Court of Public Opnion and to get that you have to EXPOSE it EVERYWHERE you can even if they ridicule or distort, some people will see thru it and come to our side.
DO THE INTERVIEW and keep present our side Valiantly.
Time to move from Tea Parties to TAX REVOLT PROTEST.
See you in DC for the Prayer & Protest on 9/12
God Bless US
September 1st, 2009 @ 1:09 pm
Dear Dr. Orly-before I forget again. If you have to locate/re-locate any of your work. I live in Florida now and one group the government does not mess with is the Indian Nations. Kevin Costner called them 500 Nations-Sovereign. I don’t think even the Obots could mess with your work there.
September 1st, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS”INTERVIEW” – If you thought MSNBC was unfair then you should shun this opportunity. You are courageous and fighting for this country – they will make you look like a crazed racist lunatic and it will be written in a way to demean the whole effort to get Obama to release his personal documents. We live in an upside down world where a President refuses to release any of his personal documents and the Press thinks that is just fine – anyone questioning this is crazy.
September 1st, 2009 @ 5:11 pm
I haven’t researched much on the Guardian, but atleast the following articles on their website indicate that they do promote and value REAL investigative journalism:
https://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/feb/12/newspapers-investigative-journalism-endowments
https://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/29/huffington-investigative-reporters
The following blog post about their work to expose the recent MP expense scandal in the UK, where some of the Labor Party MPs were implicated also indicates that they do take their investigative reporting seriously:
https://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment/
So, it is possible that this message asking you to not do the interview may be an attempt at spreading disinformation about the Guardian, to prevent the facts about the usurper’s ineligibility from spreading in the UK.
September 1st, 2009 @ 6:01 pm
Orly, The Guardian will never give you a fair hearing. Try the Daily Telegraph for a daily paper, and the Spectator for a good weekly periodical. Also try Talk Sport Radio in UK . It is a generally left wing national radio station, but Ian Collins or Mike Graham will give you a fair hearing. They regularly have US guests on.
I think you need a press agent.
Best wishes.
MarkR UK
September 1st, 2009 @ 6:43 pm
The Guardian and The Independent are banned from this household.
They are a biased and left leaning anti-semitic newspaper. Totally in the bag for Obama.
I remember with horror, in 2005 they entertained a trainee journalist reporter who was an active member of the Hizb ut-Tahrir!
The paper itself, wouldn’t touch it with a bargepole, nor would I read it if it were given out freely, I’d probably use it to help dispose of the contents of the cat litter tray tho!
September 1st, 2009 @ 6:48 pm
Btw, my comments about The Guardian, were relating to the UK newspaper, as I reside in the UK….
September 1st, 2009 @ 7:11 pm
orly no go on guardian……..its a waste of time….happy birthday by the way lefts looking for opportunity to discredit you and notice birthers…
September 1st, 2009 @ 7:13 pm
The UK Guardian is in the tank for Obama. When the Obamas went to the UK for the summit earlier, the UK Guardian did nothing but praise them. They will make you look like a fool, Orly. Don’t do it.
September 2nd, 2009 @ 10:15 am
I have been using the “Guardian” as a reliable source of information on an issue where the pseudo-democratic Socialists happened to be right –the liberation of Kosovo in 1999.
Yet there is little likelihood that a dyed-in-the-wool pseudo-democratic Socialist would only understand the Constitutional issues involved with Certifigate, or measure the extent to which a Communist usurpation destroys the Republic.
The mere fact that he speaks of a “birther movement” rather than an “eligibility issue” shows that he is not willing to acknowledge the fact that there is a problem.
September 2nd, 2009 @ 1:46 pm
DO the INTERVIEW any PUBLICITY is good for our cause. You will be reaching people that need to hear about this issue. No harm can come from it. The Lieberal Erosionist won’t listen but many others will. If we get the Liebrals to hate us more that is a good thing. They are great at HATE.
Do the interview it will let more and more people know about the FRAUD and will raise Alarm about teh INSURGENCY PRESIDENCY.
September 3rd, 2009 @ 2:19 pm
Dr. Taitz: I am with everyone else here…do NOT do this interview. These new “journalists” have no morals or professional ethics but they are skilled at twisting, revising, editing, etc. You will end up looking like a nut and the interviewer will get a pat on the back from his keeper.
From reading the news coming out of the UK recently, if this guy wants to do interviews there are limitless opportunities to do so right there in the UK…the land of the sleaze and home of the knave.
BTW…I am an Infection Control & OSHA Compliance Coordinator in a dental practice; nice to see a dental professional so involved. Conservative women may very well end up as the saviors of our nation. God bless you, m’am.