USVFnews
Posted on | August 9, 2009 | 7 Comments
E
Saturday, August 8, 2009 11:15 PM
From:
“Bill News” <usvfnews@charter.net>
Add sender to Contacts
To:
“Bill News” <usvfnews@charter.net>
Mo l o n l a b e E m ai l N e w s Lis t usvfnews@charter.net
In God, we h ave a great and invincible ally!
His fait h ful will be raised on eagle’s wings!
From Paul Andrew Mitc h ell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: If you love & respect t h e law and dislike lawyers, t h en read t h is
Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009, 6:34 PM
[reformatted for American Standard Englis h by t h e Supreme Law Firm]
THIS IS THE MOST FASCINATING LEGAL DISCOVERY YET ….
SOMETHING NEW JUST ARRIVED RE THE OBAMA BIRTH ISSUE
by MindBender26
Be h ind t h e scenes, at many military bases across t h e country and around t h e world, a not-too quiet c h allenge is developing against Barack Obama and h is questionable qualifications to be President of t h e United States .
Most FReepers are familiar wit h t h e ongoing civil litigation against Obama.
Plaintiffs claim h e is not constitutionally qualified to be president because h e does not meet t h e legal description of a “natural-born citizen.”
Obama’s lawyers h ave never entered pleadings on t h e MERITS of t h e plaintiffs’ cases.
T h ey oppose t h e plaintiffs’ suits on t h e issue of “standing.”
T h ey claim t h e plaintiff’s do not h ave a rig h t to sue.
Generally, t h at “standing” claim is well-founded.
Giving every citizen t h e rig h t to sue t h e president would be a nig h tmare.
Can you imagine George Bus h defending 10,000,000 individual suits by Dems over t h e war in Iraq ?
But recently, one plaintiff h ad a strong c h ance of being given “standing to sue.”
T h e plaintiff was an Army Reserve Major, Stefan Frederick Cook, from t h e Tampa area.
His call-up to active duty positioned h im as a person w h o could demonstrate t h e likeli h ood of real damages if Obama was not a legally-elected president.
Cook could be killed, wounded or even c h arged as a war criminal if Obama was not legally t h e president.
He sued, claiming Obama was not legally qualified to be President, not legally qualified to order h im to do anyt h ing.
T h e judge was set to begin preliminary h earings w h en t h e government lawyers dropped a legal bomb.
T h ey canceled Major Cook’s orders for t h e obvious purpose of denying h im standing.
Wit h Major Cook longer on activation orders, t h e case was moot and was dismissed by t h e judge.
T h is h ugely significant legal surrender by t h e government was noticed by every lawyer in t h e country watc h ing t h is issue.
It also immediately became an enormous topic of conversation in every barracks in America .
If Obama was willing to cancel one soldier’s deployment orders because of a court c h allenge to h is rig h t to be president, w h at would h e do t h e next time someone raised t h e issue?
As a result, service members and lawyers began action immediately.
It is believed t h at as many as 100 lawyers are preparing to file litigation suc h as Major Cook’s.
T h is litigation would be in many courts across t h e country and put a h uge strain on t h e Obama-DNC legal team.
Do t h ey cancel 100 sets of orders t h is week, only to face 1000 suits next week?
Even worse, sources close to some of t h e potential litigants tell me t h at at least four lawyers, including one very well known conservative Vietnam veteran-lawyer, are seeking enoug h clients so t h ey can petition t h e court for t h e establis h ment of a Class of Plaintiffs in a proposed class action case.
If t h at h appens, t h en every military service member on orders for SWA would be covered.
At t h at point, Obama h as no viable legal option.
He h as proven h imself unwilling to try t h e case on its merits, and willing to cancel orders to avoid h aving to face discovery.
How can h e be POTUS and CINC if h e cannot issue orders to t h e military h e claims to command?
From t h ere, every time Obama tries to act under color of law in any matter, military of not, someone sues and Obama’s action ceases.
T h is is an important turning point in a case of incredible constitutional and legal significance.
Stay tuned!
Comments
7 Responses to “USVFnews”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
August 9th, 2009 @ 9:55 am
Now this sounds promising! This is exactly what SHOULD be happening. When the Army canceled Major Cook’s deployment order, Obama showed his cards. He can’t prove he’s a legitimate Commander-in-Chief. So let’s have at him and force him to open up his records or leave office!
August 9th, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
One can only hope this is the case. I fear the action or better said, the reaction from obozzo if more military stepped up with lawsuits. I believe obozzo doesn’t appreciate nor fear our proud and honorable service members. I still believe they (the military) are waiting for a change in congress before action. If congress won’t begin proceedings, they he can’t be impeached nor imprisoned. Waiting just seems like an eternity. I support our constitution, our military and under normal circumstances, our government. These are not normal circumstances. GOD BLESS YOU ORLY.
August 9th, 2009 @ 1:13 pm
He can send men to die on a battlefield but he is too afraid himself to merely enter a court room. What a great guy!
August 9th, 2009 @ 1:28 pm
obama always speaks to one audience. i thought he was the president of the whole usa
August 9th, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
Cripes, I couldn’t read the above properly, so have sorted out the spacing for anyone else who is going boss-eyed trying to read it:
Fnews
E
Saturday, August 8, 2009 11:15 PM
From:
“Bill News”
Add sender to Contacts
To:
“Bill News”
Molonlabe Email News List usvfnews@charter.net
In God, we have a great and invincible ally!
His faithful will be raised on eagle’s wings!
From Paul Andrew Mitchell
Subject: Re: Fw: If you love & respect the law and dislike lawyers, then read this
Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009, 6:34 PM
[reformatted for American Standard English by the Supreme Law Firm]
THIS IS THE MOST FASCINATING LEGAL DISCOVERY YET ….
SOMETHING NEW JUST ARRIVED RE THE OBAMA BIRTH ISSUE
by MindBender26
Behind the scenes, at many military bases across the country and around the world, a not-too quiet challenge is developing against Barack Obama and his questionable qualifications to be President of the United States .
Most FReepers are familiar with the ongoing civil litigation against Obama.
Plaintiffs claim he is not constitutionally qualified to be president because he does not meet the legal description of a “natural-born citizen.”
Obama’s lawyers have never entered pleadings on the MERITS of the plaintiffs’ cases.
They oppose the plaintiffs’ suits on the issue of “standing.”
They claim the plaintiff’s do not have a right to sue.
Generally, that “standing” claim is well-founded.
Giving every citizen the right to sue the president would be a nightmare.
Can you imagine George Bush defending 10,000,000 individual suits by Dems over the war in Iraq?
But recently, one plaintiff had a strong chance of being given “standing to sue.”
The plaintiff was an Army Reserve Major, Stefan Frederick Cook, from the Tampa area.
His call-up to active duty positioned him as a person who could demonstrate the likelihood of real damages if Obama was not a legally-elected president.
Cook could be killed, wounded or even charged as a war criminal if Obama was not legally the president.
He sued, claiming Obama was not legally qualified to be President, not legally qualified to order him to do anything.
The judge was set to begin preliminary hearings when the government lawyers dropped a legal bomb.
They canceled Major Cook’s orders for the obvious purpose of denying him standing.
With Major Cook longer on activation orders, the case was moot and was dismissed by the judge.
This hugely significant legal surrender by the government was noticed by every lawyer in the country watching this issue.
It also immediately became an enormous topic of conversation in every barracks in America .
If Obama was willing to cancel one soldier’s deployment orders because of a court challenge to h is right to be president, what would he do the next time someone raised the issue?
As a result, service members and lawyers began action immediately.
It is believed that as many as 100 lawyers are preparing to file litigation such as Major Cook’s.
This litigation would be in many courts across the country and put a huge strain on the Obama-DNC legal team.
Do they cancel 100 sets of orders this week, only to face 1000 suits next week?
Even worse, sources close to some of the potential litigants tell me that at least four lawyers, including one very well known conservative Vietnam veteran-lawyer, are seeking enough clients so they can petition the court for the establishment of a Class of Plaintiffs in a proposed class action case.
If that happens, then every military service member on orders for SWA would be covered.
At that point, Obama has no viable legal option.
He has proven himself unwilling to try the case on its merits, and willing to cancel orders to avoid having to face discovery.
How can he be POTUS and CINC if he cannot issue orders to the military he claims to command?
From there, everytime Obama tries to act under color of law in any matter, military of not, someone sues and Obama’s action ceases.
This is an important turning point in a case of incredible constitutional and legal significance.
Stay tuned!
August 9th, 2009 @ 3:17 pm
And now for the rest of that story, Major Cook is not, and was not at the time an active duty military person. He is a reservist who submitted a formal request to his H/R Command in St. Louis volunteering to go to Afghanistan and serve 1 year with an Army Special Ops command on May 8th of this year, (5 months into Obama’s Presidency) his tour to begin 7/15/09. His orders were issued on 6/9/09.
AND by law any reservist who “volunteers” for an assignment, (which is exactly what this man did) may ask for (and be granted) a revocation of those orders up until the day he is scheduled to deploy. But on July 8th, the week BEFORE he was to deploy while he was still eligible to rescind his “request” to volunteer to go, he had Orly Taitz file in federal court for a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector stating he would not go on the grounds that Obama is not eligible to be President and wanted his orders revoked.
What a load of crap! That whole episode was blatantly staged. If he objected, why did he volunteer in the first place?
See, this is how conspiracies work and manipulate the simple minded and gullible into believing their cause has merit. Pah-Leease!
Here’s a link to the “Whole” story.
https://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/story/777472.html
August 11th, 2009 @ 12:22 am
This is good news . In one of the videos done by Thomas Paine he said “The military are the only ones who have never failed us” From this ,it appears,they do not intend to start now.