Can someone trace this Bowford?
Posted on | August 7, 2009 | 22 Comments
This is the only link I could find that said it was where the Australian BC originated. When clicked it says “Does not exist ” When I ran it through the Wayback Machine, it found no record. Is there another link that it supposedly came from ?
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
22 Responses to “Can someone trace this Bowford?”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
August 7th, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Orly, I have sent a word.doc attachment with a complete cut & paste from the Bomford geneaology where it shows David Jeffery Bomford in the list.
I also read somewhere that he has been interviewed.
August 7th, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
You can find a copy here:
https://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-the-source-of-the-forged-kenyan-birth-certificate
August 7th, 2009 @ 6:54 pm
Bomford certificate
https://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-the-source-of-the-forged-kenyan-birth-certificate
August 7th, 2009 @ 7:02 pm
FOUND THIS IN THE PAGE SOURCE:
28 Nov 1981 at Somerton Park, South Australia I0546 Amanda Jane Sandover, b 1959, and had issue [an image of David’s birth certificate has been removed from the website temporarily as at 4 August 2009 as the site has a limited download capacity. See https://washingtonindependent.com/53658/is-this-the-source-of-the-forged-kenyan-birth-certificate%5D
August 7th, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
Either there isn’t a lin, or everything has been scrubbed, or maybe a set up??
But I’m sure that ther has to be another link some whereI jst don’t know where.
August 7th, 2009 @ 8:38 pm
Orly,
I don’t know with certainty what link you’re referencing because, on your web site, I only see words, “Can someone trace this Bowford?” If you meant domain name ‘Bowford.com’ (the other two domain name forms are not in use), then the following is the information you might be seeking. Please let me know the precise link if I am researching the wrong information. I will be glad to help:
Domain Name: bowford.com
Registrar: Name.com LLC
Expiration Date: 2010-03-25 00:00:00
Creation Date: 2007-03-25 22:29:25
Name Servers:
NS1.NAME.COM
NS2.NAME.COM
NS3.NAME.COM
NS4.NAME.COM
REGISTRANT CONTACT INFO
Bowford Renovations
Kevin Kulhavy
#2-124 River Ave
Cochrane
Alberta
T4C1R3
CA
Phone: +1.4036134906
Email Address:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT INFO
Bowford Renovations
Kevin Kulhavy
#2-124 River Ave
Cochrane
Alberta
T4C1R3
CA
Phone: +1.4036134906
Email Address:
TECHNICAL CONTACT INFO
Bowford Renovations
Kevin Kulhavy
#2-124 River Ave
Cochrane
Alberta
T4C1R3
CA
Phone: +1.4036134906
Email Address:
BILLING CONTACT INFO
Bowford Renovations
Kevin Kulhavy
#2-124 River Ave
Cochrane
Alberta
T4C1R3
CA
Phone: +1.4036134906
Email Address:
1249689889.048
***********************************************
Also, I know someone willing to help you with making your articles and site more visible (Search Engine Optimization) for no charge and I might be able to help with mass emailing and any analyses using a lot of data if you don’t already have someone to help.
Sincerely,
John G. Freeman
Member, Commander-in-Chief’s Guard and Escort to the President,
1980 – 1983 | Carter, Reagan
‘Qualified’ is used as a transitive verb as it is today (https://www.yourdictionary.com/qualify) in the United States Constitution, Amendment XX, meaning that candidates seeking the office of the Presidency must initiate the proof and aggressively satisfy qualification requirements, just as someone wanting a slice of bread from Welfare must qualify by showing their long form birth certificate, especially since September 11, 2001. In other words, even if Obama had all of the qualifications and were elected by 100% of the populace, since he did not ‘qualify’ himself in the minds of the electors, he was never a part of any legitimate electoral process nor did he become ‘President’ on noon, January 20, 2009. Shame on the justice who looked Obama in the face and demonstrated before the world his own lack of qualifications to be a Supreme Court Justice.
August 7th, 2009 @ 8:42 pm
Oh, shoot…..I just read your comment about no links. Sorry. I should have read further. Ok, you can check out “The Steady Drip” that mentions the Bomford faked birth certificate.
August 7th, 2009 @ 8:53 pm
You might ask the reporter who interviewed him on ABC. Will look for the link.
August 7th, 2009 @ 8:56 pm
I think you should look for the name Bomford rather than Bowford, see on my site https://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=2853
Best regards
David
August 7th, 2009 @ 9:47 pm
Dr. Orly, the name is BOMFORD, not BOWfORD. There are several sites when you search the BOMFORD name.
August 7th, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
Here is the interview, with audio:
https://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm
PS: I don’t know if it’s faked, rehearsed, or genuine … judge for yourself.
August 7th, 2009 @ 10:58 pm
I think that info (the link) can be found on the freerepublic site, but it is probably the same link you have.
Around the time it went public, the link to the Bomford BC was taken down as far as I remember.
August 8th, 2009 @ 12:59 am
It’s David Bomfield from South Australia.
I have just sent off 3 emails and what I have copied and paste regarding about him. If you Google his name you will get plenty of information about him.
Regards Diane.
August 8th, 2009 @ 1:02 am
Sorry about my mistake his name is Bomford and not Bomfield has I had quoted.
Regards D
August 8th, 2009 @ 1:43 am
Here’s the guy who said he faked the Kenyan BC. But is he claiming he faked it before you got it…or that he did a 2nd one after you put the picture up?
https://fearlessblogging.com/post/view/3037
August 8th, 2009 @ 1:53 am
https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/ar … FIqcZZ_R5w (google cites AFP as source but leaves no link)
https://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090806/od … amaoffbeat (yahoo does same with exact same words but at least gives AFP link)
https://www.afp.com/afpcom/en/content/news (can’t find any info here)
https://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2646009.htm (this is original source giving Bomford’s name & small town he lives in–he’s an official of some kind there)
August 8th, 2009 @ 1:55 am
Why does WND say their investigators have discovered your Kenyan BC is not authentic and then they compare a 1961 Birth Certificate to your 1964 Registration? That’s comparing apples to oranges.
August 8th, 2009 @ 2:50 am
Check your yahoo email.
August 8th, 2009 @ 3:58 am
The name is not ‘Bowford’ but is ‘Bomford’. (Orly, you don’t get enough rest, but you know that.)
Need to investigate:
MIGHT THE BOMFORD CREATION BE A HOAX?
This is most important . . . it is about the two DIFFERENT keyboards used to produce, respectively, your Kenyan registration of birth and the Bomford registration of birth.
Look closely at the numbers on each document.
The numbers on the Kenyan RB are ALL the SAME HEIGHT, just like in this close-up photo of the keyboard of a high-quality typewriter made in Germany in the year 1964 (same year Kenyan RB certification copy was dated).
To convert these characters to a working link, delete the spaces. You won’t need the h t t p : / / for the link to work. You do need to look at the photo of this 1964 typewriter’s keyboard so that you can observe that all the numbers are the same height.
c o m m o n s . w i k i m e d i a . o r g / w i k i / F i l e : K e y b o a r d _ o n _ a _ t y p e w r i t e r . j p g
Now, Orly, look at the numbers in the Bomford RB. Notice that their HEIGHTS are MIXED.
And observe the design of the 3 and the 5. See how their ‘tails’ (descenders) curve downward like the 9’s tail (descender)? In fact, their descenders descend BELOW the typeface’s baseline. The ‘tail’ of the 4 and 7 likewise descend below the typeface’s baseline. And the 6’s ascender rises ABOVE the height of the 2.
Numerals of mixed height are called “old style” numbers and you will find them in old books that were manually typeset. Some computer-typeset books also use fonts with old style numbers.
To see a diagram and fuller discussion, read the “Descender” topic at Wikipedia. That topic includes links to other information about typefaces.
The Bomford registration of birth also contains an alien number. At the top of the page, look at “10th April.” The number 1 in ’10th’ is a real number 1, like on computer keyboards.
But, for mechanical reasons, most old typewriters used the lower case l (el) for the number 1 as well as for the lower case l. And they used the upper case letter O (oh) for the zero. Thus, the Kenyan RB’s number is really ’47,O44′ (with an uppercase letter O) and the year of Obama’s birth is typed ‘l96l’ (with lower case letter ls).
However, the Bomford’s FIRST number 1 is a NUMERAL 1 (in “10th April”) and the REMAINING Bomford number 1s are a standard typewriter’s LOWER CASE Ls.
Why did the Bomford RB’s typist use two DIFFERENT keyboard characters for the number one?? Was the typist in the habit of typing the numeral 1 . . . and then remembered to use the lower case l instead?
And what about that different Bomford typeface (font)? To me, its numbers do NOT look like STANDARD typewriter numbers. But I am not familiar with typewriter history. Can you find a professional or a knowledgeable hobbiest who can ascertain — and provide INDISPUTABLE evidence for — the FIRST year a typewriter was made with those MIXED HEIGHT numbers?
IF (and that is a big ‘if’) no such typewriter was manufactured before 1961, you might be able to demonstrate that the Bomford registration of birth is a hoax.
August 8th, 2009 @ 5:22 am
Dr. Taitz,
This guy should be able to identify the make and mark of the typewiiter used on the Bomford
h t t p: // mytypewriter .com/ contact-us.aspx
(spaces added to avoid link being created)
August 8th, 2009 @ 1:15 pm
Anonymouse-
WND reports that some blogger claims to have forged the Kenyan BC using a 1940 Royal Model KMM manual typewriter.
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106220
He claims to also have used in inkjet printer, which I assume he is claiming to have used to create the form and graphics. The typewriter would be for the typewritten text. It would be good if we could examine the characters of said typewriter.
August 12th, 2009 @ 1:16 am
Orly, I’ve observed more about the Bomford’s font. Look at the ‘tails’ (descenders) of the Bomford’s letters ‘g’, ‘p’, and ‘y’. They are shortened, they are up very close to the font’s baseline! That is a trick of computer font designers so that there will be less space between the lines of type. When more lines can fit on a page, book and magazine publishers can spend less on paper.
The Bomford document’s font appears to be a computer font, not a typewriter font. It is possible it’s an authentic typewriter font because not all the letters strike the baseline. Some of the capital letters are elevated a bit above the baseline. However, a skilled typographer designing a font to look like that of a well-used typewriter would make some of the letters look displaced.
But I have looked at many fonts, and never observed one with long descenders on the numbers and short descenders on the letters. The design is not consistent. If the Bomford font belongs to an actual typewriter, my guess is that its vintage is later than the 1960s.
Here are some amateur examples of computer fonts designed to look like typewriter fonts. They don’t look like the Bomford’s font, but they demonstrate that a lot of imitation-typewriter fonts are out there.
ht tp: //w ww.dafont.com/theme.php?cat=113&page=1&nb_ppp_old=10&text=Type+your+text+here&nb_ppp=50&psize=s&classt=pop