OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


The Kenya BC, that I am seeking to be authenticated, is more plausible then the short version HI BC posted by Obama

Posted on | August 5, 2009 | 20 Comments

FreeRepublic.com

August 5, 2009

by BP2

Few people know the prima facie facts tied to the Obama’s mother’s 1964 and 1980 divorces as well as a handful of us here on Free Republic. I know it probably better than most.

When I started looking at the date (Feb 17, 1964) on this new Kenyan birth certificate, I immediately started comparing it with the dates of the 1964 divorce between Obama’s mother and father – TRYING to REFUTE the Kenyan birth certificate. Was it at all PLAUSIBLE, at least based upon what we know as prima facie facts, confirmed by an independent source – such as a judge in a divorce case? If you wish to refer back to this initial comparison, the information is on Post 2,222 of the Free Republic thread “Is this really it? (re: possible Obama’s Kenyan B.C.)”.

There’s been a fair number of fake Obama documents surfacing in the days and weeks leading up to the release of the Kenyan birth certificate, quickly debunked, designed to create confusion of prima facieso, many of us are naturally suspicious. You can cry “wolf” only so many times before others stop believing you, even though later there may truly be a wolf. That said, I’m not a forensics expert, nor have I seen the Kenya birth certificate – but I can connect dots.

Although ANY document can be faked, I find it incredibly difficult to believe that a sneaky pro-Obama “operative” came up with a fake document that also plausibly MATCHES the timeline of the 1964 Obama divorce and other events, as well as the new Kenyan birth certificate does. Anything is possible of course, but I see the Kenya birth certificate as a believable document – for various reasons that I’ll outline below.

Not all of the deductive reasoning used in Post 2,222 came from 13-page divorce decree. For example, information regarding the 10-day “knock and nail” notification for Obama SR in Boston came from work with a local Private Investigator and a clerk in a Hawaii Court records office (who will remain nameless to eschew FURTHER harassment to them from the Left). These “contacts” also explained that Marriage and Birth Certificates are NOT Public Record in Hawaii, but divorce decrees ARE Public Record. However, documents that are NOT Public Record have occasionally “popped-up” mixed in with Public Records upon modern review, due to sloppy record-keeping decades ago, as well as changes to Hawaiian privacy statutes since the cases were judged.

 

Additionally … there’s the issue of the missing page from the 1964 divorce papers … page 11 …

In assisting with the retrieval of the initial 8 pages a couple of weeks before Obama’s Inauguration, I and a few other researchers subsequently discovered from the clerk in Hawaii that there were 6 MORE pages, or 14 total pages total. The clerk read the index information directly from the microfiche machine over the phone when the request was placed. “14 pages total,” she said, very clearly, repeating the answer when queried several more times on the page count.

I mailed off a check for the other 6 pages to be sent. Imagine my surprise a few days later when I opened the envelope and only saw 5 pagespage 11 was missing – bringing the total page count to 13.

See the whole Obama 1964 divorce on Scribd.com or as 13 individual images below (in proper order):

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

I immediately called the clerk in Hawaii and asked where the extra page was. She looked, and counted, and said that there must be some mistake in the records – she counted only 13 pages that are available for reprint. I pointed out to her that the page count she sent skipped from page 10 to page 12 – page 11 was missing. To that, she suggested that perhaps the pages were simply misnumbered before they where archived into the microfiche.

I accepted her answer, not thinking much about it at the time. Perhaps it was just a clerical error in the 1960s, when hand-filed paper records and IBM punch cards were how court documents were tracked and maintained.

I have since come to learn that Obama and his team of lawyers have been working to sanitize his records since he announced that he’d run for President circa November 2004. Now in the White House, he’s still ACTIVELY blocking subpoenas for such documents as his Cambridge and Occidental College records TODAY – the same type of documents promised to be made available during his campaign. Obama and his lawyers are exceedingly adept at exploiting loopholes in Hawaiian birth certificate law to keep Obama’s past hidden from the American people.

This missing page – page 11 – very likely is a copy of the original birth certificate, based upon the prima facie timeline of the 1964 divorce. The Kenya birth certificate was likely requested on Jan 23, 1964 by either Judge King (to award custody on the next trial date), or recommended to Ann Dunham by her attorney for the ex parte divorce, where only one parent was expected to be present.

The missing page, 11, should be chronologically-numbered as all other pages were in the original docket file, by the court clerk at the time. Starting at page 8, Exhibit A is placed where it would have occurred by date in the paperwork (and appeared on microfiche), even denoting an erased, yet barely-readable “8” on both pages of the returned notification sent to Obama SR. The missing page, numbered as page 11, would likely be a page that would have been admitted to the divorce file sometime in mid- to late-February 1964 – almost as if it were an undocumented “Exhibit B”.

Here’s a very plausible timeline merging the 1964 Obama Divorce papers and new Kenya birth certificate:

Jan 20 (Mon) – divorce request is filed by Stanley Ann D. Obama
Jan 23 (Thur) – divorce orders for trial are given by Judge King at chambers (note – if the judge, or Ann Dunham’s attorney, told her to order the Kenya birth certificate, it would have been mailed 10,000 miles away, to the “Coast Province” Registrar’s office of the “Republic of Kenya”, likely arriving around the first week of February 1964 to be processed)
Jan 28 (Tue) – Gail A. Watanabe, presumably an assistant of Ann Obama attorney George Kerr, mails the notification for trial to Obama SR (her affidavit is signed Feb 3 and filed)
Jan 30 (Thur) – via Air Mail, notification of trial arrives at Obama SR’s Cambridge, Mass, address. The 10-day “knock and nail” notification would have expired on Sun, Feb 9. Therefore, the next trial date would have been automatically set, per Judge King’s instructions, for the first Tuesday, 30 days later, on March 3
Feb 10 (Mon) – allowing for a 10-day “knock and nail” notification for trial, Obama SR’s trial notification would have been retrieved by the US Post Office on this date, to be mailed back (as events turned out – UNSIGNED by Obama SR) to Hawaii as an exhibit for trial
Feb 17 (Mon) – the Obama Kenya birth certificate is signed by the “Coast Province” Deputy Registrar, to be mailed back to Hawaii for receipt by Ann Obama and/or her attorney (note: mail time would have ranged from a few days (Air Mail) to a couple of weeks (ship), arriving back in Hawaii in the last week of February to first week of March 3 (Tue). Based upon Judge King’s Jan 23 orders for the next trial date, “at 9:30 a.m. on the first Tuesday after thirty (30) days have elapsed from and after the date” that Obama SR would have been served with the notice of trial. That notification came back, unsigned, by Obama SR, so Ann’s attorneys surely requested, and received Default Judgment for the divorce in her favor for “grievous mental suffering”
Mar 5 (Thur) – trial takes place in favor of divorce in Hawaii, placing custody of Obama JR to his mother by default (note: the trial was likely rescheduled 2 days after the automatically set date of Mar 3, possibly for the convenience of the judge and/or parties)
Mar 20 (Fri) – the divorce decree is signed by Judge King

In Hawaii, birth certificates are not Public Record. If the Kenya birth certificate was a part of the divorce decree, it may have been pulled out at the end of the trial, or more recently by a watchful archivist or attorneys wishing to remove unfavorable information about Obama.
To date, despite other honest attempts to refute the Kenya birth certificate, such as dealing with when the “Republic of Kenya” came into existence as a republic have been “un-bunked.” Dishonest alterations of the Kenya birth certificate have been maliciously created by sites such as Democratic Underground, designed to discredit the Kenya birth certificate – they’ve been un-bunked as well.

Having not actually seeing the Kenya birth certificate, and it’s chain of evidence, no intellectually-honest person can say if it’s real or not. By the same token, none of us have seen or touched the short-form “Certification of Live Birth” that has appeared on Obama’s “Fight the Smears” or FactCheck.org websites.

No one can confirm the chain of evidence of Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth” that has appeared online, which is the abbreviated-version of Obama’s true, 1961, original long-form(s) “Certificate of Live Birth” and associated vital statistics records. Even the Hawaii Department of Health directly refuses to verify Obama’s online COLBs.

Hawaiian law would have allowed for Obama to have been born in a foreign country. The “Certification of Live Birth” can’t confirm if Obama has EVER been eligible to hold the office of Commander in Chief, based upon loopholes in pre-statehood, transitional and current Hawaiian statutes. Inconsistencies, such as conflicting hospitals in Hawaii that Obama, his friends and family have publicly-stated he may have been born only add to the confusion. Obama’s abstract “Certification of Live Birth” doesn’t tell us if there were ANY “certifying officials” present who independent verified the “facts” of his birth – it’s anyone’s guess.

Obama himself cannot guaranty that he was born on American soil – really, who can remember their own childbirth?! Furthermore, his mother’s whereabouts are unconfirmed, inconsistent, and unknown, from the time of Obama’s conception, until a few weeks or months after his birth.

Thus is the purpose of Medical Doctors, Nurses, Midwives and Registrars, acting as “Certifying Officials” of a birth, to ensure the integrity – or chain of evidence – of the birth certificate to be properly recorded within Vital Statistics archives. Judges presiding over divorces ALSO produce a verifiable paper trail, as we can see on the 1964 Obama divorce.

 

At this time, both Birth Certificates from Kenya and Hawaii lack a publicly-exhibited, independently-verifiable chain of evidence – and chain of custody. As such, the Obama Kenyan birth certificate is as strong and believable a document as the Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth”. However, Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate possesses something the Certification does not – plausibility, based upon independent prima facie facts – the 1964 Obama divorce decree.

6,799 posted on Wednesday, August 05, 2009 4:22:21 AM by BP2

 
 
Posted 2009-08-05 9:51 AM (#19775) By: EternalVigilance

 
BTTT…

This is a very important post, one that should be sent to everyone on your email list and copied to every forum and social networking site in which you participate.

 

 
 
Posted 2009-08-05 11:45 AM (#19785 – in reply to #19775) By: EternalVigilance

Comments

20 Responses to “The Kenya BC, that I am seeking to be authenticated, is more plausible then the short version HI BC posted by Obama”

  1. syc1959
    August 5th, 2009 @ 3:58 pm

    Excellent info Orly.
    The other issue, is that the Hawaiian COLB’s have been produced in three versions. Which one of three versions of the Hawaiian COLB is accurate?

    We not contradictory evidence that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii along with the possibility of forged documents!

    The media is as guilty as those that have allowed this to happen.

    I am sincerly be grateful that the present news media was not in
    place during the Watergate era, for those abuses that were reported with pomp and fanfare then are now a mere passing remark. Our Founding Fathers would be screaming as we decend down the road of Socialism.

  2. john
    August 5th, 2009 @ 7:49 pm

    More importantly, If the time-line fits with the divorse, the only reason to request a Kenyan birth certificate would be that none existed in Hawaii at the time or what was on file, disproved birth in Hawaii. There is no other reason to go to Kenya.

  3. Harry H
    August 5th, 2009 @ 7:57 pm

    Compared to the Hawaiian COLB, the Kenyan birth registration is much stronger evidence because it is certified, bears a seal, has a signature, names a hospital of birth, names potentially verifiable public officials, is close in time to the date of Obama’s birth, and displays a typescript consistent with the business usage of that time.

    It would be better to reserve the term “birth certificate” for the real McCoy. What we have is a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth.” It is a powerful pitchfork we can use to prick the thick hides of our public officials.

    Let’s not be intimidated out of using this tool, unless and until it is disproven. The burden for dispoving it is on ObamAxelrod, Inc.

  4. Michelle
    August 5th, 2009 @ 8:00 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly-FYI
    I read somewhere that Orly’s husband is a big wig at Novartis. Has anyone else heard that?
    from Citizen Wells blog in case your husband prefers to remain anonymous.

  5. NewEnglandPatrot
    August 5th, 2009 @ 8:07 pm

    This is an excellent analysis. I remember when the Obama divorce papers first became public that there was a missing page. Either they redacted that page because birth certificates were not public domain, or someone removed it recently to protect Obama, just as the writer said.

    The first thing I thought of when I saw the Kenyan document was that the Obamas divorced in 1964. Kenya became a republic in 1963, and it would make sense that the paperwork requested in ’64 would reflect that. Plus when you request a certified birth certificate from the town or city of origin, they NEVER send the original, only a “certified copy.” It always has the raised seal so that anyone would know it came from the proper source.

    I’ve requested my children’s birth certificates a couple of times, and that’s always what I received back – certified copies. But they certainly reflected all of the vital information: time, date, height, weight, doctor’s signature, name of hospital, etc.

    I understand now that certified copies are all computer-generated, but they glean their information from files that have been computerized from paper originals. I would think that they still must bear a raised seal to be authentic. The “image” on the internet that Obama put out there had no seal, then one was added when people made that observation!

  6. Barbara
    August 5th, 2009 @ 10:41 pm

    I agree, Orly. God Bless you for taking this on. Godspeed!

    I haven’t seen any comments posted on this site to and of the more recent posts. Are they still being monitored?

  7. kw
    August 6th, 2009 @ 1:31 am

    Obama/Soetoro can’t hide forever. The pressure for the truth will continue and the truth will become known. Somebody will eventually provide what is needed.

  8. Jerome
    August 6th, 2009 @ 3:30 am

    Hi Orly,

    Here is some PROOF that the Kenyan and the Aussie BCs are completely different Documents with NO relation. One is not a copy of the other.

    There is an entire BOX of text missing in the Kenyan BC.

    The Bomford Australian BC has a box containing the following text….

    “Signature and Description of Authorized Person, and Name, Description, and Residence of informant.”

    The Kenyan doesn’t have that BOX or that same text. In fact the BOX in the Bomford almost duplicates the BOX above it. It’s redundant at the least. Which is interesting. So far as I know no one else has noticed this yet.

    Now Both Kenya and Australia being British colonies would of course use the same forms. They would also modify them to thier own use. If anything it’s proof one is not just a Photoshop copy of the other. So if anyone brings it up you can point to that big difference. Also the Typewriter text is a different font on each BC.

  9. Civis Naturaliter Natus
    August 6th, 2009 @ 6:29 am

    Some circumstantial evidence for Stanly Ann Dunham to want to go to Kenya

    * She studied Anthropology later in life. Perhaps she had read of the work of Leeky in Kenya, certainly other Americans were going to Kenya in this time to study the origins of man: see this

    https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/566814522.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Jan+17%2C+1960&author=&pub=Chicago+Tribune&desc=HOPE+TO+SHED+LIGHT+ON+MAN+IN+AFRICA+TRIP

    Also Mombasa (Zanzibar) was featured in travel sections of major papers of the time

    https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/574106612.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Dec+03%2C+1961&author=&pub=Chicago+Tribune&desc=Romantic+Past+in+Fragrant+Air+of+Zanzibar

    Kenyatta was greeted in Mombasa soon after his release

    https://www.keesings.com/search?kssp_selected_tab=article&kssp_a_id=18311n01ken

    Also, Mombasa to be given to Kenya?

    https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20B1EFD3F5D1B728DDDAD0A94DA405B818AF1D3

    https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60D14F93F581B728DDDA90A94DA415B818AF1D3

    Dunham marries Obama on Feb 2, 1961, just days after Kenya in news for political rumblings for independence

    https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70714FB34551B728DDDA00A94D9405B818AF1D3

    And reports that there is a place for Whites in Africa after independence

    https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10613FC3D541B728DDDAF0A94DA405B818AF1D3

    Why even Pepsi had just opened a bottling plant at Mombassa,

    https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C15FE395F147A93C7AB178ED85F458685F9

  10. Anne
    August 6th, 2009 @ 9:09 am

    Even if the Kenyan BC is 100% authenticate, can it become an evidence that Obama is not eligible to be the POTUS?

  11. da verg
    August 6th, 2009 @ 11:16 am

    why don’t you go back to the attorney’s and see if they have anything in their file

    also, they may may have been transferred to microfiche , may want to see if that happened.

    just a suggestion

  12. Juliet Staudt
    August 6th, 2009 @ 11:46 am

    Dr. Taitz,
    Good job. We (“the people”) are so fortunate to have like-minded citizens (like you) who have the talent and the drive to pursue the truth. We really appreciate your courage and your tenacity. Stay the course. Stay strong. God bless you.
    Juliet Staudt
    An American

  13. Bruno Erico
    August 6th, 2009 @ 12:57 pm

    Polls demonstrate Obama popularity down to 50% since inauguration day… after his Kenian birth certificate was found it will go to almost ZERO.

    Rise up Americans, remove the Usurper from POTUS….URGENTLY.

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!

    GOD bless AMERICA, and Dr. Orly.

  14. Ed
    August 6th, 2009 @ 6:34 pm

    Question: Has anyone done/used the wayback machine on the website that had the BC from Austrailia, Just to capture the page??
    I don’t know how that works ( perhaps someone here who is more computer savy will), but I do know that when the Pakistan web site was scrubbed someone here or at the old site did and it is now safe and secure on many computers.
    The oringinal site I speak of state’s Obama’s name , as Now President of the United States, and as “KENYAN BORN”. That along with this new BC from Kenya, and the time line you have just given is, to me just more fodder for the cannon….know what I mean…

  15. LCpl Mosley
    August 6th, 2009 @ 10:49 pm

    The Original says K.F. Lavender and has a 47644 not 47044.

    Someone hacked your site and changed some stuff.

    I know who didn’t look through the details of the thing and briefly checked it. But Bomford and crew are forging documents and claiming it’s yours the idiots also made the mistake of taking pictures of it on a different bedspread with similar coloring.

  16. Larry
    August 7th, 2009 @ 1:59 am

    good info, very suspicious. plus alot better than Obama’s pre-k computer project

  17. Truthsayer
    August 7th, 2009 @ 1:17 pm

    This is very exciting, but I’m afraid a lot of people are missing it. From what I see abroad, people are being scared off by google flagging this place as a virus site. Can you do anything to get the block removed? It’s been days, and I still have a lot of trouble getting in. Many people new to you and your cause are being told it was all a scam designed to spread viruses. Seeing your site come up blocked as an attack site is convincing them the issue really is fake.
    Let’s not lose the hearts and minds of people. We need every awake American we can get. Honest informed citizens are in the minority, and we can’t change that if the obots are free to brand you a virus spreader.
    I didn’t really like google before, but now I’m absolutely fed up with them. Honest citizens need a good alternative search engine with other services that we can support. That way, we can eventually have a replacement for google who can then go rot in their own filth.

  18. Bill Angles
    August 7th, 2009 @ 3:22 pm

    Truthsayer: maybe you can try http://www.us.ixquick.com/ as your search engine. It works pretty good for me.

  19. Leonard Daneman
    August 7th, 2009 @ 3:35 pm

    1) I did the same research and the date of the ‘Lavender’ certification coincides with the second hearing for child custody.

    2) This should be a lesson to you. The Primary Issue is that of Dual Nationality barring Natural Born Citizen status. I can not stress this enough.

    paralegalnm at wordpress dot com

  20. jdayh
    August 11th, 2009 @ 4:32 am

    Orly– I hope your travels are going well!! (while our nation needs you now… you do deserve a break!) Was wondering if you can just go to Kenya , since you are oversees!? In less than a day you could probably discover several things….
    1– if there is indeed a plaque hanging on the wall at the gov. building dedicated to the Lavender fellow from the 1960’s…..(a Kenyan resident posted there is)
    2– get several copies of different BC from the same erra, to compare them.
    3– interview the supposed doctor /nurses who delivered BO. (assuming they are stil alive) get sworn depositions from them .
    4– attempt to get a certiified copy of his BC, or at least to verify if such a copy exists in their record keeping. (this should not be too hard, as there is an ID # on the BC photo that you have.
    5– interview and get sworn depositions from any family members that may still be alive.

    there may be more you could do…. (as I am sure you can think of other items that may be helpful to the case.) While you may think this is (perhaps) not worth the jouney… You may find yourself flush with all kinds of evidence that will prove once and for all… his guilt!! If you need aditional funds to make this stop in Kenya.. contact me as I could help in raising the money if you would like. (I helped raise money for Ron Paul during last years presidential “rip-off” election) grrr….

    take care and thanks for your persistence.