SCOTUS clerks are misinforming the citizens again
Posted on | May 17, 2009 | 26 Comments
I got a phone call from Mr. Bill Van Allen, who filed his case in SCOTUS. What concerned me, is the fact that his case was returned with a letter from a clerk, stating that the cases can be filed only after they went through lower courts. I’ve seen a similar letter before. This is wrong. Under Article 3 of the Constitution the Supreme Court has an original jurisdiction in a number of cases, for exmaple, when the Ambassadors and ministers are involved. Also, it has an original jurisdiction in some other cases, like a dispute between the states. If Rick Perry of TX files a legal action and sues Linda Lingle of HI, for not releasing Obama’s original BC, SCOTUS has to hear this case under the original jurisdiction.
I am concerned by the fact that as BO tries to rewrite or circumvent the Constitution on the Natural Born Citizen issue, those clerks are aiding and abetting him by telling the citizens that the only way to bring the case to SCOTUS, is by going through the lower courts. As a matter of fact I filed directly in SCOTUS because the Mandamus is to the Ambassadors of Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan and Great Britain to provide information in regards to the entrance visas, that were given to BO as he entered their countries: what passport did he provide, from what country and what serial number.
This is ridiculous to think, that the ambassadors would not have the right to appear in court right there in DC, in SCOTUS. What do those clerks think? That I should file such case in the lowest possible court: in the Circuit court of Yahoo-Ville or the District Court of Bun-dogs???
As I explained, the case was hand delivered on Friday, it takes a day or two for the security Anthrax check and then it should be forwarded to the clerk and entered into the docket. My previous case Lightfoot v Bowen, also Petition for the Extraordinary writ writ of Mandamus was deemed to be filed properly and it was forwarded by Chief Justice Roberts to the conference of all 9 Justices, as one that has value to be reviewed in the full conference. Current case has some 100 plaintiffs with perfect standing: active duty military, that are risking their lives and cannot take unlawful orders from an illegitimate Commander in chief, State Representatives, an elector and Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates. The case is ripe. According to rule 20 as authorized by 28 USC 1651 (a) I spent 45 pages showing exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the court’s discretionary powers and why adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form of from any other court. Since I asked for a stay, of Obama’s performance of his functions of a president and Commander in chief, pending verification of his eligibility, Justice Souter has a right to issue a stay on his own, without even bringing the case to the conference. This is my logic. As Justice David Souter is leaving the Supreme Court next month, he has an opportunity to leave as an American Hero, who saved his country from an usurper, he can go down in the American History as one to par with the First Chief Justice John Jay (whom I quote) or Justice Marshall; or he can leave as one as scared as the others, with no guts or backbone to do the right thing , to uphold the Constitution, as one ultimately accountable to the American Citizens and their Common law Grand Juries.
Comments
26 Responses to “SCOTUS clerks are misinforming the citizens again”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 17th, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
I hope that Justice David Souter will not be as gutless as my Congressman Ron Paul has been on the “Obama” birth issue.
But I sure wouldn’t bet any money on it.
My guess is that Souter will duck and dodge the issue on his way out.
May 17th, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
Orly, I receive a great newsletter from one of my state legislators. I would like to share the most recent copy with your followers. It is great. I am also including my response back to her. I do correspond frequently with my state and federal legislators, hoping that some action comes from our constant communication. Enjoy!!! Thank you for all you are doing for U.S.
*********************************************************
Betty,
Thank you for another of your wonderful newsletters and all that you are doing to protect and strengthen Iowa and her people. Like you, I see that Iowa is being damaged more and more as each day passes. I only wish I could wiggle my nose and make this insanity go away.
Having said that, one of the first things I would make happen is for every one of our elected officials and judiciary officials get back on track by upholding the oath of office they took, requiring them to abide by the terms of the United States Constitution as well as the individual state’s Constitutions. They are truly trampling on these constitutions and are heading American on a fast track to destruction. In my opinion, this is by design. If we look back on history, this destructive path has been underway for decades. It is time for those of us, who have our feet on the ground and have not lost our senses, to redirect this fast moving train and demand that our constitution be honored and enforced. There should be no bill or legislation on the table that conflicts with the constitution. Any and all bills, acts, treaties, etc. that have been enacted that are in violation of the constitution must be voided and reversed as soon as possible. “Back to the constitution!”
With regard to ‘stimulus’, I am a firm believer that if we hand out free goodies to anyone, they will have no incentive to work and our system begins to crumble. These so called ‘stimulus’ packages should be renamed ‘entitlement’ packages and everyone who receives anything they do not work for should be made to report for work in their own city as gratitude to their neighbors who pay taxes to sponsor this ‘entitlement’ process. The management of this ‘entitlement’ process (aka. welfare) should be managed totally by each state individually and the federal government should not be involved. The role of the federal government is the problem. Each state should take responsibility for their own affairs and not expect the other states to carry the burden of mistakes being made by their neighboring states. Don’t get me wrong, I am not against helping those people who truly need help. One of Iowa’s richest assets is the compassion of it’s people. Our people never fail to sense when one of their ‘families’ need assistance and they take them under their wing and assist them without hesitation. “Back to the constitution!”
What gives the federal government the right to decide who will cover my medical expenses and what medical procedures I am allowed and which ones are a waste of time and money? When did I become a number and stop being a valued human being? Why would my personal doctor want to continue his practice? Why would any young adult want to go into the medical industry if their ability to succeed financially looks bleak? Iowa is already one of the least compensated for providing the existing government sponsored medical systems (Medicaid and Medicare). We should be finding ways to balance this system out rather than looking for ways to further prey on the taxpaying people so we can line the pockets of the lobbyists, pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, oil companies, federal reserve bank, and any other entity that takes a huge profit at the expense of the unknowing taxpayer. “Back to the constitution!”
When did we loose our right to faith without the control of the federal government? I am really worried and mad that the new administration feels they have a right to attack this right of ours. “Back to the constitution!”
When did the individual states in our republic let go of their sovereign rights and begin to allow the federal government to govern state business? Let’s study the activities of those states who are fighting back and implement similar initiatives within our own state, I.e., Montana, Utah, Oklahoma, Texas, etc. “Back to the constitution!”
When did we turn our monetary system over to a private business and allow this business entity to invade our personal finances through corruption and racketeering? “Back to the constitution!”
When did we loose our right to protect our home and family, even if it means bearing arms? “Back to the constitution!”
When did we loose our right to choose the health and welfare of our home and family? Our health care is a private matter that should not be monitored and controlled by any government entity. Rather, the health care providers and their subsidiaries should be better regulated to ensure that the people are not victimized and treated like lab specimen. Criminal charges need to be invoked against any and all companies and people who inflict harm on the American people through medical malpractice, including the application of harmful drugs and toxic substance in our food product. Rather than protecting our people, we are found to be protecting the criminals. “Back to the constitution!”
Our education system has become shameful. We are modifying the text used to educate our children to fit the political agenda of the purveyors of our society. Our children are being fed intellectual poison. This must stop. One of the reasons our children are not able to cast an intelligent vote during our election process is because we have stopped teaching critical subject matter in their classrooms. We need to return to teaching the wholesome basic subjects, including civics, so our young adults are better prepared to take responsibility for their lives when they vote and when they enter the work force. It is no wonder why they flounder when they get out of school. They are not prepared to enter into the adult world and begin the path to financial independence. We currently allow our children to rebel and demand from us, whether it is good for them or not. If their demands are not met, they will be protected by the entitlement systems. On the other hand, we as parents, have become lax in our rearing and nurturing responsibilities and seem to have taken the path of least resistance. We do not demand of our children. Rather, we give into them and leave them to their own demises. We owe our children a wholesome and solid childhood, including a quality education. Our children’s education should be one of our top priorities, even over that of people migrating to our country from other countries. Our people, especially our children, must come first! “Back to the constitution!”
When did we become overtaken by taxation and lose our right to provide input to the taxation process and initiatives? “Back to the constitution!”
When did we lose the right to protect our borders and enforce the laws to control who enters our country? “Back to the constitution!”
When Oh When, did we begin to attack the wonderful American heroes who put their life on the line to protect our safety and freedoms? This is shameful! “Back to the constitution!”
When did our elected officials and judiciary officials begin to feel they are above the law and have the right to persecute innocent people to the betterment of their own desires and political agendas? “Back to the constitution!”
One final stand that I must take. This may not settle well with some, but I must share this fact. It is well known that our current congressional administration is being run by a usurper. Barack Obama is not and will never be eligible to be the President of the United States. He is not a ‘natural born Citizen’. At best, he is a naturalized citizen. Fraudulent evidence has been cleverly planted to lead us to believe we are wrong. The news media refuses to report on this issue. Courts refuse to do their duty and honor the many law suits presented for hearing. Tremendous funds are being expended to counter this issue, hoping it will go away. There are millions of American people who know the facts and are so frustrated that our elected officials refuse to uphold their oath of office and deal with this matter. Our judicial system has failed us miserably. “Back to the constitution!”
We must reclaim our unalienable rights as defined in our Constitution and take pride in our own being. We need to be held accountable to our individual responsibilities and stop holding our hands out for free support. We need to stop imposing taxes on our fellow people in order to sponsor the greed and luxuries of the life styles we can’t afford. “Back to the constitution!”
Having presented you with all of these issues and my request for you to carry my message to our state’s government officials and our country’s federal government officials, I am ever proud to be an American and I will never give up the fight to protect my country’s freedoms and unalienable rights. “Back to the constitution!”
Sincerely,
One of your constituents and a proud ‘natural born Citizen’
P.S. Please share my message to you with the other Iowa legislators and our state’s federal legislators as a wakeup call. We cannot continue to sit on our sofas, wringing our hands and hope these problems go away. We are the only ones who can clean up this mess. Back to the constitution!
From: DeBoef, Betty [LEGIS]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 2:47 PM
To: REPRESENTATIVE_DEBOEF@LISTSERV.LEGIS.STATE.IA.US
Subject: [REPRESENTATIVE_DEBOEF] Newsletter-May 15,2009
FROM THE DESK OF
REPRESENTATIVE DE BOEF
May 15, 2009
It is no secret that we live in a state that is “getting older.” The average age of Iowans increases each year because we are losing more and more of our young adults to out of state opportunities.
As an example, we have a net loss of 8,500 college graduates each year, creating a drain of highly trained young adults, a loss that demands our attention.
Iowa’s population is around 3 million and has been stagnant for about a century.
I think it is a legitimate job of government to create a social climate which attracts people, not one they find repellant. Our current political power structure doesn’t seem to see it that way. Their economic policies seem designed to send businesses, and hence jobs, high-tailing it for other states.
What is happening in Iowa is part of a national migration in which there are winners and losers. The losers are states that have over taxed, over regulated and in general made economic development more difficult.
The winners are states that have made their environment more attractive to the business community by limiting the encroachment of government.
The best comparison features two similar states going in opposite directions — California and Texas.
One demographic writer makes a vivid case. He studied — if you can believe it — rental records of the U-Haul company, reasoning logically enough that they should give a fair idea of how real people react to high tax and heavy regulation. He found this:
“When comparing California with Texas, U-Haul says it all. To rent a 26-foot truck one-way from San Francisco to Austin, the charge is $3,236, and yet the one-way charge for that same truck from Austin to San Francisco is just $399.”
Why? It is clear that thousands of people are leaving California for Texas, and U-Haul must pay its employees to travel to Texas to retrieve the trucks because almost no one is moving the other way.
More simply stated, Texas is a friendly business state.
There are a variety of independent think tanks that evaluate the best states in which to do business every year. The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is one such nonpartisan group that provides a variety of services and educational opportunities to state legislators. It’s 2009 economic index is fairly consistent with similar studies, some of which show Iowa in even more dire straits.
The ALEC economic outlook for Iowa indicates we are well on our way in joining California as an economic loser. By its measure we have fallen from 23rd to 35th in the latest year alone in terms of our economic attractiveness to business.
The ALEC study uses such factors as, personal and corporate income tax rates, property tax burdens, estate/inheritance taxes, number of public employees per 10,000, minimum wage, and if the state is a right to work state.
While 35th is bad, the majority party in Iowa is apparently trying to make it worse. In the past two years a few blue dog Democrats have joined Republicans in stopping forced union dues for public employees, the loss of federal deductibility as a state income tax deduction, doctor assignment in workers comp cases, costly energy policies, and an attempt to end Iowa’s status as a right-to-work state. Space limits my ability to report a bevy of other anti-business initiatives sponsored majority party legislation.
Some folks just don’t get it. We cannot raise the cost of business by higher taxes and regulation and expect to improve our attractiveness as a business state. There are some things we don’t have control over like the weather and geographic location but we do have control over the policies we set.
I will predict that Iowa will fall even further in the coming year as a result of its hostility toward the business community. That fall will continue until we have a majority of members committed to policies that foster economic growth.
In the mean time if you are looking to supplement your income consider the U-Haul business.
As an aside, it should be noted that the state’s taxing policies are having a decided impact on older Iowans as well. Many of our retired mobile seniors are moving their residence to states like Florida and Texas that have no state income tax. Finding ways to keep their purchasing power and contributions to our local communities is another challenge worth investigation.
I am indebted to ALEC for their continued analysis of state policies and especially for their analysis of the competitiveness of state economic policies.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me during the interim. I can be reached at 641-634-2227, or hgdb@iowatelecom.net.
May 17th, 2009 @ 3:11 pm
“I got a phone call from Mr. Bill Van Allen, who filed his case in SCOTUS. What concerned me, is the fact that his case was returned with a letter from a clerk, stating that the cases can be filed only after they went through lower courts.”
What did type of action did Mr. Van Allen file with SCOTUS?
May 17th, 2009 @ 4:58 pm
By now, Danny Bickell is probably monitoring all the blogs, and can see this stuff coming from a mile away.
May 17th, 2009 @ 5:04 pm
good. less chance for problems
May 17th, 2009 @ 5:41 pm
WHOOO HOOO!!!
Keep up the terrific work! Wow!
The Sheriff & DA in Tulsa, Ok are Repubs, but the Okla. State Atty Gen & Gov are Blue Dog Demos. Any chance of a citizens grand jury going anywhere in Okla.?
I heard about a new case in Okla on Mario Apuzzo’s blog site… Craig vs. USA. It was just one line. I would love to read more about it. I don’t know where to look to follow-up. Can anyone help me?
May 17th, 2009 @ 7:08 pm
Maybe I asked the wrong question or was not clear enough.
Did Mr. Van Allen file a separate case from ones you have filed with SCOTUS or was he delivering one of your?
If it’s a separate case from one of yours, what type of action was it that got kicked back?
Thanks. Keep up the fine work.
May 17th, 2009 @ 7:46 pm
JUSTICE SOUTER REFUSES ORDER FROM JUSTICE ROBERTS.
Did you read the article posted on Defendusx concerning Justice Souter? Evidently papers in other countries are reporting that he resigned because he refused to follow Justice Robert’s orders for this coming fall when Marshall Law will be instituted due to the H1N1 Flu. I am unsure if this story was vetted, but nonetheless here is an excerpt from it.
SNIPPED from Defendusx
By Defendusx
May 13, 2009 00:04
* Northeastern Intelligence is reporting this very same thing about the
Avian Flu coming soon and Martial Law going along with it
According to these reports, Justice Souter, Justice Ruth Ginsberg and Justice
Samuel Alito were all refusing Chief Justice Roberts orders, a protégé of Justice Alito, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General under President Clinton, and head of fundraising for Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential bid, Mark Levy, was “suicided” prompting Justice Souter’s immediate resignation.
May 17th, 2009 @ 8:36 pm
I accidently ran into this information. It’s very interesting.
Video: Teacher said Obama told him “Call me Barry”
https://www.khnl.com/global/video/flash/popupplayer.asp?ClipID1=3106855&h1=Obama%27s%20former%20homeroom%20teacher%20remembers%20%27Barry%27&vt1=v&at1=News&d1=120366&LaunchPageAdTag=News&activePane=info&rnd=80445369
May 17th, 2009 @ 9:17 pm
yes, he filed a different case
May 17th, 2009 @ 9:58 pm
Our Justice system has or soon will be merely the servant of the rich and powerful and thus inidferent to or an enemy of the people if they persist in estasblishing nit picking procedural laws to prevent the common man from defending his rights or those of the entire nation in the courts.
May 17th, 2009 @ 11:21 pm
Now that Obama/Soetoro, The Pretender-in-Chief, has received an Honorary Degree from Notre Shame Univ, the Judas of Catholic Universities, will Obama/Soetoro move quickly to SEAL ALL HIS Notre Shame Univ RECORDS.
How can we and people that swore an Oath to the Constitution sit by and allow this FRAUD, the PONZI PREZ, to be a squatter in the White House, after he himself admitted he was NOT a Natural Born Citizen. By his own ADMISSION on his website he stated that he was a citizen of Kenya til the age of 21. This by his own ADMISSION makes him NOT a Natural Born Citizen and in violation of the First and Most Important qualification to be President.
He was born to ONLY one(1) citizen parent and NOT the required TWO (2) American Citizens as required to be a Natural Born Citizen. Even if he was born in the Lincoln Bedroom he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen and therefore an USURPER.
Stand Up, Rise Up, Wake Up America the Constitution needs Patriots Now. Time to RESET this country to it’s foundings and follow the Guidance of our Supreme Law, The Constitution.
May 18th, 2009 @ 1:07 am
Most people hope form the best. The majority are traditional slighty right of center types and that includes many misguided souls who voted for this fraud nowin office.
Americans are these days so media hypnotized, and it is within their essential nature not to disrupt the flow of things. They are passive and obedient Savage calls the SHEEPel. I agree.
The universal health care will proceed the legalizing of 30,000,000 illegals in violation of federal law. (They did not enforce it as this cancer grew ,and they will not enforce it now as it metasticizes with new virulent and resistent strains of TB coming across the border along with the mexcian swine flu..
Unemployment is rising, the illegals will be given preference over legal citizens who are unemployed andf they will have health coverage.
THe way he is moving this will happen quickly. The reaction too will happen quickly.
I maintain the egg is cracking and leaking as I type this. Obamas’ waste matter lies are in conflict with the fresh water of truth and constitutional law, but law not enforced by people that should not be in office if they avoid vital issues and obfuscate and place road blocks in the path to truth.
My peronal feeling after speaaking to so many responsible people who examine the issues in a balanced manner, is that the crack in the egg is widening nand the meaningful vital essence of our country’s life force is in direct and irreovable contact with the Obama waste matter. The well of truth and justice is contaminated not only by barry, but by those in positions of responsibility mandated to obey asnd enforce the law.
At the highst levels of government, in all three branches Orly and others are being stonewalled by a far left bunch of cronies and good ole boys resistant to truth and change. In fact when truth comes up against vested interest the result is usually rationalization.
So what do you do to ameliorate this situation, talk ad infinitum to deaf or non receptive ears? Talk ad nauseum?
File potent legal briefs screwed around by low level clerks?
They–all of them–are moving us far left. They bath in the folly of the new world order and have contaminated the body politic. The press are their lefty lackies and Obama is riding high with all three branches of government as he dismantles any semblance of constitutional governmnet as developed by our forefathers.
There is a wide systemic breakdown occuring. How do we deal with it? Wait for 2010? Some say he will self destruct. I don’t think so. I think we will self destruct if we continue to tolerate this assault on our country by this bought and sold self out traitor and his lackies, insane ron emmanuel being at the top of the list.
Some say demonstrate. The force of a righteous demonstration is directly proportional to its numbers in high concentration around the white house in silent vigil holding up signs with brief statements. “Produce proof of eligibility or step down.” Don’t waste time and energy shouting or screaming or venting. The silent focus of a few hundred thousand people around the white house with signs stating their position will scream in their ears. Butb the numbers must be too large for authorities to manage effectively.
A sign may say: Do the right thing Barry Soetoro go back to Indonesia.
USURPER STEP DOWN NOW
DO NOT SULLY OUR WHITE HOUSE, STEP DOWN.—
And so on..
Break silence to read on loud speaker the results of the citizen’s grand jury. If he does not step down, then inform him that his days are numbered. Leave as orderly as you came and return with an armed militia–our right according to constitutional law- and remove the usurper and his staff.
I see no other viable option than installing a military governor to control the transition back to a civilian caretaker government after much house cleaning, prior to new elections.
Perhaps a viable third party would be the Nationalist Party
May 18th, 2009 @ 10:10 am
The SCOTUS clerks are bureaucrats. They should know that SCOTUS has original jurisdiction to hear certain cases. And people wonder why we don’t want a bigger government with more bureaucrats!
May 18th, 2009 @ 11:03 am
Martin Pinsky, you are a traitorous old coot.
————————————
“Leave as orderly as you came and return with an armed militia–our right according to constitutional law- and remove the usurper and his staff.
I see no other viable option than installing a military governor”
May 18th, 2009 @ 11:13 am
Orly,
While I support everything you are doing, I believe you made a tactical mistake presenting your case to Souter. There is little in Souter’s history on the court that would suggest he would make such a bold move on his way out. A better choice, in my humble opinion , would have been Scalia.
Several months ago you reported your conversation with at a book signing where he told you that if you brought him the Obama case he would hear it….and Scalia does have a history of writing bold decisions adhering to the letter of the Constitution.
May 18th, 2009 @ 12:18 pm
The SCOTUS is not hearing any new cases until October when they resume. It doesn’t matter who files them or for what. That’s the way it has been and continues to be. No amount of blog chatter is going to change that.
May 18th, 2009 @ 12:29 pm
Just wanted to say thanks for opening a few eyeballs!
May 18th, 2009 @ 1:31 pm
This is a petition for a stay, those are heard all year around
May 18th, 2009 @ 1:32 pm
to ultimately win the case we need 5. I can always resubmit to Scalia, if Souter ends up being gutless
May 18th, 2009 @ 2:02 pm
I’m not sure if this has been verified yet; but worth checking out of someone has the resources in Canada.
Is the Obama administration working on a forged long-form Birth Certificate as we speak?
by DefendUSx April 19, 2009 16:00
Hat-tip to Probie who gives this information:
Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only reason they haven’t rolled out the foregery yet is that it is “seasoning” under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready….one to two months tops.
I also said they’d have to get a 1960s Printing Press, and indeed, by this information, looks like they found one.
The banking connection is disturbing too, gives more credibility to this also. The details here are solid.
Obama visited Canada not that long ago, anyone know if he went to Toronto?
May 18th, 2009 @ 2:03 pm
TO: Mary Adamson says:
May 18, 2009 at 11:03 am
Martin Pinsky, you are a traitorous old coot.
————————————
Maybe you are the TRAITOR and are Aiding and Abetting an USURPER. Did you ever think of that?
What if you are WRONG? Ever think of that?
There is ONLY one way to know for sure…it is for the PONZI PREZ, The Pretender-in-Chief (until he prove she is Natural Born Citizen which he can’t that is why he uses Citizen or Native Citizen) to PROVE US WRONG. The burden of PROOF is on the person that uses FRAUD/FOREGRY to USURP the Job.
We as employees DEMAND he Prove he is QUALIFIED even if he supposedly did it before, which he didn’t, we DEMAND that he PROVE he is Eligible.
Mary Adamdon: Is it Possible that your are the TRAITOR and working with the Foreign or Domestic Enemy? Is Obama paying you? Are you an ObaMORON Paid Blogger from Change.gov, Recovery.gov, whitehouse.gov or a hold over from fightthesmears.gov, etc?
I will side with the Citizen that wants the CONSTITUTION RESPECTED.
YOU MAY BE THE TRAITOR.
May 18th, 2009 @ 2:04 pm
This is the same thing that happened to Philip Berg, SCOTUS held conference twice on one of his cases but then said he bypassed a lower court. They have a ggod idea of what is involved since they hels conference on the issue but it seems natural to strt with lower courts and then proceed to the bigger ones. this should have been done from the start so time would not have been wasted.Pleas continue fighting on this issue but avoid short cuts that cost time in the long run.
May 18th, 2009 @ 2:11 pm
I think you had better go ahead and begin resubmitting. Souter hung around a little longer than he wanted in the hopes that Obama would win so that Obama could appoint another justice similar to Souter. You either need to get a Plan B or begin implementing your Plan B now.
May 18th, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
i believe that if ever this idiot people elected does get charged and convicted that a whole bunch of others should also go down with them INCLUDING THE CLERKS who i think have been tampering with evidence and our constitution
will
May 18th, 2009 @ 5:39 pm
Mary – Please tell me why you frequent this site. You agree with nothing that is posted here and you chastise everyone who believes BO is an usurper. What is your motive? There are other sites that still pour the Kool-Aid. Why don’t you join them where you are more welcome? It should be obvious by now, no one cares what you think and they just breeze by your foolish comments.