Barrister Michael Shrimpton contacted Attorney Taitz in 2013, however never provided any proof of his statements
Posted on | February 26, 2014 | 21 Comments
British Attorney Michael Shrimpton contacted Attorney Orly Taitz a year ago, on February 7, 2013. He claimed that there was a DNA test proving Obama was not connected to Dunhams, his maternal grandparents. When Taitz requested some proof, Shrimpton provided absolutely nothing. Further, Shrimpton was trying to get money from Taitz to bribe officials in Kenya. If he has a DNA test, why does he need to bribe officials in Kenya? Without any proof of his statements Shrimpton might be either an opportunist seeking money or working for a joined CIA-MI6 operation to try to discredit Taitz and others by bringing forward hoaxes. Shrimpton needs to provide some evidence in order to be believed. However, even without Shrimpton we have ample evidence showing Obama using a stolen SSN and bogus IDs. All we need is one honest judge to act upon this evidence. Taitz is hopeful that one of the courts presiding over one of her cases will be an honest court
I’m Michael Shrimpton, a barrister and national security lawyer based in England. I was the CIA’s original source on Obama (they verified in 2007 with a low-copy DNA test). Philip Berg and others have consulted me.
As a courtesy I attach my legal and national security cv’s and a photo.
I would be very happy to discuss any aspect of the fraud with you. It’s about time the truth came out!
Be wary of the ‘supremes’ – one is being leant on, I’m afraid.
best wishes and good luck,