At CPAC I am demanding an answer from Breitbart.com, Pamela Geller, Frank Gafney and others, why are they talking about the need for E-verify, but refuse to talk about the fact that Obama failed E-Verify, as well as SSNVS and is using forged IDs. Previously Obama mediathug Alex Seitz-Wald from Obama regime propaganda outlet Salon.com showed only a part of the video in order to exclude all mention of Obama’s forged IDs and tried to attack me with a distorted video.
Posted on | March 18, 2013 | 17 Comments
What is wrong with Pamela Geller from Atlasshrugs, did she go comletely brain dead? Just a few minutes earlier they talked on this panel about the need for E-Verify of the illegals in order to identify jihadists. Why is it inappropriate to ask,. why are they not talking about the fact that Obama failed E-Verify, that he is using a stolen Social Security number? Is it inappropriate because Breitbart editors, Frank Gaffney, Pamela Geller and the rest of this panel were told by the Obama regime that if they mention Obama’s bogus IDs, they will be sidelined, not allowed on National TV by the Obama regime? Were they told that they will be harassed, intimidated and abused by Obama media thugs, corrupt officials and some corrupt judges? What was inappropriate in this question?
Please, demand an answer from all of these self claimed dissidents and constitutionalists. Demand an answer and not just answer, but also action from each congressman, senator, judge, chief of police, sheriff, DA, AG, US Attorney, Commissioner od Social Security, every media outlet. We have a criminal wirh forged and stolen IDs in the WH. This is the National emergency #1. This is the news story #1. Until he is removed from the WH and criminally prosecuted, ObamaForgeryGate has to stay a #1 story and this is an appropriate question. Demand ObamaNazi scoundrels from Huffington Post, Salon.com, DailyBeast, DailyKos and the rest of the MSM to put up a full video, not a manipulated, distorted half truth version and demand all the original IDs from Obama and all the agencies involved.
15 hours ago
here is a chain of e-mails sent to me by a reader Hilary (spelled with one l) Jones. She allowed me to post this e-mail exchange on my site
I left this comment at the talkback section of this post, but I am sending it to you via this email as well because I feel so strongly about it, I am hoping you will read it. Yes, it is a criticism. But hopefully you will find it to be constructive, as it was intended. As I stated, I have always held you in the highest regard and respect, so this is in no way, hate-mail. As a matter of fact, because of your strong stands and courageousness, I have always felt a sort of kinship to you, and even though I don’t know you at all, feel as though I love ya like a sister.
But this (below) was wrong. And I am frankly, shocked that it came from you.
One of your many loyal readers,
Aren’t you always saying, “Silence is sanction”?
Please don’t sanction the fraud and the cover-up. Please don’t do it.
You want me to remove you from my list? Wow. Why? Look, I am not your enemy here. I am a concerned citizen just like you.
I wasn’t making reference to the Salon site. As one of your loyal Atlas readers, I got the story from YOUR site. And then saw the video from the Breitbart site. I don’t fall for anything Salon says, believe me. And I am no sucker. I happen to have a mind of my own and call things as I see them. I didn’t intend to whine and it’s unfortunate you took it that way.
I believe I made valid points and/or at least posed very valid and honest questions to you about the odd juxtaposition of the event, the reason for it, and the treatment of Ms. Taitz as a result of her bringing up a topic not sanctioned.
And “Insulting Bannon destroyed her argument and credibility”? How so? Does the fact that she may have insulted Bannon make what she was saying any less true? Don’t forget, many in the enemedia have suggested you have no credibility for the strong stances you have taken (and of course they are as wrong as they can be). And I think you are incorrect that Taitz’s issue is not with the Breitbart event. The Breitbart event was supposed to be about open and free exchange of ideas and subjects that the Establishment deem verboten. That was the whole point of havinf the “Disinvited” event, right?
So because I ask these questions and challenge you on this issue you call me a ‘sucker’ and tell me to take you off my list? I gotta say, (and I am in no way being flippant), that hurt my feelings. This is exactly what the Left wants. To conquer and divide. I am an ally of your anti-jihad, liberty cause. Not an enemy.
Perhaps you and Orly Taitz can come together on an these issues that should be of concern to all Americans. Maybe you guys can talk about it. I cc’d her on this email so that maybe you guys could address this. When you stop to think about it, you and she are on the same side.
May God bless you, Pamela Geller, and may God bless America.