OrlyTaitzESQ.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi



as the regime tampers with my site and supporters are unable to post comments, I am forwarding comments sent to my e-mail.

Posted on | November 26, 2012 | 1 Comment

Legal precedent

Inbox
x
6:00 PM (8 minutes ago)

to me
Dear Orly,
Legal precedent? Our legal system and jurisprudence itself have been hi-jacked! What happened to logic and reason? How can ANY mere law or opinion possibly trump our nation’s constitution, the very authority under-lying EVERY law and ALL supposed precedent? By what authority is our nation’s actual constitution itself ever insufficient to justify opinions and rulings? Where is it written that there can be no more land-mark court decisions based solely on our nation’s constitution, but that all arguments must now cite previous opinions and rulings to provide legal cover? The claim that we must now have “precedent” is utterly absurd and flies in the very face of logic! If true, the first cases could and would never have been decided!
Legal precedent? Our legal system and jurisprudence itself have been hi-jacked! What happened to logic and reason? How can ANY mere law or opinion possibly trump our nation’s constitution, the very authority under-lying EVERY law and ALL supposed precedent? By what authority is our nation’s actual constitution itself ever insufficient to justify opinions and rulings? Where is it written that there can be no more land-mark court decisions based solely on our nation’s constitution, but that all arguments must now cite previous opinions and rulings to provide legal cover? The claim that we must now have “precedent” is utterly absurd and flies in the very face of logic! If true, the first cases could and would never have been decided!
Obama’s lawyers know that the evidence of his fake, computer-generated “birth certificate” and constitutional ineligibility to be POTUS is absolutely indisputable and utterly damning, as are the cover-up and the resolute and flat refusal of our courts and others in authority to deal with that evidence!
“At first, Obama’s attorney Tepper stated that there is a case that says that misprision of felony cannot be a predicate crime, then he corrected himself and said that there is no such case.”
I believe we have seen such grasping at straws before. It seems to me that Obama’s lawyers are very willing and very adept at inventing or twisting facts and law in order to make their case. I suspect that Tepper is seething with anger and resentment at being exposed and humiliated in open court before a watching world by someone he does not consider to be a “real” lawyer.
“On the issue of forgery of IDs, Tepper said that in RICO there has to be a forgery of federal IDs, birth certificate is a state ID and SSN is not considered an ID.”
This in itself is to me an ASTOUNDING admission! Note that Tepper does NOT deny that Obama’s “alleged birth certificate” and other documents were FORGED; only that they are not “valid” identification! Obama’s lawyer Alexandra Hill made a similar admission in Mario’s Purpura-Moran ballot challenge <http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/update-on-purpura-and-moran-new-jersey.html> when she stipulated that neither the court nor the state of New Jersey can rely on a mere computer-generated internet image of an alleged birth certificate as legally-admissible evidence of Obama’s true identity and place of birth AND, further, agreed that Obama has produced absolutely NO OTHER EVIDENCE regarding his place of birth! If I were judge Wingate, THAT admission ALONE would move me sua sponte to order full discovery!
I feel very badly about the abuse that has been heaped upon you. You have been on a legal and emotional roller-coaster, and you are much in my thoughts and prayers. I consider you a dear fellow-patriot and constitutionalist, and I greatly admire your love and sacrifice for our republic and its God-given freedoms, and your zeal for truth. May God give you much wisdom, grace and strength.
Karl
Post script: I have been unable to comment via your internet site.

Comments

One Response to “as the regime tampers with my site and supporters are unable to post comments, I am forwarding comments sent to my e-mail.”

  1. The Cure
    November 27th, 2012 @ 12:19 am

    Karl: you have Tepper pegged. He thought he was being cute by getting involved with the case in Ms. But he has obviously shown all of us and the legal world that he was trying to FAKE HIS WAY THROUGH THIS…! He has caused a lot of trouble for Dr Orly for several years!
    …..
    Hey, Tepper, can you say: “D-I-S-B-A-R-R-E-D?” You have played with the wrong attorney this time! There is NO TRUTH IN LIES!!!

Leave a Reply