As the Queen of the Birthers I would like to state that it is my royal pleasure to welcome the State of CT in the birther kingdom. It is the 12th state that filed an eligibility bill. Great job everyone. We need to keep working hard to make sure that each and every state in the Nation files such bill
Posted on | January 31, 2011 | 23 Comments
« Back to Inbox Archive Report spam Delete Move to
Labels
More actions
1 of 21526 Older ›Presidential Certification Bill filed in Connecticut
InboxX
Reply |Jeff LICHTER to Sharon, me, Gary, Margaret, letters, birtherreport
show details 5:16 PM (3 minutes ago)
McLachlan sponsors birther bill in Hartford
Stacy Davis, Staff Writer
Published: 02:21 p.m., Monday, January 31, 2011
DANBURY — State Sen. Michael McLachlan, R-Danbury, submitted a bill proposal last week mandating presidential and vice presidential candidates to provide their birth certificates in order for their names to be placed on the ballot.
“You have to have a birth certificate to get a driver’s license,” McLachlan said. “The same should be true to become president or vice president.”
McLachlan submitted his proposal after hearing several arguments about President Barack Obama’s citizenship, he said.
“They claim that he is not a natural-born citizen,” McLachlan said.
McLachlan said he is not suggesting that Obama is not a natural-born citizen with this bill. Instead, McLachlan said, he hopes passage of the bill will stop these types of arguments in the future.
“Let’s stop talking about this,” McLachlan said.
McLachlan suspected he might receive some negative feedback about his proposed bill, but he said he is trying to enforce the U.S. Constitution, which says in Article 2, Section 1, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
The proposed bill is currently being reviewed by the Legislative Committee, McLachlan said.
Contact Stacy Davis at 203-731-3331 or sdavis@newstimes.com.
Read more: https://www.newstimes.com/default/article/McLachlan-sponsors-birther-bill-in-Hartford-987856.php#ixzz1CfJbxUpe
Comments
23 Responses to “As the Queen of the Birthers I would like to state that it is my royal pleasure to welcome the State of CT in the birther kingdom. It is the 12th state that filed an eligibility bill. Great job everyone. We need to keep working hard to make sure that each and every state in the Nation files such bill”
Leave a Reply
January 31st, 2011 @ 6:32 pm
Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Your vanity knows no bounds.
January 31st, 2011 @ 7:50 pm
You are right Orly. Connecticut is working hard. We are celebrating big time tomorrow and polijabber is not welcome. Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
also Big win in court today. Judge ruled hc crap, sh*t phoney, communistic health care bill is unconstitutional! Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Is it still funnnnnnnny politijabber???????
January 31st, 2011 @ 8:33 pm
Don’t count on Oregon. The idiots in the Portland area voted our worthless democrats back into office last Nov. Most of the smaller areas went Rep, but were not enough of us to drown out Portland/Multnomah area. I keep pushing the eligibility issue every where I can, including Darrell Issa’s FB wall, as do MANY others, but Issa continues to ignore our requests for using his subpoena power to subpoena Obama and get answers to ALL the corruption in his administration. ‘Don’t jump in somewhere; start at the TOP!’ Issa isn’t listening!! His constituents need to remember that come the next election.
January 31st, 2011 @ 9:34 pm
you need to find at least one republican to file it
January 31st, 2011 @ 10:59 pm
politi-dity:…Orly is enjoying her site!! So what? Funny that you don’t want to mention the “Neo-Narcistic, Nattering-Nabob” of Treason in the WH! How come?
Orly puts herself out for (“ALL!”) of America! This is “How Much She Loves Her Adopted NATION!” “How Much She Loves Freedom Here!” She above most Americans fully “UNDERSTANDS” what tyranny means!!!
And, at times, she “celebrates” this freedom …SO DO NOT create antagonism for her free speech! She can “express” this “form of fun” anytime she wants!!! Her “soul sings” when she’s free!
Have you (or any of your posting “comrades”) EVER “KNOWN” THE FEELING OF BEING FREE TO EXPRESS “HAPPINESS,” WITHOUT HAVING TO DEFEND YOURSELF FOR DOING SO?
Orly: Continue to “have fun” anytime you want! I love it!!! LOL! FREEDOM (“WILL RING!”)
Your friend, Davey Crockett…
February 1st, 2011 @ 12:40 am
Ro, I wouldn’t be celebrating yet. This is Judge Vinson, the infamous “broccoli judge”. The logic of his rulin is unsound, clearly politically motivated, and in conflict with the controlling precedent. He will be overruled, and the historic and excellent Health Care Reform Bill will remain the law of the land. And yes, birthers are still funny.
Read the language of the CT bill’s sponsor regarding driver’s licenses carefully, and see if you recognize the insurmountable problem it represents for you birthers.
February 1st, 2011 @ 2:23 am
Check out https://einhornpress.com/GovernorNeilAbercrombieontheObamaBirth.aspx sometime, and pleae vote at the bottom of the page.
February 1st, 2011 @ 2:32 am
Here is another example of where your English Language Comprehension has failed you.
“Queen of the Birthers” is a derogatory label. It is not one of those you can decide to own and make it mean what you want, either.
When you make posts like the one I am responding to, you feed into a delusional fantasy that is a set up, rigged by your retractors.
I am really curious, there could be several different reasons you continue this.
If you have the legal education you claim, then why do you not understand simple points of law? You seem to not even grasp the most basic legal principle of our whole judicial system, that one is innocent until proven guilty. The prosecutor has to have enough evidence that someone committed a crime in order to get discovery. In civil suits the principle is the same, you have to have evidence before you begin.
The burden of proof is yours, not Obama’s, nor any other defendant’s.
Of course another option is you know all this and you are doing it for some other reason, all the while knowing you can never win.
February 1st, 2011 @ 6:00 am
> also Big win in court today. Judge ruled hc crap, sh*t phoney, communistic health care bill is unconstitutional
Can you even tell which court in which state or did you pull that out of your behind as usual?
February 1st, 2011 @ 8:23 am
Politijabber…it’s all in how we see things! Orly is not only a woman of integrity and courage, she has a delightful sense of humor. As Queen of the Birthers, she has a right to brag…just like I have, too, since I’m also a Queen, the queenofshina!
February 1st, 2011 @ 10:29 am
Julia, you lack a sense of humor and Orly captured the derogatory names, sprayed them with gold flakes, and made them her own. You say that Obama is innocent until proven guilty, and Orly does not understand this basic tenet. She understands you are not hired until proven eligible, which is a wee bit different. Obama is guilty of not being a natural born citizen, and there seem to be people thinking a birth certificate in Hawaii would make Obama eligible. He claims to have a foreign father, so that is what makes him not eligible. Since this is a public fact which he himself states, he has made himself guilty of running for a public office and not being eligible for that office, and scamming the public and collecting monies across state lines. He is guilty of fraud. So yes, he is innocent until proven guilty, and it does not take a court to prove him guilty. It does take a court to remove him from office. Perhaps you do not understand “natural born citizen.” Perhaps you think the brain surgeon who failed to provide his hospital residency papers can operate. Perhaps you are have been fooled by the Alinskies, and cannot reason your way through this jungle gym of twisted phrases. Why would you defend somebody who is too afraid to defend himself? I would think you would at least be embarrassed that your “leader” cannot build trust in his leadership by providing the simplest of paperwork and two legitimate private detectives have found him to be using a fraudulent social security system. The public has a right to enter their own court system and have this cleared up. If you feel he is so “innocent” with a foreign father and hidden documents and a fraudulent social security number, then bring your leader and prove it in a court….prove the Queen is wrong. Why attack the Queen, when it is a simple matter to clear up? Why not attack your leader who is too scared to defend himself? Why would you follow that kind of leader, anyway? The whole world knows he cannot enter a court and win, and now he has Dr. Lakin, a respected medical doctor who has served our men in battle, sitting in prison. Is that the kind of leader you defend????? He is innocent until proven guilty…he has proven himself guilty…he is not hired until proven eligible, the facts have proven himself ineligible….foreign father. You know that he would provide papers and enter a court, if he had any chance of winning. The longer he can stall and delay, the more confusion he can create. Why would you defend this behavior?
February 1st, 2011 @ 12:14 pm
Julie does not get that you have to provide credentials when requested when running for public office if required. The statutes require when challenged, a candidate must prove (for example), they are a resident. The presidency is no different, just never before challenged like today. BTW, by British Law, Barack is a British Citizen no matter where he was born.
February 1st, 2011 @ 12:39 pm
Orly, this Saturday some State Reps. will be holding a Cracker Barrel session at the School of Mines and Technology here in Rapid City.
I plan on attending with a few Tea Party members, and the Elegibility Issue WILL be discussed. So, South Dakota will have a voice in the Usurpers next Presidential run.
God Bless Orly… Smiles! 🙂
February 1st, 2011 @ 1:09 pm
@Julia. We are not in a court of law thank you. You sit here and talk about how we need to porve it. Last time I checked the U.S. constitution, it says that the president and vice president must prove to be a citizen. Why does Obama just not show it and prove us all worng, make us look like idiots? Because he can’t and the worse party in the world which is the democrats will bury this to destory this country.
February 1st, 2011 @ 6:06 pm
Julia, you don’t seem to understand. There is proof. We have all the proof we need. Orly made us all aware of the dire situation that Obama is a fraud. She had done much to bring enlightenment among the masses in this country to see that we have an imposter for a president.
tHE BURDEN IS OBAMA’S. HE HAS NOT PROVED HE IS A CITIZEN CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT IN THIS COUNTRY. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW, FOR HIM TO PROVE HE IS ELIGIBLE.
WHY HAS HE SPENT 2 MILLION DOLLARS TRYING TO HIDE THE PROOF., HIS FATHER IS KENYAN, HE HAD ADMITTED THAT AND THEREFORE HE SHOULD NOT BE POTUS, HE HAS COMMITTED TREASON.
February 1st, 2011 @ 6:06 pm
Julia, you don’t seem to understand. There is proof. We have all the proof we need. Orly made us all aware of the dire situation that Obama is a fraud. She had done much to bring enlightenment among the masses in this country to see that we have an imposter for a president.
tHE BURDEN IS OBAMA’S. HE HAS NOT PROVED HE IS A CITIZEN CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT IN THIS COUNTRY. WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW, FOR HIM TO PROVE HE IS ELIGIBLE.
WHY HAS HE SPENT 2 MILLION DOLLARS TRYING TO HIDE THE PROOF., HIS FATHER IS KENYAN, HE HAD ADMITTED THAT AND THEREFORE HE SHOULD NOT BE POTUS, HE HAS COMMITTED TREASON.
February 2nd, 2011 @ 12:04 am
Julia: “where for art thou,” missy? That was a “dense-dunce” post!! But we must realize that an Obo-supporter is just “obeying” the “muslim-moon-doggie”!!!
Davey Crockett…
February 2nd, 2011 @ 12:59 am
@ch – You’re completely wrong about the settled legal meaning of the Article 2 phrase “natural born citizen”. There is more than a century of case law that defines this phrase to mean being born on US soil – period. The parentage of a Presidential candidate has absolutely no legal bearing on eligibility. You may not like it, but that doesn’t change the facts.
February 2nd, 2011 @ 1:06 am
@Brandon – “Last time I checked the U.S. constitution, it says that the president and vice president must prove to be a citizen. ”
Check again, Brandon – it doesn’t actually say anything at all like that. Since you’ve probably never actually seen the Constitution, you want to read through Article 2 section 5, and also the 14th Amendment.
“Why does Obama just not show it and prove us all worng(sic)”?
He has, Brandon. He provided a copy of his Hawaii birth certificate in 2008. That’s all that’s legally required. The “long form/short form/certificate of live birth” arguments are all meaningless – any copy of a birth record certified by the controlling Registrar (in this case, the Hawaii State Department of Health, Office of Vital Records) carries the full weight of law. That’s the fact, and just because you don’t like it doesn’t change anything.
February 2nd, 2011 @ 1:09 am
@Tom/PoP – have fun with your Tea Party buddies at the Cracker barrel session – I hope they don’t set your bail too high!
February 2nd, 2011 @ 9:12 am
You Obots are hilarious. If your BHO is a constitutional Natural Born Citizen and his Social Security number is valid, if he is NOT a British subject, if he was NOT an Indonesian citizen, and our Queen Orly and other birthers have no evidence, why do you bother to even post here? What’s the point? Why do you waste your time and energy debating, insulting, or threatening, when according to you there is no issue?
It is ’cause you know darn well, the emporer has no vital records to show. The louder you protest, the more guilty you appear. HAHAHA.
February 2nd, 2011 @ 11:27 am
https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index?more=2667385
White House insider warns of dire consequences from eligibility issue
Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:39:04 AM · by Islander7 · 68 replies
The Examiner ^ | Jan 27, 2011 | Anthony Martin
Evidence is growing that the White House is so sensitive about stories in the media concerning the issue of Presidential eligibility that reporters have been warned of dire consequences if they merely ask questions about the subject. A White House insider has reported that the subject is so highly sensitive that reporters must ‘tread softly’ and ‘be very careful’ if they dare delve into Obama’s background.
February 2nd, 2011 @ 6:20 pm
Several of you really need to work on your reading comprehension skills. Read my post again and If you must try to reply to a post that was addressed to Orly, work on making it relevant.