Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz

If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.

The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi

After half a year and filing a law suit I received a FOIA response from the SSA, which was supposed to be provided within 20 days. Still most important info is missing and I am proceeding with legal action

Posted on | March 24, 2011 | 8 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ


Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688


Ms Dawn Wiggins

Social Security Administration

OEO FOIA Workgroup

300 N. Green Street

P.O. Box 33022

Baltimore, MD 21290-3022

Dear Ms. Higgins,

I am requesting US Code 5 §552 FOIA disclosure of the following information in regards to a number of matters where the disclosure of information under US code 5 §552 FOIA is essential in the interest of US National Security and preservation of the 14 th amendment Equal Protections rights of the U.S. Citizens. A copy of this letter is being forwarded to the 36,000 outlets of U.S. and International media, Inspector General of the Department of Justice and Public Integrity Unit, 

Requested information is as follows: 

1. Official SS- 5 Social security application for Stanley Ann Dunham, mother of Barack Obama,(Exhibit 1)  show it to be filled out in 1959, however on the bottom of the card, the revision  7/65. What does 7/65 mean? Does it mean Revision date 7/1965?

2.  What are the dates for the social security form SS-5 revisions?

3. Previously I requested release of Social Security number application 042-68-4425, issued  in the state of CT in and around 1977 to an elderly  individual born in 1890 and later assumed by Barack Obama. SSA refused to provide the application. Due to the fact that the full application was denied, I am requesting only partial information:

a. zip code to which the original card was mailed

b. gender of the applicant

c. date of the application

Please, see attached a sworn affidavit from a recently retired senior deportation officer of the department of Homeland Security John Sampson, attesting to the fact that it is a common practice to release partial  SS-5 application. (Exhibit 2)

4. Research of the National databases shows that there were several individuals born between 1890-1896, who obtained Social security cards shortly before passing away, possibly for the purpose of receipt of the Medicare benefits. I am requesting a certified photocopy of the original applications for ss-5 for these individuals, as they are deceased and privacy concerns would not apply in regards to deceased  individuals. Please see an enclosed check for the $27 fee per copy, made payable to the Social Security Administration, attached to the request

Bossing Margaret


Birth 07 January, 1896

Death November 1982

SS card issued around 1977


Born 30 May 1890

Died Apr 1979   8806810 (Danbury, Fairfield, CT)(none specified)

Connecticut 042-68-9248

Social security card issued between 1977-1979

5. If another individual assisted those elderly in filling out such SS application, I am requesting information on the name of the individual, who assisted the applicants as well as the official, who processed them.

6. Please, see attached sworn affidavit of a licensed investigator, certified by the department of the Homeland Security, Susan Daniels. It states the in the national databases name Barack Obama is linked to other social security numbers, among them 485-40-5154

This number was actually assigned to    Lucille T Ballantyne

born 12.22.1912

died  09.13.98

The son of Ms. Ballantyne, Harry C. Ballantyne was the Actuary of the Social security administration with an access to all social security records and death indexes. As  any change in the social security records is supposed to leave a paper trail and electronic trail, showing the access code of the employee, who effectuated the change, please advice, if the paper trail and/or electronic trail of such records shows  Mr. Harry C. Ballantyne, Actuary of the Social Security Administration, making any changes or alterations and/or additions to Social Security records  485-40-5154 and/or 042-68-4425, 042-68-4426, and/or 042-68-4427 or any other records, contained in the Affidavits of the investigators Sankey(Exhibit 4), Daniels(exhibit 3) and Sampson (Exhibit 1).

As breach of the integrity of the Social Security administration represents the matter of National security and the time is of the essence, I request a response to this request within 20 days,


Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ.- President of

Defend our Freedoms Foundation

 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688

Public Integrity Section

Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC 20530-0001

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders

The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya

Palais des Nations

CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

International Criminal bar Hague

United Nations Commission for

Civil Rights Defenders

Orsolya Toth (Ms)

Human Rights Officer

Civil and Political Rights Section

Special Procedures Division

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

tel: + 41 22 917 91 51

email: ototh@ohchr.org


8 Responses to “After half a year and filing a law suit I received a FOIA response from the SSA, which was supposed to be provided within 20 days. Still most important info is missing and I am proceeding with legal action”

  1. Jim
    March 24th, 2011 @ 7:52 am

    LOL !!!! How can they say with a straight face that with knowing only the SS number, the gender, the zip code, and the date of application “you can use the requested information to identify the SSN holder with reasonable certainty”. The only way they can say that is if they are admitting it is Obamas SSN – but then aren’t they breaking the law they say they are upholding ?

    As far as the law is concerned they rely on Exemption 6. They quote “Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press” again. That case dealt with Exemption 7C [ criminal records], it gave some guidance in determining disclosure . However, that case dealt with releasing a detailed criminal record of the individual. The important distinction in that case was the release of the record included the name of the individual. Thus, it was found to be a “clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy”. You are not requesting the identity of the individual belonging to that number.

    They ignore the case “Department of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U. S. 352 (1976).”, specifically from the ruling

    “3. Exemption 6 does not create a blanket exemption for personnel files. With respect to such files and “similar files,” Congress enunciated a policy, to be judicially enforced, involving a balancing of public and private interests. Regardless of whether the documents whose disclosure is sought are in “personnel” or “similar” files, nondisclosure is not sanctioned unless there is a showing of a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, and redaction of documents to permit disclosure of nonexempt portions is appropriate under Exemption 6.”

    Since redaction of the document is permitted per Department of the Air Force v. Rose,and you were not requesting the identity of the person to whom the number is assigned, there definitely is no showing of clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The privacy interest of the owner of the number is not violated since the identity of the owner is unknown and is not being requested. They should have released the redacted record containing the zip code, gender, and date of application.

  2. hippybiker
    March 24th, 2011 @ 8:16 am

    they know you have connected the dots and they don’t want to give you all the info because it will most likely cause embarrass their God O-bunghole.

  3. hippybiker
    March 24th, 2011 @ 8:17 am

    I’m sorry….Cause embarrassment to

  4. Toshiba P305-S8822 Battery
    March 24th, 2011 @ 9:04 am

    Libya revolt as it happened: Sunday: Minute-by-minute coverage of events after the United Nations approved a no-fly zone over Libya.

  5. Birdy
    March 24th, 2011 @ 12:41 pm

    With the zip code, gender, and date of application, the person could be identified, as long as there was only one person of each gender living at that zip code at that time. This is an obvious cover up of identity theft by the Social Security administration officials.

    You can add Dawn S. Wiggins to the list of people aiding and abetting treason against the United States. I hope all of Obama’s accomplices get their well deserved punishment when this whole house of cards comes crashing down upon their heads.

  6. Chum Lee
    March 25th, 2011 @ 6:52 am

    How do you get a zip code number for the 1800s? They did not exist.

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 25th, 2011 @ 9:06 am

    zip code at the time of the application, March 1977
    did you have to work through the night and now half asleep??

  8. Monster Beats
    June 3rd, 2012 @ 9:30 am

    In the actually deep and in addition vast web you can find a number of internet experienced individuals. Yet it’s when I discover this site which i know There really is on-line platinum. Nonetheless, if We try to obtain the RSS Feed key I am baffled. Can simply anybody situation us by it? Thanks a lot.

Leave a Reply