after 4 years of trying to contact Senator Cornyn, this citizen gets a response after he sends my petition
Posted on | January 19, 2013 | 6 Comments
A Response from Sen. John Cornyn of Texas
7:40 AM (55 minutes ago)
i received an email about a week ago from a source with a message that was to be sent to my two Senators and Representative. The unusual thing about sending the email was that it was free. Most want a fee and I usually do not respond to those, mostly because of the large number of those that arrive almost every day.
However, this one mentioned you and some of your affidavits that you have attempted to get on record in your cases.
This morning I received an email response from my Texas Senator, John Cornyn. This was surprising since in the last four (4) years I have not received one single response from Senator Cornyn, even though my correspondence was always a signed letter, faxed to Senator Cornyn.
Senator Cornyn provided a copy of the message which is below. I am sending a copy to you (for refresher purposes) because I want you to know that the message did get through and I wanted you to know that it did not go into a black hole (till yet). I edited the message by adding the last comment at the bottom.
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Your Message To Senator Cornyn Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:46:14 -0500 (EST) From: firstname.lastname@example.org
Thank you for contacting my offices. Your correspondence has been received, and we will respond to you as quickly as possible. A copy of your message is attached below for your records.
If you need immediate assistance regarding an urgent problem you are experiencing with the federal government, visit the “Help With Federal Agencies” section of the website for details on how to proceed so that your difficulties are brought to my attention as soon as possible.
If you are seeking information or services from my offices that are NOT related to my Legislative duties, please visit my “Services For Texans” section for more information.
U.S. Senator John Cornyn
On April 15, 2010 Obama posted his 2009 tax returns on line. He forgot to flatten the PDF file and his full unredacted Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 became known to the public. This number immediately raised suspicions of Attorney Orly Taitz, as it started with 042, a digit combination which was assigned to the state of CT and Obama was never a resident of CT. E-verify and SSNVS showed that this number used by Barack Obama was never assigned to him. We have an individual sitting in the WH as the US president and Commander-in-Chief, in control of our nuclear arsenal, while using a stolen/fraudulently obtained Social Security number from a state where he never resided.
Additionally, former Chief Investigator of the special investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman prepared a sworn affidavit for Attorney Orly Taitz showing that Obama’s alleged application for the Selective Service is a forgery. According to 5 USC ï¿½ 3328.one is forbidden from holding a position in the executive branch if he did not register for the Selective Service. Obama never legally registered for the selective service, as his application is a forgery, as such he is forbidden to work as a President in the White House or as a janitor in the White House.
According to Obama’s school registration in Indonesia he is a citizen of Indonesia. According to his mother’s passport records his legal last name is Soebarkah.
According to sworn affidavits of the Sheriff of Maricopa county, AZ and multiple experts Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. Attorney Orly Taitz and her supporters, law abiding U.S. citizens, demand that the U.S. Congress do not engage in treason and do not cover up Obama’s usurpation of the U.S. Presidency with forged IDs and a fraudulently obtained SSN. We demand immediate investigation of Obama’s usurpation of the U.S. Presidency to be conducted in both houses of the U.S. Congress.
[Not one single Congressman (meaning Senators as well), who all have taken a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution have spoken up to defend Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. NOT ONE!!!] [Added my me]
I appreciate your efforts and I hope you get a smile. Now I am looking forward to his promised response.
Never, never, never give in,