A very important conversation with one of the leaders of Obama defense on the Internet- He is now willing to state that the computer image posted by Obama on line cannot be used as a verification of anything
Posted on | January 5, 2013 | 48 Comments
I just got of the phone with Kevin Davidson, who runs a blog “Dr. Conspiracy”. Mr. Davidson was a leader of the Obama technical defense on the internet for 4 years.
We had a civil conversation, we agreed to disagree on a number of technical issues.
Mr. Davidson allowed me to write on my blog about our conversation. He stated that he owned a software company which dealt with scanning birth certificates, converting information and creating computerised birth certificates.
We agreed on two main points:
1. Computer image posted by Obama on whiteHouse.gov is not a document, it is just a coputer image, it is not a certified copy, it cannot be used by anybody for any purpose.
2. Certified copy differs from the computer printout in that a certified copy contains ultraviolet safety feature, which is built in the security paper. when you get your passport you have to provide a proper document: an original or a certified copy with proper security features. If there is a reason to doubt authenticity of the document, then an original needs to be examined.
3. He stated that he never was opposed to demands for original identification documents by Barack Obama and he believes that original documents should be produced.
We had disagreements on an issue of a halo effect. According to most experts halo (white shadow effect ) came from computer manipulation, specifically a computer application calle unsharp mask.
Mr. Davidson stated that he read an article by someone in Brazil, who stated that in some instances when MRC compression is done, there can be a halo effect and that this compression can be done by some scanners. My response to him was that he needs to show that it happenned in this case. The best response to this argument, is that not one of the other known birth certificates from Hawaii have this halo effect.
If it is something that would be created by a scanner there, then we would have seen it in every birth certificate, however we see it only in Obama’s.
His response to this was that the halo effect was created not in Hawaii, but in the White House, by the scanner in the White House, that is why all other Hawaiian BCs do not have it.
My response to this is that if our tax payer money were to go to some lousy scanner in the White House, that creates white shadow around every word and line, then we would have seen it in every document coming from the White House, every scanned document from the White House would have had white shadows, however it is not happening, therefor even if one were to believe that this white halo effect is something that can happen theoretically because of a scanner, it did not happen here, it was nt the reason for white halo effect in Obama’s birth certificate.
I asked him about the fact that the letters in the birth certificate are of different sizes and different fonts, different shapes and with different spaces between them, with kerning effect, meaning one letter encroaching into the space of another letter. If one were to create a document with a type writer, all the letters would be the same with the same spaces. His response was that the letters are of different fonts and spaces and different shapes because of the scanner.
I asked about multiple layers and the fact that the registrar’s stamp and the date stamp were on different layers and could be moved around the document.
He claimed that this was also because of the scanner.
At which point I stated that I do not even need to go into all the details. If he admits that a scanner can cause the letter to take different shapes and sizes, the spaces to appear, white halo to appear, multiple layers to appear and most importantly the stamp of the registrar to be moved around the document and be imported into the document from some other document, then obviously this computer image cannot be used for verification of anything, particularly not the eligibility of the US President, at which point he agreed that indeed a computer image is not a document and cannot be used for verification. We need to see the actual document, at the very minimum we need to see the certified copy with the security ultraviolet feature (just like money have security feature against the counterfeiting) and if there is a question of authenticity of the original, then the original has to be examined. That is what I am asking all along.
I asked him about the new document, which was produced by Obama’s attorneys Tepper and Begley, which was sent to Judge Wingate. In the new version forgers cleaned up several signs of forgery, the original layers were flattened and the white halo was cleaned up. If Onaka were to certify a copy of the original, then both copies would be identical. He had no comment, he stated that he did not analyse it. I was surprised by the fact that someone, who is an expert in birth certificates, who led the blog “doctor Conspiracy” and who spent 4 years defending Obama’s papers did not care to analyse the new document, new version released by Obama’s attorneys.
At any rate as of today the leader of Obama’s technical defense team on the Internet, the chief Cheer Leader Kevin Davidson aka “doctor Conspiracy” stated that what Obama posted on line is not a document and not a verification of anything.
At the very minimum we need to see a certified copy on security paper , however if there is a doubt about Onaka, his complicity and authenticity of the original, then the certified copy is not sufficient, we need to see the original typewritten document created in 1961, which should be on file.
We discussed a number of other issues.I will limit my report by this main point. I will only mention that he agreed that the way I was attacked and called names, the way some individuals were painting nude pornographic paintigs of me in order to assaaainate me as a human being was inappropriate and this should not have been done. He blaimed people running fogbow.
I believe he wants to distance himself from unscrupulous characters and he wants the truth to come out.
Here is the post on “Dr. Conspiracy web site”
My conversation with Orly Taitz
Dr. Taitz left a message and I called her. She was prompted to contact me because of an email from someone that pointed her to my article: “White House birth certificate: not identical to original.” She had questions about what I wrote. We talked for over an hour on a wide range of topics. It was interesting. A lot of what she said you can find in her writing and I won’t go into details about the conversation which I consider private anyway. It was civil and she was rather eloquent in explaining why she feels the way she does.
For my part, I agreed that I have no objection if Obama choses to release additional documents. That’s his decision. I personally don’t doubt his credentials, but it’s not my affair.
We both agreed that a “document on the Internet is not proof.” It may be a picture of proof, but it’s not proof.
I confess that I said, after being interrupted, “let me finish” twice.