Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2010
World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site
If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption. Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.
The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation,
c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orlytaitz@hushmail.com or orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. -- Thomas Jefferson
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you,
then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Petitioner Orly Taitz requests a judicial notice of the Official E-Verify report showing that that Barack Obama failed E-Verify in conjunction with the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which he used in his 2009 tax returns posted on the official White House web site Whitehouse.gov.
E-verify is accompanied with a letter of authentication by Ms. Linda Jordan who obtained the E-Verify and who attests that the E-verify is a true and correct copy provided to her.
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking a reconsideration of the decision by this court, whereby this court previously upheld the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 requested under FOI 5U.S. 552 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890 and SS-5 should be released under the 120 year rule. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned record is relevant for the request for the judicial notice as according to acxiom.com/identity-search database there were two individuals using the SSN 042-68-4425: Harrison J. Bounel and Barack Obama. Only one person can legally own a specific Social Security number. According to E-verify this number does not match with the name Barack Obama, therefore by process of elimination it belongs to Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel and it should be released under the 120 year rule of the SSA.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of the E-verify report showing that the Social security number 042-68-4425 does not belong to Barack . Since Obama used the aforementioned number in his tax returns, this constitutes a Social Security fraud, IRS fraud and identity theft and justifies a requested emergency hearing .
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
Judge Royce Lambeth is the Chief Judge of the USDC for the District of Columbia. He signed an order to wiretap all of the calls of FOX reporter James Rosen, claiming National security concerns. At the same time Lamberth had in front of him 3 of my cases: against Obama, Commissioner of the Social Security Michael Astrue and White House Counsel, who was Bob Bauer, but when Lamberth ordered pleading schedule, Bauer resigned on the same day and the case became the case against Kathy Ruemmler. Lamberth had in front of him all the evidence that Obama is usurping the U.S. Presidency with forged IDs and a stolen SSN, he covered it all up and made snooty remarks, at the same time he ordered the search of the private phone and e-mail reporter, who did not do anything wrong.
Today on Hannity Rudy Giuliani, who was not only the mayor o f NY, but also the Attorney General of the NY state was reportedly extremely critical of Judge Royce Lamberth and stated something to the extent that James Rosen should sue him. I am waiting to see the clip for the exact quote.
18 mins ago – The theory hinges on the false claim that his birth certificate is fake. Birther queen Orly Taitz (a lawyer and dentist from California) continues to lead the march, …
I sent to senator Lee all the info on Obama’s failed E-verify. How can he vote for mega amnesty which promises strict E-Verify checks, when he is criminally complicit in the cover up of the failed E-Verify of Obama. Please, demand that he speak up on this immediately before they continue hearings on mega amnesty
Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Transcript
Inbox
x
caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov
10:50 AM (40 minutes ago)
to CourtMail
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 5/21/2013 at 10:50 AM PDT and filed on 5/21/2013
Docket Text: TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on April 22, 2013, before Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr, filed by Court Reporter Kathy Swinhart, Phone number 916-446-1347 E-mail kswinhartcsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction must be filed within 5 court days. Redaction Request due 6/13/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/21/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/19/2013. (Swinhart, K) 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Don’t remember a sheriff, but that doesn’t mean there wasn’t one.
Sergeant Paul W. Leeper with officers John B. Barrett & Carl M. Shoffler made the arrests on the 5 burglars on Saturday, June 17, 1972 @ 2:00 am after receiving a tip from a security guard working at Watergate.
FOREIGN TROOPS ARE LANDING BY THE PLANE LOADS ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 20-May-2013 18:41:01
High Alert!
So what is going on? A UN troop invasion? Are things getting too hot?
I’m getting cell phone calls that there are huge transport jets landing in West Virginia, Jacksonville, Fl, and Camp Atterbury, and possibly others. Plz post if you are seeing similar heavy air traffic in your areas.It appears we have a UN invasion developing.”Just had a phone call from a man in Jacksonville Florida who lives right on the flight path of the Naval Air station there who advised that starting early yesterday morning there has been a constant flow of huge unmarked military transport planes landing non-stop since. He thinks they’re C130′s and C17′s also. He said he’s never in all the years there seen more than a dozen per day.These jets are silver and plain, no tail markings. Do we have anyone here who can add to this?” ”I had several high level militia members call me with Intel confirmed onUN soldiers being flown intoIndiana on 130s and c17s being issued US army name tapes and ranksand being put under order of DHSon top of that multiple armed swat raids being led by IRS in south multiple people taken Texas Florida Mississippi an Georgia.”
When soldiers asked about incoming flights they are told you did not see what you thought you saw.
(Folks, the following represents but one instance of evil to the core criminal activity by members of The Fogbow, many more are known to have been perpetrated by THE FOGBOW GANG, whih is nothing more than a common Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization)Fogbow ringleader and self-described Communist “PJ Foggy,” aka William L. Bryan, has openly admitted responsibility for a massive assemblage of law enforcement officers in Madisonville, TN, on April 20, 2010, the day LCDR Fitzpatrick appeared before a mandatory assignment hearing at the “trailer park” General Sessions Monroe County courthouse.
Foggy and his Fogbow Gang buried local Monroe County law enforcement and government officials with false and misleading phone calls and emails in brazen acts of criminal political activity, falsely warning that LCDR Fitzpatrick and his supporters were planning to descend upon the city of Madisonville promising armed violence.
Taking full advantage of what law enforcement knew to be an invented police crisis and a domestic terrorist hoax, government operatives deployed a shocking paramilitary assault of extreme proportion.
Perhaps the judge should know that the Obama Enterprise is funneling money somewhere through a FAKE and IRS approved “charity” which is based out of UPS store.
Who can make these things up? America has fallen into absolute Third World conditions under Soetoro:
—-
Tax-exempt Obama Foundation
doesn’t exist at listed addresses
By Charles Johnson @ Daily Caller
The “charity” run by President Barack Obama’s half-brother that was fast-tracked for IRS tax-exempt status is based at a Virginia UPS store, according to its website.
The organization’s IRS filings list another Virginia address that is actually a drug rehab center where the foundation does not appear ever to have been based.
The Barack H. Obama Foundation is run by Abon’go “Roy” Malik Obama, the half-brother of Barack Obama…..
Yet again I am in front of Judge Royce C. Lamberth. What joy, am I a lucky girl or what? (not) Feel just like a Dulcinea (for people in the know, Lamberth is the judge who in 2010-2012 covered up Obama’s forged ID that I provided him, claiming that he is not going to be tilting at windmills with me. He had no problem though attacking this big evil scary knight, James Rosen of FOX news) :-)
For the finale I am attaching Placido Domingo’s “Impossible Dream” from “the Man of La Mancha”, paying homage to Judge Lamberth’s tilting at windmills remarks (don’t worry, it will be redacted from the court filing)
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
Form 709 of the 2009 Tax returns for Barack and Michelle Obama posted by Barack and Michelle Obama on public web site WhoteHouse.gov on Thursday April 15, 2010, 11:15:29 AM and a redacted, flattened version of the same form 709 of the 2009 tax return of Barack and Michelle Obama posted on WhiteHouse.gov by Barack and Michelle Obama on Thursday, April 15, 2010 7 hours 2 minutes and 23 seconds later, at 6:17:52 PM.
Tax return in question is provided together with the authenticating affidavit of Felicito Papa, Barchelor of Science in Informaton Technology who authenticated that the attached copies are true and correct copies of the aforementioned documents posted by Barack and Michelle Obama on WhiteHouse.gov and downloaded by him through Adobe Illustrator program.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Official census information is:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Aforementioned report is a part of public domain and can be received by the court upon request from the White House.
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Orly Taitz is seeking a reconsideration of the ruling by this court to affirm the decision by the SSA to deny her FOIA 5US 552 request for release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
This information is relevant as according to acxiom.com/identity -search database also provided with this motion for reconsideration, SSN 042-68-4425 was issued to Harrison J. Bounel born in 1890. Attached tax returns show that Barack Obama is using the Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel. Additionally E-Verify and SSNVS official reports show that the Social Security number 042-68-4425 was not assigned to Barack Obama. As such not only the SS-5 in question should be released under the 120 year rule of the SSA, under FOIA 5U.S. 552, but this court should grant the petitioner an expedient 20 day hearing of the motion at hand, as this represents the most serious breach of the U.S. National Security in the history of this nation, it shows the usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander- in-Chief by a criminal using a stolen Social Security number and an unknown allegiance.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Form 709 of the 2009 Tax returns for Barack and Michelle Obama posted by Barack and Michelle Obama on public web site WhoteHouse.gov on Thursday April 15, 2010, 11:15:29 AM and a redacted, flattened version of the same form 709 of the 2009 tax return of Barack and Michelle Obama posted on WhiteHouse.gov by Barack and Michelle Obama on Thursday, April 15, 2010 7 hours 2 minutes and 23 seconds later, at 6:17:52 PM.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
Thank you so much for sending the PDF, and I apologize that it took me a while to reply. Unlike most of my NorCal neighbors I am a busy woman with two kids and college full time. Tomorrow I am taking time out of my finals to print out the paper work and hand deliver it to the IRS office on Market Street in San Jose, CA.
Is their anything in particular I should say? I will try to get contact information from the ‘front desk’ as to who to contact for follow up. My husband will be with me and I would like for him to photo the situation, only because I have never done anything like this before and I am a little frightened. So, if I get a photo or two I will send them to you.
I have never affiliated with any particular party in my life, but now it is official I am with the Tea Party, and will be in contact wth my local Tea Partiers as soon as I can find some. Remember, I live behind enemy lines in the SF Bay Area, but was always raised here and know how to appeal to the Progressives.
If in two weeks Sheriff Joe Arpaio and/or Sheriff Mike Zullo do not announce that they have filed a criminal complaint in court on the 100 % fraudulent Obama BC, I am going to demand an immediate contribution refund from them for solicitation under false presence. This criminal complaint has to be filed in a timely manner.
A federal judge ruled in 2010 that the JusticeDepartment did not need to notify Fox News Channel reporter James Rosen that his emails, telephone records may be read by federal investigators, according to a report inPOLITICO. Chief U.S. District Court JudgeRoyce Lamberth overruled a decision by a federal magistrate in September, 2010, who had previously determined that Rosen required notification if his personal email account, among other aspects of Rosen’s personal life, were going to be subject to a federal investigation.
“Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen’s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not required to provide any notice of the search,” wrotePOLITICO’s Josh Gerstein.
“The government has no further obligation to notify the subscriber of the e-mail account at issue,” Lamberth wrote at the time.
While both Rosen and the Justice Department did not comment to POLITICO regarding when Rosen became aware of the federal investigation into his contact with a State Department source. “Rosen would have known of the investigation by August 27, 2010 at the latest,” Gerstein writes.
Lamberth’s ruling became public knowledge in November, 2010, but the fact that the DOJ had investigated Rosen’s personal email was first reported in the Washington Post on Monday.
Date Filed: 01/27/2010
Date Terminated: 04/14/2010
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZ
represented by
ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
represented by
Alan R. Burch
U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Civil Division
555 Fourth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 514-7204
Fax: (202) 514-8780
Email: alan.burch@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
JOHN DOES 1-100
Movant
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
represented by
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue
Apartment 281
Brooklyn, NY 11238
(845) 901-6767
PRO SE
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the US Attorney. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA served on 1/27/2010, answer due 3/29/2010 (rdj) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on Attorney General. Date of Service Upon Attorney General 1/27/10. (rdj) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
MOTION for preliminary injunction by ORLY TAITZ(dr) Modified on 2/23/2010 to seal entry, pursuant to Privacy Act(rdj). Modified on 3/16/2010 (mm, ). (Entered: 02/19/2010)
02/16/2010
MOTION for a CM/ECF Password by ORLY TAITZ. (Image for this pleading is in document 8 on the docket report.) (mm, ) (Entered: 03/16/2010)
Memorandum in opposition to re 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for CM/ECF password see R.10 for exhibits filed by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. (Burch, Alan) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
MOTION for Leave to File Opposition to Motion to Intervene (R.6) by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (Attachments: # 1 Opposition to Motion to Intervene)(Burch, Alan) (Entered: 03/02/2010)
REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for CM/ECF password filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(rdj) (This document contains privacy information and is unavailable for viewing) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
03/16/2010
MINUTE ENTRY ORDER granting Motion of Plaintiff for a CM/ECF Password; signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 3/16/2010. (lcrcl4) (Entered: 03/16/2010)
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JOHN DOES filed by ORLY TAITZ.(znmw, ) Modified on 3/24/2010 (znmw, ).(This document contains privacy information and is unavailable for viewing) (jeb) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
First MOTION to Consolidate Cases by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Affidavit of Retired Homeland Security officer, # 2 Exhibit Affidavit of investigator licensed by Dep of Homeland Sec, # 3Exhibit Affidavit of Private inv. licensed by Dep of Homeland Sec, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit for Affidavit of investigator Neil Sankey, # 5 Memorandum in Support Declaration of the Forensic doc examiner)(TAITZ, ORLY) (Entered: 03/25/2010)
Memorandum in opposition to re 17 First MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1. M.D. Fla. decision denying Plaintiff’s motion to intervene)(Burch, Alan) (Entered: 04/12/2010)
Memorandum in opposition to re 18 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Statement of Kenyan minister of lands regarding Obama’s Kenyan birth)(TAITZ, ORLY) (Entered: 04/12/2010)
04/14/2010
MINUTE ORDER granting 19 motion to take judicial notice of the order entered in Civil Action No. 3:10-91 (N.D. Fla). Judicial notice is taken. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 4/14/2010. (lcrcl4, ) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
04/14/2010
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss due to filing of the first amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 4/14/2010. (lcrcl4, ) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss the first Amended Complaint. ORDER denying as moot 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ORDER granting 13 motion for leave to file an oppositon to motion to intervene. ORDER denying 6 Motion to Intervene. FURTHER ORDERED denying 17 Motion to Consolidate Cases. This case now Stands DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 4/14/10. (rje) Modified on 4/16/2010 (rje, ). (Entered: 04/16/2010)
MOTION for Reconsideration re 22 Order on Motion to Intervene, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to File, Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases, Order on Motion to Dismiss by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (rdj) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
Memorandum in opposition to re 25 Amended MOTION for Reconsideration, 26 MOTION for Reconsideration re 22 Order on Motion to Intervene, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to File,, Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases, Order on Motion to Dismiss MOTION for Reconsideration re 22 Order on Motion to Intervene, Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Leave to File,, Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases, Order on Motion to Dismiss filed by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. (Burch, Alan) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to re 29 Reply to opposition to Motion filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 05.18.10 letter from SSA, # 2 Exhibit 05.19.10 Death threat)(TAITZ, ORLY) (Entered: 05/24/2010)
COPY OF ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation – MDL 2170 Deeming the plaintiff’s motion seeking centralization and transfer of case Moot, and Vacating the 5/27/10 Hearing Session. Signed by Clerk of the Panel, Jeffery N. Luthi. (ks) (Entered: 05/27/2010)
NOTICE of request for extension of time filed by CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK. “Let this be filed” signed by Judge Royce Lamberth on 6/18/2010. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 06/18/2010)
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 26 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on June 18, 2010. (lcrcl3) (Entered: 06/18/2010)
REPLY to opposition to motion re 34 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A Affidavit of Deportation officer re. Immigration file of Soetoro and Passport file of Dunham, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B Immigration file of Lolo Soetoro, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C Ann Dunham Passport file, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D Affidavit of deportation officer re. redacted SS application)(TAITZ, ORLY) (Entered: 09/23/2010)
REPLY to opposition to motion re 34 MOTION for Reconsideration First Amended Reply to Opposition to Motion filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A Affidavit of Deportation officer re Soetoro immigration file and Dunham passport file, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B Lolo Soetoro Immigration file, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C Ann Dunham passport file, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D Affidavit of Senior Deportation officer re need for redacted SS application for 042-68-4425, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E AP report re Obama-Soetoro Indonesian school registration)(TAITZ, ORLY) (Entered: 09/24/2010)
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 34 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 9, 2010. (lcrcl2) Modified on 12/9/2010 (lcrcl2, ). (Entered: 12/09/2010)
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
TAITZ v. ASTRUE
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Date Filed: 02/16/2011
Date Terminated: 08/30/2011
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZ Dr.
represented by
ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
represented by
Patrick George Nemeroff
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Room 5381
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 305-8727
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Email: patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
DOES 1 – 100 TERMINATED: 04/08/2011
V.
Interested Party
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Movant
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER Dr.
represented by
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Island of Taiwan in the Allied American Formosa Trust
Territory, West Pacific
27-1 Yu Nung Rd
5th floor 1-2, 5A3
East Dist
Taiwan City 70164
289-7481
PRO SE
Date Filed
#
Docket Text
02/16/2011
Summons (1) Issued as to MICHAEL ASTRUE. (jf, ) (Entered: 02/22/2011)
AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed, The Court notes mailing was sent to improper address for the U.S. Attorney, and time to respond doesn’t run until U.S. Attorney is properly served.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth.(rdj) (Entered: 04/11/2011)
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/30/2011. (rdj) (Entered: 04/13/2011)
AFFIDAVIT of Mailing to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia with Summons and First Amended Complaint by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 04/25/2011)
AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed. Request DENIED. No proof of service has been filed ; only proof of mailing.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 05/19/2011)
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL ASTRUE served on 3/28/2011, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/3/2011. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 5/3/2011.) (rdj) (Entered: 05/23/2011)
NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick George Nemeroff on behalf of MICHAEL ASTRUE (Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer(rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
ANSWER to 3 Amended Complaint by MICHAEL ASTRUE. Related document: 3 Amended Complaint filed by ORLY TAITZ.(Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer (rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
MOTION to Strike 1 Complaint, 3 Amended Complaint and Attached Exhibits by MICHAEL ASTRUE (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) Modified on 5/24/2011 to correct filer (rdj). (Entered: 05/23/2011)
SCHEDULING ORDER: Any Dispositive Motions by defendant shall be due within thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/2/11. (rje, ) (Entered: 06/03/2011)
MOTION to Intervene, MOTION for Hearing on contempt of the Court’s order of June 2 by PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER “Let this be filed. Motion and all reliefs DENIED.” Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 06/09/2011)
Redacted COMPLAINT against MICHAEL ASTRUE ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616036614) filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Per 06/02/2011 Order 13 )(rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/15/2011)
Redacted AMENDED COMPLAINT against MICHAEL ASTRUE filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Per 06/02/2011 Order 13 )(rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/15/2011)
06/14/2011
Leave to File Denied. Notice of Motion and Motion for Default Judgment, “Leave to file DENIED. No certificate of service on counsel for defendant.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth (rdj) (Entered: 06/15/2011)
MOTION to Strike 10 Answer to Amended Complaint by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 06/21/2011)
ORDER that plaintiff shall file the redacted version of her Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen days of this date. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on July 21, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 07/21/2011)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration and Striking 28 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/25/11. (rje) (Entered: 07/25/2011)
Memorandum in opposition to re 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed, except for Exhibit 9, which shall be filed under seal only since it still contains improper redactions.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 9 *Sealed pursuant to Chief Judge Lamberth*)(various pages are illegible in paper form and on ECF)(zrdj) (Entered: 07/28/2011)
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Compel; denying 18 Motion to Strike; denying 19 Motion for Clarification; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment; and denying 22 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 30, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit (Unredacted))(various pages are illegible in paper form and on ECF) (Entered: 09/13/2011)
Memorandum in opposition to re 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,,,,, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,,,,, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL ASTRUE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nemeroff, Patrick) (Entered: 09/23/2011)
REPLY to opposition to motion re 36 MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment MOTION for Reconsideration re 35 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 10/03/2011)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on October 17, 2011. (lcrcl2) (Entered: 10/17/2011)
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 34 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ. Filing fee $ 0.00. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (rdj) (Entered: 10/26/2011)
Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Fee remains to be paid and another notice will be transmitted when the fee has been paid in the District Court re 40 Notice of Appeal. (rdj) (Entered: 10/26/2011)
11/01/2011
USCA Case Number 11-5304 for 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 11/01/2011)
12/02/2011
USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455 receipt number 4616044235 re 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 12/02/2011)
MANDATE of USCA (certified copy) as to 40 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ ; ORDERED that the motion for default judgement be denied; FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. USCA Case Number 11-5304. (md, ) (Entered: 08/30/2012)
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-01421-RCL
TAITZ v. RUEMMLER
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Date Filed: 08/04/2011
Date Terminated: 05/23/2012
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff
ORLY TAITZ Dr., Esquire
represented by
ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 – 5411
Fax: (949) 766 – 7603
Email: orly.taitz@gmail.com
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
KATHY RUEMMLER in her capacity as the White House counsel and custodian of records
represented by
Patrick George Nemeroff
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Room 5381
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 305-8727
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Email: patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 6 Order on Motion to Dismiss by ORLY TAITZ. Filing fee $ 0.00. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (rdj) (Entered: 11/01/2011)
Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Fee remains to be paid and another notice will be transmitted when the fee has been paid in the District Court re 7 Notice of Appeal. (rdj) (Entered: 11/01/2011)
11/03/2011
USCA Case Number 11-5306 for 7 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 11/03/2011)
12/02/2011
USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455 receipt number 4616044234 re 7 Notice of Appeal filed by ORLY TAITZ (rdj) (Entered: 12/02/2011)
MANDATE of USCA (certified copy) as to 8 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA ; USCA Case Number 11-5306. ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. (sth, ) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/05/from-the-leader-of-the-arizona-tea-party-brian-reilly-who-organized-a-group-of-250-citizens-who-met-with-arpaio-and-demanded-the-investigation-in-the-first-place-he-is-pictured-with-arpaio-during-t-2460526.html In article by Brian Reilly The “work product” belongs to the corporation called “The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold Case” not the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office as I understand it. Who runs the corporation? Mike Zullo is listed as a Director. His “work product” is the “report” that he apparently is still writing. As I understand it, if the full report is exposed
in a court proceeding, it then falls into the public domain. It seems to me that it would then be difficult if not impossible to copyright the final work product. What does your legal training tell you about this possible scenario? Again, I want to see this criminal investigation result in a criminal complaint to the proper authorities. I want to see justice for America and I want to see what appears to be a huge criminal fraud against the public, our Republic and our Constitution come to an end. I didn’t do this for Zullo & Co. to write a second book or e-book to be sold on Amazon.com. I didn’t do this to make a dollar. What is the motivation currently driving the Cold Case Posse? Is it truth and justice? Or, is it a money making proposition and ego gratification? I’m sure the public would like some answers. Were donations made to fund a book or to bring forward a criminal complaint? If it’s another book, I’ll be asking for a donation refund. (From the leader of the arizona tea Party Brian Reilly, who organized a group of 250 citizens, who met with arpaio and demanded the investigation in the first place. He is pictured with Arpaio during the press conference. He demands to file the criminal report and not keep the evidence for yet another book by Zullo and Corsi.)
Please, read this letter from Sheriff Joyce in ME.
He brings forward 2 main points
1. he can’t start a criminal investigation based on copies of the documents. This is not really a problem, I can fix it and ask investigators to forward the originals to him or he can subpoena the originals himself.
2. he is saying that this is more of an issue for the FBI. It is extremely important that every one of you write to this sheriff and to every sheriff and explain that we can’t rely on FBI. FBI is part of the department of Justice. the head of the FBI reports to the AG Eric Holder. Holder has the information on Obama’s forged IDs. I filed a quo warranto with him 4 years ago and he refused to do a thing. He is criminally complicit. For that reason we have to go to the sheriffs, as crime was committed in every county. Barack Obama, a criminal with all forged and stolen IDs, ran for office and defrauded the citizens of every county, he claimed his identity and eligibility based on forged IDs. Every sheriff around the country has a duty to file a criminal complaint against Obama and Holder and the rest of his accomplices.
Please, help me by writing to every sheriff, visiting every sheriff and every prosecutor. I really need your help. If we do not have a break, if we can’t find one honest sheriff, one honest prosecutor or judge, we are really becoming a NAZI Germany.
when people go to the sheriff and ask for an investigation, they expect the sheriff to use resources that are not available to public at large, such as requesting a warrant for a search and seizure of the original documents.
I am thinking out-loud if Arpaio and Zullo were to ever file such a request with any judge, Obama for sure would oppose it. This would go to court, there would have been a hearing, the judge would have to decide whether Arpaio can get a warrant, just as it was during the Watergate, when judge Joseph Sirica had to decide in regards to the Watergate tapes, we would have known about it. During all this time have anyone heard of any such application for a warrant for search and seizure of the original wet ink birth certificate, original Selective Service certificate, original SS-5 for the stolen Social Security number?
I am not a sheriff, I have to dry my brains out to find a way to get any information, but it is so easy for the Sheriff to obtain, so the question is: why have we never heard of any application by Sheriff Arpaio or investigator Zullo for a warrant and any opposition by Obama, Onaka and others???
Weeks ago, I notified Arpaio, Zullo, and Gallups if they transmitted one more communication soliciting funds “for the investigation”, I would visit the local U.S.Attorney and take action. This morning, I kept my word.
Today Mike Zullo made yet another interview with Carl Gallops. I can see real changes and I believe those changes are coming because of intensive pressure and demand for answers from you.
1. They stopped making defamatory statements about me.
2. Zullo and Gallops have changed their tune yet again. Recently they were saying that it will be 6 months before aomething is filed. When they stated that Obama’s bc is a 100% forgery, I demanded through my articles some answers. If it is a forgery and they have proven it, why don’t they file a criminal complaint? They responded that there will not be a criminal complaint “under the color of Sheriff of Maricopa county”. Former police officer and talk show host Carl Gallops wrote an article on his web site stating that I do not know what I am talking about, that a sheriff has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. So I responded by saying that if he believed that he has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint, why did he raise money all this time for a criminal investigation? Today Zullo and Gallops back pedaled again and they are no longer stating that I do not know what a first year law student knows, they no longer state that the sheriff has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint, they are saying that something will come out in 2 weeks. That it might be a complaint with the prosecutors or more in depth investigation. So they now admit that they can file a criminal complaint with the prosecutors and they are saying that the sheriff can file a complaint with the DA or AG. I was proven a 100% correct.
3. now let’s go to the investigation. They are saying that some “nefarious people” (no names used ) are pushing them to file something that they are not ready to file.
Now let’s think for a moment. Just a couple of days ago Carl Gallops issued a statement that they have proven that Obama’s birth certificate is a 100% forgery. So what are they waiting for? Are they waiting to prove it 101%? A 102%?
If they were to state: “We are 90% sure that Obama’s BC is a forgery and we want to make sure a 100%, then they would have made some sense, but they set themselves up by saying that the document is a 100% forgery. This is the threshold. When you have proven that the document is a 100% forgery, it is time to file a criminal complaint.
I was correct on this point as well.
4. Zullo and Gallops are saying that there is a difference between filing charges and filing a criminal complaint. They are trying to say that it was said that they need to bring charges. I never said that. I specifically stated that they need file their criminal complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General and they need to forward it to the U.S. attorney if federal employees are involved. So they confirmed this. On this point I was absolutely correct yet again.
5. Now Zullo is stating that he is only interested in publishing “an investigative report that results in a conviction”, that he is not interested in a book. He stated that all he cares about are prayers coming from the supporters. That all sounds wonderful, however let’s look at his track record in the immediate past. On March 1, 2012 Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo held their first press conference. On the same day Mike Zullo started selling his book that he co-wrote with Jerome Corsi (see article below) and from day one he was profiteering from this book. Please, read an article by Jared Dillingham published in AZhome.com. He interviewed Corsi and was told that the book is sold for $9.99 and Corsi and Zullo are splitting the profits. They are not giving any money to the Sheriff’s department and no money for the Cold Case Posse. I talked to Brian Riley, who was the leader of the Tea Party group, leader of 250 people, who brought the complaint to Arpaio in the first place. He was disgusted by the fact that Zullo published this book, but no criminal complaint was filed. According to Brian Rilley Zullo asked him to forward the book to all of his contacts. He and his wife were so upset that they did not forward the book to any contacts. Mr. Rilley stated that he and others spent countless hours as members of the cold case posse, they donated money, they spent hours working pro bono, while Zullo and Coersi came up from the book and split the profits without giving a certain percentage to the Sheriff’s department or the Cold Case posse foundation. When the author of the article questioned Corsi about the fact that the investigator is selling the results of the investigation before the case even went to the grand jury, Corsi stated: “Mike owns his work product and as such, he’s permitted to utilize that work product for compensation,” Corsi explained.
This is shocking to me. An investigator does not own results of the investigation done by the Sheriff. When the author of the articles questioned the county supervisor about it, she stated: ”I’m shocked to learn about this book,” said Maricopa County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox.
Furthermore, as stated in the radio interview given by a retired deportation officer John Sampson, Arpaio, Zullo and Sampson made an agreement that they will not comply with the court subpoenas that were served on them in my case in Indiana, where we had trial in the fall of 2012. They claimed that if they will appear, it will jeopardize the criminal investigation, however Arpaio and Zullo did not believe that doing press conferences all over the country, doing fundraisers all over the country and Zullo selling his book in Barnes and Noble and Amazon.com from March 1, 2012 and profiting around $5.00 per e-book somehow might jeopardize the investigation? He did not think that the Director of the Cold Case Posse and the lead investigator in the case selling a book and profiteering from the book for a year and a half now will not bring the question of bias during the criminal trial? I am sure that if this case ever goes to trial, the first thing Obama’s attorney will state: “Your Honor, chief investigator in the case, Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo, co-wrote a book about the investigation “A question of eligibility” and he has been profiteering from this book for a year and a half, his motifs are questionable, the investigation is tainted, the defense demands to dismiss the case”. What are we going to do then? Did Mike Zullo think about it? I was correct on this point again. So, who is in the wrong here? I spent 5 years on this case and did not write a book, Zullo did. So, whose motifs are questionable
6. Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi, WND, WesternJounalism.com and ORYR never responded if they were ever paid anything for advertising by either Mike Zullo or Cold Case Posse or Sheriff’s campaign or any other affiliated organizations. This is a legitimate question, as it might explain lopsided and biased coverage. We still did not get an answer to this question.
7. We did not get an answer whether Sheriff Arpaio ever filed with a judge a request for a warrant for the search of the original IDs and whether he ever sought to extend such warrant with a judge in the sister jurisdiction in HI, MD and DC? As far as we know sheriff Arpaio did not do this and the question is why?
Please, demand answers to these questions.
Moreover, I demand that CarlGallops/PPSimmons, ORYR/ ObamaReleaseYourrecords, WesternJournalism and others remove from their websites all of the defamatory statements about me that they have been publishing and I demand a public retraction and apology from all of them. I was proven to be correct in what I was stating, my actions are furthering public interest and they all owe me an apology and a retraction.
I do not believe it would be beneficial to spend time on filing legal actions against people who previously were allies for defamation per se of my character , specifically defamation of me as an attorney, I prefer spending my time working on cases, where I am exposing Obama, however I need to warn all of these individuals that their actions are actionable and they are engaged in a vicious smear of a good name of me, an attorney who worked 24/7 for 5 years now on this cause.
MikeZullo, a retired detective … Zullo‘s co-author is JeromeCorsi, a well-known political conspiracy writer who started the Swift-boat case against Sen. John Kerry.
PHOENIX – The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation into President Obama’s birth certificate is profiting from the case.
Mike Zullo, a retired detective and volunteer Maricopa County Sheriff Posse member, is listed as the co-author of “A Question of Eligibility,” an e-book for sale on Amazon and Barnes and Noble. The book is a copy of the investigation findings presented to the press on Thursday.
Zullo’s co-author is Jerome Corsi, a well-known political conspiracy writer who started the Swift-boat case against Sen. John Kerry. More recently, Corsi, who writes for World Net Daily, has spent the last few years driving the birther movement.
Corsi supplied much of the research for the MCSO investigation, which labeled the president’s birth certificate “a fake.”
Corsi and Zullo are selling the investigation online for $9.99, and Corsi said they are splitting the profits. In a phone interview Friday night, Corsi told 3TV neither Arpaio nor the MCSO will see profits from the sales.
Corsi denied using the MCSO as a promotional tool to sell his books and theories.
“It’s what I do. I’m a writer,” Corsi said, “My motive is to get the information to the American public [so] if they want to read it in a book, they’ve got one available.”
Corsi said he informed Arpaio of his plans to sell the investigation’s findings six months ago, at the start of the investigation.
“He approved,” Corsi said, since neither he nor Zullo are paid members of the MCSO.
“Since he’s a volunteer, Mike owns his work product and as such, he’s permitted to utilize that work product for compensation,” Corsi explained.
Still, the sale of the investigation is raising eyebrows and ethical questions from Arpaio critics.
“I’m shocked to learn about this book,” said Maricopa County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox.
Hi Dr. Taitz…Just making sure you have heard this latest interview of Mike Zullo by Carl Gallups…He claims something will happen in two weeks.
God Bless,
Tony
answer from Orly:
I did not hear the interview but I certainly hope that when Arpaio and Zullo are saying that something will happen in 2 weeks, they mean that in 2 weeks they will file a criminal complaint against Obama based on the fact that they confirmed that Obama’s IDs are a 100% forgery.
It would be nice if for a change instead of attacking and defaming me, Mike Zullo finally does what he is supposed to do and together with Sheriff Arpaio file a criminal complaint against Obama and his accomplices in the state and federal government.
We will see what they will actually do in 2 weeks. What is your guess? Do you believe Mike Zullo will stop doing defamatory interviews about me, where he made defamation per se statements about me as an attorney, and will actually file a criminal complaint against Obama?
General Vallely, do not allow Sheriff Arpaio, President of CCP foundation Mike Zullo and talk show host Carl Gallops treat you like a complete moron
Inbox
x
Robert Hill
10:16 AM (37 minutes ago)
to me
Orly,
I am in full agreement with you on this. The Maricopa County attorney is William G. Montgomery, himself a West Point graduate like General Vallely. The motto of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point is “Duty. Honor. Country.”
Please check out this link from the Arizona Republic when Mr. Montgomery was running for office.
I see that you are spreading around a WND article about Arpaio.
Please, read the articles I posted on
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Arpaio spent nearly 3 years soliciting donations for his criminal investigation of Obama,he kept telling the public that he is conducting a criminal investigation, that it is a criminal case, asked people to have patience. Arpaio stated that Obama’s IDs are forged and now, when pressured by me and others with demands for answers, why didn’t he file a criminal complaint with the prosecutors, he claims that he never had any jurisdiction to file anything. So, why did he solicit donations for the investigation if he never had any jurisdiction?
He and his Cold Case Posse foundation director Mike Zullo simply took the money and never filed the criminal complaint, which they were obligated to file the moment they found out that fraud was committed, when they found out that people of Arizona were defrauded by a criminal using all forged and stolen IDs. Arpaio and Zullo advertised with WND. WND usual cut, which was paid by Attorney Kreep in his similar solicitations for donations, is 50% of donations received through WND or $7,000 for each mass e-mailing. Arpaio is the golden goose for WND, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi and as I suspect for Carl Gallops from PPSimmons as well.
Arpaio, Zullo and WND are treating every American including you as a complete moron. Do you enjoy being treated like a moron?
Instead of spreading around WND articles you need to send an open letter to Arpaio, demanding that Arpaio and Zullo file their official criminal complaint with the District Attorney of Maricopa County, where people are paying 486 million dollars a year to the Sheriff’s department to do just that, protect them from fraud and forgery, file with the Attorney General of Arizona, Secretary of State of Arizona and US Attorney’s office for the state of Arizona. Tell Arpaio to do his job, we can’t wait. If he is not filing an official complaint, while he has all the evidence, he becomes complicit in the cover up of forgery, identity theft, SSA fraud, elections fraud and treason in covering up the usurpation of the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief. Is there a reason, why wouldn’t you confront Arpaio, Zullo and WND and Carl Gallops ?
This e-mail is being cc-ed to other members of the military, public and media.
Pastor Gallups, the people are looking to you for answers. You and your organization has been a major platform for the Mke Zullo promotion efforts. The American people do not need another book we need proper and legal action from American men of honor and courage. Hiding the truth here has the potential to damage reputations on many levels. This is your opportunity in history…Have Dr. Taitz on your radio program and direct your listeners to solutions that will serve the American people for many generations.
Nationwide Protest of the IRS, all over America-Tuesday May 21 2013 12:00 noon
Tea Party United- We need everyone to defend this nation.
Please remind everyone… This is tyranny and it is no conspiracy theory. Now it is real.
If you are following the news you know the IRS targeted the Tea Party and many other conservative groups. To make matters worse the person in charge of the office which did the targeting has been promoted to oversee the IRS operation of ObamaCare. Are you comfortable with that?
Do you want this government and this IRS
in charge of your health care?
We feel it is time to stand up against this tyranny. Maybe it’s time to end the IRS and go to a Flat Tax.
If you agree.
If you are as outraged as the rest of us, then please stand with us.
JENNY BETH MARTIN
FROM
TEA PARTY PATRIOTS
HAS ASKED US TO JOIN THE NATIONWIDE PROTEST OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
ON
TUESDAY, MAY 21, 2013 AT 12NOON
Please join us in letting them know that it is not OKAY what they have been pulling on conservative organizations!
Beforeitsnews DOES NOT ALLOW attacks upon other Beforeitsnews contributors. This story has been deleted. DO NOT attack other Beforeitsnews contributors EVER AGAIN please.
With all due respect, Ms. Taitz, I responded to what was written on your website. I also responded because of what was discussed on Freedom Friday, May 17, 2013.
Specifically, you wrote: “Moreover, as Zullo tried to attack me, he admitted that Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint as people expected. He stated at the interview held yesterday that there will not be a complaint under the color of the Sheriff of Maricopa county, but Zullo will write and will tell all because it is his work product.”
The “work product” belongs to the corporation called “The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold Case” not the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office as I understand it. Who runs the corporation? Mike Zullo is listed as a Director. His “work product” is the “report” that he apparently is still writing. As I understand it, if the full report is exposed
in a court proceeding, it then falls into the public domain. It seems to me that it would then be difficult if not impossible to copyright the final work product. What does your legal training tell you about this possible scenario?
Again, I want to see this criminal investigation result in a criminal complaint to the proper authorities. I want to see justice for America and I want to see what appears to be a huge criminal fraud against the public, our Republic and our Constitution come to an end. I didn’t do this for Zullo & Co. to write a second book or e-book to be sold on Amazon.com. I didn’t do this to make a dollar.
What is the motivation currently driving the Cold Case Posse? Is it truth and justice? Or, is it a money making proposition and ego gratification? I’m sure the public would like some answers. Were donations made to fund a book or to bring forward a criminal complaint? If it’s another book, I’ll be asking for a donation refund.
18 hours ago – HOME · Obama Birthplace Controversy · Google Microsoft. Profile image. By Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire (Reporter) Contributor profile | More stories …
17 hours ago – From Orly Taitz: Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama? I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the d…
17 hours ago – From Orly Taitz: Beforeitsnews.com, a highly travelled web site, removed from their web site an interview by Carl Gallops (PPSimmons), where Carl Gallops and …
Demand to enter essential information in the record of the Senate Judicial Committee in regards to the Immigration Reform bill S-744
Factual allegations in relation to S-744:
1. U.S. Senate Judicial committee is currently deliberating S-744, a massive amnesty of millions of illegals, whereby the U.S. citizens are asked to accept the bill as they are promised that there will be a strong enforcement of the E-Verify, which should identify individuals who are using stolen and fraudulently obtained IDs.
2. Petitioner herein, Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ, President of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, is providing evidence that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Soebarkah, aka alias Harrison J. Bounel is using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him and failed not only E-Verify, but SSNVS as well.
3. On April 15, 2010, Mr. Obama posted his 2009 tax returns on line and originally did not flatten the PDF file, therefore thousands of individuals could download the full unredacted Social Security number used by him. While Obama realized his error, removed, flattened the file and uploaded it, it was too late, the number became known to the public and it was checked through E-Verify and SSNVS and it failed both. Please, see attached Exhibit 1 E-Verify and SSNVS reports, affidavit of Felichito Papa, an information technology specialist, who downloaded the file, as well as affidavit of Linda Jordan, who got the E-Verify report.
4. Additionally Petitioner Taitz provides Exhibit 2, a sworn affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, Retired Chief Investigator of the U.S. Coast Guard attesting to the fact that Obama’s Selective service certificate is a forgery as well.
5. Exhibit 4, excerpt of the passport records from Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing that Obama’s last name in his mother’s passport was listed as Soebarkah and it shows that Obama was stricken from his mother’s passport when he ostensibly got his Indonesian citizenship.
6. Exhibit 5 shows sworn affidavits of law enforcement official and experts attesting to forgery in Obama’s alleged copy of his alleged birth certificate.
7. In spite of claims to the contrary coming from the Obama’s camp, not one single judge or jury have seen the original (wet ink) birth certificate, original Selective Service certificate and original Social Security application for Obama, the original documents are still sealed (if they even exist), and the copies provided to the public are deemed to be laughable forgeries. All of the legal challenges against Obama were dismissed not on the merits, but due to technical reasons, such as jurisdiction or standing.
8. Petitioner demands that the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate stay any further hearings on the Immigration bill 2013 S-744 until the Judiciary Committee conducts an emergency hearing in relation to the fact that an individual with all forged IDs and fraudulently obtained Social Security number is usurping the position of the U.S. President and Commander- in- Chief. The public cannot trust the claims by the U.S. Senate that it will be checking the E-Verify of millions of illegals if the U.S. Senate covers up the failed E-Verify of the U.S. President.
9. Additionally you and your fellow members of the Judiciary Committee and Congress at large will be criminally complicit and will be committing treason, if you do not hold an immediate hearing on this matter, as you would be aiding and abetting a foreign born criminal, who is using all forged and stolen IDs to usurp the U.S. Presidency. Your actions would also qualify as Deprivation of civil rights of the U.S. Citizens under color of authority and deprivation of honest services.
10. Petitioner Taitz is requesting to allow her to appear and testify before the commission and provide all of the pertinent information.
Demand to enter essential information in the record of the Senate Judicial Committee in regards to the Immigration Reform bill S-744
Factual allegations in relation to S-744:
1. U.S. Senate Judicial committee is currently deliberating S-744, a massive amnesty of millions of illegals, whereby the U.S. citizens are asked to accept the bill as they are promised that there will be a strong enforcement of the E-Verify, which should identify individuals who are using stolen and fraudulently obtained IDs.
2. Petitioner herein, Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ, President of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, is providing evidence that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Soebarkah, aka alias Harrison J. Bounel is using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him and failed not only E-Verify, but SSNVS as well.
3. On April 15, 2010, Mr. Obama posted his 2009 tax returns on line and originally did not flatten the PDF file, therefore thousands of individuals could download the full unredacted Social Security number used by him. While Obama realized his error, removed, flattened the file and uploaded it, it was too late, the number became known to the public and it was checked through E-Verify and SSNVS and it failed both. Please, see attached Exhibit 1 E-Verify and SSNVS reports, affidavit of Felichito Papa, an information technology specialist, who downloaded the file, as well as affidavit of Linda Jordan, who got the E-Verify report.
4. Additionally Petitioner Taitz provides Exhibit 2, a sworn affidavit of Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, Retired Chief Investigator of the U.S. Coast Guard attesting to the fact that Obama’s Selective service certificate is a forgery as well.
5. Exhibit 4, excerpt of the passport records from Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing that Obama’s last name in his mother’s passport was listed as Soebarkah and it shows that Obama was stricken from his mother’s passport when he ostensibly got his Indonesian citizenship.
6. Exhibit 5 shows sworn affidavits of law enforcement official and experts attesting to forgery in Obama’s alleged copy of his alleged birth certificate.
7. In spite of claims to the contrary coming from the Obama’s camp, not one single judge or jury have seen the original (wet ink) birth certificate, original Selective Service certificate and original Social Security application for Obama, the original documents are still sealed (if they even exist), and the copies provided to the public are deemed to be laughable forgeries. All of the legal challenges against Obama were dismissed not on the merits, but due to technical reasons, such as jurisdiction or standing.
8. Petitioner demands that the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate stay any further hearings on the Immigration bill 2013 S-744 until the Judiciary Committee conducts an emergency hearing in relation to the fact that an individual with all forged IDs and fraudulently obtained Social Security number is usurping the position of the U.S. President and Commander- in- Chief. The public cannot trust the claims by the U.S. Senate that it will be checking the E-Verify of millions of illegals if the U.S. Senate covers up the failed E-Verify of the U.S. President.
9. Additionally you and your fellow members of the Judiciary Committee and Congress at large will be criminally complicit and will be committing treason, if you do not hold an immediate hearing on this matter, as you would be aiding and abetting a foreign born criminal, who is using all forged and stolen IDs to usurp the U.S. Presidency. Your actions would also qualify as Deprivation of civil rights of the U.S. Citizens under color of authority and deprivation of honest services.
10. Petitioner Taitz is requesting to allow her to appear and testify before the commission and provide all of the pertinent information.
A few comments are in order for your consideration.
1.) I requested the Arpaio investigation and it officially began mid September, 2011. The investigation has only been underway for 20 months. Within 6 months after I was notified that the investigation would be done with “the utmost diligence” there was a finding of probable cause that crimes were committed. There has been no criminal complaint filed since March of 2012. That’s 14 months!
2.) The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Cold Case Posse is a non profit corporation and Zullo is listed as a Director by the Arizona Corporation Commission. As I understand it, when you send in your tax deductible contributions to the Cold Case Posse, that is a separate organization. The money, as I understand it, goes to the Volunteer Cold Case Posse, and not to Sheriff Arpaio or his office.
3.) As I understand it, the investigation done be the Cold Case Posse belongs to the Cold Case Posse, not Sheriff Arpaio. It is Zullo’s work product to use as he sees fit. That is evident from the e-book that Zullo & Corsi authored with an introduction by Sheriff Arpaio. My opinion is that if another book is to be published,it will most likely be done prior to any further release of additional investigative materials. As I understand it, it’s been said to be Zullo’s work product and he can do with it what he will. If the next 3 to 6 month delay is simply to write a book, it will be extremely disappointing and people will have a right to be more than mortified.
4.) A criminal complaint needs to be immediately filed with the appropriate authorities in my opinion. This does not look good and time is short.
, I’ve worked with numerous Muslim organizations as well. And every single application of a Muslim nonprofit has gone through the IRS, with less scrutiny. Of course, they still did get scrutiny– after all, Islamophobia is still pretty rampant everywhere and it’s inaccurate to say that they got a free pass. But truth be told, they never got a 10-page questionnaire on each and every one of their grantees.
Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama?
I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the donors for sheriff Arpaio and citizens of Maricopa county, AZ.
Why so? Because Arpaio already announced that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, however he is not willing to file a criminal complaint, as he is supposed to as the chief law enforcement officer of the Maricopa County.
WND, which is a big backer for Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman is talking about an appeal in the Supreme court of AL. first, as WND had a 50/50 split of donations with Kreep there is a high probability that WND and possibly Western journalism connected to WND and possibly PPSimmons got financial compensation from arpaio or his team, either got payment for advertising and fundraising or an outright percentage of donations received. If this is the case, their reporting is highly biased.
Now, as i said before, I really hope that the Supreme Court of AL will rule for the plaintiffs, however even if this appeal is granted in half a year or so, it will not make any difference, as the plaintiffs asked the Secretary of State of Al to ask the Department of Health of HI for a certified copy of Obama’s BC. All HI will do, is certify another copy of the same forgery, of the same computer generated forgery and you are in square one.
On the other hand there is a way to proceed immediately with the criminal complaint.
As I said, for nearly 3 years Arpaio and Zullo were making press conferences saying that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now after 3 years of raising money for their alleged criminal instigation they are refusing to file a criminal complaint, saying that they do not have jurisdiction to file, even though they have 100% proof that Obama’s BC is a forgery.
So, we are seeing the same passing the buck, same kicking the can.
What can be done? People who donated to Arpaio have now all the power and all the leverage. They can demand that Arpaio file his findings or they will file a legal action against Arpaio and seek 2 things:
1. An injunction, an order of specific performance, a writ of mandamus from the court ordering Arpaio to file this criminal complaint with proper prosecutors.
2. refund of all the donations due to lack of performance and due to solicitation of donations under false pretenses.
What is happening now is that Arpaio is afraid of Obama, just like judges are afraid when they claim that they have no jurisdiction, however in this situation Arpaio will be afraid of the donors more than he will be afraid of Obama.
Why so?
Normally law enforcement officer has a prosecutorial discretion, however the discretion is whether there is enough evidence to convict. When Arpaio stated that Obama’s BC ia a 100% forgery, then it is beyond discretion.
In this situation Obama does not have any any cards in his deck, however the people hold all the aces.
Obama will not be a defendant in this case and he will not be able to bring his attorneys to challenge on his behalf. This will be a private action, so Arpaio will have to respond personally. This will give a lot of publicity to the issue of Obama’s forged IDs and Obama will not be able to do anything about it.
I know that Arpaio is afraid that Obama will retaliate against him, however what can Obama do?
1. If Arpaio thinks that Obama might refile his law suit against Arpaio for violation of civil rights of Hispanics this will not happen, as it will be a very obvious retaliation. The feds dismissed their case against Arpaio last August saying that there was not enough evidence. So what will the feds say? Will they say that they had an understanding that they will dismiss their case against Arpaio and Arpaio will never file his criminal complaint against Obama? They can’t say that, they will have to stay quiet.
2. I don’t know if Arpaio received any financial considertion not to file a criminal complaint against Obama, to say that he has no jurisdiction after nearly 3 years of criminal investigation and after receiving millions in donations for this criminal investigation I hope that there was no financial consideration. But if arguendo, one were to believe that there was some type of a consideration, what will Obama do? Do you think he file file a law suit saying “I want my money back?” He can’t.
3. Obama is now weakened and his henchmen in IRS and DOJ are weakened by scandals. We are getting stronger.
So, please, if you are a donor to Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ, demand a meeting and demand that he stop the nonsense. He is a chief law enforcement officer of his county. People turned to him as a law enforcement officer. You do not enforce the law by doing press conferences and just talking to people. You enforce the law by filing a criminal complaint. Please, keep up the pressure and tell Arpaio that after he stated that Obama’s BC is a 100%forgery, he, as a chief law enforcement officer, has a duty to file a criminal complaint that fraud was committed and that Obama ran for office in his jurisdiction using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a proof of his identity. Anybody else would be in prison for that and so should Obama. Tell Arpaio that if he does not file a criminal complaint and show a copy of the signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint, donors will file a complaint against Arpaio for:
1. soliciting and accepting donations under the false pretenses
2. misappropriation of donations.
3. violation of oath of office
4. denial of honest services under the color of authority
5. deprivation of civil right to a lawful law enforcement, redress of grievances, egual protection under the color of authority.
Demand that Arpaio and Zullo file the criminal complaint ASAP. You have the most leverage: use it or lose.
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425. (redacted report is being posted on the public docket, unredacted report is being filed under seal)
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database is a database which provides information to licensed debt collector, investigators and attorneys. It provides a collection of data readily available in public records. by entering a specific Social Security number one can find names of individuals who used this Social Security number according to public records. Aforementioned report is being provided with an accompanying affidavit of a professional debt collector Albert Hendershot, who under the penalty of perjury attests to its authenticity.
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Part of the new information is 1940 census released to the public in 2011. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned record is relevant for the request for the judicial notice as it shows that
1. Harrison J Bounel born in 1890 used Social Security number 042-68-4425
2. Barack Obama used Social Security number 042-68-4425 as well.
Official E-Verify and SSNVS reports attached herein show that 042-68-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, therefore by process of elimination it was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel. Since Harrison J. Bounel was born in 1890 according to 1940 census (attached to the motion) based on 120 year rule, the SS-5 for SSN 042-68-4425 should be released under FOIA 5U.S. 552
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
Beforeitsnews.com, a highly travelled web site, removed from their web site an interview by Carl Gallops (PPSimmons), where Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo made ad hominem attacks on me and defamed me. I am asking the editors of other publications who re-posted this interview to do the same. I believe that Carl Gallops needs to remove this interview as well, issue an apology to me and respond to the public, whether he received any financial consideration from Mike Zullo, Sheriff Arpaio, Cold Case posse or affiliated entities for fundraising for them and attacks on me.
Of course one of the insinuations by Gallops,is that I am somehow helping Obama by demanding that Arpaio file a criminal complaint.
As these were professional attacks on me, I m responding:
let me remind you that in the past 5 years some 45 licensed attorneys filed legal challenges against Obama. Out of 45 only 2 attorneys: myself and Attorney Klayman continue the fight. If you count all the challenges and all the cases in the courts of appeals and challenges in front of elections commissions, I had some 40 cases. Mr. Klayman has only 2, both of which were dismissed by the lower courts and they are now being appealed.
In terms of my cases, 2 were not dismissed yet by the lower courts. One of the cases that is still going on, is a case in MS, where RICO (racketeering) cause of action is filed by me against Obama and his accomplices.
In terms of other cases, not relating to Obama, I had 6 figure settlements in my favor and large, including 6 figure judgments made in my favor.
Nobody won cases against Obama, as they were dismissed on technicalities: lack of standing and lack of jurisdiction, judges are simply looking for excuses as they are afraid to touch Obama.
Carl Gallops is stating that professionals no longer work with me. This is not true. In terms of professionals and investigators, I am still working with the same investigators: former Scotland Yard elite anti-organized crime and anti communist proliferation officer Neil Sanke, retired intelligence officer Pamela Barnett, investigator Albert Hendershot, former NSA employee Paul Irey, scanning expert Douglad Vogt, NATO relational data analyst George Collins and many others.
The oly witness that did not testify when asked in Indiana case, was former Deportation Officer John Sampson. This happened because of the direct interference, when Corsi, Arpaio and Zullo inviting him to the ColdCassePosse meeting, Arpaio deputized him to be a part of the criminal case, asked him not to testify for me, because of the ongoing criminal case and only in the last couple of days Arpaio through his de facto spokesperson Carl Gallops admitted that he is not intending to file a criminal case because he believes that he has no jurisdiction and never had any jurisdiction to file a criminal case. Sampson believed that Arpaio will file a criminal case. He admitted on the radio that three of them: Arpaio, Zullo and Sampson made an agreement not to comply with the court subpoenas in my cases and not to appear at trial. Other witnesses appeared at trial. Sadly, after witnesses appeared and were deemed to be experts, Judge Reid ruled that there was no jurisdiction and she retroactively vacated the trial which already took place. Jerome Corsi, Joseph Farah, and other reporters from WND did not publish a word about this trial in Indiana, which was retroactively vacated. I suspect that they did not publish anything about my cases in the past year and a half because I was not sharing donations and not paying large mounts for advertising and promotion at WND. I suspect that WND received large amounts in advertizing fees or sharing of donations for promoting Arpaio.
To: Drew Zahn <dzahn@wnd.com>
Sent: Sat, May 18, 2013 10:27 pm
Subject: Fwd: Shocking Accusations
Drew,
Shocking information!
Should be front page news….Yes?
But wait…is there some truth to what Dr. Taitz is describing? Does she also wear a tinfoil hat?
Hmmmm…Seems like Mr. Corsi, who like you Drew, was a contributor/reporter for WND was a big supporter of the Arpaio/Zullo episode?
We are all waiting for you to expose the truth on this……
Arnie
Arnie:
Would you forward me a copy of Arpaio/Zullo’s complaint to the FBI? Does it exist? No?
Is there a copy of their formal complaint to Congress? No?
Did Obama and enablers not commit a crime against the people of Maricopa County and Arizona? If so, where are the complaints to AG and Maricopa prosecutor?
Adam Kokesh arrested at Philly “Smoke Down”
Submitted by JO4RP on Sat, 05/18/2013 – 18:05
in
Activism & Events
Adam has been arrested and is in jail in Philly… I can personally testify that he hadn’t even smoked yet… everyone please phone bomb the philly police and jail phone lines and demand adam be released amd able to make contact with us… other protesters were actually smoking and released after arrest but adam was taken away in a white chevy suburban… phone bomb them now!!! — Brother Lucas
From Facebook: Joe Pauli A nice gentleman answered the phone and asked me if this was about that “Adam Coken fellow” to which I replied yes, and he gave me “The Roundhouse” phone number to call. 215-686-1234
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
Sixteenth Census of the United States of America 1940
Population schedule
State of New York,
County -The Bronx,
Ward of city-7A-B
915 Daly Ave
Apartment 311
SD No 24 E.D. No-3-1199
sheet No 13B
Enumerated Apri 16, 1940
Released by the U.S. Census in 2011
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Official census information is:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Aforementioned report is easily obtainable from the U.S. Census
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Part of the new information is 1940 census released to the public in 2011. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned Census report attached herein as exhibit 1 shows
that Harry Bounel immigrant from Russia, 50 years old at the time of the 1940 census resided as a lodger at Apartment 311 of 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, New York.
This information is relevant to the case at hand since Mr. Bounel was 50 years old at the time of the official 1940 census, it means that he was born in 1890 and he would be 123 years old today and according to120 year rule of the SSA, his SS-5 has to be released under FOIA 5U.S. 552.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Sixteenth Census of the United States of America 1940
Population schedule
State of New York,
County -The Bronx,
Ward of city-7A-B
915 Daly Ave
Apartment 311
SD No 24 E.D. No-3-1199
sheet No 13B
Enumerated Apri 16, 1940
Released by the U.S. Census in 2011
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Chief FOIA Officer Report for 2011
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Social security administration Chief FOIA Officer report is
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
Aforementioned report is posted on the official web site of the Social Security administration www.ssa.gov
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
the report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
SSA Chief Foia Officer report in question in Section I, (1) (c) states
We have revisited longstanding decisions regarding the withholding of certain frequently requested data, to determine if our recommended guidance is still applicable and reflects the presumption of openness. For instance, we issued new guidance for disclosing extremely aged individuals’ original Social Security Applications (SS-5) when our records do not indicate a date of death. We developed a new policy that establishes a “120 year rule” and assumes that an individual is alive unless their birth date exceeds 120 years or we have proof of the individual’s death. This new policy enabled us to release more information and potentially reduced requests on appeal.
Since Harrison J. Bounel was born in 1890, he would be 123 years old and according to aforementioned 120 year rule SSA was obligated to release his SS0-5 under FOIA 5US 552.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of the SSA Chief FOIA Officer report
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
In response to my article Carl Gallops, the De Facto spokesperson for Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo is saying the following:
“2. Zullo and Arpaio have filed no criminal charges because it is not within their jurisdiction to do so. Taitz should know this. Any first year law student or police academy attendee knows this. The citizens of Maricopa County felt they had been defrauded in an election – they asked their Sheriff to investigate. He did through the CCP. They discovered that a document connected with the President of the United States had been forged, fabricated, and was 100% fraudulent. Arpaio has no authority to march to the White House and make arrests of the perpetrators and accomplices. However, Congress, the Federal Courts, Federal prosecutors, and Federal law enforcement do have that authority and responsibility.”
This sounds even more egregious.
a. Actually, Arpaio has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint and I will explain further on why. But if Arpaio and Zullo believed that they have no jurisdiction, why didn’t they state so to the donors from day one? They collected reported 7 million dollars from the public, most of the money donated to Arpaio came from outside AZ because the public believed that Arpaio will file the criminal complaint against Obama, they made multiple radio appearances claiming that they are conducting a criminal investigation and a criminal case.
I had 4 cases, where there were actual hearings in trial courts: in GA, MS, IN, CA, where I subpoenaed them to appear. They could testify in trial courts and they refused to comply with subpoenas. Moreover, my strongest witness in GA was a retired deportation officer John Sampson. after Sampson testified in GA Arpaio, Corsi and Zullo invited him to travel to AZ to the cold case posse meeting. They paid for his airfare to AZ. There Arpaio deputized Sampson as a member of the Cold Case posse. Later on Peter Boyles show, on the air, on the record, John Sampson stated that they asked him not to testify in my cases, as he is now a part of a criminal investigation. Sampson stated on the air that he and Arpaio and Zullo made an agreement not to comply with the subpoenas in the court case in IN because of an ongoing criminal case. It means that they actually interfered with my witness in a case, claiming that his testimony would jeopardize the criminal investigation.
So who can file a criminal complaint, which is the result of a criminal investigation that they claim to have been conducting for nearly three years and solicited donations for nearly 3 years?
Now they are saying that it is up to the U.S. Congress, however the U.S. Congress cannot file a criminal complaint. They can impeach, but they can’t file a criminal complaint.
Next, they are saying judges: yet again, the judges can only hear the complaint that was presented to them.
Who files a complaint with the judges, with the courts?
Well, if it is a state court, then the District Attorney and Attorney General file a criminal complaint.
If it is a federal court, than the U.S. attorney, the federal prosecutor will file the complaint.
Who submits the results of his investigation and the complaint to the prosecutors? the sheriff.
So, you see even a rookie officer or a first year law student know that what Arpaio and Zullo are saying now through their de facto spokesperson and chief fundraiser Carl Gallops is simply not true. For nearly three years they have been conducting a criminal investigation. They have a duty to submit the results of their investigation to the prosecutors. As the issue involves both federal and state officials, they have a duty to submit their complaint to both state and federal prosecutors.
b. As you can see, more pressure we are applying more truth is coming out. Now Arpaio and Zullo are admitting that they are not planning to file a criminal complaint and that they solicited donations for nearly 3 years while knowing that they will never file a criminal complaint. In my opinion this behavior is even more egregious than the behavior of corrupt judges, corrupt prosecutors and corrupt congressmen. All of them have been kicking the can, passing the buck and refusing to take any action, but Arpaio and Zullo collected donations for nearly three years, stating that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now they are saying that they believe that they never had any jurisdiction.
This would be akin to a lawyer collecting fees from a client for nearly three years only to tell the client that he will not file the case because he is not licensed in this state. If a case like this would be in front of Arpaio, he would file a criminal complaint for fraud against such lawyer, for accepting money from a client under false pretenses.
c. Moreover, during CPAC convention I talked to Carl Gallops and I specifically asked him, why didn’t he question Zullo, as to why the criminal complaint was not filed. Gallops told me that Zullo told him that the complaint was filed. When Zullo joined us, I questioned Zullo: isn’t it true that you and Arpaio never filed a criminal complaint. Zullo responded: Arpaio went to talk to AG, but AG was not interested in filing this case. I responded that this is not a meeting between buddies, regardless of whether AG is interested or not, Arpaio has a duty to file the complaint. Zullo responded that they are still investigating and that the complaint will be filed in 3 months or so. So, actually until now I believed that they will file the criminal complaint, Gallops believed that they will file the criminal complaint, the public believed it, as Zullo kept saying so. Only now, when Zullo said that the document is 100% forged and nearly 3 years past and hardly any evidence was actually discovered by the cold case posse on top of what was given to them to begin with, the public started demanding answers, why are they not filing the criminal complaint. So now, after nearly 3 years of PR, interviews, and fundraising suddenly Arpaio and Zullo changed their tune and started claiming that they do not have jurisdiction.
Please, keep up the pressure. Arpaio definitely has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. He obtained evidence of forgery, he claims that Obama’s birth certificate is 100% forged, his selective service certificate is 100% forged. He has evidence that Obama defrauded the citizens of Maricopa county AZ in placing his name on the ballot fraudulently and establishing the eligibility and identity based on forged IDs. He has to file a criminal complaint with the state and federal prosecutors. You, members of the public, and particularly donors have a very serious case. You have to keep up the pressure until Arpaio and Zullo file a criminal complaint with the DA, AG and U.S attorney.
2 years ago Sheriff Arpaio held a press conference stating that the tea party contacted him, advised him that fraud was committed in Maricopa county, Obama ran for office in Maricopa county based on fraud and using forged IDs, they were seeking a criminal complaint by Arpaio, as a duly elected sheriff, to be filed against Obama and his accomplices before the 2012 election.
Arpaio and his right hand cold case investigator Mike Zullo spent 2 years doing PR, regurgitating information provided to them by me, by Chief investigator of the U.S. Coast guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, by Paul Irey, by Douglas Vogt and others, held fund raisers and never filed a criminal complaint.
Just recently they were saying: wait 3 more month, 6 more month. Now they are saying that Arpaio has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint at all. Are you kidding me? They did 2 years of investigation without any jurisdiction? Really? This is insane.
Let’s take recent conviction of 3 Democratic party operatives in Indiana. They forged signatures of voters, a criminal complaint was filed against them, there was a criminal trial, they were convicted and they are going to prison. That is exactly what is supposed to be happening with Obama and his accomplices, Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint. Every sheriff around the country needs to file the criminal complaint. Fraud and tender of forged IDs happened in his jurisdiction and in every jurisdiction. People donated to Arpaio because they believed that he, as a duly elected sheriff, will file a criminal complaint. He did not do this.
There is an interesting coincidence. In August of 2012 the feds dismissed their law suit against Arpaio, where they claimed that Arpaio violated civil rights of Hispanics. At the same time Arpaio lowered his visibility and never filed a criminal complaint. Since around the same time only his right hand Zullo is doing interviews, mostly with Carl Gallops.
It is a legitimate question to ask: was there a quid pro quo, was there an understanding that Obama drops his criminal complaint against Arpaio and Arpaio never files his criminal complaint against Obama, in spite of all the evidence???
As members of the public confronted Gallops and Zullo, and demanded answers, Zullo and Gallops tried to attack me, claiming that the fact that I demand that Arpaio file a criminal complaint based on evidence gathered, means that I am somehow helping Obama. Really? Telling the Sheriff to do his job and file a criminal complaint, when he says he has all the evidence of forgery, means that I am helping Obama? How does that work?
Moreover, as Zullo tried to attack me, he admitted that Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint as people expected. He stated at the interview held yesterday that there will not be a complaint under the color of the Sheriff of Maricopa county, but Zullo will write and will tell all because it is his work product.
You say what?
When Zullo is saying that it will not be done under the color of Sheriff of Maricopa county, it means that Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa county, will not do his job as a sheriff and will not file a criminal complaint. When Zullo is saying that he will tell all, it means that it will be another book, tell all book, another moneymaker.
Don’t we have a ton of books already? When people were donating to Arpaio, did they do this so Mike Zullo will write a book and make money on a book, or did they donate so that Arpaio do his investigation and file a criminal complaint? You tell me, what is the answer?
Are people convicted based on writing a book or are they convicted based on a criminal complaint? And what did Zullo mean by work product? Did I and others forward to Arpaio all the evidence, so that Zullo will write a book? People provide evidence to the police and sheriff, so that the police and sheriff file a complaint, not write some tell all story. Evidence is presented for purposes of prosecution, not for profiteering by the investigators, this is a total misuse of the witness testimony, of evidence. It means that evidence was accepted under false pretenses, it means that donations were accepted under false pretenses. If Arpaio thought that he did not have jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint against Obama, he needed to write to the witnesses and experts right away and state that he has no jurisdiction to file a complaint and he should have advised the witnesses, who has jurisdiction.
Arpaio and Zullo had to refund all of the donations given to Arpaio and to the cold case posse and they were supposed to state right then and there, 2 years ago, that Sheriff Arpaio believes that he has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Otherwise, they mislead the public and they collected donations under false pretenses, giving members of the public an impression that Sheriff Arpaio has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Moreover, while we are on a subject of donations, I personally talked of Joseph Farah of WND, he told me that he has a deal with Gary Kreep, where 50% of donations given by the public to Kreep to file legal actions, where paid by Kreep to Joseph Farah/ WND in exchange for advertising and promotion. Farah told me this as he was hoping for the same deal with me. It is a legitimate question for the public to ask: is there a similar deal between Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo? Is there any arrangement, where Carl Gallops is receiving a part of donations given by the public to Arpaio and Zullo and Cold Case Posse in exchange of promotion of Zullo’s books and solicitation of donations and for personal ad hominem attacks on me? Similarly, did WND, Joseph Farah and Jerome Corsi on one side and Sheriff Arpaio, Mike Zullo and attorney they are working with on the other side, make a deal similar to Kreep’s? If there was such a deal, it will explain, why affidaivt of Mike Zullo was used, even though it is a hearsay, it would explain why this affidavit contained repeated references to Jerome Corsi, but no reference to any of actual investigators who submitted evidence to Arpaio, no mention of Chief Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, no mention of Paul Irey, Linda Bentley, Douglas Vogt and many others. This would explain, why from January 2012 WND and Carl Galllops were repeatedly reporting on a couple of cases where Larry Klayman was involved as an attorney, even though both cases in FL and AL were dismissed by the presiding judges immediately, and they are not reporting on some 10 cases brought by me and particularly they are not reporting on an ongoing case in MS, where a RICO (racketeering complaint against Obama and his accomplices was filed by me) and even the case in Ca, which was not formally dismissed yet. It is a reasonable question to ask, as it relates to credibility of reporting: every member of the public should demand answers from Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi: was their any payment made, was there any split of danataions given by the public to Sheriff Arpaio, cold Case Posse, Investigator Zullo, attorney Klayman to WND, Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi, PPsimmons and other members of the media? If any split of donations was made, if any money changed hands, this is traceable. Since there is a history of such split between Kreep and WND, it is a reasonable question to ask and the public needs an answer. If payments were made, the public will make its own conclusions to the credibility of statements and reason for lopsided reporting.
Carl Gallops attacked me because I was sanctioned by a corrupt judge, who tried to intimidate and stop me from proceeding with actual legal actions, when a corrupt judge Clay D. Land claimed that it is frivolous to bring a legal action in regards to forged IDs of a Commander in Chief on behalf of the members of the military who are told to risk their lives and take lives based on orders of the criminal who is sitting in the position of the Commander in Chief with all forged IDs.
Yes, Carl Gallops, Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio were never sanctioned, abused, attacked and persecuted by corrupt judges because they never filed a complaint. Where is the complaint from the former police officer Carl Gallops? Where is the complaint from Sheriff Arpaio? Where is the complaint from a former police officer and chief investigator of Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo? They do not exist. When you do nothing, you risk nothing, you surely will not be attacked and persecuted. This is the difference between people who are on the front line, like myself, and people who are just doing press conferences and fund raisers and announcing their upcoming books for early publicity.
Gallops and Zullo attacked me for not winning a case against Obama. Well there were 45 licensed attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs, who filed cases and did not win, none of the cases were heard on the merits, because as we see it vividly now, we live in a corrupt regime, similar to the Soviet Union. Not one single judge ever ruled against Stalin or Mao or Hitler. This happened not because of civil rights attorneys like myself who actually filed complaints, this happened because of corrupt and spineless sheriffs, governmental officials and sheriffs who had all the evidence against Stalin and Mao and Hitler and never did their job and never filed their complaints.
It is interesting that Carl Gallops is a former police officer in FL and Mike Zullo is a former police officer in NJ. They actually know what to do. If Arpaio is refusing to do his job, they themselves can file a complaint and actually present all the evidence to the District Attorneys. I submitted all the evidence to the District Attorney of Orange County, CA, Tony Rackaucas and I actually posted a certified mail receipt. I, also, submitted a criminal complaint to the District Attorney of Los Angeles County , CA, providing evidence that CA Attorney Scott J. Tepper, personal attorney for Barack Obama and Dem party and a part time investigator with CA Bar, submitted to court in MSin my case a forged birth certificate for Obama and sought to obtain a judicial notice that this birth certificate is authentic, when he had evidence that it is a forgery. I filed a similar complaint with the District Attorney in Jackson, MS. Actually I ask all of my supporters to call the District Attorneys in Jackson MS, Los Angeles CA, Orange County CA and demand that those District Attorneys respond to the public, why didn’t they file a criminal case yet, what are they waiting for, how much damage should be done to the country by usurper Obama until they do their job and file a criminal complaint with the criminal court.
I did my job. Why aren’t Arpaio, Zullo and Gallops submitting a criminal complaint to their DAs? why aren’t they doing their job? Additionally, District Attorney will not accept 56 pages of hearsay. A district Attorney will tell Mike Zullo and Carl Gallops: are you kidding me? You are submitting 56 pages of hearsay which is not admissible in court. You can’t say: our investigators found this. I need the actual written sworn affidavits of those investigators and experts.
District Attorney will demand from Zullo, Arpaio and Gallops something specific, something that I’ve already submitted time and again to court. For example: in his 56 page affidaivit Zullo is stating: our investigators found that Obama’s selective service certificate is a forgery. District Attorney or judge will state: where is the specifics, who is the investigator, I need his name, I need to know how did he reach this conclusion. That is exactly what I provided time and again: I submitted to court an affidavit of a retired Chef Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, who stated: I am a retired Chef Investigator of the Special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast guard, I personally examined Obama’s Selective Service certificate, I found this evidence of forgery, I provided this information to the sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona, so that he will file a criminal complaint. Next, Paul Irey provided testimony for me in Indiana: it stated, I am Paul Irey, I have 60 year of experience in typesetting, I found this specific evidence of forgery in Obama’s birth certificate. His testimony was admitted by the judge in Indiana, Judge Reid in Indiana already qualified him as an expert. That what was supposed to be done.
Next, Zullo’s claims that he will testify in the Supreme Court of Alabama. Zullo and Arpaio and Gallops know full well that in 99% of the cases in the Supreme Court of any state there is no oral argument at all. If there is an oral argument, it is only about 15 minutes per side and only on the points of law by attorneys, not witnesses. They know that no witness testimony is allowed. So, when Zullo was confronted with this point, when he was questioned, why is he claiming that he will provide testimony in AL, when no testimony is allowed in higher courts, he responded: an attorney in the case in Alabama wants me in court in case there will be an oral argument, but I do not know for what purpose. Really? Zullo is a former police office. He might be a volunteer with this cold case posse, but he used to be a police officer, he knows that the Supreme Court does not allow witness testimony, particularly not a new witness, who did not testify in the lower court, so Zullo is really misleading the public by saying that he will present testimony, when he knows that no witness testimony is allowed in the Supreme Court.
Please, keep up the pressure. Tell Mike Zullo: we did not donate so that you will write a book, we donated so that justice is done. Arpaio has to file a criminal complaint. If Arpaio is not doing his job, you Mike Zullo, as the Chief Investigator of the Cold Case Posse need to file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General, and please, do not file 56 pages of hearsay, which is not an admissible evidence by any judge, please, provide the District Attorney with the actual sworn affidavits of officers and experts who personally examined the evidence. After the criminal complaint against Obama and accomplices is filed with the DA and AG by Arpaio or if he is not doing the job, by Zullo, we the public, will follow up with the District Attorney and we will demand that the District Attorney do his job and file the criminal complaint with the Criminal Court.
Keep up the pressure, we do not need books and publicity, we need to see filed, signed, stamped criminal complaints!!! Don’t attack me, attack Obama and his accomplices with a properly filed criminal complaint!!!
I hope that ORYR (Obama release your records ) web site and PPSuimmons (aka Carl Gallops) and all the other web sites which published a vicious attack on me, show honesty and integrity and publish this rebuttal.
Here is my thought: it might be a coincidence but I am wondering if all 3 scandals going on now, while our ruling criminal enterprise is trying to push for mega amnesty, is too much of a coincidence.
Everyone is now preoccupied with those 3 scandals: Benghazi, IRS, AP, nobody is talking about mega amnesty, about mega robbery of Americans of their jobs and their benefits with the help of the best puppets money can buy.
Bilderberg mafia and its related entities tried to push for amnesty by bringing in young and cute Baba #2, Rubio, he was hard at work trying to sell us damaged goods like a used car salesman, but people were not buying. Most Americans do not want illegals taking their jobs and benefits, so our ruling mafia decided to go to plan B- a decoy. They came up not with one, but with 3 decoys. So now nobody is watching. It is like when a bunch of thugs are sent to steal some piece of garbage in the lobby of a museum and while the police is preoccupied, aces of thievery are stealing a Rembrandt. That is what is going on. Yes, there will be some results to these scandals. The highest probability in terms of the end result, is that a few low level employees will be sacrificed If need be, the ruling criminal oligarchy might even sacrifice Obama, they will give him a card out of jail in the form of a pardon and he will play golf for the rest of his life somewhere in HI or in Mombasa. But at the end of the day, if you are not vigilant and not mobilized, the ruling mafia will pull what it craves the most: mega amnesty, mega heist. Dumb GOP congressmen will sell their own seats, believing that stealing American jobs will make illegals vote for them in the future. This will not happen, as poor illegals will vote for the ones who give them more freebies: Dems.
Your biggest ace in the deck: how can you promise us that you will E-Verify millions illegals when you are criminally complicit in the cover up of Obama’s failed E-verify. Stick my report in their faces, stick Obama’s failed e-Verify. Don’t leave until something gives, until we will find 1 drop of decency in this new Babylon tower of corruption, dirt and bribery called Washington DC.
Inspector General of Social Security Administration
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, MD 21235
Via federal Express
Copy via FAX 410-597-2101
Dear Mr. O’Carroll,
Please find enclosed a copy of the complaint filed with the office of the Inspector General of the Department of Treasury as well as with the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of representatives.
The summary of the complaint is that Mr. Barack Obama has used in his 2009 tax returns a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to an immigrant from Russia Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890, presumed to be deceased with no surviving relatives. I filed multiple complaints with the SSA and even traveled to the CT office and discussed the matter with employees. On March 26, 2013 I traveled to Stamford Connecticut where the number in question was issued and met with employees of the Social Security Administration: Representative Madeline Mercado, Assistant Manager Mrs. Sheridan (she refused to give her first name) and General Manager Mrs. Booker (she refused to give her first name). I demanded an explanation, why SSA is refusing to release the SS-5 for an extremely aged individual over 120 years old. I was told that this is a protected number and local office has no access to the information. I was shown a computer screen that stated that in case of any inquiries in regards to this number, employees of the SSA are supposed to call a specific number at the SSA Headquaters. (it was a 410- MD number). So, there is clearly a gate keeper at this number. This gatekeeper happens to be one Dawn Wiggins, as all the correspondence and FOIA requests in regards to the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which are sent from different parts of the country by different individuals and investigators seeking information on Harrison Bounel and Barack Obama, are always being handled by one SSA employee, Dawn Wiggins, while FOIA requests in regards to other Social Security numbers are handled by different employees. I was advised that General Manager Booker and Assistant Manager Sheridan contacted the headquarters of the Social Security administration and I will receive a response from the headquarters. Over 30 days passed and I did not receive any information. I demand investigation of this flagrant Social security fraud and actions by Ms. Wiggins, who clearly knows that Mr. Obama is using a stolen Social Security number.
Moreover, according to a sworn affidavit of licensed investigator Susan Daniels attached herein, according to national databases at some point Mr. Obama also used Social Security number 485-40-5154 issued to Lucille Ballantyne, mother of former Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration Harry C Ballantyne. I called Mr. Ballantyne and inquired if he knew that according to National databases Mr. Obama used the Social Security number of his deceased mother. Reaction of Mr. Ballantyne was highly suspect. Any individual confronted with such information would have shown signs of disbelief, anger, however Mr. Ballantyne was not surprised, and he laughed and stated:”They have no rights”. I asked him:”Who has no rights?” He stated “Dead people have no rights”. When I tried to ask more questions, Mr. Ballantyne stated that he cannot talk to me anymore. I believe that Mr. Ballantyne is the SSA employee, who is responsible for the change of the information in the databases and needs to be investigated. I demand computer tracing of any changes in the computer file of Harry J. Bounel to ascertain which SSA employees were involved in this most egregious case of SSA fraud and identity theft. While computer records can be easily changed, the original wet ink SS-5 application cannot be changed, which explains why Social Security administration is refusing to provide SS-5 for Harrison J. Bounel, even though he would be 123 years old, if he would be alive today and according to SSA own “120 year rule” this SS-5 application has to be released. I demand release of SS-5 of the SSN 042-68-4425 for Harrison J. Bounel.
CONCLUSION: Based on the attached complaint and exhibits I demand an immediate release of SS-5 of SSN 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, as well as investigation of Barack Obama for his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and immediate investigation of SSA employees Dawn Wiggins, former Chief Actuary Harry C. Ballantyne and former Commissioner Michael Astrue for criminal cover up of Social Security fraud and in being complicit in the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and the position of the Commander in Chief by Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, who is using a fraudulently obtained Social Security number.
Respectfully,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Cc. Judiciary Committee US House of Representatives
cc. Oversight Committee U.S. House of Representatives
Please, see for yourselves: Mike Zullo’s affidavit is only an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief by the Democratic Party of AL. I was correct in what I was saying.
This affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of the case in the lower court, it is not an exhibit to the Appellate Brief or a reply to the Appellate Brief. Most courts of Appeals or higher courts disregard most of the Amices Curiae, they have absolutely no duty to even look at them. For example Lucas Smith filed a Amicus Cuiae in this case, nobody even bothers to respond to it. So, if the Supreme Court of Alabama decides to simply disregard this Amicus Curiae by the Dem party or strike it from the record, they will also disregard the motion asking to disregard it and an exhibit, affidavit of Mike Zullo, attached to it.
The Supreme Court of AL has a duty to look only at the lower court case, what was filed there, Appellant’s brief, Appellee’s brief and the reply by the Appellant. Affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of any of these documents and cannot be considered and will be disregarded by the court just as an exhibit filed by the Alabama Democratic party will be disregarded, as those are new exhibits filed after the case was dismissed in the lower court. The Supreme court, which is reviewing the appeal, needs to rule based on the evidence that existed in front of the judge which reviewed the case in the lower court, to see if this judge made an error. I hope they rule for the plaintiffs/Appellants, however Mike Zullo’s affidavit will have no bearing on this decision. We do not know how the court will rule. I do not know how long does it take for this court to come up with a decision. (can someone check how long does it take for the Supreme Court to rule on average?) In the 9th Circuit it took the court nearly a year from the time it was filed to come to the decision. I filed my case in Judge Carter’s court On January 21, 2009. Decision by the 9th circuit came sometime in the end of 2011.
As I stated that even if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs and reverses the decision of the lower court, still there is the same problem. Plaintiffs asked for the certified copy of the birth certificate. Look up what the Dem party of MS did in my case in MS: they provided the court with a certified copy of another copy of the same forgery. By the way in MS they made some changes to this forgery according to sworn affidavits. So, what do you do then? The obots will say: you wanted a certified copy, here you go, here is the certified copy. Obama will declare this as yet another victory. He will state: they asked for the certified copy, they got the certified copy, case closed.
For that reason for the hundred and first time I am explaining that Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo need to do their job. Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint in his county, where he is a sheriff, in Maricopa County, AZ, he needs to file a signed, stamped complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General. He needs to go to the judge on duty and seek a subpoena for production of the original (wet ink) birth certificate , original Selective Service registration and original SS-5 for the CT SSN Obama is using. Either Sheriff or District attorney can appear before a judge in HI and in DC and seek a reciprocal local subpoena based on a subpoena issued by the judge in the sister jurisdiction in AZ. When they have the local subpoenas, they need to bring the document experts and compare Obama’s originals (if they exist) to the other similar documents from the same time period, which are kept on file. With the reports of the experts the District Attorney or Attorney General of the state can file a criminal complaint in court. That’s what needs to be done now, immediately. Please, call Arpaio and tell him that he needs to do his job as a duly elected sheriff and file the proper criminal complaint with his District Attorney and Attorney General, not wait another half a year or a year for the Supreme court of Alabama to rule and in the best case scenario get another certified copy of the same forgery as they already filed in Taitz et al v Democratic Party of MS, Obama, Astrue, Onaka (this case is still going on, no decision from the District court yet). Tell Arpaio to file the criminal complaint ASAP!!!
Mitzi posts as Black Butterfly, Bilderberg Butterfly and GeorgetownJD at fogbow and obamaconspiracies. She uses Bibikimmers at Gretawire, pretending to be black using every stereotype imaginable. She had an administrative suspension out of Coudersport, Pennsylvania. She is known to create a conservative identity to get close to bloggers with the hope of obtaining personal information. Is this used for more persecution by the IRS?
Better watch your tail Scott; you and “Jack” have crossed legal boundaries that could cost both of you your professions. You have a lot more to lose than just your profession since you weren’t born here. This is what happens when you and your brain trust start with people you have no idea who they are. I’ll be there to wave good bye.
13-15627 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”
Inbox
x
ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov
10:22 AM (10 minutes ago)
to me
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 05/15/2013 at 10:22:08 AM PDT and filed on 05/15/2013
Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SLJ): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order). Moreover, a review of the district court docket shows that a final order granting appellees’ motions to dismiss has not yet been filed. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [8629706] (WL)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
George Michael Waters
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document Description: Main Document Original Filename: 13-15627.pdf Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=05/15/2013] [FileNumber=8629706-0] [14d9b6473645e071011c4929b66ea4cd6a7ffc5a488abd9b2bfe7b62662553f4ce04ceda47f9ce04622488302896d6fe33ae83ac0e5ac3e960c06d2bf0ba2ee0]]
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
A federal judge ruled in 2010 that the JusticeDepartment did not need to notify Fox News Channel reporter 
Atlas Shrugs
Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Post & Email
Rick Baker Show
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
The People's Senator. 
