Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 1 Comment
Submitted on 2013/12/10 at 2:54 pm
I was banned today on Facebook for 12 hours for posting a comment about Obama meeting with Supreme Court first day in office when you had pending cases. Nazi Germany we are almost there!
more tampering with my computers and my web site. Temporarily I do not have access to document library and I am unable to attach PDF files to posts. I reported this to my provider and another tech support person and I hope it will be resolved soon
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 3 Comments
Press release: Obama files yet another request for more time to answer to the Appeal filed by Attorney Taitz on behalf of several minor presidential candidates
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 4 Comments
Press release: Obama files yet another request for more time to answer to the Appeal filed by Attorney Taitz on behalf of several minor presidential candidates.
13-16359 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “File a Motion”
2:26 PM (0 minutes ago)
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
The following transaction was entered on 12/10/2013 at 2:26:46 PM PST and filed on 12/10/2013
|Case Name:||James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al|
Filed (ECF) Appellees Electoral College, Barack Obama, President of the Senate and U.S. Congress Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 01/29/2014 at 11:59 pm. Date of service: 12/10/2013.  (EAO)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
George Michael Waters
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Appellees’ Motion for a 30 day Extension in Which to File Answering Brief
Original Filename: ninth circuit motion for extension of time (3).pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=12/10/2013] [FileNumber=8896180-0] [
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 8 Comments
For a memorial service it was a remarkably jovial scene: Barack Obama, David Cameron and Helle Thorning-Schmidt, the Danish prime minister, huddled together for a smart phone photograph.
I can’t believe it is happening to me again. My car dies again. For 2 days certified mechanics at the dealership cannot figure out what is wrong with my car.
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 16 Comments
Motion to for Judge Lamberth to recuse himself, which was submitted on 12.02.2013, was delivered to the USDC, however the clerks do not docket it. Please, call the court and ask to expedite docketing of the motion to recuse Judge Lamberth in Taitz v Donahoe and Williams, dealing with the cover up by the USPS of Obama’s use of a fabricated cancellation postal stamp on his fabricated Selective Service registration
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 4 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
In her capacity as the President of
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General, §
David C. Williams, Inspector General §
for the United States Postal Service §
MOTION TO RECUSE UNDER 28 USC 455
Plaintiff herein, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ respectfully requests honorable Royce Lamberth to recuse himself as a presiding judge in the case at hand and transfer the case to another judge.
28 USC 455 and precedent of Marshall v Jarrico 446 U.S. 238, 242, 100 S. Ct. 161, 642 Ed 2d 182 (1980) will provide for such recusal.
The case at hand deals with the refusal by the Postmaster General and Inspector General for the USPS to provide records under FOIA 5 US 552 Freedom of Information act. The records that are requested relate to a flagrantly forged Selective Service registration of Barack Obama and a flagrantly forged USPS cancellation stamp affixed to it. Fabricated stamp is so laughable that it looks like it was concocted by a mentally challenged five year old or a forger who is legally blind. Sworn affidavit of a former Chief Investigator of the US Coast Guard confirms that the document is altered.
At issue is the fact that this court showed bias in prior relating cases and the plaintiff is fairly sure that this court will show the same bias in the case at hand.
In the prior case of Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 plaintiff provided the court with undeniable legal, competent evidence of Obama using a stolen Social Security number of a resident of Connecticut born in 1890.
In spite of the fact that the plaintiff provided the court with all the evidence that Obama and the Social Security Administration defrauded the court and the nation and improperly withheld the SS-5 application which it was obligated to release, this court chose to ignore all the evidence and to cover it all up. By doing so this court showed bias against the plaintiff and against every US citizen for this matter and in favor of Barack Obama who stole the franchise of the US President with stolen and fabricated IDs.
It is clear that this court will continue showing the same bias in the case at hand and will cover up all evidence of Obama defrauding the nation and of the top governmental officials committing treason and being criminally complicit in the cover up and as such the plaintiff respectfully asks this court to recuse itself and transfer the case to another judge.
Moreover, in this case the defense did not furnish an answer or responsive pleadings for four months, while the defense was served by certified mail and admitted receiving the complaint and summons at DOJ by certified mail. The clerk in charge of all of the receipts of complaints received by certified mail has signed the receipt and Plaintiff provided his signed receipt and similar receipts for other cases, which were signed by the same clerk, Eddy Hase. In his sworn declaration Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel VanHorn admitted to being contacted by this court in regards to lack of an answer to complaint. Such contact by the court represents an impermissible ex-parte communication by the court with the party and it by itself requires Judge Lamberth to recuse himself from the case and transfer the case to another judge, who did not engage in impermissible ex-parte communications with the defense in order to assist the defense and in order not to issue a default judgment for the plaintiff that this court was obligated to issue.
Further, Plaintiff demanded an administrative hearing with the clerk of the DOJ Eddy Hase in order to ascertain whether someone at DOJ told this clerk to “misplace” or destroy the complaint, which was received in July of 2013. The court ignored all evidence of the complaint disappearing at the DOJ, as well as all the evidence in prior cases. This comes on the heels of James Rosen case, where this court allowed spying on FOX reporter James Rosen and even his parents based on a perjured affidavit and kept this subpoena improperly sealed for over a year. Thus, there is a pattern of this court being biased in favor of Obama and his regime, in spite of any and all crimes committed by Obama and his regime against American citizens, and this court shows bias against dissidents and whistleblowers, who blew the whistle on Obama and his regime.
Further on, such transfer of the case is in the best interest of the public at large and the time is of the essence. U.S. citizens deserve better than a thief, who is usurping the U.S. Presidency with a stolen Social Security number and fabricated IDs. National Security and the interests of the U.S. military require release of the records in question and require an end to the cover up. As such, recusal by this court is justified, essential and in the public interest.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §13-cv-1020
Plaintiff, v §
Patrick Donahoe, David Williams § Honorable Royce Lamberth
Certificate of service
I, Lila Dubert, am not a party to the above captioned case, I am over 18 years old and I attest that I served the defendant with attached pleadings by mailing them via first class mail on 12.02.2013 the pleadings attached herein by first class mail to the address of the attorney for the defendant:
US Attorneys’ office
555 Fourth str. NW
Washington DC 20530
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 5 Comments
a judge in Colorado ordered a baker to serve gay couples and produce wedding cakes for them, even though it is against the religious believes of the baker and even though gay marriages are banned in Colorado.
What if tomorrow a priest will refuse to perform a gay ceremony? Will a priest be forced to do so by a judge or will he face penalties and jail for refusing to follow the order of the judge?
What if a Muslim family asks a baker to make a cake for a man and four women getting married, because according to muslim religion a man can marry 4 wives?
Are there situations like these in California and other states? If there are, please, contact me at 949-683-5411 or email@example.com
this needs to be heard by juries of our piers and not by judges who are often politically motivated and do not really represent the people of this nation. we have a judicial tyranny which propes the regime. It is time for the public to regain its’ voice
Steve Stockman is challenging John cornyn for US Senate. so far they both were full of empty talk and hot air. Demand action from them, demand they submit to the judiciary committee actual proposed articles of impeachment based on Obama’s use of bogus IDs and other acts of fraud. If they don’t put their money where their mouth is, they are equally worthless
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | 15 Comments
Update: Attorney Orly Taitz received a call from the U.S. Attorneys’ office stating that they are seeking another extension to answer to the Appellants’ brief in Grinols case
Posted on | December 9, 2013 | 22 Comments
Update: Attorney Orly Taitz received a call from the U.S. Attorneys’ office stating that they are seeking another extension to answer to the Appellants’ brief in Grinols case.
Attorney Orly Taitz responded to the Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Olsen that she will be willing to stipulate to the extension, provided US Attorney Olsen fulfills his duty and forwards to the Federal Grand jury and criminal division of the US Attorneys’ office /Department of Justice all the pleadings and exhibits in Grinols et al v Electoral College, Congress, Obama et al for criminal investigation and prosecution of all the evidence showing Obama using a stolen Social security number and fabricated IDs.
Taitz reminded Olsen that during Watergate 3o high ranking officials of the U.S. government, including Attorney General of the United States John Mitchell, went to prison for their complicity in the cover up of fraud and obstruction of justice, that if Olsen does not forward the evidence he, as AG John Mitchell, might ultimately be prosecuted as an accomplice after the fact in Misprision of multiple felonies, in Obstruction of Justice and in a RICO to steal the franchise of the US president and wages of the U.S. President by one assenting his identity based on fraud and while using stolen and fabricated IDs. Taitz advised Olsen that she did not escape from the Communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union to see the same criminality here, that she is working pro bono and this is the matter of paramount importance for the country. Mr. Olsen responded that he knows how strongly Taitz feels about these issues. Taitz advised Olsen that her feelings are not important, that he is not requested to forward evidence because of her and her feelings, he has to do it to fulfill his duty based on his oath of office, it is his duty to this country. US Attorney Olsen asked Attorney Taitz to forward to him all the pertaining statutes for his review, which she did. Response from Mr. Olsen is due shortly.
|from:||Orly Taitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|to:|| “Olsen, Edward (USACAE)” <email@example.com>,
Orly Taitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
|date:||Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:51 AM|
Dear Mr. Olsen,
Per our conversation I am forwarding to you the pertaining statutes of the US code,
Please, see if you are not forwarding the evidence of forgery and fraud in Obama’s IDs to the Federal Grand Jury, you can be found criminally liable in misprision of all the felonies committed as well as being an accomplice after the fact to the cover up of all the stolen and fabricated IDs of Obama, in obstruction of Justice and complicity in the RICO to de facto steal the franchise of the U.S. Presidency by fraud and use of fabricated IDs.
18 USC § 4 – Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
18 USC § 3332 – Powers and duties
(a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence. Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.
(b) Whenever the district court determines that the volume of business of the special grand jury exceeds the capacity of the grand jury to discharge its obligations, the district court may order an additional special grand jury for that district to be impaneled.
18 USC Chapter 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
There is 1 Update Pending. Select the tab below to view.
- § 1962. Prohibited activities
- § 1963. Criminal penalties
- § 1964. Civil remedies
- § 1965. Venue and process
- § 1966. Expedition of actions
- § 1967. Evidence
Why Democratic party mouth piece Daily Kos attacks Democratic congresswoman and candidate for senate from HI? An answer might surprise you
Posted on | December 8, 2013 | 5 Comments
http://www.youtube.com/user/DrOrlyTV 467 subscribers 73,707 views
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | No Comments
An international incident was touched off yesterday in Johannesburg, South Africa, when a goodwill appearance by President Obama was interrupted by an impromptu funeral.
Mr. Obama was generously posing for souvenir pictures of himself with fawning admirers at the FNB Stadium (Soccer City), when security people rolled in Nelson Mandela’s casket and demanded to have a memorial service. When questioned as to why they were disrupting Mr. Obama’s appearance, the security men offered no explanation aside from “we reserved the stadium last week for this.”
“This kind of thing is a constant problem for Mr. Obama” said one of his staff. “Everyone wants to bask in his sunshine, even the deceased.”
“Then again, it’s not surprising that the life-challenged are attracted to him as he was a fierce advocate for voting rights for the dead when he lived in Chicago.”
Other staff members told us that similar “crashing” incidents have become such an annoyance for the president, he has ordered his staff to avoid having him appear anywhere where there could possibly be a memorial service of a minor political figure going on.
“He was all set to go to London last June when we found out that whats-her-name Thatcher had died,” said a White House travel planner. “We just knew her people would be rolling her casket into the camera shot while Mr. Obama was signing autographs. After all, he won the Nobel Peace Prize. What did she ever do besides running a drug store?”
Reluctantly, the president agreed to cancel the trip. “It was hard to deny London the privilege of being with Barack, but what could he do? Suppose one of those idiots ran over his foot with the hearse; he could’ve been out of action for weeks!”
Despite his staff’s efforts, such episodes are likely to increase as Mr. Obama’s presidency comes to a close with the success of his crowning achievement – universal health care – even as more anonymous, relatively unimportant people continue to die.
Ironically then, Barack Obama finds himself a victim of his own success; but in a racist society like this one, how could it be any other way?
Posted on | December 10, 2013 | No Comments
We also decided to get into the fray and make some quick buck with affordable Mandela Brand Necklacing Kits before the dust settles.
Made in China. Perfect for Winter Solstice.