According to the latest reports Adam Kokesh was wrongfully thrown in prison, please call and demand his release. I called the numbe below and was told to call the 9th district, not the 8th district. Does anyone have the number for the 9th district and updates?
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
| cq 97 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 3:36 pm
Adam Kokesh arrested at Philly “Smoke Down” From Facebook: Joe Pauli A nice gentleman answered the phone and asked me if this was about that “Adam Coken fellow” to which I replied yes, and he gave me “The Roundhouse” phone number to call. 215-686-1234 https://www.facebook.com/ADAMVSTHEMAN/posts/10151402203186260 Video of arrest: http://youtu.be/NTHBC6JOc4M |
Request for a judicial notice of the 1940 Census
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § EMERGENCY
§ MOTION FOR
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
Sixteenth Census of the United States of America 1940
Population schedule
State of New York,
County -The Bronx,
Ward of city-7A-B
915 Daly Ave
Apartment 311
SD No 24 E.D. No-3-1199
sheet No 13B
Enumerated Apri 16, 1940
Released by the U.S. Census in 2011
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Official census information is:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Aforementioned report is easily obtainable from the U.S. Census
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Part of the new information is 1940 census released to the public in 2011. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned Census report attached herein as exhibit 1 shows
that Harry Bounel immigrant from Russia, 50 years old at the time of the 1940 census resided as a lodger at Apartment 311 of 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, New York.
This information is relevant to the case at hand since Mr. Bounel was 50 years old at the time of the official 1940 census, it means that he was born in 1890 and he would be 123 years old today and according to120 year rule of the SSA, his SS-5 has to be released under FOIA 5U.S. 552.
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Sixteenth Census of the United States of America 1940
Population schedule
State of New York,
County -The Bronx,
Ward of city-7A-B
915 Daly Ave
Apartment 311
SD No 24 E.D. No-3-1199
sheet No 13B
Enumerated Apri 16, 1940
Released by the U.S. Census in 2011
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
cc Inspector general of IRS
Request for Judicial Notice of 120 year rule being filed with the US District Court for the District of Columbia. (in the public docket the SSN will be redacted)
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § EMERGENCY
§ MOTION FOR
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Chief FOIA Officer Report for 2011
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Social security administration Chief FOIA Officer report is
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
Aforementioned report is posted on the official web site of the Social Security administration www.ssa.gov
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
the report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
SSA Chief Foia Officer report in question in Section I, (1) (c) states
- We have revisited longstanding decisions regarding the withholding of certain frequently requested data, to determine if our recommended guidance is still applicable and reflects the presumption of openness. For instance, we issued new guidance for disclosing extremely aged individuals’ original Social Security Applications (SS-5) when our records do not indicate a date of death. We developed a new policy that establishes a “120 year rule” and assumes that an individual is alive unless their birth date exceeds 120 years or we have proof of the individual’s death. This new policy enabled us to release more information and potentially reduced requests on appeal.
- Since Harrison J. Bounel was born in 1890, he would be 123 years old and according to aforementioned 120 year rule SSA was obligated to release his SS0-5 under FOIA 5US 552.
- CONCLUSION
- This court should take the Judicial notice of the SSA Chief FOIA Officer report
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
cc Inspector general of IRS
BeforeitsNews published this
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 1 Comment
Do you remember Arpaio through Zullo
1 day ago
beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-
Even more egregious revelations
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 4 Comments
In response to my article Carl Gallops, the De Facto spokesperson for Sheriff Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo is saying the following:
“2. Zullo and Arpaio have filed no criminal charges because it is not within their jurisdiction to do so. Taitz should know this. Any first year law student or police academy attendee knows this. The citizens of Maricopa County felt they had been defrauded in an election – they asked their Sheriff to investigate. He did through the CCP. They discovered that a document connected with the President of the United States had been forged, fabricated, and was 100% fraudulent. Arpaio has no authority to march to the White House and make arrests of the perpetrators and accomplices. However, Congress, the Federal Courts, Federal prosecutors, and Federal law enforcement do have that authority and responsibility.”
This sounds even more egregious.
a. Actually, Arpaio has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint and I will explain further on why. But if Arpaio and Zullo believed that they have no jurisdiction, why didn’t they state so to the donors from day one? They collected reported 7 million dollars from the public, most of the money donated to Arpaio came from outside AZ because the public believed that Arpaio will file the criminal complaint against Obama, they made multiple radio appearances claiming that they are conducting a criminal investigation and a criminal case.
I had 4 cases, where there were actual hearings in trial courts: in GA, MS, IN, CA, where I subpoenaed them to appear. They could testify in trial courts and they refused to comply with subpoenas. Moreover, my strongest witness in GA was a retired deportation officer John Sampson. after Sampson testified in GA Arpaio, Corsi and Zullo invited him to travel to AZ to the cold case posse meeting. They paid for his airfare to AZ. There Arpaio deputized Sampson as a member of the Cold Case posse. Later on Peter Boyles show, on the air, on the record, John Sampson stated that they asked him not to testify in my cases, as he is now a part of a criminal investigation. Sampson stated on the air that he and Arpaio and Zullo made an agreement not to comply with the subpoenas in the court case in IN because of an ongoing criminal case. It means that they actually interfered with my witness in a case, claiming that his testimony would jeopardize the criminal investigation.
So who can file a criminal complaint, which is the result of a criminal investigation that they claim to have been conducting for nearly three years and solicited donations for nearly 3 years?
Now they are saying that it is up to the U.S. Congress, however the U.S. Congress cannot file a criminal complaint. They can impeach, but they can’t file a criminal complaint.
Next, they are saying judges: yet again, the judges can only hear the complaint that was presented to them.
Who files a complaint with the judges, with the courts?
Well, if it is a state court, then the District Attorney and Attorney General file a criminal complaint.
If it is a federal court, than the U.S. attorney, the federal prosecutor will file the complaint.
Who submits the results of his investigation and the complaint to the prosecutors? the sheriff.
So, you see even a rookie officer or a first year law student know that what Arpaio and Zullo are saying now through their de facto spokesperson and chief fundraiser Carl Gallops is simply not true. For nearly three years they have been conducting a criminal investigation. They have a duty to submit the results of their investigation to the prosecutors. As the issue involves both federal and state officials, they have a duty to submit their complaint to both state and federal prosecutors.
b. As you can see, more pressure we are applying more truth is coming out. Now Arpaio and Zullo are admitting that they are not planning to file a criminal complaint and that they solicited donations for nearly 3 years while knowing that they will never file a criminal complaint. In my opinion this behavior is even more egregious than the behavior of corrupt judges, corrupt prosecutors and corrupt congressmen. All of them have been kicking the can, passing the buck and refusing to take any action, but Arpaio and Zullo collected donations for nearly three years, stating that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now they are saying that they believe that they never had any jurisdiction.
This would be akin to a lawyer collecting fees from a client for nearly three years only to tell the client that he will not file the case because he is not licensed in this state. If a case like this would be in front of Arpaio, he would file a criminal complaint for fraud against such lawyer, for accepting money from a client under false pretenses.
c. Moreover, during CPAC convention I talked to Carl Gallops and I specifically asked him, why didn’t he question Zullo, as to why the criminal complaint was not filed. Gallops told me that Zullo told him that the complaint was filed. When Zullo joined us, I questioned Zullo: isn’t it true that you and Arpaio never filed a criminal complaint. Zullo responded: Arpaio went to talk to AG, but AG was not interested in filing this case. I responded that this is not a meeting between buddies, regardless of whether AG is interested or not, Arpaio has a duty to file the complaint. Zullo responded that they are still investigating and that the complaint will be filed in 3 months or so. So, actually until now I believed that they will file the criminal complaint, Gallops believed that they will file the criminal complaint, the public believed it, as Zullo kept saying so. Only now, when Zullo said that the document is 100% forged and nearly 3 years past and hardly any evidence was actually discovered by the cold case posse on top of what was given to them to begin with, the public started demanding answers, why are they not filing the criminal complaint. So now, after nearly 3 years of PR, interviews, and fundraising suddenly Arpaio and Zullo changed their tune and started claiming that they do not have jurisdiction.
Please, keep up the pressure. Arpaio definitely has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. He obtained evidence of forgery, he claims that Obama’s birth certificate is 100% forged, his selective service certificate is 100% forged. He has evidence that Obama defrauded the citizens of Maricopa county AZ in placing his name on the ballot fraudulently and establishing the eligibility and identity based on forged IDs. He has to file a criminal complaint with the state and federal prosecutors. You, members of the public, and particularly donors have a very serious case. You have to keep up the pressure until Arpaio and Zullo file a criminal complaint with the DA, AG and U.S attorney.
I am proven to be correct yet again: after 2 years of fundraising Sheriff Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint against Obama, Mike Zullo is planning to write a book, which will be another money maker but will not remove Obama from office.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 18 Comments
2 years ago Sheriff Arpaio held a press conference stating that the tea party contacted him, advised him that fraud was committed in Maricopa county, Obama ran for office in Maricopa county based on fraud and using forged IDs, they were seeking a criminal complaint by Arpaio, as a duly elected sheriff, to be filed against Obama and his accomplices before the 2012 election.
Arpaio and his right hand cold case investigator Mike Zullo spent 2 years doing PR, regurgitating information provided to them by me, by Chief investigator of the U.S. Coast guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, by Paul Irey, by Douglas Vogt and others, held fund raisers and never filed a criminal complaint.
Just recently they were saying: wait 3 more month, 6 more month. Now they are saying that Arpaio has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint at all. Are you kidding me? They did 2 years of investigation without any jurisdiction? Really? This is insane.
Let’s take recent conviction of 3 Democratic party operatives in Indiana. They forged signatures of voters, a criminal complaint was filed against them, there was a criminal trial, they were convicted and they are going to prison. That is exactly what is supposed to be happening with Obama and his accomplices, Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint. Every sheriff around the country needs to file the criminal complaint. Fraud and tender of forged IDs happened in his jurisdiction and in every jurisdiction. People donated to Arpaio because they believed that he, as a duly elected sheriff, will file a criminal complaint. He did not do this.
There is an interesting coincidence. In August of 2012 the feds dismissed their law suit against Arpaio, where they claimed that Arpaio violated civil rights of Hispanics. At the same time Arpaio lowered his visibility and never filed a criminal complaint. Since around the same time only his right hand Zullo is doing interviews, mostly with Carl Gallops.
It is a legitimate question to ask: was there a quid pro quo, was there an understanding that Obama drops his criminal complaint against Arpaio and Arpaio never files his criminal complaint against Obama, in spite of all the evidence???
As members of the public confronted Gallops and Zullo, and demanded answers, Zullo and Gallops tried to attack me, claiming that the fact that I demand that Arpaio file a criminal complaint based on evidence gathered, means that I am somehow helping Obama. Really? Telling the Sheriff to do his job and file a criminal complaint, when he says he has all the evidence of forgery, means that I am helping Obama? How does that work?
Moreover, as Zullo tried to attack me, he admitted that Arpaio will not file a criminal complaint as people expected. He stated at the interview held yesterday that there will not be a complaint under the color of the Sheriff of Maricopa county, but Zullo will write and will tell all because it is his work product.
You say what?
When Zullo is saying that it will not be done under the color of Sheriff of Maricopa county, it means that Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa county, will not do his job as a sheriff and will not file a criminal complaint. When Zullo is saying that he will tell all, it means that it will be another book, tell all book, another moneymaker.
Don’t we have a ton of books already? When people were donating to Arpaio, did they do this so Mike Zullo will write a book and make money on a book, or did they donate so that Arpaio do his investigation and file a criminal complaint? You tell me, what is the answer?
Are people convicted based on writing a book or are they convicted based on a criminal complaint? And what did Zullo mean by work product? Did I and others forward to Arpaio all the evidence, so that Zullo will write a book? People provide evidence to the police and sheriff, so that the police and sheriff file a complaint, not write some tell all story. Evidence is presented for purposes of prosecution, not for profiteering by the investigators, this is a total misuse of the witness testimony, of evidence. It means that evidence was accepted under false pretenses, it means that donations were accepted under false pretenses. If Arpaio thought that he did not have jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint against Obama, he needed to write to the witnesses and experts right away and state that he has no jurisdiction to file a complaint and he should have advised the witnesses, who has jurisdiction.
Arpaio and Zullo had to refund all of the donations given to Arpaio and to the cold case posse and they were supposed to state right then and there, 2 years ago, that Sheriff Arpaio believes that he has no jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Otherwise, they mislead the public and they collected donations under false pretenses, giving members of the public an impression that Sheriff Arpaio has jurisdiction to file a criminal complaint. Moreover, while we are on a subject of donations, I personally talked of Joseph Farah of WND, he told me that he has a deal with Gary Kreep, where 50% of donations given by the public to Kreep to file legal actions, where paid by Kreep to Joseph Farah/ WND in exchange for advertising and promotion. Farah told me this as he was hoping for the same deal with me. It is a legitimate question for the public to ask: is there a similar deal between Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo? Is there any arrangement, where Carl Gallops is receiving a part of donations given by the public to Arpaio and Zullo and Cold Case Posse in exchange of promotion of Zullo’s books and solicitation of donations and for personal ad hominem attacks on me? Similarly, did WND, Joseph Farah and Jerome Corsi on one side and Sheriff Arpaio, Mike Zullo and attorney they are working with on the other side, make a deal similar to Kreep’s? If there was such a deal, it will explain, why affidaivt of Mike Zullo was used, even though it is a hearsay, it would explain why this affidavit contained repeated references to Jerome Corsi, but no reference to any of actual investigators who submitted evidence to Arpaio, no mention of Chief Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, no mention of Paul Irey, Linda Bentley, Douglas Vogt and many others. This would explain, why from January 2012 WND and Carl Galllops were repeatedly reporting on a couple of cases where Larry Klayman was involved as an attorney, even though both cases in FL and AL were dismissed by the presiding judges immediately, and they are not reporting on some 10 cases brought by me and particularly they are not reporting on an ongoing case in MS, where a RICO (racketeering complaint against Obama and his accomplices was filed by me) and even the case in Ca, which was not formally dismissed yet. It is a reasonable question to ask, as it relates to credibility of reporting: every member of the public should demand answers from Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi: was their any payment made, was there any split of danataions given by the public to Sheriff Arpaio, cold Case Posse, Investigator Zullo, attorney Klayman to WND, Carl Gallops, Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi, PPsimmons and other members of the media? If any split of donations was made, if any money changed hands, this is traceable. Since there is a history of such split between Kreep and WND, it is a reasonable question to ask and the public needs an answer. If payments were made, the public will make its own conclusions to the credibility of statements and reason for lopsided reporting.
Carl Gallops attacked me because I was sanctioned by a corrupt judge, who tried to intimidate and stop me from proceeding with actual legal actions, when a corrupt judge Clay D. Land claimed that it is frivolous to bring a legal action in regards to forged IDs of a Commander in Chief on behalf of the members of the military who are told to risk their lives and take lives based on orders of the criminal who is sitting in the position of the Commander in Chief with all forged IDs.
Yes, Carl Gallops, Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio were never sanctioned, abused, attacked and persecuted by corrupt judges because they never filed a complaint. Where is the complaint from the former police officer Carl Gallops? Where is the complaint from Sheriff Arpaio? Where is the complaint from a former police officer and chief investigator of Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo? They do not exist. When you do nothing, you risk nothing, you surely will not be attacked and persecuted. This is the difference between people who are on the front line, like myself, and people who are just doing press conferences and fund raisers and announcing their upcoming books for early publicity.
Gallops and Zullo attacked me for not winning a case against Obama. Well there were 45 licensed attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs, who filed cases and did not win, none of the cases were heard on the merits, because as we see it vividly now, we live in a corrupt regime, similar to the Soviet Union. Not one single judge ever ruled against Stalin or Mao or Hitler. This happened not because of civil rights attorneys like myself who actually filed complaints, this happened because of corrupt and spineless sheriffs, governmental officials and sheriffs who had all the evidence against Stalin and Mao and Hitler and never did their job and never filed their complaints.
It is interesting that Carl Gallops is a former police officer in FL and Mike Zullo is a former police officer in NJ. They actually know what to do. If Arpaio is refusing to do his job, they themselves can file a complaint and actually present all the evidence to the District Attorneys. I submitted all the evidence to the District Attorney of Orange County, CA, Tony Rackaucas and I actually posted a certified mail receipt. I, also, submitted a criminal complaint to the District Attorney of Los Angeles County , CA, providing evidence that CA Attorney Scott J. Tepper, personal attorney for Barack Obama and Dem party and a part time investigator with CA Bar, submitted to court in MSin my case a forged birth certificate for Obama and sought to obtain a judicial notice that this birth certificate is authentic, when he had evidence that it is a forgery. I filed a similar complaint with the District Attorney in Jackson, MS. Actually I ask all of my supporters to call the District Attorneys in Jackson MS, Los Angeles CA, Orange County CA and demand that those District Attorneys respond to the public, why didn’t they file a criminal case yet, what are they waiting for, how much damage should be done to the country by usurper Obama until they do their job and file a criminal complaint with the criminal court.
I did my job. Why aren’t Arpaio, Zullo and Gallops submitting a criminal complaint to their DAs? why aren’t they doing their job? Additionally, District Attorney will not accept 56 pages of hearsay. A district Attorney will tell Mike Zullo and Carl Gallops: are you kidding me? You are submitting 56 pages of hearsay which is not admissible in court. You can’t say: our investigators found this. I need the actual written sworn affidavits of those investigators and experts.
District Attorney will demand from Zullo, Arpaio and Gallops something specific, something that I’ve already submitted time and again to court. For example: in his 56 page affidaivit Zullo is stating: our investigators found that Obama’s selective service certificate is a forgery. District Attorney or judge will state: where is the specifics, who is the investigator, I need his name, I need to know how did he reach this conclusion. That is exactly what I provided time and again: I submitted to court an affidavit of a retired Chef Investigator Jeffrey Stephan Coffman, who stated: I am a retired Chef Investigator of the Special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast guard, I personally examined Obama’s Selective Service certificate, I found this evidence of forgery, I provided this information to the sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona, so that he will file a criminal complaint. Next, Paul Irey provided testimony for me in Indiana: it stated, I am Paul Irey, I have 60 year of experience in typesetting, I found this specific evidence of forgery in Obama’s birth certificate. His testimony was admitted by the judge in Indiana, Judge Reid in Indiana already qualified him as an expert. That what was supposed to be done.
Next, Zullo’s claims that he will testify in the Supreme Court of Alabama. Zullo and Arpaio and Gallops know full well that in 99% of the cases in the Supreme Court of any state there is no oral argument at all. If there is an oral argument, it is only about 15 minutes per side and only on the points of law by attorneys, not witnesses. They know that no witness testimony is allowed. So, when Zullo was confronted with this point, when he was questioned, why is he claiming that he will provide testimony in AL, when no testimony is allowed in higher courts, he responded: an attorney in the case in Alabama wants me in court in case there will be an oral argument, but I do not know for what purpose. Really? Zullo is a former police office. He might be a volunteer with this cold case posse, but he used to be a police officer, he knows that the Supreme Court does not allow witness testimony, particularly not a new witness, who did not testify in the lower court, so Zullo is really misleading the public by saying that he will present testimony, when he knows that no witness testimony is allowed in the Supreme Court.
Please, keep up the pressure. Tell Mike Zullo: we did not donate so that you will write a book, we donated so that justice is done. Arpaio has to file a criminal complaint. If Arpaio is not doing his job, you Mike Zullo, as the Chief Investigator of the Cold Case Posse need to file a criminal complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General, and please, do not file 56 pages of hearsay, which is not an admissible evidence by any judge, please, provide the District Attorney with the actual sworn affidavits of officers and experts who personally examined the evidence. After the criminal complaint against Obama and accomplices is filed with the DA and AG by Arpaio or if he is not doing the job, by Zullo, we the public, will follow up with the District Attorney and we will demand that the District Attorney do his job and file the criminal complaint with the Criminal Court.
Keep up the pressure, we do not need books and publicity, we need to see filed, signed, stamped criminal complaints!!! Don’t attack me, attack Obama and his accomplices with a properly filed criminal complaint!!!
I hope that ORYR (Obama release your records ) web site and PPSuimmons (aka Carl Gallops) and all the other web sites which published a vicious attack on me, show honesty and integrity and publish this rebuttal.
Ruling mafia puppets in the House of Representatives reached an agreement in principle to push down our throats the mega amnesty and give millions of illegals not just amnesty, our jobs and benefits, but also Obamacare. All of the raging scandals might be a decoy to pull the biggest heist in the World History. Don’t get your eyes of the target. Tell every corrupt congressman: you vote for mega amnesty, we will throw you out in the primary and will prosecute you for treason. You have to be in their faces with biggest signs, shaming them or you and your children will lose your future.
Posted on | May 16, 2013 | 14 Comments
House Group Says They Have Immigration Deal
Here is my thought: it might be a coincidence but I am wondering if all 3 scandals going on now, while our ruling criminal enterprise is trying to push for mega amnesty, is too much of a coincidence.
Everyone is now preoccupied with those 3 scandals: Benghazi, IRS, AP, nobody is talking about mega amnesty, about mega robbery of Americans of their jobs and their benefits with the help of the best puppets money can buy.
Bilderberg mafia and its related entities tried to push for amnesty by bringing in young and cute Baba #2, Rubio, he was hard at work trying to sell us damaged goods like a used car salesman, but people were not buying. Most Americans do not want illegals taking their jobs and benefits, so our ruling mafia decided to go to plan B- a decoy. They came up not with one, but with 3 decoys. So now nobody is watching. It is like when a bunch of thugs are sent to steal some piece of garbage in the lobby of a museum and while the police is preoccupied, aces of thievery are stealing a Rembrandt. That is what is going on. Yes, there will be some results to these scandals. The highest probability in terms of the end result, is that a few low level employees will be sacrificed If need be, the ruling criminal oligarchy might even sacrifice Obama, they will give him a card out of jail in the form of a pardon and he will play golf for the rest of his life somewhere in HI or in Mombasa. But at the end of the day, if you are not vigilant and not mobilized, the ruling mafia will pull what it craves the most: mega amnesty, mega heist. Dumb GOP congressmen will sell their own seats, believing that stealing American jobs will make illegals vote for them in the future. This will not happen, as poor illegals will vote for the ones who give them more freebies: Dems.
Your biggest ace in the deck: how can you promise us that you will E-Verify millions illegals when you are criminally complicit in the cover up of Obama’s failed E-verify. Stick my report in their faces, stick Obama’s failed e-Verify. Don’t leave until something gives, until we will find 1 drop of decency in this new Babylon tower of corruption, dirt and bribery called Washington DC.
Demand for investigation and release of information sent to the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
Posted on | May 16, 2013 | 9 Comments
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Ph. 949-683-5411 Fax 949-766-7603
Orly.Taitz@gmail.com
05.16.2013
Attn Patrick O’Carroll Jr.
Inspector General of Social Security Administration
P.O. Box 17785
Baltimore, MD 21235
Via federal Express
Copy via FAX 410-597-2101
Dear Mr. O’Carroll,
Please find enclosed a copy of the complaint filed with the office of the Inspector General of the Department of Treasury as well as with the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of representatives.
The summary of the complaint is that Mr. Barack Obama has used in his 2009 tax returns a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him, which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to an immigrant from Russia Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890, presumed to be deceased with no surviving relatives. I filed multiple complaints with the SSA and even traveled to the CT office and discussed the matter with employees. On March 26, 2013 I traveled to Stamford Connecticut where the number in question was issued and met with employees of the Social Security Administration: Representative Madeline Mercado, Assistant Manager Mrs. Sheridan (she refused to give her first name) and General Manager Mrs. Booker (she refused to give her first name). I demanded an explanation, why SSA is refusing to release the SS-5 for an extremely aged individual over 120 years old. I was told that this is a protected number and local office has no access to the information. I was shown a computer screen that stated that in case of any inquiries in regards to this number, employees of the SSA are supposed to call a specific number at the SSA Headquaters. (it was a 410- MD number). So, there is clearly a gate keeper at this number. This gatekeeper happens to be one Dawn Wiggins, as all the correspondence and FOIA requests in regards to the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which are sent from different parts of the country by different individuals and investigators seeking information on Harrison Bounel and Barack Obama, are always being handled by one SSA employee, Dawn Wiggins, while FOIA requests in regards to other Social Security numbers are handled by different employees. I was advised that General Manager Booker and Assistant Manager Sheridan contacted the headquarters of the Social Security administration and I will receive a response from the headquarters. Over 30 days passed and I did not receive any information. I demand investigation of this flagrant Social security fraud and actions by Ms. Wiggins, who clearly knows that Mr. Obama is using a stolen Social Security number.
Moreover, according to a sworn affidavit of licensed investigator Susan Daniels attached herein, according to national databases at some point Mr. Obama also used Social Security number 485-40-5154 issued to Lucille Ballantyne, mother of former Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration Harry C Ballantyne. I called Mr. Ballantyne and inquired if he knew that according to National databases Mr. Obama used the Social Security number of his deceased mother. Reaction of Mr. Ballantyne was highly suspect. Any individual confronted with such information would have shown signs of disbelief, anger, however Mr. Ballantyne was not surprised, and he laughed and stated:”They have no rights”. I asked him:”Who has no rights?” He stated “Dead people have no rights”. When I tried to ask more questions, Mr. Ballantyne stated that he cannot talk to me anymore. I believe that Mr. Ballantyne is the SSA employee, who is responsible for the change of the information in the databases and needs to be investigated. I demand computer tracing of any changes in the computer file of Harry J. Bounel to ascertain which SSA employees were involved in this most egregious case of SSA fraud and identity theft. While computer records can be easily changed, the original wet ink SS-5 application cannot be changed, which explains why Social Security administration is refusing to provide SS-5 for Harrison J. Bounel, even though he would be 123 years old, if he would be alive today and according to SSA own “120 year rule” this SS-5 application has to be released. I demand release of SS-5 of the SSN 042-68-4425 for Harrison J. Bounel.
CONCLUSION: Based on the attached complaint and exhibits I demand an immediate release of SS-5 of SSN 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, as well as investigation of Barack Obama for his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number which failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and immediate investigation of SSA employees Dawn Wiggins, former Chief Actuary Harry C. Ballantyne and former Commissioner Michael Astrue for criminal cover up of Social Security fraud and in being complicit in the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency and the position of the Commander in Chief by Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, who is using a fraudulently obtained Social Security number.
Respectfully,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Cc. Judiciary Committee US House of Representatives
cc. Oversight Committee U.S. House of Representatives
cc. U.S. and International media
Obama didn’t know? Mitzi Torri, IRS attorney, who posted threats, is running the “Fogbow” together with Obama’s personal attorney Scott J. Tepper, who at the same time filed complaints against me with the CA bar. This looks to me like a coordinated attack. all of them need to be brought to testify before Congress and subpoenaed to testify who paid for their convention in Phoenix, AZ
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 12 Comments
I was absolutely correct. Affidavit of Mike Zullo was attached as an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae brief of AL Dem Party, it is not a part of the underlying case or Appelant’s brief or a reply to the brief by the Appellee, Secretary of State
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 2 Comments
Please, see for yourselves: Mike Zullo’s affidavit is only an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief by the Democratic Party of AL. I was correct in what I was saying.
This affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of the case in the lower court, it is not an exhibit to the Appellate Brief or a reply to the Appellate Brief. Most courts of Appeals or higher courts disregard most of the Amices Curiae, they have absolutely no duty to even look at them. For example Lucas Smith filed a Amicus Cuiae in this case, nobody even bothers to respond to it. So, if the Supreme Court of Alabama decides to simply disregard this Amicus Curiae by the Dem party or strike it from the record, they will also disregard the motion asking to disregard it and an exhibit, affidavit of Mike Zullo, attached to it.
The Supreme Court of AL has a duty to look only at the lower court case, what was filed there, Appellant’s brief, Appellee’s brief and the reply by the Appellant. Affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of any of these documents and cannot be considered and will be disregarded by the court just as an exhibit filed by the Alabama Democratic party will be disregarded, as those are new exhibits filed after the case was dismissed in the lower court. The Supreme court, which is reviewing the appeal, needs to rule based on the evidence that existed in front of the judge which reviewed the case in the lower court, to see if this judge made an error. I hope they rule for the plaintiffs/Appellants, however Mike Zullo’s affidavit will have no bearing on this decision. We do not know how the court will rule. I do not know how long does it take for this court to come up with a decision. (can someone check how long does it take for the Supreme Court to rule on average?) In the 9th Circuit it took the court nearly a year from the time it was filed to come to the decision. I filed my case in Judge Carter’s court On January 21, 2009. Decision by the 9th circuit came sometime in the end of 2011.
As I stated that even if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs and reverses the decision of the lower court, still there is the same problem. Plaintiffs asked for the certified copy of the birth certificate. Look up what the Dem party of MS did in my case in MS: they provided the court with a certified copy of another copy of the same forgery. By the way in MS they made some changes to this forgery according to sworn affidavits. So, what do you do then? The obots will say: you wanted a certified copy, here you go, here is the certified copy. Obama will declare this as yet another victory. He will state: they asked for the certified copy, they got the certified copy, case closed.
For that reason for the hundred and first time I am explaining that Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo need to do their job. Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint in his county, where he is a sheriff, in Maricopa County, AZ, he needs to file a signed, stamped complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General. He needs to go to the judge on duty and seek a subpoena for production of the original (wet ink) birth certificate , original Selective Service registration and original SS-5 for the CT SSN Obama is using. Either Sheriff or District attorney can appear before a judge in HI and in DC and seek a reciprocal local subpoena based on a subpoena issued by the judge in the sister jurisdiction in AZ. When they have the local subpoenas, they need to bring the document experts and compare Obama’s originals (if they exist) to the other similar documents from the same time period, which are kept on file. With the reports of the experts the District Attorney or Attorney General of the state can file a criminal complaint in court. That’s what needs to be done now, immediately. Please, call Arpaio and tell him that he needs to do his job as a duly elected sheriff and file the proper criminal complaint with his District Attorney and Attorney General, not wait another half a year or a year for the Supreme court of Alabama to rule and in the best case scenario get another certified copy of the same forgery as they already filed in Taitz et al v Democratic Party of MS, Obama, Astrue, Onaka (this case is still going on, no decision from the District court yet). Tell Arpaio to file the criminal complaint ASAP!!!
If Mitzi Torri, Attorney for IRS, New Orleans office, made any threats against you or others under any of her pseudonyms, please forward the screenshots and links to orly.taitz@gmail.com or to this thread
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 4 Comments
| Chasing Oz |
Submitted on 2013/05/15 at 2:18 pm
Mitzi posts as Black Butterfly, Bilderberg Butterfly and GeorgetownJD at fogbow and obamaconspiracies. She uses Bibikimmers at Gretawire, pretending to be black using every stereotype imaginable. She had an administrative suspension out of Coudersport, Pennsylvania. She is known to create a conservative identity to get close to bloggers with the hope of obtaining personal information. Is this used for more persecution by the IRS? Better watch your tail Scott; you and “Jack” have crossed legal boundaries that could cost both of you your professions. You have a lot more to lose than just your profession since you weren’t born here. This is what happens when you and your brain trust start with people you have no idea who they are. I’ll be there to wave good bye. |
A talked to the special agent. The complaint was divided between offices, I forwarded to her additional information that she needed
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 2 Comments
I can’t believe it, but I got a call back from the Department of Treasury, from the special agent who left a message for me. I was busy with a patient and could not get to the phone. We’ll see what happens next. I hope they will actually move on the issue of Obama’s stolen SSN used in his tax returns. The agent wanted me to call back and provide more info. I called and left a message. I hope Holder is not bugging my phone.
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 28 Comments
It looks like judge England did not issue the final order to dismiss the Grinols case and there is no transcript from the clerk either. I am still waiting for the transcript. the 9th circuit states that they do not have jurisdiction as there is not final order to dismiss by judge England
Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 12 Comments
13-15627 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
10:22 AM (10 minutes ago)
 |
|
||
|
||||
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
The following transaction was entered on 05/15/2013 at 10:22:08 AM PDT and filed on 05/15/2013
| Case Name: | James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al |
| Case Number: | 13-15627 |
| Document(s): | Document(s) |
Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SLJ): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order). Moreover, a review of the district court docket shows that a final order granting appellees’ motions to dismiss has not yet been filed. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [8629706] (WL)
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
George Michael Waters
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: 13-15627.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=05/15/2013] [FileNumber=8629706-0] [
More evidence that Zuckerberg and Facebook are aiding and abetting Obama regime and aiding and abetting the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Obama.
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
| Freedom First 132 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:20 am
I agree 100% Dr. Taitz. We need men of courage to do the right thing for our nation. Not even for us, but for the future of our children and grandchildren. |
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
| Joanne Semonski 0 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:33 am
I wonder if Zullo is taking advantage of the elderly Sheriff Joe. Call Arpaio (602) 876-1801 directly. Ask to speak to “Cookie” Sifuentes — she is Sheriff Joe’s personal assistant. |
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | No Comments
| speedy 117 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 5:34 am
When I heard Zullo and Gallups call Orly an obot, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. What is so obot about wanting the sheriff and cold case posse to file a criminal complaint against the usurper? Orly was working on this way longer than they were and is way far from being an obot. What obot would say that bo has fake documents and stolen ID? Obots are always trying to defend the usurper and call people who know the facts wing nuts, birthers, conspiracy theorists, etc. because they cannot refute the facts and have nothing but the usurper’s lies to go by to defend him. |
RSS Feed: Subscribe for Free RSS Feed- request for a judicial notice of the 1940 CensusDr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688 Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603 E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Plaintiff, § […]
- request for a judicial notice of the 1940 Census
-
Official website for Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Other Sites
Advertisement / Sponsors
Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012 in CA
--------------------------------------
Please make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA U.S. Senate 2012 Campaign
--------------------------------------
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
----------------------------------------
The People's Senator.
She fights for America!Share
Atlas Shrugs
Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Post & Email
Rick Baker Show
The People's Senator. 
