PDF of 3 requests for Judicial notice of documents showing Obama using a stolen Social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 1 Comment
PDF of 3 requests for Judicial notice of documents showing Obama using a stolen social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel
Who has the greatest leverage and power to stop Obama and push for criminal prosecution of Obama?
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 9 Comments
Who has the greatest power to push for criminal prosecution of Obama?
I am explaining it again: the greatest leverage is in the hands of the donors for sheriff Arpaio and citizens of Maricopa county, AZ.
Why so? Because Arpaio already announced that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, however he is not willing to file a criminal complaint, as he is supposed to as the chief law enforcement officer of the Maricopa County.
WND, which is a big backer for Arpaio, Zullo and Klayman is talking about an appeal in the Supreme court of AL. first, as WND had a 50/50 split of donations with Kreep there is a high probability that WND and possibly Western journalism connected to WND and possibly PPSimmons got financial compensation from arpaio or his team, either got payment for advertising and fundraising or an outright percentage of donations received. If this is the case, their reporting is highly biased.
Now, as i said before, I really hope that the Supreme Court of AL will rule for the plaintiffs, however even if this appeal is granted in half a year or so, it will not make any difference, as the plaintiffs asked the Secretary of State of Al to ask the Department of Health of HI for a certified copy of Obama’s BC. All HI will do, is certify another copy of the same forgery, of the same computer generated forgery and you are in square one.
On the other hand there is a way to proceed immediately with the criminal complaint.
As I said, for nearly 3 years Arpaio and Zullo were making press conferences saying that they are conducting a criminal investigation and now after 3 years of raising money for their alleged criminal instigation they are refusing to file a criminal complaint, saying that they do not have jurisdiction to file, even though they have 100% proof that Obama’s BC is a forgery.
So, we are seeing the same passing the buck, same kicking the can.
What can be done? People who donated to Arpaio have now all the power and all the leverage. They can demand that Arpaio file his findings or they will file a legal action against Arpaio and seek 2 things:
1. An injunction, an order of specific performance, a writ of mandamus from the court ordering Arpaio to file this criminal complaint with proper prosecutors.
2. refund of all the donations due to lack of performance and due to solicitation of donations under false pretenses.
What is happening now is that Arpaio is afraid of Obama, just like judges are afraid when they claim that they have no jurisdiction, however in this situation Arpaio will be afraid of the donors more than he will be afraid of Obama.
Why so?
Normally law enforcement officer has a prosecutorial discretion, however the discretion is whether there is enough evidence to convict. When Arpaio stated that Obama’s BC ia a 100% forgery, then it is beyond discretion.
In this situation Obama does not have any any cards in his deck, however the people hold all the aces.
Obama will not be a defendant in this case and he will not be able to bring his attorneys to challenge on his behalf. This will be a private action, so Arpaio will have to respond personally. This will give a lot of publicity to the issue of Obama’s forged IDs and Obama will not be able to do anything about it.
I know that Arpaio is afraid that Obama will retaliate against him, however what can Obama do?
1. If Arpaio thinks that Obama might refile his law suit against Arpaio for violation of civil rights of Hispanics this will not happen, as it will be a very obvious retaliation. The feds dismissed their case against Arpaio last August saying that there was not enough evidence. So what will the feds say? Will they say that they had an understanding that they will dismiss their case against Arpaio and Arpaio will never file his criminal complaint against Obama? They can’t say that, they will have to stay quiet.
2. I don’t know if Arpaio received any financial considertion not to file a criminal complaint against Obama, to say that he has no jurisdiction after nearly 3 years of criminal investigation and after receiving millions in donations for this criminal investigation I hope that there was no financial consideration. But if arguendo, one were to believe that there was some type of a consideration, what will Obama do? Do you think he file file a law suit saying “I want my money back?” He can’t.
3. Obama is now weakened and his henchmen in IRS and DOJ are weakened by scandals. We are getting stronger.
So, please, if you are a donor to Arpaio or at least a resident of Maricopa county, AZ, demand a meeting and demand that he stop the nonsense. He is a chief law enforcement officer of his county. People turned to him as a law enforcement officer. You do not enforce the law by doing press conferences and just talking to people. You enforce the law by filing a criminal complaint. Please, keep up the pressure and tell Arpaio that after he stated that Obama’s BC is a 100%forgery, he, as a chief law enforcement officer, has a duty to file a criminal complaint that fraud was committed and that Obama ran for office in his jurisdiction using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs as a proof of his identity. Anybody else would be in prison for that and so should Obama. Tell Arpaio that if he does not file a criminal complaint and show a copy of the signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint, donors will file a complaint against Arpaio for:
1. soliciting and accepting donations under the false pretenses
2. misappropriation of donations.
3. violation of oath of office
4. denial of honest services under the color of authority
5. deprivation of civil right to a lawful law enforcement, redress of grievances, egual protection under the color of authority.
Demand that Arpaio and Zullo file the criminal complaint ASAP. You have the most leverage: use it or lose.
After I posted requests of judicial notice of documents showing Obama using a stolen Social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, Google immediately de-linked 400,000 articles with any positive mentioning of me. the most defamatory articles were kept at the top positions. Looks like someone might be concerned
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 6 Comments
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | No Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § EMERGENCY
§ MOTION FOR
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425. (redacted report is being posted on the public docket, unredacted report is being filed under seal)
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database is a database which provides information to licensed debt collector, investigators and attorneys. It provides a collection of data readily available in public records. by entering a specific Social Security number one can find names of individuals who used this Social Security number according to public records. Aforementioned report is being provided with an accompanying affidavit of a professional debt collector Albert Hendershot, who under the penalty of perjury attests to its authenticity.
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Part of the new information is 1940 census released to the public in 2011. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned record is relevant for the request for the judicial notice as it shows that
1. Harrison J Bounel born in 1890 used Social Security number 042-68-4425
2. Barack Obama used Social Security number 042-68-4425 as well.
Official E-Verify and SSNVS reports attached herein show that 042-68-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, therefore by process of elimination it was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel. Since Harrison J. Bounel was born in 1890 according to 1940 census (attached to the motion) based on 120 year rule, the SS-5 for SSN 042-68-4425 should be released under FOIA 5U.S. 552
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
cc Inspector general of IRS
I am asking my supporters to check at the IRS FOIA reading room for any applications from Muslims organizations, were any of them denied and how long did they need to wait for an approval
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 3 Comments
| GillianH 2 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/19 at 8:47 am
All applications for 501(c) status that have been approved are available in the IRS FOIA Reading Room in Washington DC. Pretty well known for anyone who reads the IRS publications and notices. |
||
Reply to Comment |
|||
Request for a judicial notice filed in DC federal court seeking a Judicial notice of Merlins information systems report showing Obama using a stolen Social Security number of Harrison J. Bounel
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 2 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603
E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com, orly.taitz@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE §
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § EMERGENCY
§ MOTION FOR
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the § RECONSIDERATION
Social Security Administration, § 11-cv-00402
§
§
§ Honorable Royce Lamberth
Respondent § Chief Justice presiding
Request FOR A JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN Conjunction with AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425. (redacted report is being posted on the public docket, unredacted report is being filed under seal)
Plaintiff Pro Se Dr. Orly Taitz (hereinafter “Taitz”) hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following document attached as Exhibit 1.
This request is made pursuant to Rule 201 (a), (b)1, (b)2, (c)2 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
RULE 201. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATIVE FACTS
(a) Scope. This rule governs judicial notice of an adjudicative fact only, not a legislative fact.
(b) Kinds of Facts That May Be Judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
(c) Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
(d) Timing. The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.
(e) Opportunity to Be Heard. On timely request, a party is entitled to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the fact to be noticed. If the court takes judicial notice before notifying a party, the party, on request, is still entitled to be heard.
Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database is a database which provides information to licensed debt collector, investigators and attorneys. It provides a collection of data readily available in public records. by entering a specific Social Security number one can find names of individuals who used this Social Security number according to public records. Aforementioned report is being provided with an accompanying affidavit of a professional debt collector Albert Hendershot, who under the penalty of perjury attests to its authenticity.
(1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.
and under 201 C (2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary information.
The report in question is relevant to the proceeding as Petitioner Taitz is seeking reconsideration of the decision by the SSA to deny her release of the SS-5 for the Social Security number 042-68-4425 due to privacy considerations. In her motion for reconsideration Taitz provides newly discovered evidence showing that the Social Security number in question was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel, an immigrant from Russia, born in 1890. Part of the new information is 1940 census released to the public in 2011. Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201. Under Fed. R. Evid. Rule 201(f) judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding. Government of Canal Zone v Burjan, 596 F.2d 690, 694 (5th Circ. 1979).
Aforementioned record is relevant for the request for the judicial notice as it shows that
1. Harrison J Bounel born in 1890 used Social Security number 042-68-4425
2. Barack Obama used Social Security number 042-68-4425 as well.
Official E-Verify and SSNVS reports attached herein show that 042-68-4425 was never issued to Barack Obama, therefore by process of elimination it was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel. Since Harrison J. Bounel was born in 1890 according to 1940 census (attached to the motion) based on 120 year rule, the SS-5 for SSN 042-68-4425 should be released under FOIA 5U.S. 552
CONCLUSION
This court should take the Judicial notice of
Report of the Merlins Information systems acxiom.com /identity-solutions database generated under the Social Security number 042-68-4425.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
05.18.2013
cc Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
cc senator Chuck Grassley ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee
cc Congressman Bob Goodlatte Chair of the House Judiciary Committee
cc Daryl Issa, Chair of the House Oversight Committee
cc Inspector general of IRS
Beforethenews.com removed from their website an interview by Carl Gallops(PPSimmons), where Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo engaged in ad hominem attacks on me and made defamatory statements
Posted on | May 19, 2013 | 2 Comments
Beforeitsnews.com, a highly travelled web site, removed from their web site an interview by Carl Gallops (PPSimmons), where Carl Gallops and Mike Zullo made ad hominem attacks on me and defamed me. I am asking the editors of other publications who re-posted this interview to do the same. I believe that Carl Gallops needs to remove this interview as well, issue an apology to me and respond to the public, whether he received any financial consideration from Mike Zullo, Sheriff Arpaio, Cold Case posse or affiliated entities for fundraising for them and attacks on me.
Of course one of the insinuations by Gallops,is that I am somehow helping Obama by demanding that Arpaio file a criminal complaint.
As these were professional attacks on me, I m responding:
let me remind you that in the past 5 years some 45 licensed attorneys filed legal challenges against Obama. Out of 45 only 2 attorneys: myself and Attorney Klayman continue the fight. If you count all the challenges and all the cases in the courts of appeals and challenges in front of elections commissions, I had some 40 cases. Mr. Klayman has only 2, both of which were dismissed by the lower courts and they are now being appealed.
In terms of my cases, 2 were not dismissed yet by the lower courts. One of the cases that is still going on, is a case in MS, where RICO (racketeering) cause of action is filed by me against Obama and his accomplices.
In terms of other cases, not relating to Obama, I had 6 figure settlements in my favor and large, including 6 figure judgments made in my favor.
Nobody won cases against Obama, as they were dismissed on technicalities: lack of standing and lack of jurisdiction, judges are simply looking for excuses as they are afraid to touch Obama.
Carl Gallops is stating that professionals no longer work with me. This is not true. In terms of professionals and investigators, I am still working with the same investigators: former Scotland Yard elite anti-organized crime and anti communist proliferation officer Neil Sanke, retired intelligence officer Pamela Barnett, investigator Albert Hendershot, former NSA employee Paul Irey, scanning expert Douglad Vogt, NATO relational data analyst George Collins and many others.
The oly witness that did not testify when asked in Indiana case, was former Deportation Officer John Sampson. This happened because of the direct interference, when Corsi, Arpaio and Zullo inviting him to the ColdCassePosse meeting, Arpaio deputized him to be a part of the criminal case, asked him not to testify for me, because of the ongoing criminal case and only in the last couple of days Arpaio through his de facto spokesperson Carl Gallops admitted that he is not intending to file a criminal case because he believes that he has no jurisdiction and never had any jurisdiction to file a criminal case. Sampson believed that Arpaio will file a criminal case. He admitted on the radio that three of them: Arpaio, Zullo and Sampson made an agreement not to comply with the court subpoenas in my cases and not to appear at trial. Other witnesses appeared at trial. Sadly, after witnesses appeared and were deemed to be experts, Judge Reid ruled that there was no jurisdiction and she retroactively vacated the trial which already took place. Jerome Corsi, Joseph Farah, and other reporters from WND did not publish a word about this trial in Indiana, which was retroactively vacated. I suspect that they did not publish anything about my cases in the past year and a half because I was not sharing donations and not paying large mounts for advertising and promotion at WND. I suspect that WND received large amounts in advertizing fees or sharing of donations for promoting Arpaio.
Help in research needed. Is there any evidence of Obama IRS goons targeting any Muslim organizations or did they target only Christian and Jewish organizations???
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 8 Comments
E-mails were sent to Drew Zahn and Jerome Corsi of WND. Does WND have a comment to the latest statements by Mike Zullo that Sheriff Arpaio will not file any criminal complaint against Obama in spite of the fact that for nearly 3 years he was stating that he is conducting a criminal investigation, collected money through WND for this investigation, and WND extensively wrote about this criminal investigations that did not bring any essential new evidence, and now we know that Arpaio never believed that he has any jurisdiction to file any criminal complaint
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 7 Comments
From: Arnie <
To: Drew Zahn <dzahn@wnd.com>
Sent: Sat, May 18, 2013 10:27 pm
Subject: Fwd: Shocking Accusations
According to the latest reports Adam Kokesh was wrongfully thrown in prison, please call and demand his release. I called the numbe below and was told to call the 9th district, not the 8th district. Does anyone have the number for the 9th district and updates?
Posted on | May 18, 2013 | 6 Comments
| cq 97 approved |
Submitted on 2013/05/18 at 3:36 pm
Adam Kokesh arrested at Philly “Smoke Down” From Facebook: Joe Pauli A nice gentleman answered the phone and asked me if this was about that “Adam Coken fellow” to which I replied yes, and he gave me “The Roundhouse” phone number to call. 215-686-1234 https://www.facebook.com/ADAMVSTHEMAN/posts/10151402203186260 Video of arrest: http://youtu.be/NTHBC6JOc4M |
RSS Feed: Subscribe for Free RSS Feed-
Official website for Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Other Sites
Advertisement / Sponsors
Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012 in CA
--------------------------------------
Please make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA U.S. Senate 2012 Campaign
--------------------------------------
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
----------------------------------------
The People's Senator.
She fights for America!Share
Atlas Shrugs
Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Post & Email
Rick Baker Show
The People's Senator. 
