Salon.com is writing about the eligibility and Obamagate
Posted on | April 5, 2010 | 1 Comment
I have noticed, that some of the Marxist blogs have toned down their rhetoric and insults, but they are still refusing to provide truthful info. They don’t talk about Obama’s fraudulent use of Social Security numbers, which is felonious, they don’t talk about the definition of the Natural born and it’s inconsistency with split citizenship.
Comments
One Response to “Salon.com is writing about the eligibility and Obamagate”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

April 6th, 2010 @ 12:00 pm
Definition of a ” Natural born Citizen ”
per U.S. Constitution
——————————————————————-
§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.