Corruption personified! 3 judges of the Court of Appeals decide that there is no public interest in knowing, whether the President of the US and Commander in Chief is a criminal using a stolen Social Security number from a state, where he never resided. These judges should be prosecurted together with Obama for aiding and abetting SSA fraud and possibly treason
Posted on | May 25, 2012 | 15 Comments
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1375820 Filed: 05/25/2012 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals
F
OR T HE D ISTRICT OF C OLUMBIA C IRCUIT
No. 11-5304 September Term 2011
1:11-cv-00402-RCL Filed On:
May 25, 2012
Orly Taitz, Dr., Appellant
v.
Michael James Astrue, Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration, Appellee
BEFORE:
Rogers, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; the motion for summary reversal, styled as a “motion for summary judgment in favor of the appellant,” which includes a request to appoint a special prosecutor; and the motion for default judgment, it is
ORDERED
that the motion for default judgment be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED
that the motion for summary reversal be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819
F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). The district court correctly concluded that disclosure of the requested information “would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6). Appellant has not demonstrated any valid public interest in disclosure to balance against the substantial privacy interest at stake. See Horowitz v. Peace Corps, 428 F.3d 271, 278 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (“If there is no public interest in the disclosure of certain information, ‘something, even a modest privacy interest, outweighs nothing every time.’” (quoting Nat’l Ass’n of Retired Fed. Employees v. Horner, 879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C. Cir. 1989)).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Comments
15 Responses to “Corruption personified! 3 judges of the Court of Appeals decide that there is no public interest in knowing, whether the President of the US and Commander in Chief is a criminal using a stolen Social Security number from a state, where he never resided. These judges should be prosecurted together with Obama for aiding and abetting SSA fraud and possibly treason”
Leave a Reply
May 25th, 2012 @ 2:16 pm
They need to read the Washington Times:
———
Hawaii State Registrar does not verify authenticity
of President Obama’s birth certificate
Washington Times
WASHINGTON, May 24, 2012 – The “Verification of Birth” letter sent by the Hawaii State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett fails to respond to the fundamental question asked by Mr. Bennett in a March 30, 2012 letter to Hawaii Department of Health officials: Whether or not the image of President Obama’s “long form” Certificate of Live Birth, posted on the White House web site on April 27, 2011 is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your files”.
The official whose signature appears on the “Verification of Birth,” as well as the copy of President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth released by the White House
is Onaka……………..
May 25th, 2012 @ 3:09 pm
Hahahahahahahahaha!
Ya LOST again, you fat-assed LOSER! And TWICE in one day!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
A smart person would finally get a clue but not YOU!
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Nobody but a few nutjobs believes your LIES.
May 25th, 2012 @ 3:30 pm
I am appalled at the audacity these judges have shown. Someday these obsequious judicial stooges will all be appropriately punished.
May 25th, 2012 @ 3:46 pm
You failed again. You have always failed. You will always fail.
May 25th, 2012 @ 4:09 pm
Unbelievable! No public interest? …. I am interested in rule of law! I am the public! Why bother having laws if they will not be enforced?
May 25th, 2012 @ 4:41 pm
ABSOLUTELY CRAZY!! This confirms and clears any doubts now in my mind of any corruption in our judicial system. PLEASE ADD THEM TO RICO!! And for those of you who don’t believe what is happening to our judicial system,this is proof positive that it is there. Just like the fall of the Roman Empire, it started in the legal system, allowing the barbaric tribes to conquered them. Everyone should write or send an email to the Court of Appeals. For the Non-believers enjoy your slavery, for those who believe in God, start praying,because this is the history and fall of the United States of America. “Bonum ex integra causa,malum ex quocunque defectu”
May 25th, 2012 @ 5:50 pm
This is absurd. The Court of Appeals determines that “Appellant has not demonstrated any valid public interest in disclosure to balance against the substantial privacy interest at stake.” and “If there is no public interest in the disclosure of certain information, something, even a modest privacy interest, outweighs nothing every time.”
The social security number in question is already public knowledge, so the privacy arguement is pure BS. Regarding Public interest, poll after poll in recent months have shown that half of the nation wants Congress to investigate the question.
These Judges are openly displaying total and absolute corruption.
Add them to the RICO list.
May 25th, 2012 @ 5:51 pm
The Congress, as well as the Judiciary, are rife with traitors and must be prosecuted to the full extent of the Constitution of the united states of America.
May 25th, 2012 @ 5:52 pm
This is absurd. The Court of Appeals determines that “Appellant has not demonstrated any valid public interest in disclosure to balance against the substantial privacy interest at stake.” and “If there is no public interest in the disclosure of certain information, something, even a modest privacy interest, outweighs nothing every time.”
The social security number in question is already public knowledge, so the privacy arguement is pure BS. Regarding Public interest, poll after poll in recent months have shown that half of the nation wants Congress to investigate the question.
These Judges are openly displaying total and absolute corruption.
Add them to the RICO list.
May 25th, 2012 @ 5:55 pm
@Susie M
@Kimberly Stone
Stupid useful idiots. I guess the fact NONE of the loses have ever been on the merits of the case but always based on some ridiculous and outrageous claims of “privacy” or “standing” doesn’t bother you? Why would it, right? Ignorant idealogue Obamabots like you have obviously never studied any twentieth century history. It’s right in front of your face but you can’t see it. Morons.
Hope you’re still laughing in the gulags, that is if you make it that far. You disgust me.
May 26th, 2012 @ 2:57 am
Itchik: Good post! I think it’s great that a female is posting against these “deranged” types! I usually hit ’em good! But I saw your post, so I will give you my support in your summary, since I think it fits them to a (T)! Such a scrambled thinking process is hard to believe!!!
May 26th, 2012 @ 5:10 am
Sorry I can’t tell my comments went through.
May 26th, 2012 @ 8:59 am
Kimberly and Susie(aliases, for sure)
You both, with others, are allied
on the side of the godless and wicked
so it would behoove you to consider
your futures. When you post such
foolishness, ……
I immediately think of Psalm 1:4-6
(Living Bible, so you can understand it
in full.)
“But for sinners, they blow away like chaff
before the wind; they are not safe on
Judgment Day; they shall not stand among
the godly.
For the Lord watches over all the plans
and paths of the godly, but the paths
of the godless lead to doom.”
in other words:
“The way of the wicked will perish.”
(King James version)
May 27th, 2012 @ 9:33 am
Orly we need to have list of ALL corrupt judges who have attacked you. All of them. Every one.
We need to create HALL OF INFAMY AND RICO for these corrupt judges who have pervetted law in USofA!
We need to have them deport themselves back to Mexico or Kenya or wherever. Our next President talks about selfdeportation. That’s what all these corrupt and blind judges need to do.
Please give us names of ALL corrupt judges Orly. They need to be identified. From beginning.
Can you be a judge AND a senator at same time? We need this to. Keep up the great job and gives us the names of those RICO judges. Even one is too much.
October 22nd, 2012 @ 3:21 am