OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Was Bill Clinton sending a message that Obama is not qualified under the Constitution?

Posted on | January 10, 2010 | 4 Comments

Been a while since I’ve seen this – but – was Bill Clinton telling the American people something about OBAMA’s qualification to be POTUS……we failed to listen…..here is his quote:

In an interview that aired on ABC’s World News Tonight Bill Clinton denied that he is angry at Barack Obama, but offered very little in terms of an endorsement and enthusiasm for the Democratic nominee.
Clinton denied that he is still angry, “I’m not, and I never was mad at Senator Obama. I think everybody’s got a right to run for president if he qualifies under the Constitution,

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

4 Responses to “Was Bill Clinton sending a message that Obama is not qualified under the Constitution?”

  1. Veritas
    January 10th, 2010 @ 9:16 pm

    Interesting that Newsmax mentioned today a story from the NY Post:

    Insider Report from Newsmax.com

    1. ‘Hillary Was Right’ About Obama and Terror

    During the 2008 presidential race Hillary Clinton’s campaign warned that if a national security crisis arose with Barack Obama in the White House and the “red phone” alerting him rang at 3 a.m., he could not be trusted to adequately respond.

    “Turns out Hillary Rodham Clinton was right all along,” declared Charles Hurt, Washington, D.C. bureau chief for the New York Post.

  2. R. P. Frye
    January 11th, 2010 @ 12:03 pm

    As an old TV character would say “Veerry interesting”—I think Clinton knows exactly what the deal is. During the Dem. primary campaign, Hillary indicated that she had information that would eliminate Obama as an opponent. This was only mentioned once and ,obviously, never followed up, but they knew the elligibility story. Only they know why it didn’t come out. Very likely because the BHO crowd threatened her with exposior of her many misdeeds. She was in no position to threaten anyone.
    What a wonderous group we have to control our fate!!!

  3. Kevan Corkill
    January 11th, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

    God Bless YOU! Dr. Orly! YOU are a wonderful patriot! Prayers for strength for you! Kevan Corkill, San Antonio, Texas kevan@fastmail.ca

  4. Thomas
    January 12th, 2010 @ 10:26 am

    The following was copied from this post ( ie )
    Dr Orly Taitz site
    *——————————————-*
    The idea of a constitution is to help us all argue from the same starting point. There are basic constitutional differences that can’t have to be resolved in order to format national policies, differences involving decentralized free market vs. centralized collectivism among other things, some questions more difficult than others. If we give in on the easy questions, where does that lead us? One of the easy questions should be, does Obama meet the constitutional test for the presidency? He managed to avoid addressing this issue in 2008, but there’s still 2012. Whether Obama meets this requirement can be very easily put to rest, by him providing his full, original certificate of live birth. He hasn’t done this. The abbreviated, ex-post-facto computer version he put on the internet proves nothing. Let’s see the real one.
    * ————————————— *
    I still see an error , in this statement
    ——————————————
    ” Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both citizens of the U.S.) may be president of the United States, can become president according to the constitution.”
    —————————————–
    It should read Only Natural Born not Native born , Native born includes anybody born on U.S. soil regardless of the status of the parents ( ie ) citizenship , via the U.S. Constitution , particularily ” The Law of Nations ” which is the ” Legalities ” invloved in the writing of the Constitution ” Natural Born Citizen ” is defined as “Being born on U.S. soil to parents not owing foriegn alliegence to any other country ” therefore this will eliminate any dual or multiple citizenship . this case needs to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court , Obama is probably guilty of Treason against the U.S.A., He is obviously not the Legal President of the U.S.A. via the Legalities established in the U.S. Constitution